The lipophilic properties of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors do not influence their diffusion through cultured endothelium

Acidity, lipophilicity, solubility, absorption, and polar surface area of some ACE inhibitors

Computational chemical methods have been used to correlate the molecular properties of the 10 ACE inhibitors (captopril, enalapril, perindopril, lisinopril, ramipril, trandolapril, quinapril, fosinopril, benazepril, and cilazapril) and some of their active metabolites (enalaprilat, perindoprilat, ramiprilat, trandolaprilat, quinaprilat, fosinoprilat, benazeprilat, and cilazaprilat). The computed pK a values correlate well with the available experimental values. In the dicarboxylic ACE inhibitors, the carboxyalkyl carboxylate group of the ACE inhibitors studied is more acidic than the C-terminal carboxylate. However, at physiological pH = 7.4 both carboxyl groups of ACE inhibitors are completely ionized and the dicarboxyl-containing ACE inhibitors behave as strong acids. The available experimental partition coefficients of these ACE inhibitors investigated are well reproduced by the neural network-based ALOGPs and the fragment-based KoWWiN methods. All parent drugs (and prodrugs), with the exception of fosinopril, are compounds with low lipophilicity. Calculated pK a, lipophilicity, solubility, absorption, and polar surface area of the most effective ACE inhibitors for the prevention of myocardial infarction, perindopril and ramipril, were found similar. Therefore, it is probable that the experimentally observed differences in the survival benefits in the first year after acute myocardial infarction in patients 65 years of age or older correlate closely to the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the specific ACE inhibitor that is used.

Significant target organs for hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

To clarify the mechanisms by which angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors lower blood pressure or inhibit cardiac hypertrophy, we analyzed the correlations among tissue ACE activities, blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy. In spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), blood pressure, heart weight and ACE activities in plasma and various tissues were measured 3, 24 and 48 h after repeated daily treatment for 2 weeks with the ACE inhibitors trandolapril, perindopril, temocapril and enalapril. For all four ACE inhibitors, blood pressure and ACE activities in the plasma, aorta and kidney were significantly reduced 3 h after the last treatment. Although hypotensive effects were maintained at 24 h, ACE activities in plasma were not suppressed by temocapril and enalapril. Even at 3 h, enalapril could not suppress ACE activity in the brain, and temocapril and enalapril could not inhibit ACE activities in the heart. Significant correlations between ACE activity in the aorta and blood pressure were observed for all four ACE inhibitors, while the ACE activities in the heart and brain were not correlated with changes in blood pressure. Significant decreases in the ratio of heart weight to body weight were observed in SHR treated with trandolapril and perindopril, whereas they were not observed with temocapril and enalapril. The ratio of heart weight to body weight was significantly correlated with ACE activity in the heart. ACE activities in vascular tissues and the heart may be important targets in terms of the ability of ACE inhibitors to lower blood pressure or inhibit cardiac hypertrophy, respectively.

Can angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reverse atherosclerosis?

Angiotensin II, a potent vasoconstrictor, is mainly present in the vascular endothelium. Multiple studies have confirmed that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which block the formation of angiotensin II, lower blood pressure and also improve heart failure. These agents not only have beneficial hemodynamic effects but also bestow additional benefits on vascular function and prevent clinical cardiovascular events in patients at risk for coronary artery disease. These latter benefits may represent effects of ACE inhibitors on local endocrine pathways, inflammatory processes, and atherosclerosis taking place within the arterial wall. Current evidence suggests that, although ACE inhibitors may not substantially reverse atherosclerotic plaque already present, they may slow the progression of such atherosclerotic lesions. In addition, by modulating inflammatory pathways within and adjacent to the atherosclerotic lesion, they may stabilize an unstable plaque and therefore decrease the risk of plaque rupture and its complications.

