Apolipoproteins C-II and C-III as nutritional markers unaffected by inflammation

BACKGROUND

Rapid turnover proteins (RTPs), such as transthyretin (TTR), retinol binding protein (RBP), and transferrin (Tf), provide an accurate assessment of nutritional status but are susceptible to inflammation. Lipid-related markers, which have short half-lives in serum, may be better suited for nutritional assessment. We sought to identify sensitive nutritional markers unaffected by inflammation.

METHODS

Fasting serum samples were collected from 30 malnourished inpatients and 25 healthy volunteers. Malnourished inpatients were divided into 2 groups: a low-C-reactive protein (CRP) group (CRP < 20 mg/l, n = 15) and a high-CRP group (CRP ≥ 20 mg/l, n = 15). Lipid-related markers, traditional nutritional markers, RTPs, micronutrients, and ketone bodies were measured and compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Apolipoprotein (Apo)C-II and ApoC-III concentrations were lower in malnourished inpatients than in the control group. There was no significant difference in ApoC-II and ApoC-III between the low- and high-CRP groups. Carnitine transporters and ketone bodies did not show a significant difference among the three groups. Albumin, TTR, RBP, and Tf concentrations were lowest in the high-CRP group, intermediate in the low-CRP group, and highest in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that ApoC-II and ApoC-III are appropriate nutritional biomarkers unaffected by inflammation.

Adiponectin levels in Brazilian adolescents: Distribution and associated factors in ERICA survey

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of adiponectin and associated factors with low adiponectin levels in a large sample of adolescents from different Brazilian regions.

METHODS

This is a national, school-based, cross-sectional multicenter study of cardiovascular risk factors in Brazilian adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Serum adiponectin levels (μg/ml) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Given the lack of reference values, sex-and age-specific median was adopted as the cutoff point, with the values below the median representing a higher-risk profile. Associated factors with low levels of adiponectin were investigated using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 4546 adolescents, the majority female (61.2%). The prevalence of overweight/obesity and abdominal obesity was 30% and 13.4%, respectively. The medians of adiponectin were 13.4 μg/ml (95%CI: 12.8-14.0) in males and 14.2 μg/ml (95%CI: 13.3-15.0) in females. Lower adiponectin levels were associated with both overweight (Prevalence Ratios (PR) = 1.17; 95%CI 1.01-1.36) and obesity (PR = 1.36; 95%CI 1.16-1.56) in males, while, in females, adiponectin levels were associated only with obesity (PR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.26-1.66). Increased waist circumference in both males and females was inversely associated with adiponectin level.

CONCLUSIONS

Adiponectin levels were lower among adolescents with weight excess and abdominal obesity. Male adolescents who live in rural areas and study at private schools also showed lower adiponectin concentrations.

Early changes in adipokines from overweight to obesity in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

Childhood obesity has been associated with metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to compare plasma levels of traditional metabolic markers, adipokines and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type 1 (sTNFR1) in overweight, obese and lean children. We also assessed the relationships of these molecules with classical metabolic risk factors.

METHODS

This study included 104 children and adolescents, which were grouped as: lean (n=24), overweight (n=30), and obese subjects (n=50). They were subjected to anthropometrical, clinical and laboratorial measurements. All measurements were compared between groups. Correlation analyses were also performed to evaluate the association between clinical data, traditional metabolic markers, adipokines and sTNFR1.

RESULTS

Fasting glucose, insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides were comparable in lean, overweight and obese subjects. Plasma levels of sTNFR1 were similar in lean and overweight subjects, but significantly increased in obese group. Leptin, adiponectin and resistin levels did not differ when overweight were compared to obese subjects. However, all adipokines differed significantly when lean subjects were compared to overweight and obese individuals. Plasma levels of adiponectin were negatively correlated with body mass index (BMI), whereas leptin, resistin and sTNFR1 concentrations positively correlated with BMI.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed significant differences in circulating levels of the evaluated markers when lean, overweight and obese individuals were compared, suggesting that these biomarkers may change from lean to overweight and from overweight to obesity.