Sex-based differences and risk of recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation

INTRODUCTION

Studies suggest increased likelihood of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA) in women than in men, indicating that sex may be an independent risk factor for recurrence. Nevertheless, the influence of sex on AF recurrence and underlying mechanisms remains unclear.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-centre study including patients undergoing AF CA between 2017 and 2021. Late recurrence (LR) was defined as AF recurrence ≥90 days after ablation, whereas early recurrence (ER) occurred within 90 days.

RESULTS

656 patients (32% women) were included, with a median follow-up period of 26 months. Compared to men, women undergoing CA were older, had higher body mass indexes, and had higher rates of hypertension, thyroid dysfunction, and valvular disease. Women also had increased LR risk after CA (HR 1.76, 95% CI [1.19, 2.59]). A time-split multivariable analysis at one year of follow-up showed no difference in LR risk during the first 12 months after CA (HR 1.19, 95% CI [0.73, 1.94]); however, LR risk increased in women (HR 2.90, 95% CI [1.68, 5.01]) after 12 months. In a sex-stratified analysis, coronary calcium score (CCS) >100 was associated with increased LR risk in men (HR 1.81, 95% CI [1.06, 3.08]), but not in women. Cardiac adipose tissue volume was not associated with increased LR risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer women underwent CA than men and LR was more frequent in women, particularly one year after the procedure. CCS was associated with increased LR risk in men.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile.

Objective

To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Exposure

PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19).

Conclusion and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Tool to Predict Recurrence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation after the First-Time Catheter Ablation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

There is no gold standard to tell frustrating outcomes after the catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The study aims to construct a prognostic tool. We retrospectively analyzed 315 patients with PAF who underwent first-time ablation at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The endpoint was identified as any documented relapse of atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting longer than 30 s after the three-month blanking period. Univariate Cox regression analyzed eleven preablation parameters, followed by two supervised machine learning algorithms and stepwise regression to construct a nomogram internally validated. Five factors related to ablation failure were as follows: female sex, left atrial appendage emptying flow velocity ≤31 cm/s, estimated glomerular filtration rate <65.8 mL/(min·1.73 m²), P wave duration in lead aVF ≥ 120 ms, and that in lead V1 ≥ 100 ms, which constructed a nomogram. It was correlated with the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score but outperformed the latter evidently in discrimination and clinical utility, not to mention its robust performances in goodness-of-fit and calibration. In addition, the nomogram-based risk stratification could effectively separate ablation outcomes. Patients at risk of relapse after PAF ablation can be recognized at baseline using the proposed five-factor nomogram.

Sex difference in atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs

OBJECTIVE

The risk of recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (AFCA) is higher in women than in men. However, it is unknown whether a sex difference exists in antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) responsiveness among patients with recurrence.

METHODS

Among 2999 consecutive patients (26.5% women, 58.3±10.9 years old, 68.1% paroxysmal AF) who underwent de novo AFCA, we compared and evaluated the sex differences in rhythm outcome in 1094 patients with recurrence and in 788 patients who subsequently underwent rhythm control with AAD.

RESULTS

During a follow-up of 48.2±34.9 months, 1094 patients (36.5%) had AF recurrence after AFCA, and 508 of 788 patients (64.5%) had AF recurrence under AAD. Although the rhythm outcome of a de novo AFCA was worse (log-rank p=0.041, HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.59), p=0.031) in women, AAD response after postprocedural recurrences was better in women than in men (log-rank p=0.003, HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.95, p=0.022), especially in women older than 60 years old (log-rank p=0.003). In 249 patients who underwent repeat procedure after AAD use, the pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection rate (62.7% vs 76.8%, p=0.048) was lower in women than in men but not the existence of extra-PV trigger (37.8% vs 25.4%, p=0.169).

CONCLUSIONS

Although women showed worse rhythm outcomes than men after AFCA, the post-AFCA AAD response was better in elderly women than in men.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02138695.

