Total Laparoscopic Aortofemoral Bypass as a Routine Procedure for the Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Review and current update of robotic-assisted laparoscopic vascular surgery

The field of vascular surgery is constantly evolving and is unsurpassed in its innovation and adoption of new technologies. Endovascular therapy has fundamentally changed the treatment paradigms for aneurysm and occlusive disease. As we continue to make advances in not only endovascular therapy, but also robotic surgery, artificial intelligence, and minimally invasive surgery, it is important that the vascular community stay at the forefront. Topics include the advantages of laparoscopic and robotic surgery over open surgery for aortic procedures, robotic versus laparoscopic aortic surgery, patient candidacy for robotic-assisted aortic surgery, and how to increase training and adoption of robotic-assisted laparoscopic aortic surgery. Future growth includes the development of new platforms and technologies, creation and validation of curriculum and virtual simulators, and conduction of randomized clinical trials to determine the best applications of robotics in vascular surgery.

Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease or abdominal aortic aneurysms - a systematic review and critical appraisal of literature

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the published literature regarding totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) surgery in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) or abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), compared with open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the medical literature between 1990 and 2016 was performed, searching the medical databases Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase and PubMed. Studies concerning totally LABF with or without control group and containing more than 10 patients were included in the analysis. Operative and aortic cross-clamping times, blood loss, rate of conversion to open surgery, mortality and morbidity within the first 30 postoperative days, hospital stay and primary and secondary patency of the graft were extracted and compared with open surgery when possible.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review, 16 of them matched the inclusion criteria for quantitative synthesis. The patient material consisted of 588 patients undergoing totally LABF, 22 due to AAA, and the remaining 566 for AIOD. Five comparative studies regarding AIOD compared 211 totally LABF procedures with 246 open procedures. Only one study concerning AAA was eligible for inclusion, and this study did not provide a comparison against an open group. The operating and aortic cross-clamping times were shorter in the open group. Conversion rates ranged from 0% to 27%. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups (p=0.64). Hospital stays ranged from 4.0 to 12.1 and 5.0 to 12.8 days in the laparoscopic group and open group, respectively. Most of the studies provided low levels of evidence, mainly due to lack of blinding, randomization and correction of bias.

CONCLUSION

Totally laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery seems to be a feasible technique with unaffected mortality and trend toward benefits in hospital stay and possibly also in complication rates. The literature published this far is sparse and with inconsistent results. More randomized controlled trials are required before this method can be widely implemented.

Long-term Results of Totally Laparoscopic Aortobifemoral Bypass

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to estimate the long-term results and patency rates of totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass in aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD).

METHODS

All 87 patients who received a laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for AIOD on an intention to treat basis between October 2003 and October 2013 were identified. All operations were performed by the same surgical team using a totally laparoscopic technique. Demographic, pre-operative, peri-operative, and follow up variables were collected and analyzed. Patients were followed up at 1 month post-operatively and annually thereafter. Patency rates were calculated in accordance with published patency reporting standards.

RESULTS

The median age was 57 years (range 40-78 years). The conversion rate was 20.6% overall. The thirty-day post-operative mortality was 1.1%. Six patients required early re-intervention. There were no graft infections. The median length hospital stay was 6 days (range 4-39 days). The mean follow up was 58.0 months (range 1-133 months). Graft limb based primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were respectively 96.1%, 98.1% and 99.4% at 1 year, and 83.0%, 92.0% and 97.0% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass is a safe alternative to open surgery in selected patients, with excellent long-term patency rates, albeit at the cost of a steep learning curve.

Total Laparoscopic Aortic Surgery Versus Minimal Access Techniques: Review Of More Than 600 Patients

In the following paper we describe our experience with a large number of patients in which either a laparoscopic assisted procedure or a total laparoscopic operation was performed.

From 1996 until 2005 a total number of 638 aortic patients were operated on using a total laparoscopic or a laparoscopic assisted approach. A total laparoscopic operation was accomplished in 236 cases. A laparoscopic assisted aortic operation was performed in 402 patients. In aneurysm patients a tube graft was more frequently implanted.

Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with a total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (3.0%) compared to a laparoscopic assisted procedure (1.8%). There was no significant difference in mortality in patients with occlusive disease and a total laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass versus a laparoscopically assisted operation.

The same tendency could be observed when analyzing the incidence of major perioperative complications. Again we found no significant difference in patients with occlusive disease yet more severe complications directly related to the operation in patients with a total laparoscopic aneurysm repair.

