Evaluation of the new Abbott®Alinity assay for the measurement of thyroglobulin antibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Measurement of antithyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) is important in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with total thyroidectomy. These patients are monitored based on serum thyroglobulin (Tg) levels. TgAb is known to interfere with the measurement of Tg by immunoassay. This study evaluates a new methodology for the measurement of TgAb Alinity Abbott® and the concordance with other methods (first and second generation Advia Centaur Systems Siemens® and Phadia 250 Thermofisher®).

METHODS

The technical characteristics of Alinity TgAb measurement methodology were analysed, with imprecision and repeatable studies. In order to assess concordance, a minimum of 69 and a maximum of 76 samples from patients with DTC and total thyroidectomy were processed in parallel by several TgAb measurement methodologies. Agreement rates were determined using kappa statistics. The correlation between the four methods was examined pairwise using McNemar test analysis.

RESULTS

The coefficients of variation (standard deviation as a percentage of the mean % CV) for the Alinity Abbott kit reagent TgAb were within 10% included the functional sensitivity. On the other hand, the concordance analysis with the kappa index concluded substantial agreement. The McNemar test showed a significant difference between Alinity versus Centaur second generation (difference 8.33%, CI 95% 0.68-8.33, p = .0313).

CONCLUSION

The new methodology for the measurement of TgAb meets the imprecision standards while presenting an adequate concordance agreement with other methodologies available in laboratories. It is important to define the functional sensitivity when reporting results so that they are as reliable as possible.

Serum antithyroglobulin antibody levels are not a good predictive factor on detection of disease activity in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

Objective

Thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) are detected in thyroid cancer patients up to 25%. We investigated the prognostic value of TgAb positivity in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) after initial therapy.

Patients and Methods

A database of 109 consecutive patients who underwent total thyroidectomy and therapeutic lateral neck dissection followed by remnant ablation for PTC between January 1989 and December 2014 was reviewed We recorded the patients' all serum Tg and TgAb levels over time to establish changing trends. Patients were classified as either positive or negative according to serum TgAb levels. The recurrence or persistence rates in both groups were compared.

Results

Of the 109 patients enrolled 14 patients had TgAb positivity. Thirty-two (29.3%) showed disease recurrence or persistent disease during 101 months of follow-up. Twenty-seven of 95 patients (28.4%) with negative TgAb had persistent or recurrent disease, whereas 5 of 14 patients (35.7%) with positive TgAb had persistence or recurrence (P = 0.57). No significant difference in disease-free survival (115.3 ± 10.8 vs. 224.1 ± 16.6 months, P = 0.78) and overall survival (P = 0.59) was observed between TgAb positive and TgAb negative patients.

Conclusions

TgAb status is not useful as a prognostic and predictive factor for clinical outcomes in patients with PTC in our experience.

Low-Dose Radioiodine Ablation in Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

AIM

Based on the response criteria of the 2015 American Thyroid Associations guidelines, our objectives were to -determine the response rate when using a low dose of -131-I GBq in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (LRDTC) and the influence of clinical and analytical variables on the prediction of complete response.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre and longitudinal study, including patients who were operated for LRDTC and who underwent radioiodine remnant ablation with a low-dose of 131-I. All patients were assessed at 6-12 months, and their status was classified as complete (excellent response) or incomplete response (structural incomplete, biochemical incomplete or indeterminate response). Various factors including age, gender, histology, tumour focality and size, stage, time from surgery to treatment, type of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation, preablation serum thyroglobulin (pTg), antiTg antibodies (pAntiTgAb) and TSH (pTSH) levels were also analysed in order to predict the complete response rate.

RESULTS

Of 108 patients, 79.6$ achieved complete response and the remaining showed incomplete response (2.9, 5.5 and 12$ due to biochemical incomplete, structural incomplete and indeterminate response respectively). Six patients received a new dose of 131-I. Tumour size and pAntiTgAb were the only factors related to therapeutic response (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). However, pAntiTgAb was the only independent factor related to complete -response. Patients with complete response showed lower pTg than those with incomplete response (5.1 ± 12.9 vs. 11.2 ± 25 ng/mL) although without statistical significance (p = 0.14). There was no significant difference in the response rate depending on the thyrotropin stimulation methods.

