1
|
Wong V, Ippolito GM, Crescenze I. Integrating Patient Preferences with Guideline-Based Care in Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:277-284. [PMID: 38609199 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Individual and social factors are important for clinical decision-making in patients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury (SCI). These factors include the availability of caregivers, social infrastructure, and personal preferences, which all can drive bladder management decisions. These elements can be overlooked in clinical decision-making; therefore, there is a need to elicit and prioritize patient preferences and values into neurogenic bladder care to facilitate personalized bladder management choices. For the purposes of this article, we review the role of guideline-based care and shared decision-making in the SCI population with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Wong
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Suite 3100, Room 3105, Columbus, OH 43212, USA.
| | - Giulia M Ippolito
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, 1733 Monterey Court, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA
| | - Irene Crescenze
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, 2nd Floor Suite 2000, Columbus, OH 43212, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wheelwright S, Maunsell R, Taylor S, Drinkwater N, Erridge C, Foster C, Hardcastle M, Hogden A, Lawson I, Lisiecka D, Mcdermott C, Morrison KE, Muir C, Recio-Saucedo A, White S. Development of 'gastrostomy tube - is it for me?', a web-based patient decision aid for people living with motor neurone disease considering having a gastrostomy tube placed. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2023; 24:1-9. [PMID: 37332172 DOI: 10.1080/21678421.2023.2220743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To develop and pilot a web-based patient decision aid (PDA) to support people living with motor neurone disease (plwMND) considering having a gastrostomy tube placed. Methods: In Phase 1, content and design were informed by semi-structured interviews, literature reviews and a prioritization survey. In Phase 2, the prototype PDA was tested with users and developed iteratively with feedback from surveys and 'think-aloud' interviews. Phase 1 and 2 participants were plwMND, carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). In Phase 3, the PDA was evaluated by plwMND using validated questionnaires and HCPs provided feedback in focus groups. Results: Sixteen plwMND, 16 carers and 25 HCPs took part in Phases 1 and 2. Interviews and the literature review informed a prioritization survey with 82 content items. Seventy-seven per cent (63/82) of the content of the PDA was retained. A prototype PDA, which conforms to international standards, was produced and improved during Phase 2. In Phase 3, 17 plwMND completed questionnaires after using the PDA. Most plwMND (94%) found the PDA completely acceptable and would recommend it to others in their position, 88% had no decisional conflict, 82% were well prepared and 100% were satisfied with their decision-making. Seventeen HCPs provided positive feedback and suggestions for use in clinical practice. Conclusion: Gastrostomy Tube: Is it for me? was co-produced with stakeholders and found to be acceptable, practical and useful. Freely available from the MND Association website, the PDA is a valuable tool to support the shared decision-making process for gastrostomy tube placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R Maunsell
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Taylor
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - N Drinkwater
- Motor Neurone Disease Association, Northampton, UK
| | - C Erridge
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - C Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - A Hogden
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - I Lawson
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - D Lisiecka
- Munster Technological University - Kerry Campus, Republic of Ireland, Tralee, UK
| | | | - K E Morrison
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - C Muir
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - A Recio-Saucedo
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S White
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, and
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ubbink DT, Damman OC, de Jong BA. Shared decision-making in patients with multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1063904. [PMID: 36438979 PMCID: PMC9691958 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1063904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and progressive neurological disorder impacting physical, cognitive, and psychosocial health. The disease course, severity, and presence of symptoms differ within and between persons over time and are unpredictable. Given the preference-sensitive nature of many key decisions to be made, and the increasing numbers of disease-modifying therapies, shared decision-making (SDM) with patients seems to be key in offering optimum care and outcomes for people suffering from MS. In this paper, we describe our perspective on how to achieve SDM in patients with MS, following key SDM-elements from established SDM-frameworks. As for deliberation in the clinical encounter, SDM communication training of professionals and feedback on their current performance are key aspects, as well as encouraging patients to participate. Concerning information for patients, it is important to provide balanced, evidence-based information about the benefits and the harms of different treatment options, including the option of surveillance only. At the same time, attention is needed for the optimal dosage of that information, given the symptoms of cognitive dysfunction and fatigue among MS-patients, and the uncertainties they have to cope with. Finally, for broader communication, a system is required that assures patient preferences are actually implemented by multidisciplinary MS-teams. As SDM is also being implemented in many countries within the context of value-based health care, we consider the systematic use of outcome information, such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and Patient Decision Aids, as an opportunity to achieve SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk T. Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olga C. Damman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Public Health Research Institute, Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Brigit A. de Jong