There was a significantly increased complication rate in total laparoscopic aortoiliac repair with a bifurcated prosthesis compared to a tube graft repair: a tendency we could not observe in aneurysm patients with a laparoscopic assisted operation.

Our data also show that there is a lot of room for technical improvements such as stapling devices or special grafts to reduce total operating times as well as the period of aortic crossclamping. The routine use of a minilaparotomy can hardly be a solution considering the technical drawbacks such as impaired vision and long term complications like ventral hernias. Compared to open surgery the midterm results of laparoscopic aortic procedures are promising. The time has come to prove that good results can be obtained in more than a few specialized centers.

Laparoscopic versus open approach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease--a multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate differences between open and laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aorto-iliac occlusive disease on postoperative morbidity and mortality.

DESIGN

A multicentre randomised controlled trial.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and November 2009, 28 patients with severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (TASC II C or D) were randomised between laparoscopic and open approach at one community hospital and one university hospital (TASC = Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus on the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease).

RESULTS

The operation time was longer for the laparoscopic approach (mean 4 h 19 min (2 h 00 min to 6 h 20 min) vs. 3 h 30 min (1 h 42 min to 5 h 11 min); p = 0.101)). Nevertheless, postoperative recovery and in-hospital stay were significantly shorter after laparoscopic surgery. Also oral intake could be restarted earlier (mean 20 h 34 min (6 h 00 min to 26 h 55 min) vs. 43 h 43 min (19 h 40 min to 77 h 30 min); p = 0.00014)) as well as postoperative mobilisation (walking) (mean 46 h 15 min (16 h 07 min to 112 h 40 min) vs. mean 94 h 14 min (66 h 10 min to 127 h 23 min); p = 0.00016)). Length of hospitalisation was shorter (mean 5.5 days (2.5-15) vs. mean 13.0 days (7-45); p = 0.0095)). Visual pain scores and visual discomfort scores were both lower after laparoscopic surgery. Also return to normal daily activities was achieved earlier. There were no major complications in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aorto-iliac occlusive disease is a safe procedure with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity and in-hospital stay and earlier recovery.

Successful total robotic-assisted aortobifemoral bypass for treatment of complicated aortoiliac occlusive disease

Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (AFB) for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is a durable, minimally invasive procedure with comparable long-term outcomes to conventional open AFB. However, laparoscopic AFB requires advance training in laparoscopy with prolong learning curve to accomplish infrarenal aortic dissection and vascular reconstruction to minimize aortic clamp time and leg ischemia time. We describe another minimally invasive technique of total robotic-assisted AFB for extensive, complicated AIOD in 3 patients who are not endovascular candidate or have failed endoluminal approach previously.

Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease

The aim of this study was to evaluate middle-term clinical results of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) to treat aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Between 2002 and 2007, 28 consecutive patients received robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass grafting ( n = 24) or aortoiliac endarterectomy ( n = 4). Patients were followed prospectively. RALS could be completed successfully in 24 patients; conversion to open surgery was necessary in four patients (14%). Median operative time was 350 min. Median aortic clamping time was 70 min. Median hospital stay was five days. One patient died within 30 days. Non-lethal complications occurred in four patients (14%). Clinical symptoms improved in all patients. Primary and secondary limb-based patencies at 36 months were 89% and 91%, respectively. In conclusion, RALS is a feasible and durable technique for patients with AIOD. Although operative times are long, RALS allows rapid postoperative recovery.

Cirurgia aórtica totalmente laparoscópica para tratamento de isquemia crítica de membros: relato do primeiro caso no Brasil

A cirurgia videolaparoscópica (CVL) vem evoluindo como alternativa cirúrgica menos invasiva para o tratamento da doença aterosclerótica oclusiva aortoilíaca. O objetivo deste relato de caso foi demonstrar os resultados da primeira cirurgia aórtica totalmente laparoscópica relatada no Brasil para o tratamento da doença oclusiva aortoilíaca em paciente com isquemia crítica. Os tempos cirúrgicos totais de dissecção e exposição da aorta antes do clampeamento, exposição retroperitoneal da aorta, clampeamento total e da anastomose proximal com técnica totalmente laparoscópica foram de 220 minutos, 15 e 27 minutos, 42 minutos, 110 minutos e 78 minutos, respectivamente. A técnica videolaparoscópica é mais uma ferramenta minimamente invasiva, viável, segura e eficaz para o tratamento da doença oclusiva aortoilíaca extensa. Ela, que nada mais é do que a cirurgia convencional realizada sob visão laparoscópica, tem bons resultados a longo prazo, que se associam à elegância técnica.