CONCLUSIONS

A low dose of 131-I was sufficient for reaching a complete response at 6-12 months of follow-up in the majority of patients with LRDTC. Tumour size and pAntiTgAb variables were related to therapeutic response.

Definition of the upper reference limit for thyroglobulin antibodies according to the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry guidelines: comparison of eleven different automated methods

Purpose

In the last two decades, thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb) measurement has progressively switched from marker of thyroid autoimmunity to test associated with thyroglobulin (Tg) to verify the presence or absence of TgAb interference in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Of note, TgAb measurement is cumbersome: despite standardization against the International Reference Preparation MRC 65/93, several studies demonstrated high inter-method variability and wide variation in limits of detection and in reference intervals. Taking into account the above considerations, the main aim of the present study was the determination of TgAb upper reference limit (URL), according to the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry guidelines, through the comparison of eleven commercial automated immunoassay platforms.

Methods

The sera of 120 healthy males, selected from a population survey in the province of Verona, Italy, were tested for TgAb concentration using eleven IMA applied on as many automated analyzers: AIA-2000 (AIA) and AIA-CL2400 (CL2), Tosoh Bioscience; Architect (ARC), Abbott Diagnostics; Advia Centaur XP (CEN) and Immulite 2000 XPi (IMM), Siemens Healthineers; Cobas 6000 (COB), Roche Diagnostics; Kryptor (KRY), Thermo Fisher Scientific BRAHMS, Liaison XL (LIA), Diasorin; Lumipulse G (LUM), Fujirebio; Maglumi 2000 Plus (MAG), Snibe and Phadia 250 (PHA), Phadia AB, Thermo Fisher Scientific. All assays were performed according to manufacturers’ instructions in six different laboratories in Friuli-Venezia Giulia and Veneto regions of Italy [Lab 1 (AIA), Lab 2 (CL2), Lab 3 (ARC, COB and LUM), Lab 4 (CEN, IMM, KRY and MAG), Lab 5 (LIA) and Lab 6 (PHA)]. Since TgAb values were not normally distributed, the experimental URL (e-URL) was established at 97.5 percentile according to the non-parametric method.

Results

TgAb e-URLs showed a significant inter-method variability. Considering the same method, e-URL was much lower than that suggested by manufacturers (m-URL), except for ARC and MAG. Correlation and linear regression were unsatisfactory. Consequently, the agreement between methods was poor, with significant bias in Bland–Altman plot.

Conclusions

Despite the efforts for harmonization, TgAb methods cannot be used interchangeably. Therefore, additional effort is required to improve analytical performance taking into consideration approved protocols and guidelines. Moreover, TgAb URL should be used with caution in the management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients since the presence and/or the degree of TgAb interference in Tg measurement has not yet been well defined.

Follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma

The aim of follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (CTD) is the assessment of remission, and, in further steps, the early recognition of patients who develop a recurrence. Tools for the follow-up of CTD include the assessment of thyroglobulin and imaging procedures. Thyroglobulin (Tg) is a strong marker of persistent or recurrent disease, but it must be known that Tg antibodies may give falsely low Tg concentration. TSH stimulation, mainly by the mean of recombinant human TSH, improves the sensitivity of Tg determination. New highly sensitive assays may preclude the need for TSH stimulation, at least in some situations. In the last decades, (131)iodine whole body scan gave place to neck ultrasonography (US) as the most performing imaging procedure in the follow-up of CTD. Criteria to identify cervical lymph node suspect of metastasis have been described, and standardized procedures proposed. Finally, the proof of tumoral invasion is brought by cytological analysis of fine needle biopsies of suspicious lymph nodes. (18)FDG PET is a valuable tool for diagnosis and prognosis in metastatic patients, especially with negative (131)I WBS. Initial response to therapy, assessed by Tg determination and neck US, allows re-stratification of the risk of relapse. According to this "reassessed risk", adapted rhythms and modalities of follow-up have been recently proposed.

2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules are a common clinical problem, and differentiated thyroid cancer is becoming increasingly prevalent. Since the American Thyroid Association's (ATA's) guidelines for the management of these disorders were revised in 2009, significant scientific advances have occurred in the field. The aim of these guidelines is to inform clinicians, patients, researchers, and health policy makers on published evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.

