Pathological femoral fracture caused by primary bone tumour: a population-based study

Amputation surgery associated with shortened survival in patients with localized extremity bone sarcoma

Background

This study assesses survival rates among patients with localized extremity bone sarcoma who have undergone amputation, pinpointing subpopulations that are disproportionately affected by amputation-related survival disparities.

Methods

Examination of data was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, analyzing records of 3765 patients diagnosed with localized extremity bone sarcoma between 2000 and 2019. Of these, 857 received amputations (Amputation cohort), and 2908 underwent limb-sparing surgeries. Propensity score matching, considering demographic and clinical features, was utilized to ensure a fair comparison.

Results

Following propensity score matching, the study focused on 1714 cases. The Amputation cohort was observed to have significantly poorer survival rates (Cancer-Specific Survival [CSS]: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.28, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.05-1.55; Overall Survival [OS]: HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.15-1.63). Subsequent subgroup analysis indicated that individuals with tumors exceeding 8 cm in size or those located in the lower limbs were notably at a higher risk of shortened survival (for tumors >8 cm - CSS: HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.71; OS: HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.09-1.76; for lower limb tumors - CSS: HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.54; OS: HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.11-1.61).

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that patients diagnosed with localized extremity bone sarcoma undergoing amputation exhibit lower survival rates, especially in cases involving tumors of greater size or those situated in the lower limbs. In patient groups where amputation is inevitable, careful follow-up is required after surgical intervention.

Establishment and validation of systematic prognostic nomograms in patients over 60 years of age with osteosarcoma: A multicenter external verification study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop and validate systematic nomograms to predict cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in osteosarcoma patients aged over 60 years.

METHODS

We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and identified 982 patients with osteosarcoma over 60 years of age diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Overall, 306 patients met the requirements for the training group. Next, we enrolled 56 patients who met the study requirements from multiple medical centers as the external validation group to validate and analyze our model. We collected all available variables and finally selected eight that were statistically associated with CSS and OS through Cox regression analysis. Integrating the identified variables, we constructed 3- and 5-year OS and CSS nomograms, respectively, which were further evaluated by calculating the C-index. A calibration curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of the model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves measured the predictive capacity of the nomograms. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for all patient-based variables to explore the influence of various factors on patient survival. Finally, a decision curve analysis (DCA) curve was used to analyze whether our model would be suitable for application in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Cox regression analysis of clinical variables identified age, sex, marital status, tumor grade, tumor laterality, tumor size, M-stage, and surgical treatment as prognostic factors. Nomograms showed good predictive capacity for OS and CSS. We calculated that the C-index of the OS nomogram of the training population was 0.827 (95% CI 0.778-0.876), while that of the CSS nomogram was 0.722 (95% CI 0.665-0.779). The C-index of the OS nomogram evaluated on the external validation population was 0.716 (95% CI 0.575-0.857), while that of the CSS nomogram was 0.642 (95% CI 0.50-0.788). Furthermore, the calibration curve of our prediction models indicated the nomograms could accurately predict patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The constructed nomogram is a useful tool for accurately predicting OS and CSS at 3 and 5 years for patients over 60 years of age with osteosarcoma and can assist clinicians in making appropriate decisions in practice.

A meta-analysis comparing efficiency of limb-salvage surgery vs amputation on patients with osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Osteogenic sarcoma is the central malignant bone neoplasm affecting the bones of arms and legs and rarely the soft tissues outside the bones. Historically, amputation was the chief surgical technique; currently, the popular standard is limb salvage surgery (LSS), although both procedures' effect on 5‐year‐event survival, 5‐year disease‐free survival rates (DFS) and the local recurrence is uncertain. Therefore, this meta‐study aimed to establish the relationship between the effect of LSS and amputation in subjects with osteogenic carcinoma. A systematic survey till January 2021 to know the effect of LLS vs amputation with subjects treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was conducted. Clinical studies were identified with 9760 subjects with osteosarcoma of the extremities at the beginning of the trial; 7095 of them were managed with limb salvage surgery and 2611 with amputation. This study tried to compare the effects of LSS vs amputation in subjects with osteogenic sarcoma in the extremities. The dichotomous method in statistical analysis was used as a tool for establishing odds ratio (OR) at a confidence interval of 95% (CI) to assess the efficiency of LSS and amputees with osteosarcoma of the extremities with a fixed or random‐effect model. Although patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities managed with LSS were significantly related to a higher local recurrence rate than those treated with amputation, they were also associated with higher 5‐year overall survival (OS) than amputation. Patients showed no significant difference in a 5‐year DFS rate between LSS vs amputation. The subjects who have undergone LSS for osteosarcoma of the extremities may have a higher risk of local recurrence than amputees. However, LSS may increase 5‐year OS compared to amputees. These results depict that local recurrence of osteosarcoma does not influence survival rate. However, more studies are needed to validate this finding.

