1
|
Martin R, Nasir N, Carusi A. Enhancing research culture through PhD training: a systems approach to identifying leverage points for policy formation. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 8:422. [PMID: 38173561 PMCID: PMC10762290 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19567.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
This article examines the role of PhD training programmes in identifying and implementing positive interventions in research culture in the biosciences. Using a data set consisting of transcripts from interviews and group discussions with 179 participants from 18 of the current 23 (78%) UK-based Wellcome-funded PhD programmes, we apply a systems theory methodology to the system of higher education and PhD training. Using system mapping as an investigative tool, this approach identifies points of leverage within the system where policy interventions might be best targeted to affect changes to research culture in the global higher education sector. The results of this investigation highlight the student-supervisor relationship as a nexus for these interventions and recommends the programme structure as a global policy for PhD training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Martin
- Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Nazia Nasir
- UK Research Development, Research and Innovation Services, Univresity of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Horton A, Loban K, Fortin MC, Charbonneau S, Nugus P, Pâquet MR, Chaudhury P, Cantarovich M, Sandal S. Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Quebec: A Qualitative Case Study of Health System Barriers and Facilitators. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2023; 10:20543581221150675. [PMID: 36704234 PMCID: PMC9871975 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221150675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with kidney failure represent a major public health burden, and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for these patients. Current work to optimize LDKT delivery to patients has focused on microlevel interventions and has not addressed interdependencies with meso and macro levels of practice. Objective We aimed to learn from a health system with historically low LDKT performance to identify facilitators and barriers to LDKT. Our specific aims were to understand how LDKT delivery is organized through interacting macro, meso, and micro levels of practice and identify what attributes and processes of this health system facilitate the delivery of LDKT to patients with kidney failure and what creates barriers. Design We conducted a qualitative case study, applying a complex adaptive systems approach to LDKT delivery, that recognizes health systems as being made up of dynamic, nested, and interconnected levels, with the patient at its core. Setting The setting for this case study was the province of Quebec, Canada. Participants Thirty-two key stakeholders from all levels of the health system. This included health care professionals, leaders in LDKT governance, living kidney donors, and kidney recipients. Methods Semi-structured interviews with 32 key stakeholders and a document review were undertaken between February 2021 and December 2021. Inductive thematic analysis was used to generate themes. Results Overall, we identified strong links between system attributes and processes and LDKT delivery, and more barriers than facilitators were discerned. Barriers that undermined access to LDKT included fragmented LDKT governance and expertise, disconnected care practices, limited resources, and regional inequities. Some were mitigated to an extent by the intervention of a program launched in 2018 to increase LDKT. Facilitators driven by the program included advocacy for LDKT from individual member(s) of the care team, dedicated resources, increased collaboration, and training opportunities that targeted LDKT delivery at multiple levels of practice. Limitations Delineating the borders of a "case" is a challenge in case study research, and it is possible that some perspectives may have been missed. Participants may have produced socially desirable answers. Conclusions Our study systematically investigated real-world practices as they operate throughout a health system. This novel approach has cross-disciplinary methodological relevance, and our findings have policy implications that can help inform multilevel interventions to improve LDKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Horton
- Research Institute of the McGill
University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Katya Loban
- Research Institute of the McGill
University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Chantal Fortin
- Centre de recherche du Centre
hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Peter Nugus
- Department of Family Medicine and
Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC,
Canada
| | - Michel R. Pâquet
- Centre de recherche du Centre
hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Prosanto Chaudhury
- Research Institute of the McGill
University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Surgery, McGill
University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marcelo Cantarovich
- Research Institute of the McGill
University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shaifali Sandal
- Research Institute of the McGill
University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Shaifali Sandal, Research Institute of the
McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital Glen Site, D05-7176,
