Quantitative evaluation of a directly depolarized area induced by high-output pacing on the cardiac muscle

Arrhythmogenic Difference Between the Left and Right Atria During Rapid Atrial Activation in a Canine Model of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Continuous rapid atrial stimulation causes atrial remodeling, but little is known about the difference in the arrhythmogenicity of the left (LA) and right atria (RA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 14 beagle dogs, continuous rapid pacing (400 beats/min) was delivered from the right (n=7) or left (n=7) atrial appendage (RAA or LAA) for 2 weeks. The atrial effective refractory period (ERP), ERP dispersion, and inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) were evaluated along the time course from 4 atrial sites: (1) RAA, (2) area close to the inferior vena cava (IVC), (3) Bachmann's bundle (BB) and (4) LA. The ERP exhibited progressive shortening at all sites, but the degree of shortening differed among them. In the RA stimulation group, ERP shortening was more prominent in the RAA and LA than in the IVC or BB. In contrast, in the LA stimulation group, ERP shortening was more prominent in the LA than in the other sites. As a result, ERP dispersion was larger in the LA stimulation group than in the RA stimulation group and the AF inducibility was higher in the LA stimulation group than in the RA stimulation group, especially at the LA site (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

LAA stimulation was more arrhythmogenic than RAA stimulation in this model. This result may partly explain the importance of premature contractions occurring from the pulmonary veins in clinical cases of AF.

Basic assessment of paced activation sequence mapping: implications for practical use

Some experiences support the use of atrial paced activation sequence mapping, but there is no systematic study assessing its spatial resolution, reproducibility, and influence of pacing parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate these issues by using a 24-pole catheter positioned at the atrial aspect of the tricuspid and mitral annuli in 15 patients. Bipolar pacing was performed at two sites (right and left atria), 2 cycle lengths (300 and 500 ms) and two outputs (twice and tenfold the late diastolic threshold voltage for 2-ms pulses). The elapsed time between the atrial activation at the two dipoles adjacent to the pacing dipole (activation time [AT]) was measured during each pacing sequence. Changes in cycle length did not modify the AT. The increase in voltage slightly modified the AT (maximum -2 ms at the RA; 95% CI -3 to -1 ms) due to a greater shortening of the conduction time to the dipole located next to the anode. The 95% limits of the intraobserver and interobserver agreements in the AT measurement were -2 to 3 ms and -3 to 3 ms, respectively. The spatial resolution was studied in ten patients by measuring the AT during pacing from each dipole of a 20-pole catheter with a 1-3-1 mm interelectrode distance. The mean AT change was 10 +/- 4 ms per 6 mm of pacing site displacement (95% CI 8-11 ms, range 2.5-20 ms). In conclusion, paced atrial activation sequence analysis is reproducible, accurate, and relatively independent of pacing parameters.

Verapamil suppresses the inhomogeneity of electrical remodeling in a canine long-term rapid atrial stimulation model

Verapamil is known to suppress shortening of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) during relatively short-term atrial pacing, although the effect of a long-term stimulation model is unclear. The effect of verapamil on electrical remodeling was evaluated in a canine rapid atrial stimulation model. The right atrial appendage (RAA) was continuously paced (400 beats/min) for 2 weeks. Four pairs of electrodes were sutured at four atrial sites; the RAA, right atrium close to the inferior vena cava, Bachmann's bundle, and LA. AERP, AERP dispersion (AERPd), conduction time, and inducibility of AF were evaluated during the pacing phase and the recovery phase. The same protocol was performed under the administration of verapamil. In five control dogs, the AERP shortening was inhomogeneous and the shortening of the AERP was most prominent in the LA. AERPd increased during the rapid pacing phase by 5 +/- 2 ms, but recovered quickly in the recovery phase. The max AERPd was 46 +/- 4 ms in the control group and was larger than that in the verapamil group (31 +/- 3 ms, P = 0.001). At the LA site, the shortening of the AERP was decreased by verapamil administration (-19 +/- 3 vs -5 +/- 2 ms, P = 0.04). However, the AF inducibility was not significantly different between the two groups. The effect of verapamil on electrical remodeling was inhomogeneous, depending on the anatomic portion. As a result, AERPd widening during the rapid pacing phase was suppressed by verapamil, while the AF inducibility was unchanged.

