Protective Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Myocardial Damage After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Angina Patients With Complex Coronary Lesions - Subanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of Nicorandil in Preventing Myocardial Injury and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure for treating coronary artery disease, but it carries a risk of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI). This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of nicorandil, a hybrid compound with nitrate-like and potassium channel-opening properties, in preventing PMI during PCI. A comprehensive literature search identified 14 studies involving 1,762 patients, with 882 receiving nicorandil and 880 in the control group. The analysis revealed that nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of PMI (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.86) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-0.99) compared to the control group. Nicorandil's cardioprotective effects are attributed to its ability to improve coronary blood flow, precondition the myocardium, and reduce oxidative stress and inflammation. These findings suggest that nicorandil could be a valuable adjunctive therapy during PCI, potentially improving patient outcomes. However, the study had limitations, including variations in drug administration methods and a lack of individual-level data for subgroup analysis. Future research should focus on optimizing dosing regimens and administration timing and comparing nicorandil's effectiveness with other cardioprotective agents.

Effects of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Stable and Unstable Angina Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

Type 4a myocardial infarction (T4aMI), defined as myocardial injury associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is associated with a poor prognosis and there is conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) in its prevention. This review aimed to determine the effect of RIC on stable and unstable angina patients.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Central database. Outcome measures were: changes in peak troponin, creatine kinase myocardial band (CKMB), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, incidence of T4aMI, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Data were meta-analysed and reported as standardised mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR). Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies with no significant risk of bias were included. Peak troponin level was reduced in the RIC group, particularly after excluding a study with low statin use, while CKMB and CRP levels resulted in a non-significant SMD between the groups. The incidence of T4aMI was significantly lower in the intervention group (OR 0.714; p=0.026); this finding was also seen in subgroups of elective PCI, pre-conditioning, and high statin use. Incidence of MACE also only reached statistically significant protective effects with OR <1 in similar subgroups. No substantial heterogeneity was found and the funnel plot did not show publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Remote ischaemic conditioning in elective PCI patients has been proven to be potentially beneficial in reducing peak troponin levels and risk of T4aMI and MACE.

Association between Ranolazine, Ischemic Preconditioning, and Cardioprotection in Patients Undergoing Scheduled Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background and Objectives: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated efficacy in protecting against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury when applied before percutaneous coronary revascularization. Ranolazine, an anti-ischemic drug, has been utilized to minimize ischemic events in chronic angina patients. However, there is a lack of trials exploring the combined effects of ranolazine pretreatment and RIPC in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Materials and Methods: The present study is a prospective study which enrolled 150 patients scheduled for nonemergent percutaneous coronary revascularization. Three groups were formed: a control group undergoing only PCIs, an RIPC group with RIPC applied to either upper limb before the PCI (preconditioning group), and a group with RIPC before the PCI along with prior ranolazine treatment for stable angina (ranolazine group). Statistical analyses, including ANOVAs and Kruskal-Wallis tests, were conducted, with the Bonferroni correction for type I errors. A repeated-measures ANOVA assessed the changes in serum enzyme levels (SGOT, LDH, CRP, CPK, CK-MB, troponin I) over the follow-up. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The ranolazine group showed (A) significantly lower troponin I level increases compared to the control group for up to 24 h, (B) significantly lower CPK levels after 4, 10, and 24 h compared to the preconditioning group (p = 0.020, p = 0.020, and p = 0.019, respectively) and significantly lower CPK levels compared to the control group after 10 h (p = 0.050), and (C) significantly lower CK-MB levels after 10 h compared to the control group (p = 0.050). Conclusions: This study suggests that combining RIPC before scheduled coronary procedures with ranolazine pretreatment may be linked to reduced ischemia induction, as evidenced by lower myocardial enzyme levels.

Application Value of Limb Ischemic Preconditioning in Preventing Intradialytic Hypotension during Maintenance Hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of limb ischemia preconditioning (LIPC) in the treatment of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, and randomized controlled case study. A total of 38 patients with MHD who met the inclusion criteria from September 2021 to August 2022 were selected from the Blood Purification Center of our hospital. They were randomly divided into the LIPC group (n = 19) and the control group (n = 19). For patients in the LIPC group, the femoral artery blood flow was blocked with an LIPC instrument for 5 min (pressurized to 200 mm Hg) before each dialysis, and they were reperfused for 5 min. The cycle was repeated five times, with a total of 50 min for 12 weeks. The control group was pressurized to 20 mm Hg with an LIPC instrument, and the rest was the same as the LIPC group. The blood pressure of 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, and body weight before and after hemodialysis were measured in the two groups during hemodialysis, the incidence of IDH and the changes of serum troponin I (TNI) and creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) levels before and after the intervention were observed, and the ultrafiltration volume and ultrafiltration rate were recorded.