Limb-salvage surgery offers better five-year survival rate than amputation in patients with limb osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone sarcoma. Currently, the main treatment option for high-grade osteosarcomas is neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection of the lesion and adjuvant chemotherapy. Limb salvage surgery (LSS) and amputation are the main surgical techniques; however, controversy still exists concerning the best surgical method. Our meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of LSS and amputation combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with limb osteosarcoma, in terms of 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence rate.

Methods

Following the established methodology of PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar from 1975 until January 2020. Two independent reviewers evaluated the study quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of the OS, DFS and local recurrence rate were calculated.

Results

Thirteen studies were finally included with a total of 2884 patients; 1986 patients undergone LSS and 898 amputations. Five-year overall survival was almost 2-fold in patients treated with LSS than those treated with amputation (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.35-2.93; I² = 74%, p < 0.001). No difference was found in 5-year DFS between LSS patients and amputees (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.55-2.79; I² = 67%, p = 0.01). The odds of local recurrence was numerically higher in LSS compared to amputation but not statistically significant (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 0.95-5.53; I² = 47%, p = 0.05). However, the included studies did not clearly define differences in the stages of patients of the two groups.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that in patients with limb osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, LSS is associated with a higher 5-year overall survival and the odds of local recurrence may be increased but these results should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity.

A comparative study between limb-salvage and amputation for treating osteosarcoma

Purpose

Osteosarcoma is an aggressive malignant neoplasm, and conflicting findings have been reported on the survival and function recovery in osteosarcoma patients experiencing limb salvage or amputation. In the present study, we compared clinical outcomes regarding limb salvage surgery vs. amputation for osteosarcoma patients by a meta-analysis.

Method

Literature search was conducted in CNKI, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and Web of Sciences, and the quality of included studies was evaluated based on Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of the local recurrence, 5-year overall survival, and metastasis occurrence were calculated.

Results

17 articles were included according to selection criteria. There were 1343 patients in total derived from these studies. Our result showed that there was no significant difference between limb salvage surgery and amputation with respect to local recurrence, and patients with limb salvage surgery had a higher 5-year overall survival, and a lower metastasis occurrence.

Conclusions

The present study provided more comprehensive evidences to support limb salvage surgery as an optimal treatment of osteosarcoma patients.

Does a pathological fracture affect the prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities?

Opinion remains divided as to whether the development of pathological fracture affects the prognosis of patients with an osteosarcoma of the extremities.

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of papers which reported the outcomes of osteosarcoma patients with and without a pathological fracture. There were eight eligible papers for final analysis which reported on 1713 patients, of whom 303 (17.7%) had a pathological fracture. The mean age for 1464 patients in six studies was 23.2 years old (2 to 82). The mean follow-up for 1481 patients in seven studies was 90.1 months (6 to 240).

The pooled estimates of local recurrence rates in osteosarcoma patients with and without pathological fractures were 14.4% (8.7 to 20.0) versus 11.4% (8.0 to 14.8). The pooled estimate of relative risk was 1.39 (0.89 to 2.20). The pooled estimates of five-year event-free survival rates in osteosarcoma patients with and without a pathological fracture were 49.3% (95% CI 43.6 to 54.9) versus 66.8% (95% CI 60.7 to 72.8). The pooled estimate of relative risk was 1.33 (1.12 to 1.59). There was no significant difference in the rate of local recurrence between patients who were treated by amputation or limb salvage.

The development of a pathological fracture is a negative prognostic indicator in osteosarcoma and is associated with a reduced five-year event-free survival and a possibly higher rate of local recurrence. Our findings suggest that there is no absolute indication for amputation, as similar rates of local recurrence can be achieved in patients who are carefully selected for limb salvage.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1396–1403

Meta-analysis of limb salvage versus amputation for treating high-grade and localized osteosarcoma in patients with pathological fracture

The goal of this study was to determine outcomes related to limb salvage vs. amputation for treating high-grade and localized osteosarcoma in patients with pathological fractures. Literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Database. Two reviewers independently assessed all eligible publications. The primary outcome measurement was pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of local recurrence, 5-year overall survival rate and metastatic occurrence calculated through the fixed-effects method. Seven eligible studies were identified, which included a total of 284 patients. The risk for local recurrence and 5-year overall survival rate did not differ significantly (P>0.05) between the limb salvage group and amputation group, with an OR of 1.48 (95% CI, 0.67-3.30) and 1.85 (95% CI, 0.86-3.98), respectively. The risk for metastatic occurrence differed significantly (P<0.05), with an OR of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.10-0.91). The occurrence of a pathological fracture is not regarded as an absolute contraindication to limb salvage in patients with high-grade and localized osteosarcoma. Limb salvage as an alternative for treating high-grade and localized osteosarcoma in patients with pathological fracture does not greatly increase the risk for local recurrence or 5-year overall survival rate compared to amputation and has a lower risk for metastatic occurrence.