Myocardial positron tomography with N-13 ammonia in assessment of aortocoronary bypass surgery

Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography

The patency of coronary artery bypass grafts was evaluated by helical computed tomographic (CT) scan. One hundred forty patients who received an enhanced chest CT scan and a coronary angiography after bypass surgery were studied before discharge at the Fukui Cardiovascular Center. Among them was a total of 398 grafts and 436 anastomoses. For the evaluation of 248 vein grafts, the CT scan showed a 99.5% correct positive ratio and an overall accuracy of 96.4%. In 122 internal thoracic arteries tested, an overall accuracy of 64.7% was obtained. In gastroepiploic artery tests the overall accuracy was 33.3% and in radial artery tests it was 45.5%. Thirty-seven venous sequential anastomoses in 34 grafts and 1 internal thoracic artery sequential anastomosis were also evaluated. In the venous sequential anastomosis, the CT scan showed a 73.0% of accuracy overall. This study showed that the helical CT scan was useful to evaluate graft patency following bypass surgery.

Quantification of coronary artery bypass graft flow by magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping

OBJECTIVES

Determination of the true coronary artery bypass graft function requires quantification of the flow rate within the graft. The purpose of the present study was to assess the feasibility of characterizing and quantifying graft flow by magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with 41 angiographically patent coronary artery bypass grafts underwent electrocardiographically gated magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. Imaging was performed at 0.6 Tesla using a surface coil. Velocity maps of the bypass grafts were obtained throughout the cardiac cycle with a temporal resolution of 50 ms and a spatial resolution of 1.9 x 1.2 x 5 mm3, allowing calculation of phasic and mean graft flow.

RESULTS

Adequate flow measurements were obtained in 84% (41 out of 49) of the grafts. Coronary artery bypass graft flow was characterized by a biphasic pattern with a first peak during systole and a second peak during diastole. Average maximum systolic and diastolic velocities over the cross-section of the grafts were 14 +/- 8 cm/s and 15 +/- 9 cm/s, respectively. Mean coronary artery bypass graft cross-sectional area was 0.28 +/- 0.13 cm2. Mean volume flow was 87 +/- 59 ml/min.

CONCLUSION

Flow in coronary artery bypass grafts can be characterized and measured noninvasively by magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.

Nonangiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency

Coronary artery bypass graft patency can be assessed using the indirect techniques of evaluating patients' symptoms and exercise tolerance, changes in stress electrocardiogram, radioisotope regional perfusion, and myocardial wall contraction. The direct techniques assess graft patency directly by visualizing grafts using conventional computed tomography (CT), ultrafast CT, magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography, and echocardiography. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these modalities are reviewed. At the present time, ultrafast CT and possibly magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler appear to be the only techniques besides angiography that can consistently evaluate bypass graft patency. Although they have the advantage of being minimally invasive, they cannot show graft stenosis or sequential graft patency. These techniques are best used in following patients after coronary bypass graft surgery and ruling out graft closure as the source of chest pain.