A comparison of the effects of radiation on tumour growth delay and cell survival. The effect of radiation quality

Kinetics of Depopulation, Repopulation and Host Cell Infiltration in the Rhabdomyosarcoma R1H After 14 MeV Neutron Irradiation

The kinetics of depopulation and repopulation of the solid transplantable rhabdomyosarcoma R1H in the rat was studied following irradiation with 5 Gy of 14 MeV neutrons. Several parameters were sequentially measured over a time period of 4 weeks after irradiation: the tumour volume was assessed by in situ caliper measurements; the numerical density of tumour cells was obtained by morphometry; the clonogenic fraction of tumour cells was derived from in vitro colony assay; and the numerical ratio of host to tumour cells was determined by flow cytometry. From these primary parameters the number of clonogenic tumour cells, non-clonogenic tumour cells, and nucleated host cells per tumour, as well as their variation with time, were derived. The results were compared with two sets of data obtained previously for the same tumour exposed to 15 Gy of 200 kVp X-rays. Survival of tumour cells was reduced to 5.5 +/- 0.5% by 5 Gy neutrons and to 4.5 +/- 0.5% by 15 Gy X-rays, i.e. an RBE of close to 3. There was a lag period before the onset of repopulation (4.9 +/- 0.4 days and 4.9 +/- 0.5 days, respectively), followed by a high initial rate of repopulation corresponding to a doubling time of 2.0 +/- 0.2 days for neutrons and 2.1 +/- 0.2 days for X-rays. The rate of depopulation was significantly different for the two treatment modalities; the halving time for the number of non-clonogenic tumour cells was 11 +/- 4 days for neutrons and 2.8 +/- 0.5 days for X-rays.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Tumor hypoxia: its impact on cancer therapy

The presence of radiation resistant cells in solid human tumors is believed to be a major reason why radiotherapy fails to eradicate some such neoplasms. The presence of unperfused regions containing hypoxic cells may also contribute to resistance to some chemotherapeutic agents. This paper reviews the evidence that radiation resistant hypoxic cells exist in solid tumors, the assumptions and results of the methods used to detect hypoxic cells, and the causes and nature of tumor hypoxia. Evidence that radiation resistant hypoxic cells exist in the vast majority of transplanted rodent tumors and xenografted human tumors is direct and convincing, but problems with the current methodology make quantitative statements about the magnitude of the hypoxic fractions problematic. Evidence that radiation resistant hypoxic cells exist in human tumors is considerably more indirect than the evidence for their existence in transplanted tumors, but it is convincing. However, evidence that hypoxic cells are a significant cause of local failure after optimal clinical radiotherapy or chemotherapy regimens is limited and less definitive. The nature and causes of tumor hypoxia are not definitively known. In particular, it is not certain whether hypoxia is a chronic or a transient state, whether hypoxic cells are proliferating or quiescent, or whether hypoxic cells have the same repair capacity as aerobic cells. A number of new methods for assessing hypoxia are reviewed. While there are still problems with all of the new techniques, some of them have the potential of allowing the assessment of hypoxia in individual human tumors.

L.H. Gray Medal lecture: cell kinetics and radiation oncology

Development of the study of human tumor cell kinetics during the past decades has deepened our understanding of the natural history of human cancers. Mathematical models based on the data which have been accumulated may help to evaluate, for the various types of human tumors, the time during their growth that the dissemination process occurred and to calculate the size distribution of the subclinical metastases at the time of treatment of the primary tumor. The perturbations caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy are complex and include reassortment of surviving cells and repopulation. Currently it appears difficult in clinical practice to take advantage of cell reassortment while the differences in the rate and in the duration of repopulation between normal and neoplastic tissues are exploited in most therapeutic regimens. A better knowledge of cell and tissue kinetics following treatment may help to optimize the treatment scheduling in particular during combined administration of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The study of the kinetics of proliferation in normal tissue has shown the existence of several types of inhibitory and stimulatory humoral factors. These, when purified, can be used to manipulate the proliferation of critical normal tissues in order to protect them during the administration of cell cycle specific drug or to accelerate their regeneration after treatment.