Cirurgia aorto-ilíaca videolaparoscópica para tratamento de isquemia crítica de membros: relato do primeiro caso no Brasil

A cirurgia videolaparoscópica vem evoluindo como alternativa cirúrgica menos invasiva para o tratamento da doença aterosclerótica oclusiva aorto-ilíaca. O objetivo deste relato é demonstrar os resultados da primeira cirurgia videolaparoscópica realizada no Brasil para o tratamento da doença oclusiva aorto-ilíaca, associada a procedimentos híbridos distais para lesões ateroscleróticas multissegmentares em paciente com isquemia crítica. A técnica videolaparoscópica é mais uma ferramenta minimamente invasiva, viável, segura e eficaz para o tratamento da doença oclusiva aorto-ilíaca extensa. A referida técnica, que nada mais é do que a cirurgia convencional realizada sob visão laparoscópica, tem bons resultados a longo prazo, associados à elegância técnica.

Laparoscopic surgery in the management of complex aortic disease: techniques and lessons learned

Laparoscopic vascular surgery must be assessed in the context of both open and endovascular interventions. The development of improved laparoscopic equipment and endoscopic techniques makes performance of laparoscopy easier, but endovascular interventions still hold wide appeal because they are minimally invasive and are easier to master by vascular surgeons. Despite decreased morbidity and recovery time, endovascular interventions have inferior durability and higher reintervention rates when compared with open aortoiliac interventions. In particular, after endovascular aneurysm repair, patients need lifelong surveillance because there is potential for delayed endoleaks, aortic neck dilatation, graft migration, and ongoing risk of aneurysmal rupture. These limitations of endovascular therapy are the impetus behind the pursuit of other minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy, in vascular surgery. Currently, two evolving laparoscopic approaches are available for abdominal vascular surgery: total laparoscopic aortic surgery and hybrid techniques that combine laparoscopy with endovascular techniques to treat failing endografts.

Total laparoscopic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with short proximal necks

With the development of endovascular aneurysm repair, abdominal aortic aneurysms with short infrarenal necks (< or =10 mm, AAASN) are considered juxtarenal aneurysms. Minimally invasive treatment consists of hybrid procedures or fenestrated endografts. We present our experience with direct aortic repair for AAASN performed via a total laparoscopic approach. Data are expressed as median values with extremes. From February 2002 to December 2007, 32 patients had total laparoscopic AAASN repair. Length of the infrarenal aortic neck was 5 mm (0-10). Median age of the 29 men and three women was 70 years (range 50-84). Nine patients presented with preoperative grade 1 renal insufficiency (28.1%). The procedure was totally laparoscopic in 30 patients (93.7%). Aortic approaches included left retrorenal (n = 24) and transperitoneal left retrocolic (n = 8) exposures. Median operative and clamping times were 270 (range 215-410) and 83 (range 36-147) min, respectively. Aortic clamping was suprarenal in 14 cases (43.7%), with suprarenal clamping time of 24 min (range 9-37). Median blood loss was 850 mL (range 215-2,400). Thirty-day mortality was 3.1% (one patient died from myocardial infarction). Two patients presented with severe systemic complications (6.4%, postoperative coagulopathy with hemorrhagic syndrome, pneumopathy). Seventeen patients developed mild or moderate systemic nonlethal complications (53.1%): transient renal insufficiencies (n = 12), grade 1 ischemic colitis (n = 1), surrenal insufficiency (n = 1), myocardial ischemia (n = 1), and cardiac arythmia (n = 2). One patient was reoperated for an intestinal obstruction. Liquid diet was reintroduced after 1 day (range 1-13). Most patients were ambulatory by day 3 (range 2-17). Median lengths of stay were 48 hr (range 12-552) in the intensive care unit and 10 days (range 4-37) in the hospital. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range 1-50), 28 patients are alive, with complete recovery without graft anomalies. Three patients died, from pneumopathy (n = 1) and carcinoma (n = 2), respectively, at 29, 19, and 44 months' follow-up. Two patients presented stable juxta-renal aortic dilation <35 mm. Total laparoscopic juxtarenal AAA repair is feasible and worthwhile for patients with AAASN. Short- and midterm results match well with those of open surgery. Total laparoscopic repair in AAASN reduces the trauma of extensive surgical approaches. Based on these encouraging early results, we elected to perform laparoscopy whenever possible in good surgical risk patients with AASN.