1001 boul Decarie, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goderis G, Colman E, Irusta LA, Van Hecke A, Pétré B, Devroey D, Van Deun E, Faes K, Charlier N, Verhaeghe N, Remmen R, Anthierens S, Sermeus W, Macq J. Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium. Int J Integr Care 2020; 20:12. [PMID: 33024426 PMCID: PMC7518071 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan 'Integrated Care for Better Health' aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experiences and improved cost efficiency. The aim of this article is to present the development of a mixed methods realist evaluation of this large-scale, whole system change programme. METHODS A scientific team was commissioned to co-design and implement an evaluation protocol in close collaboration with the government, the ICPs and several other involved stakeholders. RESULTS A protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation was developed to gain insights into the mechanisms that foster successful results in ICPs. The qualitative evaluation proposed will be based on the document analysis of yearly ICP progress reports, selected case studies and focus group interviews with stakeholders. Processes and outcomes of all the projects will be monitored using indicators based on administrative data on population health and the quality and costs of care. A yearly survey will be organized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes and experiences and on provider-reported measures of inter-professional collaboration and proper wellbeing. Using both quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop theories about the mechanisms and the associated contextual factors that lead to integrated care and the Quadruple Aim outcomes. DISCUSSION The objective of this study is to deliver policy recommendations on strategies and best practices to improve care integration in Belgium and to implement a sustainable monitoring system that serves both policy makers and the stakeholders within the ICPs. Some challenges due to the large scale of the project and the multiple stakeholders involved may impede the successful implementation of this proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert Goderis
- Academic Center of General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer Leuven, BE
| | - Elien Colman
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA)—Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat Antwerp, BE
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, BE
- Department of Nursing, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, BE
| | - Lucia Alvarez Irusta
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle aux champs Brussels, BE
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, BE
- Department of Nursing, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, BE
| | - Benoit Pétré
- Public Health Department, University of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, Avenue Hippocrate, Liège, BE
| | - Dirk Devroey
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BE
| | | | - Kristof Faes
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BE
| | - Nathan Charlier
- Public Health Department, University of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, Avenue Hippocrate, Liège, BE
| | - Nick Verhaeghe
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BE
- Research Group Social and Economic Policy and Social Inclusion, KU Leuven, Parkstraat, Leuven, BE
| | - Roy Remmen
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA)—Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat Antwerp, BE
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA)—Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat Antwerp, BE
| | | | - Jean Macq
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle aux champs Brussels, BE
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chung Y, Bagheri N, Salinas-Perez JA, Smurthwaite K, Walsh E, Furst M, Rosenberg S, Salvador-Carulla L. Role of visual analytics in supporting mental healthcare systems research and policy: A systematic scoping review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
5
|
Jones L, Fraser A, Stewart E. Exploring the neglected and hidden dimensions of large-scale healthcare change. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2019; 41:1221-1235. [PMID: 31099047 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Forms of large-scale change, such as the regiona l re-distribution of clinical services, are an enduring reform orthodoxy in health systems of high-income countries. The topic is of relevance and importance to medical sociology because of the way that large-scale change significantly disrupts and transforms therapeutic landscapes, relationships and practices. In this paper we review the literature on large-scale change. We find that the literature is dominated by competing forms of knowledge, such as health services research, and show how sociology can contribute new and critical perspectives and insights on what is for many people a troubling issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorelei Jones
- School of Health Sciences, University of Bangor, Bangor, UK
| | - Alec Fraser
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ellen Stewart
- Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E, Booth A. Understanding new models of integrated care in developed countries: a systematic review. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe NHS has been challenged to adopt new integrated models of service delivery that are tailored to local populations. Evidence from the international literature is needed to support the development and implementation of these new models of care.ObjectivesThe study aimed to carry out a systematic review of international evidence to enhance understanding of the mechanisms whereby new models of service delivery have an impact on health-care outcomes.DesignThe study combined rigorous and systematic methods for identification of literature, together with innovative methods for synthesis and presentation of findings.SettingAny setting.ParticipantsPatients receiving a health-care service and/or staff delivering services.InterventionsChanges to service delivery that increase integration and co-ordination of health and health-related services.Main outcome measuresOutcomes related to the delivery of services, including the views and perceptions of patients/service users and staff.Study designEmpirical work of a quantitative or qualitative design.Data sourcesWe searched electronic databases (between October 2016 and March 2017) for research published from 2006 onwards in databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Science Citation Index, Social Science Citation Index and The Cochrane Library. We also searched relevant websites, screened reference lists and citation searched on a previous review.Review methodsThe identified evidence was synthesised in