Predictors of outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Group analysis categorized by age and type of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The outcome of catheter ablation could probably differ among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), depending on age and AF type. We aimed to investigate the difference in predictors of outcome after catheter ablation for AF among the patient categories divided by age and AF type.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 396 patients with AF (mean age 65.69 ± 11.05 years, 111 women [28.0%]) who underwent catheter ablation from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. We divided the patients into four categories: patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (PeAF) who were 75 years or younger (≤75 years) or older than 75 years (>75 years). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients with PAF aged ≤75 years had the lowest AF recurrence among the four groups (log-rank test, p = .0103). In the patients with PAF aged ≤75 years (N = 186, 46.7%), significant factors associated with recurrence were female sex (p = .008) and diabetes (p = .042). In the patients with PeAF aged ≤75 years (N = 142, 35.9%), the only significant factor associated with no recurrence was medication with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (p = .044). In the patients with PAF aged >75 years (N = 53, 14.4%), diabetes was significantly associated with AF recurrence (p = .021). No significant parameters were found in the patients with PeAF aged >75 years (N = 15, 4.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the risk factors for AF recurrence after catheter ablation differed by age and AF type.

Influence of Sex-Based Differences in Cardiac Phenotype on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a commonly engaged therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Prior studies have documented elevated AF recurrence rates among females vs. males. Sex-specific mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are poorly understood. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the sex-based differences in cardiac phenotype and their influence on (AF) recurrence following first-time PVI.

Methods

A total of 204 consecutive patients referred for first-time PVI and 101 healthy subjects were prospectively studied by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Multi-chamber volumetric and functional measures were assessed by sex-corrected Z-score analyses vs. healthy subjects. Patients were followed for a median of 2.6 years for the primary outcome of clinical AF recurrence. Multivariable analyses adjusting for age and comorbidities were performed to identify independent predictors of AF recurrence.

Results

AF recurrence following first PVI occurred in 41% of males and 59% of females (p = 0.03). Females were older with higher prevalence of hypertension and thyroid disorders. Z-score-based analyses revealed significantly reduced ventricular volumes, greater left atrial (LA) volumes, and reduced LA contractility in females vs. males. Multivariable analysis revealed each of LA minimum and pre-systolic volumes and booster EF Z-scores to be independently associated with AF recurrence, providing respective hazard ratios of 1.10, 1.19, and 0.89 (p = 0.001, 0.03, and 0.01).

Conclusion

Among patients referred for first time PVI, females were older and demonstrated significantly poorer LA contractile health vs. males, the latter independently associated with AF recurrence. Assessment of LA contractile health may therefore be of value to identify female patients at elevated risk of AF recurrence. Factors influencing female patient referral for PVI at more advanced stages of atrial disease warrant focused investigation.

Discontinuation of oral anticoagulation therapy after successful atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND

The safety of discontinuing oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the safety and feasibility of discontinuing OAC therapy after successful AF ablation.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched up to October 2020 for prospective cohort studies that reported the risk of thromboembolism (TE) after successful AF ablation in off-OAC and on-OAC groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of TE events. The Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects modeling was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 11,148 patients (7,160 in the off-OAC group and 3,988 in the on-OAC group) from 10 studies were included to meta-analysis. No significant difference in TE between both groups was observed (OR, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.51-1.05; I2 = 0.0%). The risk of major bleeding in off-OAC group was significantly lower compared to the on-OAC group (OR, 0.18; 95%CI, 0.07-0.51; I2 = 51.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that it may be safe to discontinue OAC therapy in patients after successful AF ablation. Additionally, an increased risk of major bleeding was observed in patients on OAC. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity among the included study designs. Large-scale and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Subjective assessment of complexity and prognosis after pulmonary vein isolation as significant predictor for procedural success

PURPOSE

Subjective estimation of recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation is an important tool in clinical use. The aim of this study is to evaluate (1) if the subjective complexity of an atrial fibrillation ablation procedure is correlated with rhythm stability and (2) if the subjective prognosis of the operator has a predictive value.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients admitted for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Two scores were given immediately after the procedure by the operator: the complexity and the prognosis scores. With routine follow-ups, we tried to evaluate the correlation between the subjective scores and measured outcome.