Effect of pilsicainide on atrial electrophysiologic properties in the canine rapid atrial stimulation model

The heterogeneous process of atrial electrical remodeling (AER) in the canine rapid atrial stimulation model has been previously reported although it has been reported that a sodium channel blocker might suppress the shortening of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP), its effect on long-term electrical remodeling is unknown. In the present study, the effect of pilsicainide on AER was evaluated. The right atrial appendage (RAA) was paced at 400 beats/min for 2 weeks. In the RAA, Bachmann's bundle (BB), the right atrium near the inferior vena cava (IVC) and in the left atrium (LA), AERP, AERP dispersion (AERPd) and the inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) were evaluated at several time points of the pacing phase and the recovery phase (1 week). The same protocol was performed during the administration of pilsicainide (4.5 mg/kg per day) and the parameters were compared with the controls. In the control dogs, the AERP was significantly shortened by rapid pacing at all atrial sites studied and the AERP shortening (DeltaAERP) was larger at the RAA and LA sites (p<0.03). However, pilsicainide decreased these DeltaAERPs at all 4 atrial sites. AERPd was increased during the pacing phase whereas it was decreased during the recovery phase in the control dogs. In contrast, this pacing-induced AERPd was attenuated by the administration of pilsicainide. The AF inducibility was highest at the LA site in both groups, and the inducibility was lower in the pilsicainide group than the control group at all atrial sites. During the rapid pacing phase, the ventricular heart rate was significantly lower in the pilsicainide group than the control because of intra-atrial conduction block. In a canine rapid right atrial stimulation model, pilsicainide suppressed the shortening of the AERP at all atrial sites, possibly through the improvement of the hemodynamics as well as the action of the Na - Ca exchanger.

Inhomogeneity in the appearance of electrical remodeling during chronic rapid atrial pacing: evaluation of the dispersion of atrial effective refractoriness

In the present study, the long-term process of progression of electrical remodeling at various atrial sites, which is not well understood, was compared while monitoring continuously the electrophysiologic parameters at multirecording sites in canine atria during continuous atrial burst pacing. A rapid pacing device was implanted in 5 dogs, and continuous atrial burst pacing (400 beats/min) was delivered at the right atrial appendage (RAA). Four pairs of epicardial wire electrodes were sutured on (1) the RAA, (2) Bachmann's bundle (BB), (3) the right atrium close to the inferior vena cava (IVC), and (4) the left atrium (LA). The distal ends of those wires were exteriorized posteriorly and used for pacing and recording. The atrial effective refractory period (AERP), AERP dispersion (AERPd), atrial conduction time (CT) and inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) were evaluated during burst pacing for 14 days and during the subsequent 7 days' recovery. The AERP at the LA pacing site was shorter than that at the other sites on day 0. The AERP shortening was greater in the RAA and LA sites than in the BB and IVC sites. The AERPd increased during pacing and reached the maximum level on day 3, and then decreased during the recovery phase. Prolongation of CT tended to be longer between the RAAand IVC sites than that between the other sites. The incidence of AF induction became higher in accordance with the time course of the rapid pacing phase. There was another peak of AF induction on days 7-10. In a canine chronic rapid atrial stimulation model, the progression of electrical remodeling (ie, the shortening of the AERP and the prolongation of the CT) was not homogeneous in both atria, the AERPd showed a temporal increase between days 3 and 7 and matched the increase in AF inducibility at the LA pacing site, the increase in the AERPd was mainly caused by more rapid AERP shortening at the RAA or LA sites, and the LA site always showed a shorter AERP than the other atrial sites in the control state and during the rapid pacing phase, whereas AF inducibility was higher at the LA site than the other sites.