Effect of tumor dissaggregation on results of in vitro cell survival assay after in vivo treatment of the EMT-6 tumor: x-rays, cyclophosphamide, and bleomycin

EMT-6 tumors were treated in vivo with 300 kVp X-rays, cyclophosphamide, or bleomycin. Tumor cell suspensions were prepared by digesting tumors with trypsin or a collagenase-deoxyribonuclease-pronase cocktail, and cells were plated in vitro for determination of fractional cell survival. Cell survival after X-rays was identical for the two disaggregation methods. Trypsin-derived cells were far more sensitive to bleomycin but less sensitive to cyclophosphamide than those prepared with the mixed enzyme cocktail. Interaction of drug produced and enzyme caused damage was the probable cause for these discrepancies. The nature of the interaction may be drug specific and therefore unpredictable. The results were unlikely to be due to different nonrepresentative tumor cell samples being produced by the two digestion methods, because the X-ray cell survival curves were so similar for the two products.

Tumour volume response, initial cell kill and cellular repopulation in B16 melanoma treated with cyclophosphamide and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea

The relationship between tumour volume response and cell kill in B16 melanoma following treatment in vivo with cyclophosphamide (CY) and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) was investigated. Tumour volume response, expressed as growth delay, was estimated from measurements of tumour dimensions. Depression of in vitro colony-forming ability of cells from treated tumours was used as the measure of tumour cell kill. The relationship between these parameters was clearly different for the two agents studied. CY produced more growth delay (7.5 days) per decade of tumour cell kill than CCNU (2 to 3.5 days). The possibility that this was due to a technical artefact was rejected in favour of an alternative explanation that different rates of cellular repopulation in tumours treated with CY and CCNU might be responsible. Cellular repopulation was measured directly, by performing cell-survival assays at various times after treatment with doses of CY and CCNU which produced about 3 decades of cell kill. The rate of repopulation by clonogenic cells was much slower after treatment with CY than with CCNU, and this appears to account for the longer duration of the growth delay obtained with CY.

The effect of radiation on tumour growth delay, cell survival and cure of the animal using a single tumour system

The response of a murine tumour to single doses of X rays has been measured using three different assays--animal cure, cell survival in vitro after irradiation in vivo, and tumour growth delay. The dose to cure 50% of the animals, the TCD50, was 79.0 Gy. This was not affected by clamping the tumours to render all the cells hypoxic at the time of irradiation, implying that most of the cells in the tumour were hypoxic already. The enhancement ratio for the hypoxic cell sensitizer Ro-07-0582 was 2.1. The cell survival assay gave an enhancement ratio of 1.6 and an hypoxic fraction of 5%. The discrepancy in the estimates of the hypoxic fraction can be explained by the ability of the naturally hypoxic cells, but not the oxic ones, to recover from potentially lethal damage in vivo. Neither the cell survival assay nor the growth delay assay agreed with the TCD50 assay as to the effect of the hypoxic cell sensitizer, even allowing for recovery from potentially lethal damage. It is doubtful whether the measured survival curve would predict the measured TCD50.

The effect of an hypoxic cell sensitizer on tumour growth delay and cell survival. Implications for cell survival in situ and in vitro

A comparison has been made of the effects of the 2-nitroimidazole Ro-07-0582 on tumour growth delay after irradiation and tumour cell survival in vitro after irradiation in vivo. This compound has previously been shown to be a specific sensitizer of hypoxic cells. A dose of 1 mg/g body weight gave an enhancement ratio of 2-2 for both growth delay and cell survival in a system where high pressure oxygen has been shown to have no effect. However, while the hypoxic fraction in the tumour was estimated to be less then 10% from the growth delay curves, the survival curves gave a value in excess of 50%. This discrepancy probably reflects differences in the response of cells left in situ or removed and assayed in vitro.