three ways. First, data from included studies were used to develop an evidence-based logic model, and a narrative summary reports the elements of the pathway. Second, we examined the strength of evidence underpinning reported outcomes and impacts using a comparative four-item rating system. Third, we developed an applicability framework to further scrutinise and characterise the evidence.ResultsWe included 267 studies in the review. The findings detail the complex pathway from new models to impacts, with evidence regarding elements of new models of integrated care, targets for change, process change, influencing factors, service-level outcomes and system-wide impacts. A number of positive outcomes were reported in the literature, with stronger evidence of perceived increased patient satisfaction and improved quality of care and access to care. There was stronger UK-only evidence of reduced outpatient appointments and waiting times. Evidence was inconsistent regarding other outcomes and system-wide impacts such as levels of activity and costs. There was an indication that new models have particular potential with patients who have complex needs.LimitationsDefining new models of integrated care is challenging, and there is the potential that our study excluded potentially relevant literature. The review was extensive, with diverse study populations and interventions that precluded the statistical summary of effectiveness.ConclusionsThere is stronger evidence that new models of integrated care may enhance patient satisfaction and perceived quality and increase access; however, the evidence regarding other outcomes is unclear. The study recommends factors to be considered during the implementation of new models.Future workLinks between elements of new models and outcomes require further study, together with research in a wider variety of populations.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD37725.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Baxter
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Maxine Johnson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Duncan Chambers
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anthea Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Goyder
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilkinson J, Goff M, Rusoja E, Hanson C, Swanson RC. The application of systems thinking concepts, methods, and tools to global health practices: An analysis of case studies. J Eval Clin Pract 2018; 24:607-618. [PMID: 29152819 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Revised: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review of systems thinking (ST) case studies seeks to compile and analyse cases from ST literature and provide practitioners with a reference for ST in health practice. Particular attention was given to (1) reviewing the frequency and use of key ST terms, methods, and tools in the context of health, and (2) extracting and analysing longitudinal themes across cases. METHODS A systematic search of databases was conducted, and a total of 36 case studies were identified. A combination of integrative and inductive qualitative approaches to analysis was used. RESULTS Most cases identified took place in high-income countries and applied ST retrospectively. The most commonly used ST terms were agent/stakeholder/actor (n = 29), interdependent/interconnected (n = 28), emergence (n = 26), and adaptability/adaptation (n = 26). Common ST methods and tools were largely underutilized. Social network analysis was the most commonly used method (n = 4), and innovation or change management history was the most frequently used tool (n = 11). Four overarching themes were identified; the importance of the interdependent and interconnected nature of a health system, characteristics of leaders in a complex adaptive system, the benefits of using ST, and barriers to implementing ST. CONCLUSIONS This review revealed that while much has been written about the potential benefits of applying ST to health, it has yet to completely transition from theory to practice. There is however evidence of the practical use of an ST lens as well as specific methods and tools. With clear examples of ST applications, the global health community will be better equipped to understand and address key health challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Wilkinson
- Department of Health Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Morgan Goff
- Department of Health Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Evan Rusoja
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carl Hanson
- Department of Health Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
MacGregor H, McKenzie A, Jacobs T, Ullauri A. Scaling up ART adherence clubs in the public sector health system in the Western Cape, South Africa: a study of the institutionalisation of a pilot innovation. Global Health 2018; 14:40. [PMID: 29695268 PMCID: PMC5918532 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-018-0351-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2011, a decision was made to scale up a pilot innovation involving 'adherence clubs' as a form of differentiated care for HIV positive people in the public sector antiretroviral therapy programme in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. In 2016 we were involved in the qualitative aspect of an evaluation of the adherence club model, the overall objective of which was to assess the health outcomes for patients accessing clubs through epidemiological analysis, and to conduct a health systems analysis to evaluate how the model of care performed at scale. In this paper we adopt a complex adaptive systems lens to analyse planned organisational change through intervention in a state health system. We explore the challenges associated with taking to scale a pilot that began as a relatively simple innovation by a non-governmental organisation. RESULTS Our analysis reveals how a programme initially representing a simple, unitary system in terms of management and clinical governance had evolved into a complex, differentiated care system. An innovation that was assessed as an excellent idea and received political backing, worked well whilst supported on a small scale. However, as scaling