RESULTS

At the 8th and 12th week after intervention, the MAP in the LIPC group was higher than that in the control group (103.28 ± 12.19 mm Hg vs. 93.18 ± 11.11 mm Hg, p = 0.04; 101.81 ± 11.36 mm Hg vs. 91.81 ± 11.92 mm Hg, p = 0.047). The incidence of IDH in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (36.5% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.01). The incidence of clinical treatment in IDH patients in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (6.3% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.00). The incidence of early termination of hemodialysis in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (1.6% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01). The levels of TNI and CK-MB in the LIPC group after the intervention were lower than those in the control group (322.30 ± 13.72 ng/dL vs. 438.50 ± 24.72 ng/dL, p = 0.00; 159.78 ± 8.48 U/dL vs. 207.00 ± 8.70 U/dL, p = 0.00). The changes of MAP before and after the intervention were negatively correlated with the changes of TNI and CK-MB before and after the intervention (r = -0.473, p = 0.04; r = -0.469, p = 0.04). There were no differences in dry body mass and ultrafiltration rate between the two groups before and after the LIPC intervention (p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis shows that TNI is the main influencing factor of ΔMAP. No LIPC-related adverse events were found during the study period.

CONCLUSION

LIPC can effectively reduce the incidence of IDH in patients with MHD and may be associated with the alleviation of myocardial damage.

The Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil for Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nicorandil for periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing PCI through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Methods

We analyzed the clinical data of patients including the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) from selected articles. RCTs were retrieved from medical literature databases. RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare the endpoints.

Results

In total, 15 articles (16 trial comparisons) were retrieved which contained 2221 patients. In general, 1130 patients (50.9%) were randomized to the experimental group, whereas 1091 patients (49.1%) were randomized to the control group. The result showed that nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of PMI and MACE after PCI compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Overall, early use of nicorandil in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with a significant reduction of PMI and MACE.

The impact of oral nicorandil pre-treatment on ST resolution and clinical outcome of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty: A randomized placebo controlled trial

Introduction: Literature has shown the effects of intravenous/intracoronary nicorandil on increased myocardial salvage in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with mechanical reperfusion. However, the possible cardioprotective effect of oral nicorandil on the clinical outcome prior to primary coronary angioplasty is not well documented. Our aim was to assess the effect of oral nicorandil on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

Methods: A total of 240 patients with acute STEMI undergoing PPCI were randomly assigned to oral nicorandil (Intervention, n=116) and placebo (Control, n=124) groups. The intervention group received 20 mg oral nicorandil at the emergency department and another 20 mg oral nicorandil in the catheterization laboratory just before the procedure. The control group received matched placebo. Our primary outcome was ST-segment resolution ≥50% one hour after primary angioplasty. Secondary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of death, ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure and stroke.

Results: In the patients of intervention and control groups, the occurrence of ST-segment resolution ≥ 50% were 68.1% and 62.9% respectively, (P =0.27). In-hospital MACE occurred less frequently in the intervention group, compared to placebo group (11.2% vs. 22.5%, P =0.012).

Conclusion: Although the administration of oral nicorandil before primary coronary angioplasty did not improve ST-segment resolution in patients with acute STEMI, its promoting effects was remarkable on in-hospital clinical outcomes.

Clinical Registration:IRCT20140512017666N1

Periprocedural Myocardial Injury: Pathophysiology, Prognosis, and Prevention

The definition and clinical implications of myocardial infarction occurring in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention have been the subject of unresolved controversy. The definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) are many and have evolved over recent years. Additionally, the recent advancement of different imaging modalities has provided useful information on a patients' pre-procedural risk of myocardial infarction. Nonetheless, questions on the benefit of different approaches to prevent PMI and their practical implementation remain open. This review aims to address these questions and to provide a current and contemporary perspective.

Carotid artery calcification score and its association with cognitive impairment

Purpose

To retrospectively investigate the possible association between carotid artery calcification score (CS) and cognitive impairment in carotid artery stenosis (CAS) patients.

Patients and methods

Carotid artery was measured in 102 patients with cervical carotid arteries using Color Doppler ultrasound, multi-detector row spiral CT angiography and MRI scanning. Correlation analysis between CSs obtained by MD CT and cognitive scores was performed, and the correlation between CSs and vascular stenosis degree and MRI-measured plaque histological (lipid-rich necrotic nucleus [LRNC], intraplaque hemorrhage and fibrous cap surface rupture) and morphological parameters (lumen area [LA], wall area [WA], total area of blood vessels [TVA], plaque burden [PB]) was analyzed. Follow-up review analysis was conducted on 38 postoperative patients.

Results

Significant negative correlation was discovered between CS value and cognitive scores in CAS patients (R=-0.359, P<0.001), which did not exist in postoperative patients (P=0.348); CS value also showed significant correlation with WA (R=0.521, P=0.042), TVA (R=0.215, P=0.017) and PB (R=0.237, P=0.003) and had a certain predictive value for the occurrence probability of carotid plaque LRNC (P=0.029, AUC =0.780) in preoperative patients.

Conclusion

Carotid artery CSs have significant correlation with cognitive scores, which could be used as risk factor for early screening of cognitive impairment in CAS patients. The possible mechanism may be related to the calcification impact on the plaque burden.