Cost of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Determinants of Healthcare Costs in HIV-Infected Treatment-Naive Patients Initiated on Antiretroviral Therapy in Germany: Experiences of the PROPHET Study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the prospective clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes study of different first-line antiretroviral treatment strategies (PROPHET) was to examine the healthcare costs of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons in Germany treated with different antiretroviral therapy (ART) strategies and to identify variables associated with high costs.

METHODS

The setting was a 24-month prospective multicenter observational cohort study in a German HIV-specialized care setting from 2014 to 2017. A microcosting approach was used for the estimation of healthcare costs. Data were obtained via electronic case report forms. The costs were calculated from both the societal and the statutory health insurance perspective. Regression models were performed that took into consideration the impact of several independent variables.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-four patients from 24 centers throughout Germany were included. Average annual healthcare costs were €20 118 (standard deviation [SD] €6451) per patient from the societal perspective (n = 336) and €17 306 (SD €4106) from the statutory health insurance perspective (n = 292). Expenditures for the ART medication had the highest impact. Total costs declined in the second year of therapy. There was a significant association between the amount of total cost and clinical or therapeutic variables from both perspectives; a diagnosis of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) led to higher costs as well as the chosen ART strategy. Age also increased cost from the statutory health insurance perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

The main cost driver of the healthcare costs for HIV-positive patients was antiretroviral drug expenses. Further variables that influenced the costs were identified. The results provide a detailed overview of the resource use of patients in the PROPHET cohort.

Budget impact of antiretroviral therapy in a French clinic cohort

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we first assessed costs associated with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in an infectious diseases University Hospital Clinic; second, we evaluated characteristics associated with these costs and finally simulated the impact on the overall ART budget of switching first-line and second-line regimens to less-costly regimens (as effective and well tolerated).

DESIGN

Cohort analysis including persons living with HIV (PLHIV) aged at least 18 years on ART to estimate ART costs during 2014.

METHODS

The current study was conducted in the Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital Clinic in Paris, France, where 4501 PLHIV consulted in 2014. We used the medical database Nadis to describe patients' ART, characteristics and estimated costs. When assessing the budgetary impact of potential switches, we considered patients' history of failure, CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, resistance mutations, hepatitis B surface antigen or HLAB5701 profile.

RESULTS

A total of 4238 of 4501 patients were on ART (94%). The total annual cost of ART prescribed was estimated at &OV0556;48 280 200 in 2014; first/second (simplification)-line regimens represented 25% (1076/4238) of the treated PLHIV and 23% (&OV0556;11 209 000) of the annual cost. For these PLHIV, we considered switches from the most common ART regimens (protease inhibitor boosted by ritonavir or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor + two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) to less-expensive regimens. We found savings ranging from &OV0556;36 100 to 1472 600/year. Savings were the highest when we considered switching to generic-based regimens or from protease inhibitor-based triple therapy to protease inhibitor monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Costs associated with ART prescriptions are very high. Switches to generic-based regimens are associated with large savings. However, those targeting protease inhibitor regimens are also associated with substantial savings and should be considered.

HIV economic burden of illness in the Veterans Health Administration population

The objective was to assess the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) economic burden of illness in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) population. Adults (aged 18-64 years) with a HIV diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 042.x, V08) from 1 June 2007 to 31 May 2012 were selected from VHA Medical SAS(®) data-sets. Continuous VHA insurance coverage 12-month pre- and postindex date, with no antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescriptions within 180 days pre-index date, was required for treatment-naive (TN) HIV-infected patients. One baseline CD4 count or HIV viral load measured within three months after HIV diagnosis or one ART anchor drug claim postindex date was required for group comparison. All-cause health-care costs and utilizations were evaluated and stratified by CD4 cell count, viral load, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) anchor drugs (efavirenz/non-efavirenz), and ART (NNRTI/PI/INSTI/CCR-5 Antagonist-based) regimen cohorts. The overall economic burden was compared between HIV-infected vs. non-HIV-infected patients. CD4 count, viral load, and treatment patterns and the associated costs were compared among TN patients. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences. A total of 25,648 HIV-infected patients were identified (mean age 51; 96.4% male; 49.7% non-Hispanic black) of which 11,371 were TN. HIV-infected patients incurred higher PSM-adjusted total costs than non-HIV-infected patients ($25,232 vs. $10,206, p < 0.0001). Total costs for TN with CD4 cell counts ≤50 cells/mm(3) were higher than all other CD4 cell strata (p < 0.001). Total costs for TN with viral loads >100,000 copies/mL were higher than all other viral load categories (p < 0.001). Efavirenz-treated patients incurred higher ART-related ($8663 vs. $2846, p = 0.0266), but lower non-ART-related ($2339 vs. $6628, p = 0.0042) pharmacy costs than non-efavirenz patients. NNRTI-based cohort incurred lower total costs than protease inhibitor-based ($32,829 vs. $39,073, p = 0.0005) but no significant differences compared to integrase strand transfer inhibitor cohorts. This study offers new health-care costs and resource utilization estimates associated with the burden of HIV in the VHA population.