Curva de aprendizado em cirurgia aórtica videolaparoscópica: estudo experimental em porcos

CONTEXTO: A cirurgia videolaparoscópica (CVL) vem evoluindo como alternativa cirúrgica menos invasiva para o tratamento da doença aterosclerótica oclusiva aorto-ilíaca e do aneurisma da aorta abdominal. Poucos estudos avaliaram objetivamente a curva de aprendizado com essa técnica em cirurgia vascular. OBJETIVO: Avaliar objetivamente os tempos e a evolução de cada passo cirúrgico e demonstrar a exeqüibilidade dessa técnica. MÉTODOS: Entre outubro 2007 e janeiro de 2008, dois cirurgiões vasculares iniciantes na CVL operaram, após cursos e treinamentos, seis porcos consecutivos, com dissecção aórtica e interposição de um enxerto de dácron em um segmento da aorta infra-renal abdominal, com técnica totalmente laparoscópica. RESULTADOS: Todos os tempos cirúrgicos foram decrescentes ao longo do estudo, apresentando redução de 45,9% no tempo total de cirurgia, 85,8% no tempo de dissecção da aorta, 81,2% na exposição da aorta, 55,1% no clampeamento total, 71% na confecção da anastomose proximal e 64,9% na anastomose distal. CONCLUSÃO: O presente estudo mostrou que os resultados técnicos satisfatórios da CVL vascular ocorreram somente após longa curva de aprendizado, que foi decrescente ao longo do tempo, à medida que aumentou a experiência e vivência com os materiais e com a visão não-estereoscópica. Essa técnica pode ser realizada com perfeição por cirurgiões vasculares desde que façam cursos especializados, com treinamento em simuladores e animais, e desde que busquem constante aprimoramento a fim de conseguir resultados similares aos obtidos com a cirurgia convencional.

[Laparoscopy-assisted aortobifemoral bypass through the transperitoneal retrorenal approach]

The aim of laparoscopic vascular surgery in the aortoiliac segment is to replicate the excellent outcomes of open aortic surgery while providing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. We report the case of a 49-year old man with disabling hip claudication and rest pain in his left lower extremity. On examination the patient had reduced right femoral pulse and absent pulses in his left lower extremity. Angiography revealed occlusive disease in the left aortoiliac segment and right common iliac artery stenoses. Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass was planned. The surgical technique included 70 degrees -right lateral decubitus position and retrorenal retrocolic dissection from the left common iliac artery to the left renal vein. Minilaparotomy consisted of aortic clamping, arteriotomy, and end-to-side aorto-prosthetic anastomosis with Dacron graft. Time to extubation was 5 hours; peristalsis was recovered 72 hours after surgery. The patient was discharged from hospital after cardiologic assessment 9 days after surgery.

Totally Laparoscopic Aortohepatic Bypass for Aortic Debranching During Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular grafting of the aorta is gaining widespread acceptance for treating aortic aneurysms. Para-renal aneurysms or thoraco-abdominal aneurysms may be a relative contra-indication for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) unless visceral vessels can be debranched.

REPORT

We describe a case of thoraco-abdominal aneurysm extending from the descending thoracic aorta to the level of coeliac artery. A totally laparoscopic retrograde aorto-hepatic bypass was performed in conjunction with endograft exclusion of the aneurysm and coverage of the coeliac artery ostium.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic debranching of visceral vessels extends the indications of EVAR.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta

BACKGROUND

Recently introduced robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) facilitates endoscopic surgical manipulation and thereby reduces the learning curve for (advanced) laparoscopic surgery. We present our learning curve with RALS for aortobifemoral bypass grafting as a treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

METHODS

Between February 2002 and May 2005, 17 patients were treated in our institution with robot-assisted laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypasses. Dissection was performed laparoscopically and the robot was used to make the aortic anastomosis. Operative time, clamping time, and anastomosis time, as well as blood loss and hospital stay, were used as parameters to evaluate the results and to compare the first eight (group 1) and the last nine patients (group2).

RESULTS

Total median operative, clamping, and anastomosis times were 365 min (range: 225-589 min), 86 min (range: 25-205 min), and 41 min (range: 22-110 min), respectively. Total median blood loss was 1,000 ml (range: 100-5,800 ml). Median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 3-57 days). In this series 16/18 anastomoses were completed with the use of the robotic system. Three patients were converted (two in group 1, one in group 2), and one patient died postoperatively (group 1). Median clamping and anastomosis times were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (111 min [range: 85-205 min] versus 57.5 min [range: 25-130 min], p < 0.01 and 74 min [range: 40-110 min] versus 36 min [range: 22-69 min], p < 0.01, respectively) Total operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay showed no significant difference between groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted aortic anastomosis was shown to have a steep learning curve with considerable reduction of clamping and anastomosis times. However, due to a longer learning curve for laparoscopic dissection of the abdominal aorta, operation times were not significantly shortened. Even with robotic assistance, laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery remains a complex procedure.

