Radiofrequency ablation at the coronary sinus ostium interrupts the vagal efferent input to the atrioventricular node in the canine heart

Atrioventricular Node Slow-Pathway Ablation Reduces Atrial Fibrillation Inducibility: A Neuronal Mechanism

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia appears to reduce atrial tachycardia, which might relate to parasympathetic denervation at cardiac ganglionated plexuses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Compared to 7 control canines without RFA, in 14 canines, RFA at the bottom of Koch's triangle attenuated vagal stimulation-induced effective refractory periods prolongation in atrioventricular nodal and discontinuous atrioventricular conduction curves but had no effect on the sinoatrial node. RFA attenuated vagal stimulation-induced atrial effective refractory periods shortening and vulnerability window of atrial fibrillation widening in the inferior right atrium and proximal coronary sinus but not in the high right atrium and distal coronary sinus. Moreover, RFA anatomically impaired the epicardial ganglionated plexuses at the inferior vena cava‒inferior left atrial junction. This method was also investigated in 42 patients who had undergone ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, or 12 with an accessory pathway (AP) at the posterior septum (AP-PS), and 34 patients who had an AP at the free wall as control. In patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and AP-PS, RFA at the bottom of Koch's triangle prolonged atrial effective refractory periods and reduced vulnerability windows of atrial fibrillation widening at the inferior right atrium, distal coronary sinus and proximal coronary sinus but not the high right atrium. In patients with AP-free wall, RFA had no significant atrial effects.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA at the bottom of Koch's triangle attenuated local autonomic innervation in the atrioventricular node and atria, decreased vagal stimulation-induced discontinuous atrioventricular nodal conduction, and reduced atrial fibrillation inducibility due to impaired ganglionated plexuses. In patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia or AP-PS, RFA prolonged atrial effective refractory periods, and narrowed vulnerability windows of atrial fibrillation.

Effects of linear ablation at the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and inferior vena cava for atrial flutter on autonomic nervous activity: analysis of heart rate variability

Heart rate is largely affected by the autonomic nervous system. However, little is known about the anatomic pathway of autonomic nerve fibers innervating the sinus node. The present study: (1) evaluates the effects of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for common atrial flutter (AFL) on autonomic nervous function by using heart rate variability analysis, and (2) investigates the distribution of autonomic nerve pathways innervating the sinus node. Twelve patients with paroxysmal common atrial flutter who maintained sinus rhythm both before and after radiofrequency ablation were selected for the study. Holter ambulatory recordings were performed before and after (2.3 +/- 1.0 days) radiofrequency ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus. Heart rate and time domain (SDANN, rMSSD, pNN50) and frequency domain (low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF), LF/HF) analysis of heart rate variability were compared before and after ablation. Mean heart rate did not change significantly after ablation (59 +/- 6 vs 61 +/- 9 beats/min); parasympathetic indices of heart rate variability (SDANN, rMSSD, pNN50, HF) did not change significantly (110 +/- 37 vs 117 +/- 20 ms; 32 +/- 21 vs 28 +/- 9 ms; 4.8 +/- 0.9 vs 4.7 +/- 0.71n(ms2)); and sympathetic indices of heart rate variability (LF/HF) did not change significantly (1.1 +/- 0.2 vs 1.2 +/- 0.1). Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter did not significantly change heart rate and heart rate variability because parasympathetic and sympathetic fibers innervating the sinus node are scarce in this region.