RESULTS

The study population included 611 patients (63 ± 10 years, 37% females, 61% persistent AF). During follow-up (FU) (median 24, IQR 7-36 months), recurrences occurred in 44% patients. Both scores (prognosis and complexity) correlated significantly with age, persistent AF, LA diameter, procedural characteristics, and recurrences. On multivariable analysis, complexity (OR 1.304, 95%CI 1.016-1.675, p = 0.037) and prognosis (OR 1.443, 95%CI 1.080-1.982, p = 0.013) scores remained significant predictors for arrhythmia recurrences. On ROC analysis, both scores showed significant predictive value for rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation (AUC 0.599 and 0.613, both p < 0.001 for complexity and prognosis scores, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Complexity and prognosis scores are significant predictors for arrhythmia recurrences after AF catheter ablations and even independent when competing with simple risk factors.

Sex differences in mapping and rhythm outcomes of a repeat atrial fibrillation ablation

OBJECTIVE

The risk of procedure-related complications and rhythm outcomes differ between men and women after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA). We evaluated whether consistent sex differences existed in mapping and rhythm outcomes in repeat ablation procedures.

METHODS

Among 3282 patients in the registry, we analysed 443 consecutive patients (24.6% female, 58.5±10.3 years old, 61.5% with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) who underwent a second AFCA. We compared the clinical factors, mapping, left atrial (LA) pressure, complications and long-term clinical recurrences after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

LA volume index (43.1±18.6 vs 35.8±11.6 mL/m², p<0.001) was higher, but LA dimension (40.0±6.8 vs 41.6±6.3 mm, p=0.018), LA voltage (0.94±0.55 vs 1.20±0.68 mV, p=0.002) and pericardial fat volume (89.5±43.1 vs 122.1±53.9 cm³, p<0.001) were lower in women with repeat ablation than in their male counterparts. Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections were lower (58.7% vs 74.9%, p=0.001), but the proportion of extra-PV triggers (27.5% vs 17.0%, p=0.026) and elevated LA pulse pressures (79.7% vs 63.7%, p=0.019) was significantly higher in women than in men. There was no significant sex difference in the rate of procedure-related complications (4.6% vs 4.2%, p=0.791). During a 31-month (8-60) median follow-up, clinical recurrences were significantly higher in women after both the de novo procedure (log-rank p=0.039, antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-free log-rank p<0.001) and the second procedure (log-rank p=0.006, AAD-free log-rank p=0.093). Female sex (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.15, p=0.023), non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.34, p<0.010) and extra-PV triggers (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.75, p=0.001) were independently associated with clinical recurrences after repeat procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

During repeat AFCA procedures, PV reconnections were lower in women than in men, and the existence of extra-PV triggers and an LA pressure elevation were more significant, which resulted in poor rhythm outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02138695.

Sex-Related Differences in Catheter Ablation for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

The coexistence of atrial fibrillation and heart failure significantly increases the risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. Sex-related differences in all patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation include the referral of fewer women for catheter ablation (15–25%), older age of women at ablation, and higher risk of post-ablation recurrence of atrial fibrillation. We searched the existing literature for sex-related differences in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation with a focus on heart failure. Randomized controlled trials assessing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in patients with heart failure have demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. Within the eight existing randomized controlled trials on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, women composed a small proportion of the study population. Only two studies (CASTLE-AF and AATAC-HF) specifically assessed the effect of gender on outcome and showed no difference in post-ablation outcomes. Registry data-based studies assessing sex-related differences in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in heart failure reveal that women are half as likely as men to undergo ablation. Conflicting data exist on the interaction of gender and heart failure as they may affect peri-ablation and post-ablation long-term outcomes such as atrial fibrillation recurrence or heart failure hospitalizations. In conclusion, existing studies provide insight into the gender-based differences in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation as it pertains to heart failure. Further prospective studies with higher proportions of female participants are required to accurately determine gender-based differences in this population.

Women and atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a growing problem in the United States and worldwide, imposing a high individual and health system burden, including increased resource consumption due to repeated hospitalizations, stroke, dementia, heart failure, and death. This comprehensive review summarizes the most recent data on sex-related differences in risks associated with AF. Women with AF have increased risk of stroke and death compared to men, and possible reasons for this disparity are explored. Women also continue to have worse symptoms and quality of life, and poorer outcomes with stroke prevention, as well as with rate and rhythm control management strategies. Many current rhythm control treatment strategies for AF, including cardioversion and ablation, are used less frequently in women as compared to men, whereas women are more likely to be treated with rate control strategies or antiarrhythmic drugs. Sex differences should be considered in treating women with AF to improve outcomes and women and men should be offered the same interventions for AF. We need to improve the evidence base to understand if variation in utilization of rate and rhythm control management between men and women represents health inequities or appropriate clinical judgement.