Laparoscopic Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the results of clinical studies on laparoscopic surgery for aorto-iliac disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 1966 to September 2006 on laparoscopic and robotic vascular surgery was performed. Only patient series containing more than 5 cases were included. Operative, clamping and anastomosis times, conversion, mortality and morbidity and hospital stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were identified. These were all descriptive and included 9 comparative studies. Operative times varied widely, the shortest being for hand-assisted procedures (2.5-4 hours) and the longest for totally laparoscopic procedures (4-6.5 hours). Clamping times were all<1 hour in hand-assisted procedures while in other techniques clamping times from 1-2.5 hours were seen. The conversion rate varied from <5% up to 16% in smaller series. The mortality rate was approximately 5% and frequently caused by cardiac ischemia. A variety of problems ranging from minor local wound problems to cardiopulmonary- and renal insufficiency, bleeding, ureter lesions and graft thrombosis were described. Mean hospital stay for nearly all procedures was <1 week.

CONCLUSIONS

Experience of laparoscopic surgery for aorto-iliac disease is still limited. Most study results are biased by patient selection. Only a few surgeons have mastered the required surgical technique and more data are needed to asses the clinical potential of this type of surgery, in comparison with the endovascular alternative. For wider implementation simplification of the surgical procedure seems necessary.

A Laparoscopic Access Technique for Endovascular Procedures:Surgeon Training in an Animal Model

PURPOSE

To present a laparoscopic technique for placing a transperitoneal conduit in the common iliac artery (CIA) or distal aorta to circumvent stenosed or occluded iliac systems and to assess the success of this laparoscopic access in a live animal model.

TECHNIQUE

A porcine model was used owing to similarities in anatomy and size of the pig aorta to the human common iliac artery (CIA). Ethical approval was obtained, and the technique was developed in 8 animals under general anesthesia. A curved hollow needle, a partially stented Dacron conduit, an airtight laparoscopic port and a sealing sheath and valve were developed specifically for percutaneous access through the abdominal wall. A transperitoneal approach was used to the distal aorta. Cannulation by the curved hollow needle via the new port was under direct vision. The conduit was inserted over a guidewire after needle removal and deployed under fluoroscopy. The distal end of the conduit was secured by the sealing sheath and valve, enabling wire and catheter exchange thereafter. A 2-day educational workshop was held for 12 vascular surgeons with a range of laparoscopic experience. After learning the technique on a simulator model, they worked in pairs, alternating surgeon/assistant roles to insert conduits into 12 animals under general anesthesia. Laparoscopic cannulation in all 12 animals was successful. There was no bleeding around the conduit at the aortic arteriotomy. All animals were euthanized after confirmation of conduit patency by back-bleeding.

CONCLUSION

This novel technique bridges the gap between laparoscopic and endovascular techniques in striving for minimally invasive solutions to the treatment of vascular disease. Adaptation to human beings is currently underway and will mean increasing the applicability of endovascular solutions to those patients in whom it would otherwise be denied. The technique would appear not to require specialist laparoscopic skills.

Enxerto aorto-femoral por via laparoscópica: modelo experimental

OBJETIVO: Verificar a exeqüibilidade de enxerto aorto-femoral por via laparoscópica. MÉTODO: Operamos porco de 75 kg sob anestesia geral. Empregando a técnica do avental (apron) de Dion, expusemos a aorta por laparoscopia. Brevemente, em decúbito dorsal horizontal, dissecamos um "avental" do peritônio parietal esquerdo. A dissecção prosseguiu com rotação medial do cólon esquerdo. O avental, posteriormente fixo à linha mediana, serviu de anteparo às alças intestinais. Pinçamos a aorta e realizamos enxerto aorto-femoral com o tempo abdominal totalmente laparoscópico. RESULTADO: O enxerto foi realizado com sucesso, e o fluxo sangüíneo na prótese foi demonstrado através da incisão femoral. CONCLUSÃO: O enxerto aorto-femoral experimental laparoscópico é exeqüível através da exposição com a técnica do avental.