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Public Health Research Institute, Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Therkildsen SB, Hansen LH, Jensen LED, Finderup J. A Patient Decision Aid App for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Questionnaire Study. JMIR Form Res 2019; 3:e13786. [PMID: 31750836 PMCID: PMC6914284 DOI: 10.2196/13786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Dialysis Guide (DG) is a patient decision aid (PDA) available as an app and developed for mobile phones for patients with chronic kidney disease facing the decision about dialysis modality. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to uncover the applicability of the DG as a PDA. METHODS The respondents completed a questionnaire before and after using the DG. The respondents' decisional conflicts were examined using the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the usability of the app was examined using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The change in decisional conflict was determined with a paired t test. RESULTS A total of 22 respondents participated and their mean age was 65.05 years; 20 out of 22 (90%) had attended a patient school for kidney disease, and 13 out of 22 (59%) had participated in a conversation about dialysis choice with a health professional. After using the DG, the respondents' decisional conflicts were reduced, though the reduction was not statistically significant (P=.49). The mean SUS score was 66.82 (SD 14.54), corresponding to low usability. CONCLUSIONS The DG did not significantly reduce decisional conflict, though the results indicate that it helped the respondents decide on dialysis modality. Attending a patient school and having a conversation about dialysis modality choice with a health professional is assumed to have had an impact on the decisional conflict before using the DG. The usability of the DG was not found to be sufficient, which might be caused by the respondents' average age. Thus, the applicability of the DG cannot be definitively determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Metz LM. Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Early Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2019; 25:670-688. [DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000000729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
6
|
LaVela SL, Heinemann AW, Etingen B, Miskovic A, Locatelli SM, Chen D. Relational empathy and holistic care in persons with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med 2017; 40:30-42. [PMID: 26833180 PMCID: PMC5376142 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2015.1114227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describe perceptions of persons with SCI on their receipt of holistic care and relational empathy during health care encounters. DESIGN Mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING Individuals with SCI who received care from the largest suppliers of SCI care and rehabilitation (Veterans Health Administration and SCI Model Systems). OUTCOME MEASURES Using a survey and administrative databases, we collected demographic and injury characteristics, health status, health conditions, and the main outcome: Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. RESULTS The sample included 450 individuals with SCI (124 Veterans and 326 civilians). Response rate was 39% (450/1160). Analyses were conducted on patients with complete data (n = 389). Veterans and civilians with SCI differed across many demographic characteristics, age at injury, and etiology, but mean CARE scores were equivalent. Fewer than half of the full SCI cohort had CARE scores above the normative value of 43. Having a recent pressure ulcer showed a trend for lower odds of having a normative or higher CARE score. Odds of having an above-normative CARE score were nearly 2 times greater for individuals with tetraplegia, and odds were higher for those with higher physical and mental health status. CONCLUSIONS Higher physical and mental health status and tetraplegia were each independently associated with greater perceptions of holistic care and empathy in the therapeutic patient-provider relationship. Limited empathy, communication, and holistic care may arise when providers focus on disease/disease management, rather than on patients as individuals. Frequent health care use and secondary conditions may affect empathy and holistic care in encounters, making it essential to understand and employ efforts to improve the therapeutic relationship between patients with SCI and their providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherri L. LaVela
- Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Spinal Cord Injury Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (SCI QUERI), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Allen W. Heinemann
- Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bella Etingen
- Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Spinal Cord Injury Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (SCI QUERI), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