Treatment of congestive heart failure a neuroendocrine disorder

The understanding of heart failure is no longer based on a supply and demand model of pump failure. Rather, heart failure is seen as a complex pathophysiological process with activation of various neuroendocrine systems. The goals of treatment have changed towards modifying these counterproductive neuroendocrine systems and slowing myocardial maladaptation. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are the only licensed drugs in veterinary practice that have a direct effect on neurohormones in heart failure. The range of drug options in human medicine is greater and some of these drugs are also increasingly being used in veterinary cardiology practice. This review describes the neuroendocrine systems involved in heart failure and discusses the range of drugs available in human and veterinary medicine. In doing so, it concentrates on the evidence available from good quality randomised trials in both the veterinary field and, where relevant, the human medical field.

Myocardial uptake and biochemical and hemodynamic effects of ACE inhibitors in humans

There is little information on the processes affecting selective tissue ACE inhibition and the implications in human subjects. We compared intravenously administered ACE inhibitors, perindoprilat and enalaprilat, for myocardial drug uptake and effects on angiotensin and bradykinin peptides versus hemodynamic effects in 25 patients with stable angina and well-preserved left ventricular systolic function. Myocardial uptake was rapid and more efficient for perindoprilat than for enalaprilat (peak content at 26+/-3 and 30+/-4 seconds, 0.58+/-0.12% and 0.27+/-0.07% of the administered dose for perindoprilat and enalaprilat, respectively, P=0.04 for difference). Both drugs caused a decrease in angiotensin (Ang) II level, an increase in Ang I level, and reduction in Ang II/Ang I ratio in arterial and coronary sinus blood. Bradykinin (BK)-(1-9) and BK-(1-8) levels increased in arterial blood and BK-(1-8) levels increased in coronary sinus blood after drug administration. Perindoprilat and enalaprilat caused a small decrease in mean arterial pressure (-3+/-1%, P<0.05; and -4+/-1%, P<0.01, respectively) and LV+dP/dt (-5.8+/-1.7%, P<0.01 and -4.2+/-2.8%, P<0.05, respectively), whereas systemic vascular resistance index was unchanged. Despite relatively cardioselective uptake of perindoprilat, both drugs had similar effects on the cardiac metabolism of angiotensin and bradykinin and on cardiac function. Under resting conditions, both drugs exerted small negative inotropic effects.

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition increases cardiac catecholamine content and reduces monoamine oxidase activity via an angiotensin type 1 receptor-mediated mechanism

Antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are well established and have usually been attributed to the inhibition of angiotensin II (ANG)-mediated effects at vascular or ventricular (angiotensin type 1) AT(1) receptors. One other important mechanism involves ANG-induced interactions with the sympathetic nervous system, which might include alterations of cardiac catecholamine concentrations during ACE inhibition due to a modulation of monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity. Tissue catecholamines were studied in spontaneously hypertensive rats that were long-term treated with captopril (50 or 0.5 mg/kg/day), enalapril (10 or 0.1 mg/kg/day), an AT(1) receptor antagonist (candesartan-cilexetil, 3 mg/kg/day), or a calcium antagonist (mibefradil, 18 mg/kg/day). The kinetic parameters of MAO were then determined in vitro in the presence of ANG, captopril, enalaprilat, or candesartan. Noradrenaline and adrenaline contents were doubled in the left ventricle by captopril, enalapril, or candesartan independently of hypotensive potency but not in liver or cortex. In parallel, cardiac MAO activity was reduced by all doses of captopril (49/29%), enalapril (52/24%), or candesartan (38%). Mibefradil, which does not interact with the renin-angiotensin system, did not alter cardiac catecholamines or MAO activity when an equipotent antihypertensive dose was applied. In vitro MAO activity was not influenced by ANG, enalaprilat, or captopril at concentrations of up to 1 mM. It is concluded that diminished AT(1) receptor stimulation decreases cardiac MAO activity, probably by regulating MAO expression, since ANG, ACE inhibitors, and AT(1) antagonists had no effect on MAO activity in vitro. This action contributes to an increase in cardiac catecholamine content that may improve cardiac sympathetic control during therapy.