Prognostic Impact of Echocardiographic Diastolic Dysfunction on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction - Insights From the PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry

The efficacy and safety of adaptive servo-ventilation therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

It is unclear whether adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is effective. The aim of this study was to investigate the details of ASV use, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ASV in real-world HFpEF patients. We retrospectively enrolled 36 HFpEF patients at nine cardiovascular centers who initiated ASV therapy during hospitalization or on outpatient basis and were able to continue using it at home from 2012 to 2017 and survived for at least one year thereafter. The number of hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) during the 12 months before and 12 months after introduction of ASV at home was compared. The median number of HF hospitalizations for each patient was significantly reduced from 1 [interquartile range: 1-2] in the 12 months before introduction of ASV to 0 [0-0] in the 12 months after introduction of ASV (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, reduction in heart failure hospitalization was significantly greater in female patients, patients with a body mass index < 25, and those with moderate or severe tricuspid valve regurgitation. In patients with HFpEF, the number of HF hospitalizations was significantly decreased after the introduction of ASV. HFpEF patients with female sex, BMI < 25, or moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation are potential candidates who might benefit from ASV therapy.

Literature Review: Pathophysiology of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a growing public health concern, a disease with poor health outcomes, and is showing increased prevalence globally. This review paper explores the literature with a focus on the pathophysiology and microbiology of preserved ejection fraction heart failure while drawing connections between preserved and reduced ejection fraction states. The discussion teases out the cellular level changes that affect the overall dysfunction of the cardiac tissue, including the clinical manifestations, microbiological changes (endothelial cells, fibroblasts, cardiomyocytes, and excitation-contraction coupling), and the burden of structural diastolic dysfunction. The goal of this review is to summarize the pathophysiological disease state of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to enhance understanding, knowledge, current treatment models of this pathology.

Septal E/e' Ratio Is Associated With Cerebral White Matter Hyperintensity Progression in Young-Old Hypertensive Patients

Background: The incidence of hypertension increases with age, as does that of brain abnormalities associated with cerebral pathologic and functional degeneration. Little is known about the relationship between hypertension-related cardiac changes and cerebral pathologic degeneration. We examined the relationship between left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and cerebral white matter hyperintensity (WMH) progression in young-old hypertensive patients. Methods and Results: This single-center prospective longitudinal observational study included 156 individuals aged 65-75 years with well-controlled hypertension, normal LV contraction, and no history of symptomatic heart failure. WMH was quantified on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary outcome was the rate of WMH volume progression between the baseline and follow-up MRI (∆WMH). Participants were classified into tertiles on the basis of ∆WMH (small, medium, and large ∆WMH). The mean (±SD) age at recruitment was 69.6±2.8 years, and the mean follow-up period was 4.6 years. The ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic septal mitral annulus velocity (septal E/e') was significantly higher in the large ∆WMH group than in the small and medium ∆WMH groups. On multiple regression analysis, septal E/e' was significantly positively associated with square-root-transformed ∆WMH (β=0.457, P<0.001). Conclusions: Septal E/e' was significantly positively associated with the rate of progression of WMH volume, suggesting that LV diastolic dysfunction is associated with the progression of abnormal brain aging.

Impact of Structural Abnormalities in Left Ventricle and Left Atrium on Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Two key echocardiographic parameters, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left atrial volume index (LAVI), are important in assessing structural myocardial changes in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes among groups classified by LVMI and LAVI values are unclear.We examined the data of 960 patients with HFpEF hospitalized due to acute decompensated HF from the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry, a prospective, multicenter observational study. Four groups were classified according to the cut-off values of LVMI and LAVI [LVMI = 95 g/m2 (female), 115 g/m2 (male) and LAVI = 34 mL/m2]. Clinical endpoints were the composite of HF readmission and all-cause death. Study endpoints among the 4 groups were evaluated. The composite endpoint occurred in 364 patients (37.9%). Median follow-up duration was 445 days. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in the composite endpoint among the 4 groups (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that patients with increased LAVI alone were at significantly higher risk of HF readmission and the composite endpoints than those with increased LVMI alone (P = 0.030 and P = 0.024, respectively). Age, male gender, systolic blood pressure at discharge, atrial fibrillation (AF) hemoglobin, renal function, and LAVI were significant determinants of LVMI and female gender, AF, hemoglobin, and LVMI were significant determinants of LAVI.In HFpEF patients, increased LAVI alone was more strongly associated with HF readmission and the composite of HF readmission and all-cause death than those with increased LVMI alone.

Clinical trajectories and outcomes of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with normal or indeterminate diastolic function

BACKGROUND

We recently reported that nearly half of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) did not show echocardiographic diastolic dysfunction (DD), but had normal diastolic function (ND) or indeterminate diastolic function (ID). However, the clinical course and outcomes of patients with HFpEF with ND or ID (ND/ID) remain unknown.

METHODS

From the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry, we extracted 289 patients with HFpEF with ND/ID at discharge who had echocardiographic data at 1-year follow-up. Patients were classified according to the status of progression from ND/ID to DD at 1 year. Primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or HF rehospitalization.

