Early Venous Stent Failure Predicted by Platelet Count and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio

The predictive value of systemic inflammatory markers in 902 patients with tunneled hemodialysis catheter

AIM

This study aimed to assess the predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume, on catheter survival in chronic hemodialysis patients, analyzing both infectious and non-infectious complications.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis encompassed 1279 tunneled catheter insertion procedures involving 902 patients between March 2014 and October 2018. Patients were categorized into two main groups: (i) initial placement and (ii) exchange. The exchange group was further stratified into four subgroups: infection, dysfunction, displacement, and transitioning temporary hemodialysis catheters to long-term ones. Hematologic ratios were calculated from baseline hemogram data, including neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts, while mean platelet volume was derived from the same hemogram.

RESULTS

The patients in the exchange group displayed significantly higher lymphocyte and monocyte values (p < 0.001), while lower values were noted for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (p < 0.001). The transition group displayed higher monocyte values and lower mean platelet volume and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio values (p < 0.05). In the infection-related exchange subgroup, higher neutrophil count, mean platelet volume, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio values were observed compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Cases related to catheter dysfunction exhibited increased lymphocyte-monocyte ratio but lower neutrophil, monocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio values (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the interest of specific inflammatory markers, particularly monocytes, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio, in the management of tunneled catheters, notably in patients undergoing exchanges. However, cut-off values, essential for constructing management algorithms, are currently lacking, and prospective multicenter studies are needed for further elucidation.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Immune/Inflammation Biomarkers for Venous Thromboembolism: Is It Reliable for Clinical Practice?

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), has been an important cause of sudden in-hospital death. Studies have shown that the immune/inflammatory response plays an important role in the pathogenesis of vascular disease, with representative markers in the blood including the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune/inflammatory index (SII), etc. However, there is a variety of immune/inflammatory indicators. Moreover, most previous studies have been single-center investigations involving one or two indicators, with varying nature of cases, number of cases and study objectives, thereby making it difficult to reach consensus conclusions with good clinical guidelines. This article reviews the clinical value of immunoinflammatory indicators for VTE based on previous studies, including the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. In conclusion, NLR provides promising predictive capability for the onset and prognosis of VTE and deserves extensive application in clinical practice. PLR also has certain diagnostic and prognostic value, but further studies are warranted to identify its reliability and stability. Monocytes, eosinophils and platelet-related indicators show some clinical association with VTE, although the predictive capabilities are mediocre. SII is of promising potential value for VTE and deserves further investigations. This review will provide new clues and valuable clinical guidance for the diagnosis and therapy of VTE.

Fibrinogen, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Rate and Platelet-to-Neutrophil Rate as Novel Acute Phase Indicators in Patients with Thromboangiitis Obliterans

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The acute exacerbations and progressive deterioration seen in thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO) have been related to poor clinical outcomes. Here, we have studied the association of laboratory biomarkers with the acute phase of TAO (AP-TAO).

METHODS/RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study on 112 patients with TAO and 98 healthy controls; comparing the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte rate (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte rate (LMR), platelet-to-neutrophil rate (PNR), fibrinogen (FIB), and apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I). Significantly higher NLR level, as well as lower LMR, PNR, and ApoA-I levels were observed in patients with TAO, particularly the acute phase. Significantly increased FIB was only observed in AP-TAO. A positive correlation was found between NLR and with C-reactive protein (CRP) in the acute phase (r = 0.817, P < 0.001). Moreover, NLR, PNR, and FIB levels of 3.38, 45.12, and 3.69 were shown to be the predictive cut-off values for the AP-TAO (sensitivity 72.5, 82,4, and 66,7%, specificity 92.2, 78.4, and 96.1%; area under the curve [AUC] 0.875, 0.855, and 0.872), respectively. The FIB level was independently associated with the AP-TAO (OR = 11.420, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

NLR, PNR, and FIB may be useful markers for the identification of inflammation and the AP-TAO. FIB may be an independent risk factor for the acute phase.