Cortez S, Dietrich MS, Wells N. Measuring Clinical Decision Support Influence on Evidence-Based Nursing Practice.
Oncol Nurs Forum 2016;
43:E170-7. [PMID:
27314200 DOI:
10.1188/16.onf.e170-e177]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES
To measure the effect of clinical decision support (CDS) on oncology nurse evidence-based practice (EBP).
.
DESIGN
Longitudinal cluster-randomized design.
.
SETTING
Four distinctly separate oncology clinics associated with an academic medical center.
.
SAMPLE
The study sample was comprised of randomly selected data elements from the nursing documentation software. The data elements were patient-reported symptoms and the associated nurse interventions. The total sample observations were 600, derived from a baseline, posteducation, and postintervention sample of 200 each (100 in the intervention group and 100 in the control group for each sample).
.
METHODS
The cluster design was used to support randomization of the study intervention at the clinic level rather than the individual participant level to reduce possible diffusion of the study intervention. An elongated data collection cycle (11 weeks) controlled for temporary increases in nurse EBP related to the education or CDS intervention.
.
MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES
The dependent variable was the nurse evidence-based documentation rate, calculated from the nurse-documented interventions. The independent variable was the CDS added to the nursing documentation software.
.
FINDINGS
The average EBP rate at baseline for the control and intervention groups was 27%. After education, the average EBP rate increased to 37%, and then decreased to 26% in the postintervention sample. Mixed-model linear statistical analysis revealed no significant interaction of group by sample. The CDS intervention did not result in an increase in nurse EBP.
.
CONCLUSIONS
EBP education increased nurse EBP documentation rates significantly but only temporarily. Nurses may have used evidence in practice but may not have documented their interventions.
.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING
More research is needed to understand the complex relationship between CDS, nursing practice, and nursing EBP intervention documentation. CDS may have a different effect on nurse EBP, physician EBP, and other medical professional EBP.
Collapse