Comparison of 2-Stenting Strategies Depending on Sequence or Technique for Bifurcation Lesions in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era - Analysis From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III Registry

Two-Step V-Stenting and Simultaneous Kissing Stent via 6F Guides: Simple Just Got Simpler

V-stenting (VS) and simultaneously kissing stents (SKS) upfront 2-stent strategies for treating large diameter bifurcations and especially distal left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Former teaching suggests that the minimal requirements for VS and SKS requires 8F guiding catheters or 7.5F sheathless guide. Presented is the "2-Step refinement" of SKS and VS that can be executed via conventional 6F guide without any additional equipment. In view of the simplicity and suitability for unstable subjects with acute coronary syndromes; "2 Step SKS and VS" should be in the armamentarium of all advanced interventionalists.

How to use three-dimensional optical coherence tomography effectively in coronary bifurcation stenting

Imaging-guided coronary bifurcation intervention has improved clinical outcomes due to the appropriate size selection of the devices and optimization of the procedure (sufficient stent expansion, reduction of stent malapposition, appropriate stent landing zone, and detection of vessel dissection). In particular, three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (3D OCT) facilitates clear visualization of stent configuration and guidewire position, which promotes optimal guidewire crossing to the side branch. Successive side branch dilation leads to wide ostial dilation with less strut malapposition. However, the link connection of the stent located on the bifurcated carina has been found to be an impediment to sufficient opening of the side branch, resulting in incomplete strut apposition. In such cases, the aggressive proximal optimization technique improves the jailing strut pattern, and 3D OCT navigates the guidewire crossing to the optimal cell that is most likely to be expanded sufficiently, which is not always a distal cell. In two-stent deployment, 3D OCT facilitates optimal guidewire crossing, which leads to less metallic carina, clustering, and overlapping. The present review describes a method of clear visualization and assessment with 3D OCT and discusses the efficacy of 3D OCT in coronary bifurcation stenting in clinical practice.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Its Predictors Between the 1- and 2-Stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions - A Baseline Clinical and Lesion Characteristic-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Differences in the impact of the 1- or 2-stent strategy in similar coronary bifurcation lesion conditions are not well understood. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and its predictors between 1 or 2 stents in propensity score-matched (PSM) complex bifurcation lesions.Methods and Results: We analyzed the data of patients with bifurcation lesions, obtained from a multicenter registry of 2,648 patients (median follow up, 53 months). The patients were treated by second generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). PSM was performed to balance baseline clinical and angiographic discrepancies between 1 and 2 stents. After PSM (N=333 from each group), the 2-stent group had more TLRs (hazard ratio [HR] 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-6.97, P=0.005) and fewer hard endpoints (composite of cardiac death and TVMI; HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-1.01, P=0.054), which resulted in a similar TLF rate (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.83-2.37, P=0.209) compared to the 1-stent group. Compared with 1-stent, the 2-stent technique was more frequently associated with less TLF in the presence of main vessel (p_interaction=0.008) and side branch calcification (p_interaction=0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-stent strategy should be considered to reduce hard clinical endpoints in complex bifurcation lesions, particularly those with calcifications.

Rationale, Design, and Implications of Bifurcation Coronary Stenting: Insight from the Indian Bifurcation Stenting (IBIS) Registry

Background

Bifurcation coronary stenting (BCS) has unique therapeutic challenges. Several BCS strategies are prescribed for treatment, with conflicting data, and which is the best strategy for optimal short- and long-term outcomes remains a matter of debate. There is no systematic data from an Indian perspective in regard to patterns of BCS and its outcomes.

Methods and analysis

The Indian Bifurcation Stenting (IBIS) registry is a prospective, nationwide, endpoint-driven, investigator-initiated, multi-center, observational registry to compare the different bifurcation stent strategies, the effect of adjuvant techniques, and bifurcation anatomical differences in predicting short- and long-term clinical outcomes of bifurcation coronary interventions in India. A total of 1,000 patients from 20 clinical sites across the country will be enrolled in this study from September 2020 to August 2023. The primary endpoint will be the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at the end of two years. The secondary endpoints include all causes of death, MI, target vessel revascularization, in-stent restenosis, stroke, and predefined procedural parameters. The safety endpoint is the occurrence of definite or probable stent thrombosis.

Conclusion

The aim of this prospective observational registry is to assess the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary bifurcation lesion angioplasty in India. This will be extremely useful to provide an evidence-based insight as well as guidance to bifurcation angioplasty in India.