Effects of S-nitroso-cysteine on proteins that regulate exocytosis in PC12 cells: inhibitory effects on translocation of synaptophysin and ADP-ribosylation of GTP-binding proteins

Nitric oxide inhibits depolarization-evoked glutamate release from rat cerebellar granule cells

Nitric oxide (NO) modulates the release of various neurotransmitters, some of these are considered to be involved in neuronal plasticity that includes long-term depression in the cerebellum. To date, there have been no reports on the modulation of the exocytotic release of neurotransmitters in the cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) by NO. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of NO on the exocytotic release of glutamate from rat CGCs. Treatment with NO-related reagents revealed that NO inhibited high-K(+)-evoked glutamate release. Clostridium botulinum type B neurotoxin (BoNT/B) attenuated the enhancement of glutamate release caused by NO synthase (NOS) inhibition; this indicates that NO acts on the high-K(+)-evoked exocytotic pathway. cGMP-related reagents did not affect the high-K(+)-evoked glutamate release. NO-related reagents did not affect Ca(2+) ionophore-induced glutamate release, suggesting that NO inhibits Ca(2+) entry through voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels (VDCC). Monitoring of intracellular Ca(2+) revealed that NO inhibited high-K(+)-evoked Ca(2+) entry. L-type VDCC blockers inhibited glutamate release and NO did not have an additive effect on the inhibition produced by the L-type VDCC blocker. The inhibition of the high-K(+)-evoked glutamate release by NO was abolished by a reducing reagent; this suggested that NO regulates the high-K(+)-evoked glutamate release from CGCs by redox modulation.

S-nitrosothiols modulate G protein-coupled receptor signaling in a reversible and highly receptor-specific manner

Background

Recent studies indicate that the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling machinery can serve as a direct target of reactive oxygen species, including nitric oxide (NO) and S-nitrosothiols (RSNOs). To gain a broader view into the way that receptor-dependent G protein activation – an early step in signal transduction – might be affected by RSNOs, we have studied several receptors coupling to the G_i family of G proteins in their native cellular environment using the powerful functional approach of [³⁵S]GTPγS autoradiography with brain cryostat sections in combination with classical G protein activation assays.

Results

We demonstrate that RSNOs, like S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and S-nitrosocysteine (CysNO), can modulate GPCR signaling via reversible, thiol-sensitive mechanisms probably involving S-nitrosylation. RSNOs are capable of very targeted regulation, as they potentiate the signaling of some receptors (exemplified by the M2/M4 muscarinic cholinergic receptors), inhibit others (P2Y₁₂ purinergic, LPA₁lysophosphatidic acid, and cannabinoid CB₁ receptors), but may only marginally affect signaling of others, such as adenosine A₁, μ-opioid, and opiate related receptors. Amplification of M2/M4 muscarinic responses is explained by an accelerated rate of guanine nucleotide exchange, as well as an increased number of high-affinity [³⁵S]GTPγS binding sites available for the agonist-activated receptor. GSNO amplified human M4 receptor signaling also under heterologous expression in CHO cells, but the effect diminished with increasing constitutive receptor activity. RSNOs markedly inhibited P2Y₁₂ receptor signaling in native tissues (rat brain and human platelets), but failed to affect human P2Y₁₂ receptor signaling under heterologous expression in CHO cells, indicating that the native cellular signaling partners, rather than the P2Y₁₂ receptor protein, act as a molecular target for this action.

Conclusion

These in vitro studies show for the first time in a broader general context that RSNOs are capable of modulating GPCR signaling in a reversible and highly receptor-specific manner. Given that the enzymatic machinery responsible for endogenous NO production is located in close proximity with the GPCR signaling complex, especially with that for several receptors whose signaling is shown here to be modulated by exogenous RSNOs, our data suggest that GPCR signaling in vivo is likely to be subject to substantial, and highly receptor-specific modulation by NO-derived RSNOs.

Possible involvement of amino acid transporters on S-nitroso-cysteine-induced inhibition of arachidonic acid release in PC12 cells

Previously, we proposed that S-nitroso-cysteine (SNC) was incorporated via the L-type-like amino acid transporters in rat brain slices. In PC12 cells (rat neuronal cell line), SNC inhibited [(3)H]arachidonic acid (AA) release induced by mastoparan (wasp venom peptide). We investigated the involvement of amino acid transporters on SNC-induced inhibition of [(3)H]AA release in PC12 cells. SNC inhibited mastoparan-stimulated [(3)H]AA release in a concentration-dependent manner in normal Na(+)- and low Na(+)-containing buffer. The inhibitory effect of 0.6 mM SNC in low Na(+) buffer decreased by 10 mM L-leucine, L-phenylalanine, L-methionine and L-cysteine. In contrast, L-alanine, L-threonine, L-valine or L-isoleucine showed very limited effects. Addition of L-leucine and L-phenylalanine, but not L-alanine or L-valine, also decreased the inhibitory effect of SNC on ionomycin/Na(3)VO(4)-stimulated [(3)H]AA release in normal Na(+) buffer. These findings suggest that SNC is incorporated via the amino acid transporters and inhibits AA release in PC12 cells.