Obstetric outcomes in women with end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis: a review

Pregnancy in Patients Receiving Home Dialysis

Pregnancy is an important goal for many women with CKD or kidney failure, but important barriers exist, particularly as CKD stage progresses. Women with advanced CKD often have a limited fertility window and may miss their opportunity for a pregnancy if advised to defer until after kidney transplantation. Pregnancy rates in women with advanced kidney failure or receiving dialysis remain low, and despite the improved outcomes in recent years, these pregnancies remain high risk for both mother and baby with high rates of preterm birth due to both maternal and fetal complications. However, with increased experience and advances in models of care, this paradigm may be changing. Intensive hemodialysis regimens have been shown to improve both fertility and live birth rates. Increasing dialysis intensity and individualizing dialysis prescription to residual renal function, to achieve highly efficient clearances, has resulted in improved live birth rates, longer gestations, and higher birth weights. Intensive hemodialysis regimens, particularly nocturnal and home-based dialysis, are therefore a potential option for women with kidney failure desiring pregnancy. Global initiatives for the promotion and uptake of home-based dialysis are gaining momentum and may have advantages in this unique patient population. In this article, we review the epidemiology and outcomes of pregnancy in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis recipients. We discuss the role home-based therapies may play in helping women achieve more successful pregnancies and outline the principles and practicalities of management of dialysis in pregnancy with a focus on delivery of home modalities. The experience and perspectives of a patient are also shared.

Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis outcomes

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important home-based treatment for kidney failure and accounts for 11% of all dialysis and 9% of all kidney replacement therapy globally. Although PD is available in 81% of countries, this provision ranges from 96% in high-income countries to 32% in low-income countries. Compared with haemodialysis, PD has numerous potential advantages, including a simpler technique, greater feasibility of use in remote communities, generally lower cost, lesser need for trained staff, fewer management challenges during natural disasters, possibly better survival in the first few years, greater ability to travel, fewer dietary restrictions, better preservation of residual kidney function, greater treatment satisfaction, better quality of life, better outcomes following subsequent kidney transplantation, delayed need for vascular access (especially in small children), reduced need for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and lower risk of blood-borne virus infections and of SARS-CoV-2 infection. PD outcomes have been improving over time but with great variability, driven by individual and system-level inequities and by centre effects; this variation is exacerbated by a lack of standardized outcome definitions. Potential strategies for outcome improvement include enhanced standardization, monitoring and reporting of PD outcomes, and the implementation of continuous quality improvement programmes and of PD-specific interventions, such as incremental PD, the use of biocompatible PD solutions and remote PD monitoring.

The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be advantageous compared with haemodialysis treatment, although several barriers limit its broad implementation. This review examines the epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes, including clinical, patient-reported and surrogate PD outcomes.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has distinct advantages compared with haemodialysis, including the convenience of home treatment, improved quality of life, technical simplicity, lesser need for trained staff, greater cost-effectiveness in most countries, improved equity of access to dialysis in resource-limited settings, and improved survival, particularly in the first few years of initiating therapy.

Important barriers can hamper PD utilization in low-income settings, including the high costs of PD fluids (owing to the inability to manufacture them locally and the exorbitant costs of their import), limited workforce availability and a practice culture that limits optimal PD use, often leading to suboptimal outcomes.

PD outcomes are highly variable around the world owing in part to the use of variable outcome definitions, a heterogeneous practice culture, the lack of standardized monitoring and reporting of quality indicators, and kidney failure care gaps (including health care workforce shortages, inadequate health care financing, suboptimal governance and a lack of good health care information systems).

Key outcomes include not only clinical outcomes (typically defined as medical outcomes based on clinician assessment or diagnosis) — for example, PD-related infections, technique survival, mechanical complications, hospitalizations and PD-related mortality — but also patient-reported outcomes. These outcomes are directly reported by patients and focus on how they function or feel, typically in relation to quality of life or symptoms; patient-reported outcomes are used less frequently than clinical outcomes in day-to-day routine care.