up progressed, challenges have emerged at the same time as support has waned. We identified a 'tipping point' at which the system was more likely to fail, as vulnerabilities magnified and the capacity for adaptation was exceeded. Yet the study also revealed the impressive capacity that a health system can have for catalysing novel approaches. CONCLUSIONS We argue that innovation in largescale, complex programmes in health systems is a continuous process that requires ongoing support and attention to new innovation as challenges emerge. Rapid scaling up is also likely to require recourse to further resources, and a culture of iterative learning to address emerging challenges and mitigate complex system errors. These are necessary steps to the future success of adherence clubs as a cornerstone of differentiated care. Further research is needed to assess the equity and quality outcomes of a differentiated care model and to ensure the inclusive distribution of the benefits to all categories of people living with HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley MacGregor
- Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, England
| | - Andrew McKenzie
- DAI (formerly Health Partners International), Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Angelica Ullauri
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chrysanthaki T, Hendy J, Barlow J. Stimulating whole system redesign: Lessons from an organizational analysis of the Whole System Demonstrator programme. J Health Serv Res Policy 2018; 18:47-55. [PMID: 27552779 DOI: 10.1177/1355819612474249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Whole system integration of health and social care has been positioned as key to improving care, increasing efficiency and controlling costs. However, evidence for the benefits of whole system integration is scarce. Drawing on organizational theory, this study uses the implementation of remote care services, viewed as an enabler for whole system working, to explore the reality of achieving this policy objective. METHODS Qualitative, longitudinal data were collected across nine UK sites adopting remote care over three years. Three sites formed the Department of Health's Whole Systems Demonstrator (WSD) programme for remote care. In addition, the implementation of remote care was explored in six other sites unconstrained by the randomized control trial procedures of the WSD programme. The methods were ethnographic (including 235 hours of observations and 184 interviews). Participants were health and social care staff and Government policy makers. RESULTS Remote care did not lead to system redesign; however, local 'ownership' of new services did lead to more collaborative practices across the care system. Lack of integration was an enduring and endemic challenge across all sites, relating to differences in statutory responsibilities, absence of shared budgets and hybrid organizational roles, differences in work practices and organizational philosophies, and ambiguity around what 'whole system working' actually entailed. CONCLUSIONS Policy initiatives like the WSD programme provide opportunities to phase in collaborative practices and create an awareness of the need for joint working. However, the progress observed suggests that the concept of whole system redesign around remote care is currently unrealistic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theopisti Chrysanthaki
- Research Associate, Healthcare Management Group, Imperial College, Business School, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Jane Hendy
- Senior Lecturer in Health Care Management, Department of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey, UK
| | - James Barlow
- Professor of Technology and Innovation Management, Imperial College Business School, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McKenzie A, Abdulwahab A, Sokpo E, Mecaskey JW. Creating the Foundation for Health System Resilience in Northern Nigeria. Health Syst Reform 2016; 2:357-366. [PMID: 31514718 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1242453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract-The experience of a donor-supported Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health (RMNCH) program in four states of Northern Nigeria illustrates how a Complex Adaptive System (CAS) approach to health system strengthening can lead to health systems becoming more resilient. The program worked with the array of political, cultural and social determinants which interact to shape the health system and its functionality. It worked in an environment marked by weak governance with little public accountability and by very limited management capability in inadequately regulated markets. To these conditions of fragility was added the shock from the rapidly deteriorating security situation caused in 2011 by the Boko Haram insurgency and the government's ensuing response. A CAS theory of change provided the basis for the multi-faceted approach that identified critical points of leverage among institutions in social as well as professional systems and helped achieve significant improvements in health service delivery in the RMNCH continuum of care. It also established the foundation for Primary Health Care Under One Roof, which has emerged as a central national strategy in Nigeria for strengthening health sector governance and services under the 2014 Health Act. This article draws on the experience of work undertaken in Northern Nigeria over the course of the last 10 years. A team largely of Nigerian professionals from an array of disciplines worked widely across the health system, addressing issues of governance, finance, institutional management, community systems support, access and accountability, and service delivery-frequently at the same time. This experience provides lessons for efforts elsewhere on how to strengthen health systems during and after emergencies (such as Ebola in West Africa) and in situations affected by conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew McKenzie
- Health Partners International , Lewes, UK, and Abuja , Nigeria
| | | | - Emmanuel Sokpo
- Health Partners International , Lewes, UK, and Abuja , Nigeria
