Clinical Management and Outcomes of Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension Enrolled in the Japanese Multicenter Registry

Clinical outcomes of upfront combination therapy for portopulmonary hypertension

Background

Limited data exists on upfront combination therapy for portopulmonary hypertension. We evaluated the clinical efficacy, long-term outcomes, and safety of upfront combination therapy in patients with portopulmonary hypertension.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study involving a final analysis of 33 consecutive patients diagnosed with portopulmonary hypertension who were taking pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific medication. We compared hemodynamic parameters, risk profiles, composite clinical worsening events, and safety between monotherapy (n = 23) and upfront combination therapy (n = 10).

Results

Twenty-seven patients (82 %) were classified into the Child-Pugh A stage. The change ratios of pulmonary vascular resistance (-32 % vs. -57 %, P = 0.006) were significantly better with upfront combination therapy. Upfront combination therapy also showed significant improvement in risk profiles. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the composite event-free rate was significantly lower in patients who received upfront combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (P = 0.016), although no statistical differences were observed in all-cause death. In the univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, upfront combination therapy was a factor for decreasing composite clinical worsening outcomes (hazard ratio 0.190, 95 % confidence interval 0.042-0.854; P = 0.030). No significant hepatic impairments were observed over 2 years of follow-up in the upfront combination group.

Conclusions

In patients with portopulmonary hypertension, upfront combination therapy significantly improved symptoms and short-term hemodynamics, and reduced long-term clinical worsening events without serious adverse effects. This study's findings suggest that patients with portopulmonary hypertension presenting with mild hepatic impairment benefit from upfront combination therapy.

Long-term efficacies of selective vasodilators in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a comprehensive comparison using a spontaneous reporting database

There is no clinical evidence of differences in drugs associated with long-term survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) due to the small population and lack of information on death in Japanese medical database systems. This study evaluated whether patient data from a spontaneous reporting database could be used for comparing the effects of pulmonary vasodilators on long-term survival in PAH patients. PAH patient data reported in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database from April 2004 to July 2022 were extracted. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival times. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for all-cause mortality were determined using Cox proportional hazards models. Of 1969 PAH patients reported in the JADER database, 1208 were included in the survival analyses. The patient demographics were similar to those of the PAH population reported in the Japan Pulmonary Hypertension Registry. Among drugs targeting the prostacyclin pathway, epoprostenol was most associated with long-term survival (aHR, 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.64). The PAH patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists had improved survival, especially among the macitentan users (aHR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.42). Sildenafil was associated with a poor prognosis in the PAH patients (aHR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.19-2.04). Although our results must be interpreted with caution due to several limitations inherent to spontaneous reporting databases, our approach using the JADER database for survival analysis may provide useful information in limited situations such as the treatment of rare diseases including PAH.

Current clinical understanding and effectiveness of portopulmonary hypertension treatment

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a rare subtype of Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with a poor prognosis. According to the most up-to-date definition, PoPH is characterized by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) of >20 mmHg at rest, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of ≤15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of >2 Wood units with portal hypertension. Like PAH, PoPH is underpinned by an imbalance in vasoactive substances. Therefore, current guidelines recommend PAH-specific therapies for PoPH treatment; however, descriptions of the actual treatment approaches are inconsistent. Given the small patient population, PoPH is often studied in combination with idiopathic PAH; however, recent evidence suggests important differences between PoPH and idiopathic PAH in terms of hemodynamic parameters, treatment approaches, survival, socioeconomic status, and healthcare utilization. Therefore, large, multi-center registry studies are needed to examine PoPH in isolation while obtaining statistically meaningful results. PoPH has conventionally been excluded from clinical drug trials because of concerns over hepatotoxicity. Nevertheless, newer-generation endothelin receptor antagonists have shown great promise in the treatment of PoPH, reducing PVR, PAP, and World Health Organization functional class without causing hepatotoxicity. The role of liver transplantation as a treatment option for PoPH has also been controversial; however, recent evidence shows that this procedure may be beneficial in this patient population. In the future, given the shortage of liver donors, predictors of a favorable response to liver transplantation should be determined to select the most eligible patients. Collectively, advances in these three areas could help to standardize PoPH treatment in the clinic.