RESULTS

Median age was 81 years, and 138 (47.8%) patients were female. At 1 year, 107 (37%) patients had progressed to DD. The composite endpoint occurred in 90 (31.1%) patients. Compared to patients without progression to DD, those with progression had a significantly higher cumulative rate of the composite endpoint (P < 0.001) and HF rehospitalization (P < 0.001) after discharge and at the 1-year landmark (P = 0.030 and P = 0.001, respectively). Progression to DD was independently associated with the composite endpoint (hazard ratio (HR): 2.014, 95%CI 1.239-3.273, P = 0.005) and HF rehospitalization (HR: 2.362, 95%CI 1.402-3.978) after discharge. Age (odds ratio (OR): 1.043, 95%CI 1.004-1.083, P = 0.031), body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.110, 95%CI 1.031-1.195, P = 0.006), and albumin (OR: 0.452, 95%CI 0.211-0.969, P = 0.041) were independently associated with progression from ND/ID to DD.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-third of HFpEF patients with ND/ID progressed to DD at 1 year and had poor outcomes. Age, BMI and albumin were independently associated with this progression.

UMIN-CTR ID

UMIN000021831.

Predictors and Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients With a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Above or Below 60

Background Although potential therapeutic candidates for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are emerging, it is still unclear whether they will be effective in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60% or higher. Our aim was to identify the clinical characteristics of these patients with HFpEF by comparing them to patients with LVEF below 60%. Methods and Results From a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort (PURSUIT-HFpEF [Prospective Multicenter Obsevational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction]), we investigated 812 consecutive patients (median age, 83 years; 57% women), including 316 with 50% ≤ LVEF <60% and 496 with 60% ≤ LVEF, and compared the clinical backgrounds of the 2 groups and their prognoses for cardiac mortality or HF readmission. Two hundred four adverse outcomes occurred at a median of 366 days. Multivariable Cox regression tests adjusted for age, sex, heart rate, atrial fibrillation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and prior heart failure hospitalization revealed that systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.925 [95% CI, 0.862-0.992]; P=0.028), high-density lipoprotein to C-reactive protein ratio (HR, 0.975 [95% CI, 0.944-0.995]; P=0.007), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (HR, 0.870 [95% CI, 0.759-0.997]; P=0.037) were uniquely associated with outcomes among patients with 50% ≤ LVEF <60%, whereas only the ratio of peak early mitral inflow velocity to velocity of mitral annulus early diastolic motion e'(HR, 1.034 [95% CI, 1.003-1.062]; P=0.034) was associated with outcomes among patients with 60% ≤ LVEF. Conclusions Prognostic factors show distinct differences between patients with HFpEF with 50% ≤ LVEF <60% and with 60% ≤ LVEF. These findings suggest that the 2 groups have different inherent pathophysiology. Registration URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000024414; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831 PURSUIT-HFpEF.

The impact of SGLT2 inhibition on imaging markers of cardiac function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) has resulted in significant benefits in patients with heart failure irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of SGLT2-Is on cardiac function indices.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search for studies assessing the changes in LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular mass index (LVMi), left atrial volume index (LAVi), and E/e' following the initiation of an SGLT2-I.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies with 2351 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibition resulted in a significant improvement of LVEF [MD 1.97 (95%CI 0.92, 3.02), p < .01, I²:84%] in patients with heart failure, an increase in GLS [MD 1.17 (95% CI 0.25, 2.10), p < .01], a decrease in LVESV [MD: -3.60 (95% CI -7.02, -0.18), p = .04, I²:9%] while the effect was neutral concerning LVEDV [MD: -3.10 (95% CI -6.76, 0.56), p = .40, I²:4%]. LVMi [MD: -3.99 (95% CI -7.16 to -0.82), p = .01, I²:65%], LAVi [MD: -1.77 (95% CI -2.97, -0.57), p < .01, I²:0%], and E/e' [MD: -1.39 (95% CI -2.04, -0.73), p < .01, I²:55%] were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with an improvement in markers of cardiac function, confirming the importance of SGLT2 inhibition towards the reversal of cardiac remodeling.

Association between prognosis and the use of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers in frail patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Aims

The effectiveness of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE‐I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) has not been demonstrated in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We recently reported significant interaction between the use of ACE‐I and/or ARB (ACE‐I/ARB) and frailty on prognosis in patients with HFpEF. In the present study, we examined the association between ACE‐I/ARB and prognosis in patients with HFpEF stratified by the presence or absence of frailty.

Methods and results

We examined the association between the use of ACE‐I/ARB and prognosis according to the presence [Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) ≥ 5] or absence (CFS ≤ 4) of frailty in patients with HFpEF in a post hoc analysis of registry data. Primary endpoint was the composite of all‐cause mortality and heart failure admission. Secondary endpoints were all‐cause mortality and heart failure admission. Of 1059 patients, median age was 83 years and 45% were male. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the risk of composite endpoint (log‐rank P = 0.001) and all‐cause death (log‐rank P = 0.005) in patients with ACE‐I/ARB was lower in those with CFS ≥ 5, but similar between patients with and without ACE‐I/ARB in patients with CFS ≤ 4 (composite endpoint: log‐rank P = 0.830; all‐cause death: log‐rank P = 0.192). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, use of ACE‐I/ARB was significantly associated with lower risk of the composite endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.33–0.83, P = 0.005] and heart failure admission (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.25–0.83, P = 0.010) in patients with CFS ≥ 5, but not in patients with CFS ≤ 4 (composite endpoint: HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.99–2.02, P = 0.059; heart failure admission: HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.94–2.18, P = 0.091). The association between ACE‐I or ARB and prognosis did not significantly differ by CFS (CFS ≤ 4: log‐rank P = 0.562; CFS ≥ 5: log‐rank P = 0.100, for with ACE‐I vs. ARB, respectively). Adjusted HRs for CFS 1–4 were higher than 1.0 but were <1.0 at CFS 5.

Conclusions

In patients with HFpEF, use of ACE‐I/ARB was associated with better prognosis in patients with frailty as assessed with the CFS, but not in those without frailty.