Influence of peripheral vascular occlusive disease on the morbidity and mortality of coronary artery bypass grafting

Factors affecting mortality after coronary bypass surgery: a scoping review

Objectives

Previous research reports numerous factors of post-operative mortality in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, this evidence has not been mapped to the conceptual framework of care improvement. Without such mapping, interventions designed to improve care quality remain unfounded.

Methods

We identified reported factors of in-hospital mortality post isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in adults over the age of 19, published in English between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019, indexed in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE. We grouped factors and their underlying mechanism for association with in-hospital mortality according to the augmented Donabedian framework for quality of care.

Results

We selected 52 factors reported in 83 articles and mapped them by case-mix, structure, process, and intermediary outcomes. The most reported factors were related to case-mix (characteristics of patients, their disease, and their preoperative health status) (37 articles, 27 factors). Factors related to care processes (27 articles, 12 factors) and structures (11 articles, 6 factors) were reported less frequently; most proposed mechanisms for their mortality effects.

Conclusions

Few papers reported on factors of in-hospital mortality related to structures and processes of care, where intervention for care quality improvement is possible. Therefore, there is limited evidence to support quality improvement efforts that will reduce variation in mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01784-z.

Impact of Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease on 1-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Purpose:

To determine the impact of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on clinical outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Methods and Results:

Symptomatic PAD was identified in 1969 (18.9%) of 10440 consecutive patients undergoing PCI. Patients with PAD were older, more frequently female, and had smaller body surface area and more atherosclerotic risk factors, chronic renal insufficiency, and heart failure. Patients with PAD had lower rates of procedural success (94.2% versus 96.2%, p<0.0001) and higher rates of in-hospital complications, including all-cause mortality (2.1% versus 1.1%, p=0.0002), cardiac death (1.5% versus 0.7%, p=0.0009), urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (1.9% versus 1.2%, p=0.01), recurrent ischemia (5.6% versus 2.8%, p<0.0001), re-PCI to the target lesion (2.4% versus 1.1%, p<0.0001), stroke (0.6% versus 0.3%, p=0.0344), transient ischemic attack (0.4% versus 0.1%, p=0.01), femoral hematoma (10.3% versus 8.5%, p=0.01), retroperitoneal hematoma (0.8% versus 0.3%, p=0.009), limb ischemia (3.0% versus 0.7%, p<0.0001), gastrointestinal bleeding (1.9% versus 0.9%, p<0.0001), and blood transfusion (10.1% versus 5.2%, p<0.0001). At 1-year follow-up, patients with PAD had a higher mortality rate (13.6% versus 5.2%, p<0.0001), a higher rate of myocardial infarction (8.3% versus 6.5%, p=0.008), and also more target lesion (21.2% versus 19.8%, p=0.02) or target vessel revascularization (24.6% versus 21.2%, p=0.002). By multivariate analysis, PAD was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 2.07, p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Nearly a fifth of patients undergoing PCI have symptomatic PAD. The presence of PAD is associated with lower rates of procedural success, higher rates of in-hospital and 1-year adverse events, and is independently associated with increased 1-year mortality.

Risk of death and myocardial infarction in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry)

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Trends over time in outcomes with advances in PCI and medical therapy are unknown. We evaluated 866 patients with PAD in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Dynamic Registry undergoing PCI according to treatment eras: the early bare metal stent (BMS) era (wave 1, 1997 to 1998, n = 180), the BMS era (waves 2 and 3, 1999 and 2001 to 2002, n = 339), and the drug-eluting stent (DES) era (waves 4 and 5, 2004 and 2006, n = 347). We compared in-hospital and 1-year outcomes by recruitment era. In-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery rates were significantly lower in the later eras (3.9%, 0.9%, and 0.6% for the early BMS, BMS, and DES eras, respectively, p for trend = 0.005), and an increasing percentage of patients were discharged on aspirin, β blockers, statins, and thienopyridines (p for trend <0.001 for all comparisons). Cumulative 1-year event rates in patients with PAD in the early BMS era, BMS era, and DES era for death were 13.7%, 10.5%, and 9.8% (p for trend = 0.21), those for myocardial infarction (MI) were 9.8%, 8.8%, and 10.0% (p for trend = 0.95), and those for repeat revascularization were 26.8%, 21.0%, and 17.2% (p for trend = 0.008). The 1-year adjusted hazard ratios of adverse events in patients with PAD using the early BMS era as the reference were 0.84 for death in the BMS era (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to 1.55, p = 0.58) and 1.35 in the DES era (95% CI 0.71 to 2.56, p = 0.36), 0.89 for MI in the BMS era (95% CI 0.48 to 1.66, p = 0.72) and 1.02 in the DES era (95% CI 0.55 to 1.87, p = 0.95), and 0.63 for repeat revascularization in the BMS era (95% CI 0.41 to 0.97, p = 0.04) and 0.46 in the DES era (95% CI 0.29 to 0.73, p = 0.001). In conclusion, despite significant improvements in medical therapy and a decrease in repeat revascularization over time, patients with PAD who undergo PCI have a persistent high rate of death and MI.

