Effect of beta-blocker therapy on severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Anti-arrhythmic therapy in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) are the foundation of therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. While ICDs prevent SCD, they do not prevent the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias which are usually symptomatic. Though catheter ablation has been successful in substrate modification of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, there is much less evidence to support its use in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Therefore, anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) are an essential adjunctive therapy for secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), the prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias correlates with the volume of scar as characterized by late gadolinium enhancement. Beta-blockers forms the cornerstone of treatment to prevent ventricular arrhythmias in both HCM and DCM. Disopyramide is an important therapeutic option in HCM as it provides both negative inotropy which reduces obstruction as well as lass I anti-arrhythmic action. In DCM sotalol, through is combined beta-blocking and class III AD effects, significantly reduces the burden of ventricular arrhythmias. Though amiodarone is efficacious in the prevention of ventricular arrhythmias in both HCM and DCM, its use is limited by its side-effects profile. Evidence for AAD therapy for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is limited by its low prevalence and lack of studies. ICDs have been shown to reduce SCD regardless of whether patients are receiving AAD therapy.

Effective treatment of hypertension by recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptide

Background

Hypertension is considered the most serious risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides (ACEIPs), which are made from tuna frame protein (TFP) and yellow fin sole frame protein (YFP), have been used previously to treat hypertension. However, the production of these short peptides is usually dependent on enzymatic hydrolysis, resulting in a digested mixture that makes it difficult to purify the ACEIPs. Although it has been reported that ACEIPs could be produced in recombinant Escherichia coli strains, the use of lactic acid bacteria in the production of ACEIPs has not been demonstrated.

Results

In this study, the ACEIP coding sequences from TFP and YFP were joined through an arginine linker and expressed in the Lactobacillus plantarum (Lb. plantarum) NC8 strain by an inducible vector pSIP-409. Then, the antihypertensive effects were determined in the model of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) by measuring the blood pressure, hematology, blood biochemistry and nitric oxide (NO), endothelin (ET) and angiotensin II (Ang II) levels. The results showed that oral administration of recombinant Lb. plantarum NC8 (RLP) significantly decreased systolic blood pressure (P < 0.01) during treatment, which lasted for at least 10 days after the last dose. Furthermore, the presence of RLP resulted in an increased level of NO, as well as decreased levels of ET and Ang II in plasma, heart, and kidney. In addition, a dramatically decreased triglyceride level was also observed even though there was no significant change in hematology or blood biochemistry. Although some drawbacks were still observed, such as the presence of an antibiotic selection marker, no obvious side effects or bacterial translocation were observed in vivo, indicating the potential application of RLP in the treatment of hypertension.

Conclusion

These results demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of RLP on the treatment of hypertension.

Appropriate ICD Therapy in Patients With Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Long-Term Follow-Up

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has proved effective in preventing sudden death and decreasing mortality in randomised secondary prevention trials. Some nonrandomized studies have reported different incidences and predictors of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The antiarrhythmic and other medical therapies were different between the published studies and it was reported that not using beta-blockers was a predictor of appropriate ICD therapy. In the present study, we report on our long-term experience with ICD therapy in patients with DCM, the majority of whom were treated with beta-blockers and amiodarone. The study population consisted of 25 patients with DCM who underwent initial transvenous ICD implantation between December 1995 and May 2005. Indications for ICD implantation were monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 16 patients (64%), cardiac arrest in 8 patients (32%), and syncope plus inducible VT in one patient. Twenty-four patients underwent an electrophysiologic study (EPS). In 18 patients, the ICDs were programmed to only shocks and in 7 patients an additional antitachycardia pacing program was performed. One patient was lost to follow-up and 24 patients were followed-up primarily in our ICD pacemaker outpatient clinic. Appropriate ICD therapy was defined as antitachycardia pacing therapy or shock for tachyarrhythmia determined by evaluation of the clinical information and by device diagnostics to be either ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. The mean follow-up was 39.29 +/- 30.59 months after ICD implantation. At follow-up, 17 patients were using a beta-blocker and 16 patients amiodarone. Appropriate ICD therapy was observed in 14 patients (58%). The detected arrhythmias were VT in 12 patients, ventricular fibrillation (VF) in one, and VT and VF in one patient. The time to first ICD therapy was 15.93 +/- 18.45 (range, 1-74) months. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the percent survival free of appropriate ICD therapy was 82%, 72%, 66%, and 55% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years follow-up, respectively. The clinical, echocardiographic, and electrophysiologic characteristics did not differ between those who did and did not receive appropriate ICD therapy. However, the mean QRS duration was significantly longer in patients who received appropriate ICD therapies. Cox regression analysis did not reveal any factors that predicted appropriate ICD therapy. Five patients (21%) died during follow-up. Four deaths were classified as cardiac and one as noncardiac. The cumulative survival from total death was 94%, 82%, 82%, and 69%, and the cumulative survival from cardiac death was 94%, 82%, 82%, and 76% during 1, 2, 3, and 4 years of follow-up, respectively. In summary, in this selected patient population with DCM, the majority of patients were unresponsive to beta-blocker and antiarrhythmic therapy. Most of these patients received appropriate ICD therapy during follow-up. Cox regression analysis did not identify any factors that predicted appropriate ICD therapy. Additional trials with larger patient populations are needed to detect the predictors of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with DCM.

