Contemporary Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease - Implications of the ISCHEMIA Trial

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease: An umbrella review

Background

Invasive management of stable coronary artery disease is still a controversial topic. The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluate the benefits and harms of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from 2018 to August 7, 2022. We included SRs with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the question of interest. We assessed the methodological quality of the SRs with the AMSTAR-2 tool. We summarized the results of the outcomes for each SR. We calculated the degree of overlap of the RCTs included in the SRs using the corrected covered area (CCA).

Results

We found 10 SRs with meta-analyses. The SRs included 3 to 15 RCTs. The degree of overlap among the SRs was very high (CCA > 15%). No SR evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE system and 9 out of 10 had critically low methodological quality. The SRs reported heterogeneous results for the outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and angina. On the other hand, for the outcomes of cardiovascular mortality and stroke, all SRs agreed that there were no differences between PCI and OMT alone.

Conclusions

We found 10 SRs on the use of PCI compared to OMT alone for patients with stable coronary artery disease. However, none had high methodological quality, none evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach, and the results were inconsistent for several outcomes. This variability in evidence may result in divergent clinical decisions for the management of stable coronary artery disease among healthcare professionals. It is necessary to perform a high-quality SR using the GRADE approach to clarify the balance of benefits and harms of PCI.

Role of non-invasive coronary imaging in stable angina

Chest pain represents a symptom of significant clinical concern due to the potential for lethal etiologies. Accordingly, it is critical to ascertain the presence of stable angina through various diagnostic tests to inform subsequent therapeutic strategies. Stable angina, while potentially progressing to more severe conditions if left untreated, suffers from a paucity of research regarding its management compared to other more fatal causes of chest pain. Recent advancements in radiological imaging necessitate a re-evaluation of the array and functionality of diagnostic tests, with particular emphasis on prioritizing non-invasive methods such as electrocardiography and echocardiography. This study undertakes a comprehensive review of the literature pertaining to various diagnostic tests for stable angina. We conclude that the management of a patient presenting with chest pain encompasses a continuum of care, beginning with a detailed patient history to estimate pre-test probability and culminating in computed tomography coronary angiography. This continuum is highly individualized, taking into account patient-specific variables, disease burden, and test indications. In an era of rapid research advancement, our findings delineate the optimal sequence of initial diagnostic tests, emphasizing the role of current non-invasive imaging modalities as outlined in standard clinical guidelines.

Comprehensive assessment of molecular function, tissue characterization, and hemodynamic performance by non-invasive hybrid imaging: Potential role of cardiac PETMR

Noninvasive cardiovascular imaging plays a key role in diagnosis and patient management including monitoring treatment efficacy. The usefulness of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging has been extensively studied and shown to have high diagnostic reliability and prognostic significance, while the nondiagnostic results frequently encountered with single imaging modality require complementary or alternative imaging techniques. Hybrid cardiac imaging was initially introduced to integrate anatomical and functional information to enhance the diagnostic performance, and lately employed as a strategy for comprehensive assessment of the underlying pathophysiology of diseases. More recently, the utility of computed tomography has grown in diversity, and emerged from being an exploratory technique allowing functional measurement such as stress dynamic perfusion. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is widely accepted as a robust tool for evaluation of cardiac function, fibrosis, and edema, yielding high spatial resolution and soft-tissue contrast. However, the use of intravenous contrast materials is typically required for accurate diagnosis with these imaging modalities, despite the associated risk of renal toxicity. Nuclear cardiology, established as a molecular imaging technique, has advantages in visualization of the disease-specific biological process at cellular level using numerous probes without requiring contrast materials. Various imaging modalities should be appropriately used sequentially to assess concomitant disease and the progression over time. Therefore, simultaneous evaluation combining high spatial resolution and disease-specific imaging probe is a useful approach to identify the regional activity and the stage of the disease. Given the recent advance and potential of multiparametric CMR and novel nuclide tracers, hybrid positron emission tomography MR is becoming an ideal tool for disease-specific imaging.