Pregnancy in women on chronic dialysis in the last decade (2010-2020): a systematic review

Background

Pregnant women with end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis are at a high risk of maternal and foetal complications. Over the years, the prognosis of their pregnancies has improved with advances in dialysis treatments and maternal and neonatal care. We conducted this systematic review to examine the recent data on maternal and foetal outcomes in pregnant women with end-stage renal failure on chronic dialysis over the last decade.

Methods

We made a systematic review of studies on pregnant women on chronic dialysis published between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. We searched the following electronic databases: Medline via PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, with search strategies for each database. We checked the titles and abstracts identified by the search equation, and two independent reviewers assessed the articles retrieved. For each study, the two reviewers separately recorded the data from each selected article on a standardized data extraction form. For each article, we recorded relevant general information on the study, patient demographic characteristics, dialysis schedule, pregnancy complications and outcomes, maternal complications, and foetal and neonatal outcomes.

Results

The literature search yielded 1668 potentially relevant abstracts. After reviewing the titles, abstracts and full text, we identified 14 studies according to the inclusion criteria. All studies were observational, nine of them were retrospective and eight were from a single-centre experience. The total number of women included in these studies was 2364 (range 8-2008) and the total number of pregnancies was 2754 (range 8-2352). The patients' ages ranged from 15 to 45 years. Obesity was observed in 808 (34.2%) women and ranged from 1 to 778. Haemodialysis was the predominant modality with 2551 (92.6%) pregnancies, and 203 (7.4%) on peritoneal dialysis. Overall, 68 out of 402 (16.9%) spontaneous miscarriages, 21 out of 402 (5.2%) therapeutic abortions and 26 (8.3%) stillbirths among 313 (stillbirths and live births) were recorded. The mean or median gestational age at delivery ranged from 25.2 to 36 weeks. The main maternal complications were preeclampsia 11.9%, hypertension 7.7% and anaemia 3.9%. Live births represented 287 (71.4%) out of 402 pregnancies, birth weight ranged from 590 to 3500 g and preterm birth was the main, most common complication in all studies, ranging from 50% to 100%. Intrauterine growth restriction was present in 5.9% and small-for-gestational-age was reported in 18.9% of neonates. There were 22 (7.6%) neonatal deaths among 287 live births and 48 (15.3%) perinatal deaths among 313 total births (stillbirths and live births).

Conclusions

Presumably, considering the increase in the number of publications and the total number of pregnancies reported therein, the frequency of pregnancy in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease treated by chronic dialysis has increased. However, the practice of treating pregnant women on dialysis differs significantly among countries. These findings highlight the need to standardize the definition of outcomes and healthcare for pregnant women on dialysis.

Risk Factors for Adverse Fetal Outcome in Hemodialysis Pregnant Women

Introduction

Pregnancy in women on dialysis is associated with a higher risk of adverse events, and the best care for this population remains to be established.

Methods

In this series, we aimed to identify factors associated with the risk of adverse fetal outcomes among 93 pregnancies in women on hemodialysis. Dialysis dose was initially assigned according to the presence of residual diuresis, body weight, and years on dialysis. Subsequent adjustments on dialysis dose were performed according to several parameters.

Results

The overall successful delivery rate was 89.2%, with a dialysis regimen of 2.6 ± 0.7 h/d, 15.4 ± 4.0 h/wk, and mean weekly standard urea Kt/V of 3.3 ± 0.6. In the logistic models, preeclampsia, lupus, primigravida, and average midweek blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level were positively related to the risk of a composite outcome of perinatal death or extreme prematurity, whereas polyhydramnios was inversely related to it. In multivariable linear regression, preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, primigravida, average midweek BUN, and residual diuresis remained significantly and independently related to fetal weight, which is a surrogate marker of fetal outcome. An average midweek BUN of 35 mg/dl was the best value for discriminating the composite outcome, and BUN ≥35 mg/dl was associated with a significant difference in a Kaplan-Meier curve (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

Our results showed that a good fetal outcome could be reached and that preeclampsia, lupus, primigravida, residual diuresis, polyhydramnios, and hemodialysis dose were important variables associated with this outcome. In addition, we suggested that a midweek BUN <35 mg/dl might be used as a target for adjusting dialysis dose until hard data were generated.