Suppressive effect of the Gly389 allele of the beta1-adrenergic receptor gene on the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia in dilated cardiomyopathy

Beta-1-adrenergic receptor (beta1-AR) blockers reduce both the incidence of sudden death and the ventricular volume in heart failure. In vitro, the Gly389 variant of beta1-AR mediates less adenylyl cyclase activities than the Arg389 variant, so Arg389Gly polymorphism was investigated with regard to the genesis, progression, or arrhythmogenesis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Allele and genotype frequencies of the Arg389Gly polymorphism were determined in 163 DCM patients and 157 age- and sex-matched controls. There were no differences in genotype and allele frequencies between patients and controls. Echocardiograms, left ventriculograms and 24h-Holter electrocardiograms were evaluated in the DCM patients and none of the clinical indices, other than ventricular tachycardia (VT), differed among the 3 genotypes. The Gly389 allele was more frequent in the VT(-) group than in the VT(+) group (0.46 vs 0.24, p=0.001). In univariate analysis, the odds ratio for VT in patients carrying 1 or 2 copies of the Gly389 allele was 0.29 ([95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.64], p=0.002), when compared with the Arg389 homozygotes. The Gly389 variant supressed the occurrence of VT in DCM, suggesting that this allele confers a decreased risk of sudden death.

Long-term prognosis of patients with mildly dilated cardiomyopathy

The long-term prognosis of patients with mildly dilated cardiomyopathy (MDCM) was investigated in 21 patients. MDCM was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% and left ventricular end-diastolic volume < or = 120 ml/m2 by left ventriculography. During a follow-up period of 6.8+/-3.7 years, there were 9 cardiac events (5 heart failure deaths, 2 sudden deaths, and 2 re-hospitalizations for heart failure). Only in the patients without cardiac events was there a significant decrease in left ventricular size (end-diastolic dimension decreased from 58+/-6 mm to 50+/-8 mm, p<0.001) and an improvement in systolic function (fractional shortening increased from 17+/-5% to 26+/-11%, p=0.007). However, left atrial dilation was observed in the patients with an event (from 39+/-5 mm to 43+/-5 mm, p=0.02). Based on proportional hazard analysis, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure at diagnosis and left atrial dimension at the time of follow-up were significant predictors of poor outcome. A subset of patients with MDCM has impaired hemodynamics at diagnosis, left atrial dilation at follow-up and a poor prognosis, and must be followed carefully even if the left ventricular dilatation is mild.

Low-dose amiodarone for patients with advanced heart failure who are intolerant of beta-blockers

The tolerability and effectiveness of amiodarone in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) who are intolerant of beta-blockers was investigated in 22 patients (13 with and 9 without 180+/-26 mg/day of amiodarone). Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), left ventricular diastolic dimension and fractional shortening (FS) using echocardiography, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and norepinephrine concentrations were determined at baseline and after 1 and 3 months of therapy. Although 9 patients tolerated amiodarone without any signs of HF, it was exacerbated in 4 patients. In 10 patients taking amiodarone who could be followed medically for 3 months, HR decreased after 1 month and remained unchanged until after 3 months (81+/-12 vs 65+/-7 vs 65+/-7beats/min), accompanied by decreased concentration of BNP (688+/-485 vs 392+/-203 vs 261+/-192pg/ml). FS increased significantly only after 3 months (0.12+/-0.05 vs 0.14+/-0.05 vs 0.16+/-0.04). Amiodarone may be used in patients with advanced HF who are intolerant of beta-blockers.