The excitatory and inhibitory innervation of the stomachs of the domestic fowl

Development of vagal innervation to the muscle of the avian gizzard

The development of the vagal innervation to the gizzard has been investigated in chick embryos and young chicks. The membrane potential, first measurable on the 15th day of incubation, was -54 +/- 0.5 mV and increased with development to -67 +/- 0.4 mV. The latter value was attained 5 days after hatching and persisted thereafter. Stimulation of intramural nerves elicited a cholinergic, excitatory junction potential (EJP) for the first time, only in a small fraction of cells, on the 20th day of incubation. Within 3 days after hatching, cholinergic transmission showed the same features as in older chicks. Stimulation of the vagus nerve elicited no membrane potential responses before hatching but as early as 4 days after hatching, non-adrenergic, inhibitory junction potentials (IJPs) were evoked. In the next 10 days or so, the IJP was replaced with a cholinergic EJP as seen in mature tissues. After atropine (0.1-1 microM) treatment, both vagal and intramural nerve stimulation evoked a non-adrenergic IJP in a small fraction of cells immediately after hatching. The fraction of cells exhibiting the IJP increased with growth and reached 100% 5 days after hatching. Hexamethonium (50 or 100 microM) abolished the vagally-evoked EJPs. The vagally-evoked IJPs remained unchanged after application of hexamethonium in the early days after hatching, but later they were abolished in about half of the cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The avian oesophageal motor function and its nervous control: some physiological, pharmacological and comparative aspects

1. This paper deals with the avian oesophageal motor function and it attempts to draw some comparative aspects between neural regulation of the avian and mammalian oesophagus. 2. Different from the mammalian oesophagus, the avian oesophagus, presents at rest electrical activity associated to spontaneous contractions. 3. Swallowing elicits peristaltic contraction, characterized by an inhibitory and an excitatory component. 4. Non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic neurons are responsible for the inhibitory component. 5. Contrarily to what observed in mammals, where the peripheral mechanism are important for the peristaltic sequence, the primary peristaltism of birds seems to be entirely mediated by extrinsic nervous system.

Topographic representation of visceral target organs within the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve of the pigeon Columba livia

Our previous work (Katz and Karten, '83a J. Comp. Neurol. 217:31-46 demonstrated that the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve (DMN complex) in the pigeon is composed of cytoarchitecturally distinct subnuclei that are distinguished by the size, shape, position, and cytochemical characteristics of their constituent neurons. In view of the diversity of target organs innervated by the vagus nerve, we sought to determine whether the subnuclear heterogeneity of the DMN complex is related to the pattern of target innervation. To test this possibility, retrograde tracing techniques were used to define the subnuclear localization of vagal motoneurons that innervate individual vagal target organs. The distribution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled motoneurons within the DMN complex was studied following application of HRP to the cut central end of individual vagal nerve branches and after injection of the tracer into vagal target tissues. In addition, we examined the distribution of acetylcholinesterase depletion within the DMN complex following transection of individual vagal branches. Our data demonstrate that individual vagal target organs have discrete and topographic representations within cytoarchitecturally distinct subnuclei of the DMN complex. Therefore, in the pigeon, the subnuclear distribution of vagal motoneurons plays a critical role in the organization of descending vagal motor pathways. Segregation of visceral representations within the DMN complex may provide a mechanism for organizing functionally diverse afferent inputs to target-specific populations of vagal motoneurons.

Presynaptic inhibitory effects of catecholamines on cholinergic transmission in the smooth muscle of the chick stomach

In the vagus nerve--smooth muscle preparation isolated from the chick proventriculus, adrenaline, clonidine (10(-8) - 2.5 x 10(-7) M), noradrenaline (10(-7) - 2.5 x 10(-6) M) and dopamine (10(-5) - 10(-4) M) inhibited the contraction induced by low frequency (0.5 Hz) stimulation of the vagus nerve, but they did not inhibit the contraction elicited by acetylcholine (5 x 10(-8) - 5 x 10(-7) M). The concentration producing 50% inhibition was 10(-7) M for adrenaline and clonidine, 10(-6) M for noradrenaline, and 5 x 10(-5) M for dopamine. Isoproterenol (5 x 10(-8) - 5 x 10(-7) M) inhibited the responses induced by both stimulation of the vagus nerve and acetylcholine. The inhibitory effects of the catecholamine and clonidine were blocked by phentolamine (2.7 x 10(-6) M) but not by 5-(3-tert-Butylamino-2-hydroxy)-propoxy-3, 4-dihydrocarbostyril hydrochloride (OPC 1085) which blocked the effect of isoproterenol. It is suggested that presynaptic alpha-receptors are present in the myenteric plexus of the chick proventriculus, and that the catecholamines and clonidine exert their inhibitory effects on cholinergic transmission via these receptors.

Comparative studies of purinergic nerves

Purinergic nerves supply the gastrointestinal tract of vertebrates, including fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds, as well as mammals. Their cell bodies are located in Auerbach's plexus and their axons extend in an anal direction before innervating mainly the circular muscle coat. In the stomach they are controlled by preganglionic cholinergic fibres of parasympathetic origin. They are involved in "receptive relaxation" of the stomach, "descending inhibition" in peristalsis and reflex relaxation of oesophageal and internal anal sphincters. The terminal varicosities of purinergic nerves are characterised by a predominance of "large opaque vesicles," which can be distinguished from the "large granular vesicles" found in small numbers in both adrenergic and cholinergic nerves. Stimulation of purinergic nerves with single pulses produces hyperpolarisations of up to 25 mV (inhibitory junction potentials) in smooth muscle cells. These potentials are unaffected by atropine, adrenergic neuron blocking agents or sympathetic denervation, but are abolished by tetrodotoxin. The "rebound contraction" which characteristically follows cessation of purinergic nerve stimulation is probably due to prostaglandin. Evidence that ATP is the transmitter released from purinergic nerves includes: (1) synthesis and storage of ATP in nerves; (2) release of ATP from the nerves when they are stimulated; (3) exogenously applied ATP mimicking the action of nerve-released transmitter, both producing a specific increase in K+ conductance; (4) the presence of Mg-activated ATPase, 5'-nucleotidase and adenosine deaminase, enzymes which inactivate ATP; (5) drugs (including quinidine, some 2-substituted imidazolines, 2-2'pyridylisatogen and dipyridamole) which produce similar blocking or potentiating effects on the response to exogenously applied ATP and nerve stimulation. Speculations are made about the evolution and development of the nervous system, including the possibility that purinergic nerves are a primitive nerve type.