Anaortic techniques reduce neurological morbidity after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Stroke remains one of the most devastating complications of cardiac surgery. Advocates of off-pump coronary revascularisation (OPCAB) maintain that post-operative neurologic morbidity is reduced by avoiding aortic cannulation and cross-clamping, and by eliminating the systemic effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. We sought to determine whether completing off-pump coronary surgery without any aortic manipulation ("anaortic" technique) afforded any additional neurological protection, as compared to off-pump grafting in which the aorta was utilised for graft inflow.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of prospectively collected data was undertaken of all patients undergoing OPCAB in our institution between January 2002 and December 2006. Cases requiring intra-operative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass were excluded from further analysis. Patients having OPCAB surgery with aortic manipulation were compared to those having OPCAB surgery without aortic manipulation. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify possible predictors of post-operative neurologic morbidity, with particular focus on the role of aortic manipulation.

RESULTS

During the period of review, 1758 patients underwent OPCAB, of which 1201 (68.3%) were completed without aortic manipulation, constituting the "anaortic" cohort. This group was compared with the remaining 557 patients, which included fashioning at least one aorto-conduit anastomosis, utilising either a side-biting aortic clamp or a no-clamp proximal anastomotic device. The two groups of patients were well-matched with respect to risk factors for adverse neurologic outcomes. Nine patients sustained focal neurological deficits (transient or permanent) in the peri-operative period, constituting a stroke rate of 0.51% for the entire series. The incidence of peri-operative neurological deficit in the anaortic group was 0.25% compared with 1.1% in the aortic manipulation group (odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.92, p=0.037). Advanced age was also associated with peri-operative neurological injury (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.20, p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery surgery is associated with a low incidence of peri-operative stroke. Completing the surgical procedure without manipulating the ascending aorta in any way ("anaortic" technique) offers additional neurological protection and should be the goal in all suitable off-pump coronary cases.

Coronary surgery in patients with peripheral vascular disease: effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients with peripheral vascular disease are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Such patients have an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Our aim was to quantify the effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in this group of patients.

METHODS

Between April 1997 and March 2002, 3,771 consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting performed by five surgeons. Four hundred and twenty-two (11.2%) had peripheral vascular disease and of these, 211 (50%) received off-pump surgery. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the effect of off-pump surgery on in-hospital mortality and morbidity, while adjusting for treatment selection bias. Treatment selection bias was controlled for by constructing a propensity score, which was the probability of receiving off-pump surgery and included core patient characteristics. The C statistic for this model was 0.8.

RESULTS

Off-pump patients were more likely to have preoperative renal dysfunction, previous gastrointestinal surgery, and less extensive disease. The left internal mammary artery was used more in off-pump compared to on-pump cases (90.1% vs 82.9%; p = 0.033). In the univariate analyses, off-pump patients were less likely to have a postoperative stroke (p = 0.007), and had shorter postoperative hospital stays (p < 0.001). However, the incidence of new atrial arrhythmia was higher (p = 0.028). After adjustment for differences in case-mix (propensity score), avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass was still associated with a significant reduction in postoperative stroke (adjusted odds ratio 0.09 [95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.50]; p = 0.005), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary surgery is safe in patients with peripheral vascular disease, with acceptable results. The incidence of postoperative stroke is substantially reduced when avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Impact of extracardiac vascular disease on acute prognosis in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary interventions (data from the Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium [BMC2])

Extracardiac vascular disease is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and other complications after coronary interventions, independent from other co-morbidities and baseline characteristics. The underlying cause of this significant association is unclear, but it warrants further investigation in an attempt to improve outcome in this high-risk cohort.

Fracture of popliteal artery stents

In peripheral arterial obstructive disease, more than 50% of all lesions are localized in the femoropopliteal segment and surgical revascularization is the treatment of choice. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is recommended for short lesions, with subsequent stent implantation if the result is sub-optimal or dissections occur after PTA or for restenosis. There are both acute and late complications with stent implantation. In the present patient, stents were placed in the left popliteal artery where the left knee joint flexes, and obstruction because of stent fracture occurred 6 months later. The patient eventually underwent left femoro-popliteal saphenous vein bypass grafting.

Peripheral vascular disease as predictor of outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Understanding and objective assessment of risks is crucial in cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on morbidity, mortality and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) was used as indicator of PVD and was measured in 178 CABG patients. Two groups were established: 1. normal ABPI (0.9-1.3) (n = 136) and 2. lowered ABPI (< 0.9) (n = 35). The mean follow-up was 26 months.

RESULTS

The presence of PVD was 20.5 %. Patients with PVD were older (p < 0.05), more often of female sex (p < 0.05), had higher Higgins's risk score (p = 0.001) and more often intermittent claudication (IC) (p < 0.001). PVD significantly predicted atrial fibrillation (FA) (p < 0.05) and relatively postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of PVD is relatively high in CABG patients and increases with age. PVD predicts some morbidity but seems to have fairly little influence on short-term or middle-term outcome of CABG patients. ABPI may be of only limited value in identifying patients with high operative risk in CABG.