A novel and simple scoring system for assessing the indication for catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: The HEAL-AF Score

INTRODUCTION

A scoring system to determine indications for catheter ablation (CA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is desired.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 2898 consecutive patients with AF, CA was performed in 938 (32.4%). A new HEAL-AF score has been developed by six variables, all of which were independently associated with CA by multivariate analysis and for each 1 point was assigned: heart failure ≥ NYHA II, elderly patients (age ≥75 years), asymptomatic AF, long-standing persistent AF, atrial dilation (left atrial diameter ≥ 50 mm), and female sex. Low HEAL-AF score was associated with high incidence of CA performance (52.0% for 0, 36.5% for 1, 15.1% for 2, and 5.6% for ≥ 3) and the predictive capability of this score by AUC of ROC curve was 0.720 (95% CI 0.701-0.739, P < .001). The rates of freedom from AF/AT recurrence were 73.2% in HEAL-AF score 0, 71.0% in 1, 60.0% in 2, and 50.0% in ≥ 3 (log-rank test, P = .004). HEAL-AF score 2 and ≥ 3 were significantly associated with recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia as compared with HEAL-AF 0 (HR 1.755, P = .002, and HR 2.211, P = .007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A new HEAL-AF score was associated with patient indication for and the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after CA in patients with AF. Prescription of CA should be considered carefully in AF patients with HEAL-AF score of 2 and ≥ 3.

Sex-related differences in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The sex-related differences in the clinical outcomes of rhythm and safety after catheter ablation remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in women and men.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for published articles up to December 2018. Studies that met our predefined inclusion criteria were included. The primary endpoints were freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and all-cause mortality. After literature search and detailed assessment, 19 observational studies (151 370 patients; 34% women) were identified. Our analyses showed that the rate of freedom from AF/AT recurrence was lower in women than men at the 2.4-year follow-up [odds ratio (OR): 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.81; P < 0.0001]. Moreover, women had an increased risk of stroke/TIA (OR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.21-1.67; P < 0.0001) and all-cause mortality (OR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.02-2.28; P = 0.04). Nevertheless, for the endpoint of all-cause mortality, there was no significant difference between the two genders in the subgroup of prospective studies (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 0.69-2.05; P = 0.53). Additionally, women were more likely to experience major complications compared with men (pericardial effusion/tamponade, major bleeding requiring transfusion, and pacemaker implantation).

CONCLUSIONS

Women who underwent catheter ablation of AF might experience lower efficacy and a higher risk of stroke/TIA and major complications than men. The reasons for these sex-related differences need to be further studied.

Effectiveness and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation in females

BACKGROUND

Existing data on the effectiveness and safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in females are limited to studies of small sample size, lacking longer term follow-up or adjustment for potential confounders.

METHODS

A total of 6421 patients (2072 females) undergoing a first AF ablation procedure after enrollment in the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China-AF) study between August 2011 and December 2017 were analyzed. We evaluated the effectiveness (recurrence of documented [symptomatic or not] atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT)) and the safety (incidence of procedure-related complications) of AF ablation in female patients compared to male patients. Sensitivity analyses based on routine data were also utilized to avoid potential sex differences in reporting of AF symptoms.

RESULTS

Females were about 5 years older than males at the time of ablation (mean age 63.4 ± 9.5 vs 58.3 ± 10.8, P < .0001). A higher proportion of female patients had paroxysmal AF (74.3% vs 56.7%, P < .0001), hypertension (69.7% vs 61.3%, P < .0001), and hyperlipidemia (57.2% vs 52.9%, P = .001). Female sex was found to be an independent risk factor of AT recurrence in multivariate analyses (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, P < .0001). These findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses using only Holter data. Female sex was also associated with a higher risk of periprocedural complications after adjustment for baseline variables (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.94, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex is an independent risk factor of AT recurrence and periprocedural complications after AF ablation.

