Percutaneous Treatment Approaches in Atrial Fibrillation: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice, represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with an increasing prevalence. Pharmacologic treatment remains the cornerstone of its management through rhythm and rate control, as well as the prevention of thromboembolism with the use of oral anticoagulants. Recent progress in percutaneous interventional approaches have provided additional options in the therapeutic arsenal, however. The use of the different catheter ablation techniques can now lead to long arrhythmia-free intervals and significantly lower AF burden, thus reducing the rate of its complications. Particularly encouraging evidence is now available for patients with persistent AF or concomitant heart failure, situations in which catheter ablation could even be a first-line option. In the field of stroke prevention, targeting the left atrial appendage with percutaneous device implantation may reduce the risk of thromboembolism to lower rates than that predicted with conventional ischemic risk scores. Left atrial appendage occlusion through the approved Watchman or Amplatzer devices is a well-established, efficacious, and safe method, especially in high-ischemic and bleeding risk patients with contraindications for oral anticoagulation.

Impact of myocardial injury and inflammation due to ablation on the short-term and mid-term outcomes: Cryoballoon versus laser balloon ablation

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA) were developed as alternatives to conventional radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Pathological findings after ablation such as myocardial injury and inflammation are thought to be different between CBA and LBA. However, the different impact of myocardial injury and inflammation after ablation on short- and mid-term outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive PAF patients who underwent CBA and LBA were enrolled from the Osaka Rosai Atrial Fibrillation ablation (ORAF) registry. The difference of the acute myocardial injury marker (hs-TnI), and changes of inflammation markers (C reactive protein; ΔCRP, and white blood cell; ΔWBC) after catheter ablation and the difference of the short-term (within 3 months after ablation) and mid-term (from 3 months to 6 months after ablation) outcomes were evaluated between the two groups.

RESULTS

The CBA and LBA groups consisted of 55 and 56 patients, respectively. After propensity score matching, CBA and LBA groups consisted of 37 patients, respectively. Hs-TnI value was significantly higher in CBA than LBA group, while ΔCRP and ΔWBC were significantly higher in LBA than CBA group. In the propensity score-matched pairs, the LBA group had a significantly greater risk of short-term arrhythmia recurrence than the CBA group, whereas no significant difference of mid-term arrhythmia recurrence were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial injury and inflammation status differ between CBA and LBA groups. LBA group had stronger inflammation after ablation and had a significantly greater risk of short-term arrhythmia recurrence after PVI than CBA group.

Adenosine and the Cardiovascular System: The Good and the Bad

Adenosine is a nucleoside that impacts the cardiovascular system via the activation of its membrane receptors, named A₁R, A_2AR, A_2BR and A₃R. Adenosine is released during hypoxia, ischemia, beta-adrenergic stimulation or inflammation and impacts heart rhythm and produces strong vasodilation in the systemic, coronary or pulmonary vascular system. This review summarizes the main role of adenosine on the cardiovascular system in several diseases and conditions. Adenosine release participates directly in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and neurohumoral syncope. Adenosine has a key role in the adaptive response in pulmonary hypertension and heart failure, with the most relevant effects being slowing of heart rhythm, coronary vasodilation and decreasing blood pressure. In other conditions, such as altitude or apnea-induced hypoxia, obstructive sleep apnea, or systemic hypertension, the adenosinergic system activation appears in a context of an adaptive response. Due to its short half-life, adenosine allows very rapid adaptation of the cardiovascular system. Finally, the effects of adenosine on the cardiovascular system are sometimes beneficial and other times harmful. Future research should aim to develop modulating agents of adenosine receptors to slow down or conversely amplify the adenosinergic response according to the occurrence of different pathologic conditions.