What is the role of nephrologists and nurses of the dialysis department in providing fertility care to CKD patients? A questionnaire study among care providers

Purpose

This study evaluated current fertility care for CKD patients by assessing the perspectives of nephrologists and nurses in the dialysis department.

Methods

Two different surveys were distributed for this cross-sectional study among Dutch nephrologists (N = 312) and dialysis nurses (N = 1211).

Results

Response rates were 50.9% (nephrologists) and 45.4% (nurses). Guidelines on fertility care were present in the departments of 9.0% of the nephrologists and 15.6% of the nurses. 61.7% of the nephrologists and 23.6% of the nurses informed ≥50% of their patients on potential changes in fertility due to a decline in renal function. Fertility subjects discussed by nephrologists included “wish to have children” (91.2%), “risk of pregnancy for patients’ health” (85.8%), and “inheritance of the disease” (81.4%). Barriers withholding nurses from discussing FD were based on “the age of the patient” (62.6%), “insufficient training” (55.2%), and “language and ethnicity” (51.6%). 29.2% of the nurses felt competent in discussing fertility, 8.3% had sufficient knowledge about fertility, and 75.7% needed to expand their knowledge. More knowledge and competence were associated with providing fertility health care (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

In most nephrology departments, the guidelines to appoint which care provider should provide fertility care to CKD patients are absent. Fertility counseling is routinely provided by most nephrologists, nurses often skip this part of care mainly due to insufficiencies in self-imposed competence and knowledge and barriers based on cultural diversity. The outcomes identified a need for fertility guidelines in the nephrology department and training and education for nurses on providing fertility care.

Patient Outcome in Pregnancy Requiring Dialysis: A Case Series

The optimal management of pregnant dialysis patients remains a great challenge for nephrologists, end-stage renal disease being a predictor of adverse outcomes in this condition. We report a single-center experience of four patients requiring dialysis during pregnancy, all of which resulted in successful delivery of viable infants. Our success rate may reflect an overall improvement in management of this population, with special attention paid to multiple risk factors. These include blood pressure and volume control, anemia management with erythropoietin analogues, nutritional intake and total dose of dialysis.

Peritoneal dialysis prescription during the third trimester of pregnancy

Management of the pregnant patient on peritoneal dialysis (PD) is potentially challenging because uterine enlargement may negatively affect catheter function and prescribed dwell volumes. Additional reports of the management of these patients are needed. Here, we describe a near-full-term delivery in a 27-year-old woman who had been on dialysis for 7 years. Peritoneal dialysis was continued during the entire pregnancy. In the third trimester, a higher delivered automated PD volume allowed for adequate clearance and control of volume status. A decision to hospitalize the patient to limit activity and facilitate the delivery of increased dialysate is believed to have contributed to the successful outcome for mother and infant. Our report discusses the management of this patient and reviews published dialysis prescriptions used during the third trimester of pregnancy in patients treated with PD.

Renal disease and hypertension in pregnancy

Because women are becoming pregnant at a later age, hypertension is more commonly encountered in pregnancy. In addition, with increasing numbers of young women living with renal transplants and kidney disease, it is important for physicians to be aware of the effects of pregnancy on these diseases. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to assess and care for pregnant women with kidney disease. Pre-pregnancy counselling should be offered to all women with chronic kidney disease. A review of medication to avoid teratogenicity and optimise the disease prior to conception is the ideal. Pregnancy may be the first medical review for a young woman, who may present with a previously undiagnosed renal problem.