A novel modified tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), E6010, gradually increases coronary blood flow after thrombolysis compared with native t-PA, urokinase and balloon catheter occlusion-reperfusion

2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review available evidence and establish guidelines related to the use of thrombolytics for the management of small animals with suspected or confirmed thrombosis.

DESIGN

PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome) questions were formulated, and worksheets completed as part of a standardized and systematic literature evaluation. The population of interest included dogs and cats (considered separately) and arterial and venous thrombosis. The interventions assessed were the use of thrombolytics, compared to no thrombolytics, with or without anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Specific protocols for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were also evaluated. Outcomes assessed included efficacy and safety. Relevant articles were categorized according to level of evidence, quality, and as to whether they supported, were neutral to, or opposed the PICO questions. Conclusions from the PICO worksheets were used to draft guidelines, which were subsequently refined via Delphi surveys undertaken by the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) working group.

RESULTS

Fourteen PICO questions were developed, generating 14 guidelines. The majority of the literature addressing the PICO questions in dogs is experimental studies (level of evidence 3), thus providing insufficient evidence to determine if thrombolysis improves patient-centered outcomes. In cats, literature was more limited and often neutral to the PICO questions, precluding strong evidence-based recommendations for thrombolytic use. Rather, for both species, suggestions are made regarding considerations for when thrombolytic drugs may be considered, the combination of thrombolytics with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs, and the choice of thrombolytic agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial additional research is needed to address the role of thrombolytics for the treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis in dogs and cats. Clinical trials with patient-centered outcomes will be most valuable for addressing knowledge gaps in the field.

Comparative study of a mutant tissue-type plasminogen activator, YM866, with a tissue-type plasminogen activator in a canine model of femoral arterial thrombosis

Because tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), used to treat myocardial infarction, has several disadvantages thought to be connected with its low half-life, mutants of tPA have been prepared with longer half-lives. We have compared the thrombolytic effect of such a mutant, YM866, with that of tPA in copper-coil-induced femoral arterial thrombosis in dogs. One hour after thrombus formation, YM866 was administered by intravenous bolus injection, while tPA was given by the same method or by 60-min infusion under adequate heparinization. Both agents exhibited dose-dependent thrombolysis without systemic fibrinogenolysis. The recanalization rate and recanalization time of YM866 by bolus at 0.2 mg kg-1 were, however, equivalent to those of tPA by infusion at 0.4 mg kg-1 (total dose), whereas the recanalization rate of tPA by bolus was low (0.4 mg kg-1). No significant difference in reocclusion rate, reocclusion time, or patency status after successful thrombolysis was seen. These results suggest that YM866 administered at a lower dose by intravenous bolus injection exerted a thrombolytic effect equivalent to that of tPA by infusion, and that heparin could not prevent reocclusion after successful thrombolysis even under adequate anticoagulation.