METHODS

The specific clinical questions addressed in these guidelines were based on prior versions of the guidelines, stakeholder input, and input of task force members. Task force panel members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database searching, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Published English language articles on adults were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians Guideline Grading System was used for critical appraisal of evidence and grading strength of recommendations for therapeutic interventions. We developed a similarly formatted system to appraise the quality of such studies and resultant recommendations. The guideline panel had complete editorial independence from the ATA. Competing interests of guideline task force members were regularly updated, managed, and communicated to the ATA and task force members.

RESULTS

The revised guidelines for the management of thyroid nodules include recommendations regarding initial evaluation, clinical and ultrasound criteria for fine-needle aspiration biopsy, interpretation of fine-needle aspiration biopsy results, use of molecular markers, and management of benign thyroid nodules. Recommendations regarding the initial management of thyroid cancer include those relating to screening for thyroid cancer, staging and risk assessment, surgical management, radioiodine remnant ablation and therapy, and thyrotropin suppression therapy using levothyroxine. Recommendations related to long-term management of differentiated thyroid cancer include those related to surveillance for recurrent disease using imaging and serum thyroglobulin, thyroid hormone therapy, management of recurrent and metastatic disease, consideration for clinical trials and targeted therapy, as well as directions for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed evidence-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. They represent, in our opinion, contemporary optimal care for patients with these disorders.

Does (131)I Radioactivity Interfere with Thyroglobulin Measurement in Patients Undergoing Radioactive Iodine Therapy with Recombinant Human TSH?

OBJECTIVES

Recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) is widely used in radioactive iodine therapy (RIT) to avoid side effects caused by hypothyroidism during the therapy. Owing to RIT with rhTSH, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) is measured with high (131)I concentrations. It is of concern that the relatively high energy of (131)I could interfere with Tg measurement using the immunoradiometric assay (IRMA). We investigated the effect of (131)I administration on Tg measurement with IRMA after RIT.

METHODS

A total of 67 patients with thyroid cancer were analysed retrospectively. All patients had undergone rhTSH stimulation for RIT. The patients' sera were sampled 2 days after (131)I administration and divided into two portions: for Tg measurements on days 2 and 32 after (131)I administration. The count per minute (CPM) of whole serum (200 μl) was also measured at each time point. Student's paired t-test and Pearson's correlation analyses were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Serum Tg levels were significantly concordant between days 2 and 32, irrespective of the serum CPM. Subgroup analysis was performed by classification based on the (131)I dose. No difference was noted between the results of the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

IRMA using (125)I did not show interference from (131)I in the serum of patients stimulated by rhTSH.

Thyroglobulin measurement by highly sensitive assays: focus on laboratory challenges

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine cancer and its incidence has increased in recent decades. The initial treatment consists of total thyroidectomy followed by ablation of thyroid remnants by radioiodine in most cases. As thyroid cells are the only source of thyroglobulin (Tg), circulating Tg serves as a biochemical marker of persistent or recurrent disease in the follow-up of DTC. Due to the suboptimal clinical detection rate of older Tg assays endogenous or exogenous thyrotropin (TSH) stimulations are recommended for unmasking occult disease. However, the development of new Tg assays with improved analytical sensitivity and precision at low concentrations now allows detection of very low Tg concentrations, reflecting minimal amounts of thyroid tissue, even without the need for TSH stimulation. Even if the use of these assays still has not found its way in current clinical guidelines, such assays are now increasingly used in clinical practice. As serum Tg measurement is a technically challenging assay and criteria to define a ‘highly sensitive’ assay may be different, a good knowledge of the technical difficulties and interpretation criteria is of paramount importance for both clinical thyroidologists, laboratory physicians and scientists involved in the care of DTC patients.

Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) monitoring of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer using sensitive (second-generation) immunometric assays can be disrupted by false-negative and false-positive serum thyroglobulin autoantibody misclassifications

CONTEXT

Reliable thyroglobulin (Tg) autoantibody (TgAb) detection before Tg testing for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is critical when TgAb status (positive/negative) is used to authenticate sensitive second-generation immunometric assay ((2G)IMA) measurements as free from TgAb interference and when reflexing "TgAb-positive" sera to TgAb-resistant, but less sensitive, Tg methodologies (radioimmunoassay [RIA] or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [LC-MS/MS]).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess how different Kronus (K) vs Roche (R) TgAb method cutoffs for "positivity" influence false-negative vs false-positive serum TgAb misclassifications that may reduce the clinical utility of reflex Tg testing.