| | - Ana Miskovic
- Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sara M. Locatelli
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
| | - David Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cadilhac DA, Kilkenny MF, Srikanth V, Lindley RI, Lalor E, Osborne RH, Batterbsy M. Do cognitive, language, or physical impairments affect participation in a trial of self-management programs for stroke? Int J Stroke 2016; 11:77-84. [PMID: 26763023 DOI: 10.1177/1747493015607522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research studies may have limited generalizability when survivors of stroke with physical, language, or cognitive impairments are excluded. AIMS To assess whether presence of cognitive, language, or global impairments affects participation in self-management programs. METHODS Stroke survivors were recruited in South Australia from seven hospitals or via advertisements into a randomized controlled trial (1:1:1 ratio) of a Stroke Self-Management Program, the Stanford chronic condition self-management program, or standard care. Impairment status was measured using: Cognistat (cognition), Frenchay Aphasia assessment (language), modified Rankin Score (mRS; where score 3-5 = global disability). PRIMARY OUTCOMES participation (i.e. booked, accessed, and completed a program (defined as attending ≥ 50% of sessions)) and safety (i.e. adverse events). Outcomes were compared by impairment status. RESULTS Among 315 people screened 143/149 eligible were randomized (median age 71 years; 41% male; with impairments: 62% cognitive, 34% language, 64% global disability). Participation did not differ by cognitive or language impairment status (cognitive 75%, no cognitive 68%, p = 0.54; language 78%, no language 69%, p = 0.42). However, participation did vary by global impairment status (global disability 61%, no disability 96%, p < 0.001). Participants with cognitive impairment experienced more adverse events (severe n = 9 versus no cognitive impairment n = 1). CONCLUSION Survivors of stroke with cognitive, language, or global impairments are able to participate in self-management programs and should be included in these types of research studies or programs. Reduced participation by those with global disability and the possibility of more adverse events in people with cognitive impairments needs to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique A Cadilhac
- Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Monique F Kilkenny
- Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Richard I Lindley
- George Institute for Global Health and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Erin Lalor
- National Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abujarad F, Vaca FE. mHealth Tool for Alcohol Use Disorders Among Latinos in Emergency Department. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN HEALTHCARE. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN HEALTHCARE 2016; 4:12-19. [PMID: 26844234 DOI: 10.1177/2327857915041005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Latino drinkers experience a disparate number of negative health and social consequences. Emergency Department Alcohol Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (ED-SBIRT) is viable and effective at reducing harmful and hazardous drinking. However, barriers (e.g. readily available language translators, provider time burden, resources) to broad implementation remain and account for a major lag in adherence to national guidelines. We describe our approach to the design of a patient-centered bilingual Web-based mobile health ED-SBIRT App that could be integrated into a clinically complex ED environment and used regularly to provide ED-SBIRT for Spanish speaking patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuad Abujarad
- Department of Emergency Medicine Yale University, School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Federico E Vaca
- Department of Emergency Medicine Yale University, School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Syrowatka A, Krömker D, Meguerditchian AN, Tamblyn R. Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18:e20. [PMID: 26813512 PMCID: PMC4748141 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Revised: 11/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient information and education, such as decision aids, are gradually moving toward online, computer-based environments. Considerable research has been conducted to guide content and presentation of decision aids. However, given the relatively new shift to computer-based support, little attention has been given to how multimedia and interactivity can improve upon paper-based decision aids. Objective The first objective of this review was to summarize published literature into a proposed classification of features that have been integrated into computer-based decision aids. Building on this classification, the second objective was to assess whether integration of specific features was associated with higher-quality decision making. Methods Relevant studies were located by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. The review identified studies that evaluated computer-based decision aids for adults faced with preference-sensitive medical decisions and reported quality of decision-making outcomes. A thematic synthesis was conducted to develop the classification of features. Subsequently, meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences (SMD) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported knowledge or decisional conflict. Further subgroup analyses compared pooled SMDs for decision aids that incorporated a specific feature to other computer-based decision aids that did not incorporate the feature, to assess whether specific features improved quality of decision