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brainard J, Hunter PR. Do complexity-informed health interventions work? A scoping review. Implement Sci 2016; 11:127. [PMID: 27647152 PMCID: PMC5029105 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lens of complexity theory is widely advocated to improve health care delivery. However, empirical evidence that this lens has been useful in designing health care remains elusive. This review assesses whether it is possible to reliably capture evidence for efficacy in results or process within interventions that were informed by complexity science and closely related conceptual frameworks. METHODS Systematic searches of scientific and grey literature were undertaken in late 2015/early 2016. Titles and abstracts were screened for interventions (A) delivered by the health services, (B) that explicitly stated that complexity science provided theoretical underpinning, and (C) also reported specific outcomes. Outcomes had to relate to changes in actual practice, service delivery or patient clinical indicators. Data extraction and detailed analysis was undertaken for studies in three developed countries: Canada, UK and USA. Data were extracted for intervention format, barriers encountered and quality aspects (thoroughness or possible biases) of evaluation and reporting. RESULTS From 5067 initial finds in scientific literature and 171 items in grey literature, 22 interventions described in 29 articles were selected. Most interventions relied on facilitating collaboration to find solutions to specific or general problems. Many outcomes were very positive. However, some outcomes were measured only subjectively, one intervention was designed with complexity theory in mind but did not reiterate this in subsequent evaluation and other interventions were credited as compatible with complexity science but reported no relevant theoretical underpinning. Articles often omitted discussion on implementation barriers or unintended consequences, which suggests that complexity theory was not widely used in evaluation. CONCLUSIONS It is hard to establish cause and effect when attempting to leverage complex adaptive systems and perhaps even harder to reliably find evidence that confirms whether complexity-informed interventions are usually effective. While it is possible to show that interventions that are compatible with complexity science seem efficacious, it remains difficult to show that explicit planning with complexity in mind was particularly valuable. Recommendations are made to improve future evaluation reports, to establish a better evidence base about whether this conceptual framework is useful in intervention design and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julii Brainard
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK
| | - Paul R. Hunter
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Willis CD, Saul J, Bevan H, Scheirer MA, Best A, Greenhalgh T, Mannion R, Cornelissen E, Howland D, Jenkins E, Bitz J. Sustaining organizational culture change in health systems. J Health Organ Manag 2016; 30:2-30. [DOI: 10.1108/jhom-07-2014-0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– The questions addressed by this review are: first, what are the guiding principles underlying efforts to stimulate sustained cultural change; second, what are the mechanisms by which these principles operate; and, finally, what are the contextual factors that influence the likelihood of these principles being effective? The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors conducted a literature review informed by rapid realist review methodology that examined how interventions interact with contexts and mechanisms to influence the sustainability of cultural change. Reference and expert panelists assisted in refining the research questions, systematically searching published and grey literature, and helping to identify interactions between interventions, mechanisms and contexts.
Findings
– Six guiding principles were identified: align vision and action; make incremental changes within a comprehensive transformation strategy; foster distributed leadership; promote staff engagement; create collaborative relationships; and continuously assess and learn from change. These principles interact with contextual elements such as local power distributions, pre-existing values and beliefs and readiness to engage. Mechanisms influencing how these principles sustain cultural change include activation of a shared sense of urgency and fostering flexible levels of engagement.
Practical implications
– The principles identified in this review, along with the contexts and mechanisms that influence their effectiveness, are useful domains for policy and practice leaders to explore when grappling with cultural change. These principles are sufficiently broad to allow local flexibilities in adoption and application.
Originality/value
– This is the first study to adopt a realist approach for understanding how changes in organizational culture may be sustained. Through doing so, this review highlights the broad principles by which organizational action may be organized within enabling contextual settings.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cranfield S, Hendy J, Reeves B, Hutchings A, Collin S, Fulop N. Investigating healthcare IT innovations: a “conceptual blending” approach. J Health Organ Manag 2015; 29:1131-48. [DOI: 10.1108/jhom-08-2015-0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to better understand how and why adoption and implementation of healthcare IT innovations occur. The authors examine two IT applications, computerised physician order entry (CPOE) and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) at the meso and micro levels, within the context of the National Programme for IT in the English National Health Service (NHS).
Design/methodology/approach
– To analyse these multi-level dynamics, the authors blend Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory (DoIT) with Webster’s sociological critique of technological innovation in medicine and healthcare systems to illuminate a wider range of interacting factors. Qualitative data collected between 2004 and 2006 uses semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 72 stakeholders across four English NHS hospital trusts.