METHODS

Serum Tg(2G)IMA, TgRIA, and TgLC-MS/MS measurements for 52 TgAb-positive and 37 TgAb-negative patients with persistent/recurrent DTC were compared. A total of 1426 DTC sera with TgRIA of ≥ 1.0 μg/L had false-negative and false-positive TgAb frequencies determined using low Tg(2G)IMA/TgRIA ratios (<75%) to indicate TgAb interference.

RESULTS

TgAb-negative patients with disease displayed Tg(2G)IMA, TgRIA, and TgLC-MS/MS serum discordances (% coefficient of variation = 24 ± 20%, range, 0%-100%). Of the TgAb-positive patients with disease, 98% had undetectable/lower Tg(2G)IMA vs either TgRIA or TgLC-MS/MS (P < .01), whereas 8 of 52 (15%) had undetectable Tg(2G)IMA + TgLC-MS/MS associated with TgRIA of ≥ 1.0 μg/L. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis reported more sensitivity for TgAb method K vs R (81.9% vs 69.1%, P < .001), but receiver operating characteristic curve cutoffs (>0.6 kIU/L [K] vs >40 kIU/L [R]) had unacceptably high false-negative frequencies (22%-32%), whereas false positives approximated 12%. Functional sensitivity cutoffs minimized false negatives (13.5% [K] vs 21.3% [R], P < .01) and severe interferences (Tg(2G)IMA, <0.10 μg/L) (0.7% [K] vs 2.4% [R], P < .05) but false positives approximated 23%.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable detection of interfering TgAbs is method and cutoff dependent. No cutoff eliminated both false-negative and false-positive TgAb misclassifications. Functional sensitivity cutoffs were optimal for minimizing false negatives but have inherent imprecision (20% coefficient of variation) that, exacerbated by TgAb biologic variability during DTC monitoring, could cause TgAb status to fluctuate for patients with low TgAb concentrations, prompting unnecessary Tg method changes and disrupting Tg monitoring. Laboratories using reflexing should limit Tg method changes by considering a patient's Tg + TgAb testing history in addition to current TgAb status before Tg method selection.

How sensitive (second-generation) thyroglobulin measurement is changing paradigms for monitoring patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, in the absence or presence of thyroglobulin autoantibodies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss new insights regarding how sensitive (second-generation) thyroglobulin immunometric assays (TgIMAs), (functional sensitivities ≤0.10 μg/L) necessitate different approaches for postoperative thyroglobulin monitoring of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), depending on the presence of thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAbs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Reliable low-range serum thyroglobulin measurement has both enhanced clinical utility and economic advantages, provided TgAb is absent (∼75% DTC patients). Basal [nonthyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulated] TgIMA measurement obviates the need for recombinant human TSH stimulation because basal TgIMA below 0.20 μg/L has comparable negative predictive value (>95%) to recombinant human TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin values below the cutoff of 2 μg/L. Now that radioiodine remnant ablation is no longer considered necessary to treat low-risk DTC, the trend and doubling time of low basal thyroglobulin values arising from postsurgical thyroid remnants have recognized prognostic significance. The major limitation of TgIMA testing is interference by TgAb (∼25% DTC patients), causing TgIMA underestimation that can mask disease. When TgAb is present, the trend in TgAb concentrations (measured by the same method) can serve as the primary (surrogate) tumor-marker and be augmented by thyroglobulin measured by a TgAb-resistant class of method (radioimmunoassay or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry).

SUMMARY

The growing use of TgIMA measurement is changing paradigms for postoperative DTC monitoring. When TgAb is absent, it is optimal to monitor the basal TgIMA trend and doubling time (using the same method) in preference to recombinant human TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin testing. When TgAb is present, interference renders TgIMA testing unreliable and the trend in serum TgAb concentrations per se (same method) can serve as a (surrogate) tumor-marker.