Is Vagal Response During Left Atrial Ganglionated Plexi Stimulation a Normal Phenomenon?

Background:

Ganglionated plexi (GPs) play an important role in both the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). GPs can be located by using continuous high-frequency stimulation (HFS) to elicit a vagal response, but whether the vagal response phenomenon is common to patients without AF is unknown.

Methods:

HFS of the left atrial GPs was performed in 42 patients (aged 58.0±10.2 years) undergoing ablation for AF and 21 patients (aged 53.2±12.8 years) undergoing ablation for a left-sided accessory pathway. The HFS (20 Hz, 25 mA, 10-ms pulse duration) was applied for 5 seconds at 3 sites within the presumed anatomic area of each of the 5 major left atrial GPs (for a total of 15 sites per patient). We defined vagal response to HFS as prolongation of the R-R interval by >50% in comparison to the mean pre-HFS R-R interval averaged over 10 beats and active-GP areas as areas in which a vagal response was elicited.

Results:

Overall, more active-GP areas were found in the AF group patients than in the non-AF group patients, and at all 5 major GPs, the maximum R-R interval during HFS was significantly prolonged in the AF patients. After multivariate adjustment, association was established between the total number of vagal response sites and the presence of AF.

Conclusions:

The significant increase in vagal responses elicited in patients with AF compared with responses in non-AF patients suggests that vagal responses to HFS reflect abnormally increased GP activity specific to AF substrates.

Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. The scope and impact of atrial fibrillation are wide; it can affect cardiac function, functional status, and quality of life, and it confers a stroke risk. There are sex differences in atrial fibrillation across the scope of the disease process, from epidemiology and causative mechanisms to management and outcomes. The approach to management of atrial fibrillation differs between women and men, and there are sex differences in response to medical therapy and catheter ablation. There are many gaps in our knowledge of the gender differences in atrial fibrillation, and many opportunities for future research.

Catheter Ablation of Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: a Reckless Challenge or a Way to Real Cure?

Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (L-PeAF) is a category in which rhythm control is attempted while atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained for more than 1 year. Because AF is a progressive disease and L-PeAF accompanies significant electrical and structural remodeling of atria, it is difficult to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with L-PeAF. Nonetheless, the rhythm outcome is being increasingly improved by the development of sophisticated mapping devices, highly efficient catheters, and evidence-based ablation strategies, and the rational choice of patient selection criteria. This review discusses the evolution of the rhythm control outcome of L-PeAF and its future direction of development.

Non-Invasive Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure Assessment on Speckle Tracking Echocardiography as a Predictor of New-Onset Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation - Four-Year Prospective Study (NIPAF Study)

BACKGROUND

Although new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with ageing, the prediction of new-onset AF is complicated. We previously reported that pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (ePCWP) estimated by the combination of left atrial volume index (LAVI) and active left atrial emptying function (aLAEF) had a strong relationship with PCWP on catheterization (r=0.92): ePCWP=10.8-12.4×log (aLAEF/minimum LAVI). We sought to determine the usefulness of ePCWP to predict new-onset AF. Methods and Results: We measured LAVI, aLAEF and ePCWP on speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in 566 consecutive elderly patients (72±6 years) without a history of AF. A total of 63 patients (73±6 years) developed electrocardiographically confirmed AF during a mean follow-up period of 50 months. Baseline aLAEF was significantly lower in patients with than without new-onset AF (17.9±6.5 vs. 28.2±7.5%), whereas ePCWP was significantly higher (14.8±3.7 vs. 10.3±3.1 mmHg). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ePCWP and aLAEF were strong independent predictors of AF. Using ePCWP >13 mmHg or aLAEF ≤22% on univariate Cox regression analysis, the HR for new-onset AF were 3.53 (95% CI: 1.68-7.44, P<0.001) and 4.06 (95% CI: 1.90-8.65, P<0.001), respectively. By combining these 2 criteria (>13 mmHg and ≤22%), the HR increased to 11.84 (95% CI: 6.85-20.5, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ePCWP and aLAEF measured on STE are useful predictors of new-onset AF. ePCWP provides added value for risk stratification of new-onset AF.