Findings
– Overall, PACS was more successfully implemented (fully or partially in three out of four trusts) than CPOE (implemented in one trust only). Factors such as perceived benefit to users and attributes of the application – in particular speed, ease of use, reliability and flexibility and levels of readiness – were highly relevant but their influence was modulated through interaction with complex structural and relational issues.
Practical implications
– Results reveal that combining contextual system level theories with DoIT increases understanding of real-life processes underpinning implementation of IT innovations within healthcare. They also highlight important drivers affecting success of implementation, including socio-political factors, the social body of practice and degree of “co-construction” between designers and end-users.
Originality/value
– The originality of the study partly rests on its methodological innovativeness and its value on critical insights afforded into understanding complex IT implementation programmes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Nieuwenhuijze M, Downe S, Gottfreðsdóttir H, Rijnders M, du Preez A, Vaz Rebelo P. Taxonomy for complexity theory in the context of maternity care. Midwifery 2015; 31:834-43. [PMID: 26092306 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Revised: 05/05/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The linear focus of 'normal science' is unable to adequately take account of the complex interactions that direct health care systems. There is a turn towards complexity theory as a more appropriate framework for understanding system behaviour. However, a comprehensive taxonomy for complexity theory in the context of health care is lacking. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to build a taxonomy based on the key complexity theory components that have been used in publications on complexity theory and health care, and to explore their explanatory power for health care system behaviour, specifically for maternity care. METHOD A search strategy was devised in PubMed and 31 papers were identified as relevant for the taxonomy. FINDINGS The final taxonomy for complexity theory included and defined 11 components. The use of waterbirth and the impact of the Term Breech trial showed that each of the components of our taxonomy has utility in helping to understand how these techniques became widely adopted. It is not just the components themselves that characterise a complex system but also the dynamics between them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University, P.O. Box 1256, 6201 BG Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Soo Downe
- University of Central Lancashire, Brook Building BB223, Preston PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.
| | - Helga Gottfreðsdóttir
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Eirberg, Eiríksgata 34, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland.
| | | | - Antoinette du Preez
- School of Nursing Science, North West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2522, South Africa.
| | - Piedade Vaz Rebelo
- DMUC - Department of Mathematics of the University of Coimbra, Apartado 3008, EC Santa Cruz, 3001 501 Coimbra, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miller R, Appleton S. Multiple exclusion homelessness: is simplicity the answer to this complexity? JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE 2015. [DOI: 10.1108/jica-11-2014-0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore integration and complexity through the evaluation of a case study service which supports multiply excluded homeless people.
Design/methodology/approach
– A mixed methods theory based evaluation. Data gathering included semi-structured interviews with external stakeholders, analysis of referral and outcome data, focus groups with frontline staff members and managers, and interviews with people living in the service.
Findings
– The service was highly rated by its stakeholders due to its ability to meet the immediate needs of many individuals and to facilitate access and engagement with community and specialist resources. However, not every individual responded to the support that was an offer, and a number were unable to access the service due to the nature of their needs or a lack of capacity in the service. Whilst the service was able to engage community and specialist services this often appeared to be within the parameters set by these services rather than flexibly around the needs of the individual.
Research limitations/implications
– The research is based in one case study service and findings may not be transferable to different local contexts and providers. However, the findings are consistent with previous studies.
Practical implications
– It is possible for commissioners to intervene in the complexities that multiply excluded homeless people experiences through the introduction of a new service. However, this is unlikely to address all of the gaps and fragmentation that people in these circumstances face. It is therefore important that partners are sensitive to such limitations and have a shared willingness to respond to continuing gaps and shortfalls.
Social implications
– Despite specific national policies people continue to experience multiple exclusion homelessness which suggest that more still needs to be done to prevent people from this extremely disadvantaged social circumstance. Whilst specialist services can provide excellent support the response is still fragmented for some people meaning that work to better integrate their responses must continue.
Originality/value
– The paper contributes to the evidence base of support models for multiple excluded homeless people and the factors that can enable a housing support service to respond to such needs. It also provides comment on the relevance of the concept of complex adaptive systems to the study of integration.