Thyroglobulin measurement using highly sensitive assays in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: a clinical position paper

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine cancer and its incidence has increased in recent decades. Initial treatment usually consists of total thyroidectomy followed by ablation of thyroid remnants by iodine-131. As thyroid cells are assumed to be the only source of thyroglobulin (Tg) in the human body, circulating Tg serves as a biochemical marker of persistent or recurrent disease in DTC follow-up. Currently, standard follow-up for DTC comprises Tg measurement and neck ultrasound combined, when indicated, with an additional radioiodine scan. Measurement of Tg after stimulation by endogenous or exogenous TSH is recommended by current clinical guidelines to detect occult disease with a maximum sensitivity due to the suboptimal sensitivity of older Tg assays. However, the development of new highly sensitive Tg assays with improved analytical sensitivity and precision at low concentrations now allows detection of very low Tg concentrations reflecting minimal amounts of thyroid tissue without the need for TSH stimulation. Use of these highly sensitive Tg assays has not yet been incorporated into clinical guidelines but they will, we believe, be used by physicians caring for patients with DTC. The aim of this clinical position paper is, therefore, to offer advice on the various aspects and implications of using these highly sensitive Tg assays in the clinical care of patients with DTC.

Development of thyroglobulin antibodies after GVAX immunotherapy is associated with prolonged survival

Cancer immunotherapy induces a variety of autoinflammatory responses, including those against the thyroid gland, which can be exploited to predict clinical outcomes. Considering the paucity of information about thyroid autoimmunity in patients receiving cancer vaccines, we designed our study to assess the development of thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAbs) in patients treated with GVAX (vaccine made of a tumor cell type transfected with GM-CSF) and/or ipilimumab and correlated seroconversion with survival. Using both in house and commercial ELISA assays, we measured TgAbs in patients with pancreatic (No. = 53), prostate (No. = 35) or colon (No. = 8) cancer, before and after treatment with GVAX only (No. = 34), GVAX plus ipilimumab (No. = 42) or ipilimumab (No. = 20), and correlated their levels with patient's survival, disease status and T-cell surface markers. Antibodies to thyroperoxidase, myeloperoxidase, proteinase 3, insulin and actin were also measured. TgAbs specifically developed after GVAX, independent of the underlying cancer (81% in prostate, 75% colon cancer and 76% pancreatic cancer) and co-administration of ipilimumab (75% in GVAX only and 78% in GVAX plus ipilimumab). This TgAbs seroconversion could be detected mainly by the in house assay, suggesting that the thyroglobulin epitopes recognized by the antibodies induced by GVAX are different from the epitopes seen in the classic form of Hashimoto thyroiditis. Notably, TgAbs seroconversion was associated with significantly prolonged survival (p = 0.01 for pancreas and p = 0.005 for prostate cancer). In conclusion, GVAX immunotherapy induces the appearance of TgAbs that recognize a unique antigenic repertoire and associate with prolonged survival.

Thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) methods - Strengths, pitfalls and clinical utility for monitoring TgAb-positive patients with differentiated thyroid cancer

Thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb) are detected at diagnosis or during treatment in approximately 25% of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). When present, TgAb interferes with thyroglobulin (Tg) measurement causing falsely low or undetectable Tg immunometric assay (IMA) values that can mask disease. Guidelines mandate that every Tg test have TgAb measured simultaneously and quantitatively by immunoassay and not a recovery test. The propensity and magnitude of TgAb-Tg interference relates to both Tg and TgAb concentrations and the class of Tg method used. Because the TgAb trend reflects changes in thyroid tissue mass, TgAb concentrations serve as a surrogate post-operative DTC tumor marker. A rising, or de novo appearance of TgAb may indicate recurrence, whereas a progressive decline suggests successful treatment. This review focuses on the technical limitations of current TgAb methods, characteristics of TgAb interference with different classes of Tg method, and the clinical value of monitoring TgAb trends as a surrogate DTC tumor marker.

Thyroglobulin autoantibodies in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of different assays and evaluation of causes of discrepancies

CONTEXT

Thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb) have been proposed as a surrogate marker of thyroglobulin in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Commercially available TgAb assays are often discordant. We investigated the causes of discrepancy.