making. Results Of 3541 unique publications, 58 studies met the target criteria and were included in the thematic synthesis. The synthesis identified six features: content control, tailoring, patient narratives, explicit values clarification, feedback, and social support. A subset of 26 RCTs from the thematic synthesis was used to conduct the meta-analyses. As expected, computer-based decision aids performed better than usual care or alternative aids; however, some features performed better than others. Integration of content control improved quality of decision making (SMD 0.59 vs 0.23 for knowledge; SMD 0.39 vs 0.29 for decisional conflict). In contrast, tailoring reduced quality of decision making (SMD 0.40 vs 0.71 for knowledge; SMD 0.25 vs 0.52 for decisional conflict). Similarly, patient narratives also reduced quality of decision making (SMD 0.43 vs 0.65 for knowledge; SMD 0.17 vs 0.46 for decisional conflict). Results were varied for different types of explicit values clarification, feedback, and social support. Conclusions Integration of media rich or interactive features into computer-based decision aids can improve quality of preference-sensitive decision making. However, this is an emerging field with limited evidence to guide use. The systematic review and thematic synthesis identified features that have been integrated into available computer-based decision aids, in an effort to facilitate reporting of these features and to promote integration of such features into decision aids. The meta-analyses and associated subgroup analyses provide preliminary evidence to support integration of specific features into future decision aids. Further research can focus on clarifying independent contributions of specific features through experimental designs and refining the designs of features to improve effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania Syrowatka
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Locatelli SM, Etingen B, Heinemann A, Neumann HD, Miskovic A, Chen D, LaVela SL. Perceptions of Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries/Disorders. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2016; 22:192-202. [PMID: 29339861 PMCID: PMC4981014 DOI: 10.1310/sci2016-00027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background: Individuals with spinal cord injuries/disorders (SCI/D) are interested in, and benefit from, shared decision making (SDM). Objective: To explore SDM among individuals with SCI/D and how demographics and health and SCI/D characteristics are related to SDM. Method: Individuals with SCI/D who were at least 1 year post injury, resided in the Chicago metropolitan area, and received SCI care at a Veterans Affairs (VA; n = 124) or an SCI Model Systems facility (n = 326) completed a mailed survey measuring demographics, health and SCI/D characteristics, physical and mental health status, and perceptions of care, including SDM, using the Combined Outcome Measure for Risk Communication and Treatment Decision-Making Effectiveness (COMRADE) that assesses decision-making effectiveness (effectiveness) and risk communication (communication). Bivariate analyses and multiple linear regression were used to identify variables associated with SDM. Results: Participants were mostly male (83%) and White (70%) and were an average age of 54 years (SD = 14.3). Most had traumatic etiology, 44% paraplegia, and 49% complete injury. Veteran/civilian status and demographics were unrelated to scores. Bivariate analyses showed that individuals with tetraplegia had better effectiveness scores than those with paraplegia. Better effectiveness was correlated with better physical and mental health; better communication was correlated with better mental health. Multiple linear regressions showed that tetraplegia, better physical health, and better mental health were associated with better effectiveness, and better mental health was associated with better communication. Conclusion: SCI/D and health characteristics were the only variables associated with SDM. Interventions to increase engagement in SDM and provider attention to SDM may be beneficial, especially for individuals with paraplegia or in poorer physical and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M. Locatelli
- Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Spinal Cord Injury Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (SCI QUERI), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
| | - Bella Etingen
- Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Spinal Cord Injury Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (SCI QUERI), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
| | - Allen Heinemann
- Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Holly DeMark Neumann
- Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ana Miskovic
- Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Illinois
| | - David Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sherri L. LaVela
- Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Spinal Cord Injury Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (SCI QUERI), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Standing C, Gururajan R, Standing S, Cripps H. Making the Most of Virtual Expertise in Telemedicine and Telehealth Environment. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMPUTING AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE 2014. [DOI: 10.1080/10919392.2014.896714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
12
|
Cunich M, Salkeld G, Dowie J, Henderson J, Bayram C, Britt H, Howard K. Integrating Evidence and Individual Preferences Using a Web-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analytic Tool. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2011; 4:153-62. [DOI: 10.2165/11587070-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|