Different drugs in drug-eluting stents for peripheral artery disease: a systematic evaluation and Bayesian meta-analysis

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have become the first-line treatment for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Currently, there are many types of DESs on the market. The same type of DESs has different concentrations, and various drugs in them show uneven efficacy. The selection of DESs remains controversial. This study was aimed at comparing the long-term real-world outcomes of different DESs in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). The databases including Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed were searched with a time frame until March 25, 2023. The primary patency (PP) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months were used as the primary endpoints. A total of 32 studies (5467 patients) were eligible. At the six-month follow-up, DES-Evero 1 ug/mm2 ranked first in terms of PP, with a significant difference from BMSs (RR [95% CI] = 1.6). DES-Siro 0.9 ug/mm2, DES-Siro 1.4 ug/mm2, DES-Siro 1.95 ug/mm2, DES-PTX 0.167 ug/mm2, DES-PTX 1 ug/mm2 and covered stents (CSs) showed significantly better PPs than BMSs. In terms of TLR, DES-Siro 0.9 ug/mm2 (0.31) ranked first, and DES-Evero 1 ug/mm2 ranked last. Among the treatment modalities for PAD, different DESs showed overall encouraging results in improving PP and TLR compared with BMSs. DES-Evero 1 ug/mm2 showed the best PP, but it had the highest reintervention rate at 6 months. Sirolimus-eluting stents were not always more effective with higher concentrations of sirolimus. Among various DESs, sirolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting stents were superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents.

Hypoechoic Halo Imaging Findings Following Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Implantation: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hypoechoic peri-stent areas in duplex ultrasonography (DUS) (ie, "halo") have been noted following femoropopliteal artery stenting.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and potential safety implications of hypoechoic halos identified with DUS following stent implantation in the IMPERIAL (ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Zilver PTX Stent) and EMINENT (Trial Comparing ELUVIA Versus Bare Metal Stent in Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery) trials.

METHODS

The IMPERIAL and EMINENT studies of femoropopliteal artery stenting included polymer-based drug-eluting stent, nonpolymer drug-coated stent, and bare metal stent treatment arms. A dedicated DUS protocol was implemented for core laboratory assessment of halo presence at study follow-up visits. Logistic regressions were used to investigate risk factors for a halo sign and its impact on clinically driven target lesion revascularization and primary patency.

RESULTS

Diagnostic DUS imaging from 659 patients was obtained at time points ranging from 6 months to 5 years post-stent implantation. Halo prevalence ranged from 20% to 35% of patients with diagnostic DUS and was present at all time intervals. Halos were identified surrounding all stent types. In analyses of patients with diagnostic imaging from at least 2 visits, halo presence typically persisted, with occasional cases of regression and development at later times. No statistically significant association was found for halo status (ie, halo vs no halo) on 1-year clinically driven target lesion revascularization (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.70-2.30; P = 0.4240) or primary patency (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43-1.07; P = 0.0927).

CONCLUSIONS

A hypoechoic halo following a femoropopliteal stent procedure is a common occurrence associated with all studied stent types. The presence of a halo appears to be benign with no associated clinical sequelae or effect on target vessel revascularization rates within 1 year of stent implantation.

Angioscopic Evaluation of Vascular Response After Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions

BACKGROUND

Although favorable clinical outcomes have been demonstrated for fluoropolymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents (FP-DES) in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions, the vascular response after implantation has not been systematically studied through intravascular imaging.Methods and Results: We angioscopically compared FP-DES: 24 in the early phase (mean [±SD] 3±1 months), 26 in the middle phase (12±3 months), and 20 in the late phase (≥18 months) after implantation. The dominant neointimal coverage grade, heterogeneity of neointimal coverage grade, and thrombus adhesion in the stent segment were evaluated. Neointimal coverage was graded as follows: Grade 0, stent struts exposed; Grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; Grade 2, struts embedded in the neointima, but visible; Grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. Dominant neointimal coverage and heterogeneity grades were significantly higher in the middle and late phases than in the early phase (all P<0.05), but did not differ significantly between the middle and late phases. The incidence of thrombus adhesion was recorded for all stents in each of the 3 different phases.

CONCLUSIONS

The middle and late phases after FP-DES implantation were associated with significantly higher dominant neointimal coverage and heterogeneity grades than the early phase. However, thrombus adhesion was observed in all phases after FP-DES implantation. Arterial healing may not be completed even in the late phase after FP-DES implantation.

Angioscopic Findings of Stenosis Versus Occlusion in Femoropopliteal Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Despite the increase in the number of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), the pathophysiology is not fully elucidated. Recently, angioscopy with a 0.48-megapixel equivalent resolution camera became available for patients with PAD. We aimed to compare the plaque component between native stenosis and occlusion in the femoropopliteal artery using this modality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for native femoropopliteal artery disease with angioscopy were studied. The major angioscopic classifications of each lesion were defined as follows: atheromatous plaque (AP) was defined as luminal narrowing without any protrusion, calcified nodule (CN) was defined as a protruding bump with surface irregularity, a mainly reddish thrombus was defined as organizing thrombus (OG), and organized thrombus (OD) was defined by more than half of the thrombus showing a whitish intima-like appearance.

RESULTS

A total of 34 lesions (stenosis, n=18; occlusion, n=16) from 32 patients were included. All stenotic lesions showed AP or CN (n=8 [44%], n=10 [56%], respectively), whereas all occluded lesions showed OG or OD (n=5 [31%], n=11 [69%], respectively), which amounted to a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). In occluded lesions, stiff wires (>3 g) were required to cross all lesions classified as OD, whereas this was not always necessary for lesions classified as OG (11 [100%] of 11, 1 [25%] of 5, respectively; p=0.04). Yellow color plaques were observed to a similar degree in all angioscopic classifications. Major adverse limb events, defined as amputation and any reintervention at 12 months, were highly variable, depending on the angioscopic findings, and tended to be more frequently observed in CN and OD (13% in AP, 40% in CN, 0% in OT, and 36% in OD, p=0.25).

CONCLUSION

Angioscopy revealed varying components in stenosis and occlusion with different degrees of clinical impact. This may provide new information on the pathophysiology of PAD.