Collapse
|
16
|
McKenzie A, Sokpo E, Ager A. Bridging the Policy-Implementation Gap in Federal Health Systems: Lessons from the Nigerian Experience. J Public Health Afr 2014; 5:381. [PMID: 28299131 PMCID: PMC5345418 DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2014.381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2013] [Revised: 06/01/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The Partnership for Reviving Routine Immunization in Northern Nigeria - Maternal, Newborn and Child Health initiative supports efforts by the government of Nigeria to bridge primary health care (PHC) policies and services at three levels of government: federal, state and local. The paper suggests that understandings informed by complexity theory and complex adaptive systems have been helpful in shaping policy and programme design across these levels. To illustrate this, three initiatives are explored: Bringing PHC under one roof, enhancing access to funding provided by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, and strengthening the midwives service scheme. These initiatives have demonstrated how concepts and experience developed at subnational level can influence national policy and practice, and how work at subnational levels can add value to nationally conceived and nationally driven plans for PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alastair Ager
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
A. Tucker D, Hendy J, Barlow J. When infrastructure transition and work practice redesign collide. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT 2014. [DOI: 10.1108/jocm-09-2013-0173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– As management innovations become more complex, infrastructure needs to change in order to accommodate new work practices. Different challenges are associated with work practice redesign and infrastructure change however; combining these presents a dual challenge and additional challenges associated with this interaction. The purpose of this paper is to ask: what are the challenges which arise from work practice redesign, infrastructure change and simultaneously attempting both in a single transformation?
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors present a longitudinal study of three hospitals in three different countries (UK, USA and Canada) transforming both their infrastructure and work practices. Data consists of 155 ethnographic interviews complemented by 205 documents and 36 hours of observations collected over two phases for each case study.
Findings
– This paper identifies that work practice redesign challenges the cognitive load of organizational members whilst infrastructure change challenges the project management and structure of the organization. Simultaneous transformation represents a disconnect between the two aspects of change resulting in a failure to understand the relationship between work and design.
Practical implications
– These challenges suggest that organizations need to make a distinction between the two aspects of transformation and understand the unique tensions of simultaneously tackling these dual challenges. They must ensure that they have adequate skills and resources with which to build this distinction into their change planning.
Originality/value
– This paper unpacks two different aspects of complex change and considers the neglected challenges associated with modern change management objectives.
Collapse
|
18
|
Walton M. Applying complexity theory: a review to inform evaluation design. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2014; 45:119-126. [PMID: 24780280 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2013] [Revised: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 04/06/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Complexity theory has increasingly been discussed and applied within evaluation literature over the past decade. This article reviews the discussion and use of complexity theory within academic journal literature. The aim is to identify the issues to be considered when applying complexity theory to evaluation. Reviewing 46 articles, two groups of themes are identified. The first group considers implications of applying complexity theory concepts for defining evaluation purpose, scope and units of analysis. The second group of themes consider methodology and method. Results provide a starting point for a configuration of an evaluation approach consistent with complexity theory, whilst also identifying a number of design considerations to be resolved within evaluation planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mat Walton
- School of Health and Social Services, Massey University, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the evolution of health care integration strategies and associated conceptualization and practice through a review and synthesis of over 25 years of international academic research and literature. METHODS A search of the health sciences literature was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE. A total of 114 articles were identified for inclusion and thematically analyzed using a strategy content model for systems-level integration. FINDINGS Six major, inter-related shifts in integration strategies were identified: (1) from a focus on horizontal integration to an emphasis on vertical integration; (2) from acute care and institution-centered models of integration to a broader focus on community-based health and social services; (3) from economic arguments for integration to an emphasis on improving quality of care and creating value; (4) from evaluations of integration using an organizational perspective to an emerging interest in patient-centered measures; (5) from a focus on modifying organizational and environmental structures to an emphasis on changing ways of working and influencing underlying cultural attitudes and norms; and (6) from integration for all patients within defined regions to a strategic focus on integrating care for specific populations. We propose that underlying many of these shifts is a growing recognition of the value of understanding health care delivery and integration as processes situated in Complex-Adaptive Systems (CAS). ORIGINALITY/VALUE This review builds a descriptive framework against which to assess, compare, and track integration strategies over time.
Collapse
|
20
|
Adoption in practice: The relationship between managerial interpretations of evidence and the adoption of a healthcare innovation. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
21
|
For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|