DESIGN

TgAb were measured by three noncompetitive immunometric assays and three competitive RIA in 72 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and associated lymphocytic thyroiditis (PTC-T), 105 with papillary thyroid carcinoma and no lymphocytic thyroiditis (PTC), 160 with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and in 150 normal subjects. The results of the six assays were correlated. TgAb epitope pattern, evaluated by inhibition of serum TgAb binding to thyroglobulin by TgAb-Fab regions A, B, C, and D, were compared in sera which were positive in all six assays (concordant sera) and positive in only one to five assays (discordant sera) were compared. TgAb International Reference Preparation (IRP) was measured in 2007 and 2009.

RESULTS

The correlations of the six assays ranged from -0.01 to 0.93 and were higher in PTC-T and Hashimoto's thyroiditis than in PTC and normal subjects. Two uncorrelated components, one including the three immunometric assays, the other the three RIA, explained 40 and 37% of the total variance of the results of the six assays. The levels of inhibition were higher in concordant sera than in discordant sera by TgAb-Fab region B (27.0%, 21.2-34.0 vs. 6.0%, and 2.7-12.7%) and region C (30.5%, 21.3-37.7 vs. 4.0%, and 1.0-6.5%); thus, the epitope pattern was more homogeneous in concordant sera than in discordant sera. TgAb IRP ranged from 157 to 1088 (expected 1000) IU/ml in 2009; results in 2007 were similar in all but two assays.

CONCLUSIONS

TgAb assays are highly discordant. Discrepancy is lower when comparing assays with similar methodology. Results of TgAb from PTC-T are more concordant than those from PTC because their epitope pattern is more restricted. The internal standardization of TgAb is generally, but not completely, satisfactory.

Causes of discordance between thyroglobulin antibody assays

Background

Anti-thyroglobulin (Anti-Tg) assays show poor concordance.

Methods

We have investigated concordance and the causes of discordance between Abbott, Roche and Immulite Anti-Tg assays in 606 patients followed up for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The reference range (RR) or lower reporting limit (LRL) was used to classify samples as negative or positive.

Results

Anti-Tg prevalence ranged between 6% and 55% depending on the method and cut-off. Concordance was 45% using LRL and 75% using RR. Specimens between the RR and LRL using the Immulite and Roche assays were identified that were positive by the Abbott assay and showed poor recovery of Tg in the Tg assay. This suggests misclassification using the RR. Anti-Tg International Reference Preparation (IRP) concentrations measured by the Roche and Abbott methods agreed well but patient samples did not. This is likely to be due to the heterogeneity of Anti-Tg. The Immulite assay appeared less sensitive than the Abbott and Roche based on investigations using the IRP and the low prevalence of Anti-Tg in the DTC patients (6–8%). Interference by Tg (>1000 μg/L) in the Roche assay was also identified as a cause of assay discordance.

Conclusions

Anti-Tg is used as a tumour marker for DTC and to predict interference in Tg assays themselves and hence inform clinicians of reported Tg concentrations. We have identified several causes of Anti-Tg assay discordance. This includes variation in assay sensitivity and interference from Tg, the heterogeneity of Anti-Tg and the use of different cut-offs to classify samples as antibody-positive or -negative.

Can we interpret serum thyroglobulin results?

Thyroglobulin (Tg) is a tumour marker for differentiated thyroid cancer. Interpretation requires a knowledge of the current thyrotropin (TSH) concentration as secretion is TSH-dependent. While a raised serum Tg may be indicative of residual or recurrent thyroid cancer, trauma to the thyroid (e.g. surgical, biopsy or due to radioiodine treatment) also causes an increase. Tg may be measured when TSH is suppressed and also following recombinant TSH (rhTSH) stimulation. Interpretation of results in pregnancy and in children is discussed. Assay bias and interference by endogenous Tg antibodies (Abs) are the main confounders in the interpretation of results. Although there is an international standard for Tg, there are large differences in results and yet there are few assay-specific clinical decision limits. Patients should therefore be monitored with the same assay. Endogenous TgAbs may cause false-negative interference in immunometric assays and may cause false-positive results in radioimmunoassay. Although the measurement of TgAbs has been advocated for predicting interference, it is now clear that interference can still occur when TgAbs have not been detected, the effect being TgAb-assay-specific. Approaches to identifying those samples where there may be interference are discussed. The laboratory should have a protocol for the investigation of possible interferences and data on the bias of the Tg assay that they use. An appreciation of the clinical uses of the service is required as an understanding by endocrinologists, oncologists and endocrine surgeons of the analytical limitations of the service.