The effects of cochlear implantation on middle ear function: A prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Although sound conduction mechanisms may influence by cochlear implantation (CI), it is not very clear whether, how, and to what extent these mechanisms may be influenced the pediatric population. Wideband tympanometry (WBT) is a sensitive tool to evaluate alternations in the middle ear mechanics in a wide frequency range. The current study aimed to explore CI's impacts on sound conduction across the middle ear cavity using WBT in pediatrics.

METHODS

In a prospective design, 35 unilaterally implanted children (<24 months of age) with normal temporal bone anatomy were included in this study. Traditional tympanometry (226-Hz) and WBT measures were compared for each child in the implanted and non-implanted ears preoperatively and three months postoperatively.

RESULTS

No significant changes in the "static acoustic admittance" and "peak pressure" parameters were observed between the pre-CI and post-CI conditions in the implanted and non-implanted ears in the 226-Hz tympanometry test. Wideband absorbance recordings before CI surgery exhibited a double-peaked pattern over a frequency range of 250 to 8000 Hz. The pre- and postoperative acoustic energy absorbance comparisons indicated a significantly reduced mid-frequency (1260 to 3175 Hz) and high-frequency (5040 to 8000 Hz) absorbance in the implanted ears. However, our results indicated no significant differences in sound absorbance between the pre- and postoperative conditions in non-implanted ears.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that WBT is a more sensitive method than traditional tympanometry for monitoring the mechanical status of the middle ear after cochlear implantation in pediatrics. Cochlear implantation in young children can significantly reduce mid- and high-frequency acoustic absorbance measured by WBT.

Wideband reflectance in Down syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a high incidence of middle ear disorders and congenital abnormalities of the external, middle and inner ear. Energy reflectance (ER), a wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) measurement parameter, can measure the sound energy reflected or absorbed in the ear canal over a wider range of frequencies more efficiently and faster than conventional single-tone 226 Hz tympanometry. The aim of the present study was to compare the WAI measurements of children with DS with those of typically developing, normal-hearing children according to their tympanometric findings.

METHODS

Four groups of children with Down syndrome (age range: 2 years and 4 months to 16 years and 3 months; mean age: 8.5 yr) with normal tympanograms (19 ears), flat tympanograms (13 ears), mild negative pressure tympanograms (6 ears between -100 and -199 daPa at the admittance peak) and severe negative pressure tympanograms (4 ears at -200 daPa or lower at the admittance peak) were assessed. All findings were compared with data obtained from 21 ears of a healthy control group (age range: 3 years and 1 month to 13 years and 11 months; mean age: 7.9 yr). The subjects underwent tympanometry with a 226-Hz probe tone frequency and ER measurements along the 200-6,000 Hz range with a chirp stimulus using the Middle-Ear Power Analyzer (MEPA3 - HearID) by Mimosa Acoustics (Champaign, IL), software, version 3.3 [38].

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed in the ER curves for some comparisons between the studied groups. There was also a negative correlation between the static acoustic admittance at the tympanic membrane level and ER measured with a chirp stimulus at 500 and 1,000 Hz. The discriminant analysis technique, which used a chirp stimulus at 1,000 and 1,600 Hz to classify the participants' data based on ER values, achieved a correct classification rate of 59.52% for participants with DS.

CONCLUSION

While groups with abnormal middle ear status, as indicated by tympanometry, showed higher ER values compared to the DS tymp A group and the control group, similar reflectance curves were observed between control group and the DS tymp A group. WAI shows promise as a clinical diagnostic tool in investigating the impact of middle ear disorders in DS group. However, further research is required to investigate this issue in narrower age range group and a larger sample size.