Re-irradiation of soft-tissue sarcoma

Reirradiation in Conservative Salvage of Recurrent Soft-tissue Sarcoma: An Analysis of Treatment Efficacy and Toxicities

OBJECTIVE

Compared with radical resection alone, perioperative radiation therapy (RT) combined with neurovascular preserving surgery is the standard for the management of virgin soft-tissue sarcomas. Yet, the optimal management of a local recurrence remains unclear. We report outcomes of patients with locally recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma treated with resection and reirradiation at the University of Florida.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients treated with primary conservative surgery and radiation for soft-tissue sarcoma followed by salvage resection and reirradiation for a local recurrence at our institution.

RESULTS

We analyzed 23 patients treated between 1976 and 2014 (median follow-up, 46 mo). Tumor sites included: proximal extremity, 11 patients; trunk, 6; distal extremity, 5; and head and neck, 1. All patients had conservative gross total resection of their recurrent tumor, without amputation. For reirradiation, 16 patients received external-beam RT alone, 6 received external-beam RT and brachytherapy, and 1 received brachytherapy alone. Two patients received chemotherapy. After retreatment, the 5-year overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, and distant control rates were 39%, 42%, 46%, and 60%, respectively. Ten patients experienced local recurrences, 1 experienced regional recurrence, and 9 developed distant metastases. Retreatment-related complications ranged from delayed wound healing to limb amputation; 8 patients required amputation. Only 3 patients remained disease-free at last follow-up. No statistically significant associations were found between treatment factors (eg, RT dose) and local control.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving local control of recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma is challenging. Treatment with reoperation and reirradiation can lead to debilitating complications affecting function and quality of life.

Salvage Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Radiation-Induced Second Primary Sarcoma of the Head and Neck

Purpose: Salvage radiation therapy (RT) is a potentially curative treatment option for head and neck sarcomas (HNS) that did not respond to previous treatment(s). We report the first clinical experience of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for salvage treatment of locally recurrent (LR) or RT-induced secondary HNS after surgery and/or radiotherapy.

Methods and Materials: A retrospective analysis of the ongoing prospective data registries from the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center was conducted. Patients with LR-HNS who underwent surgery and/or RT and those with RT-induced second primary HNS were included. Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late radiation toxicity scoring system, respectively. The actuarial 12-month local progression-free and overall survival rates (LPFS and OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Between 10/2015 and 7/2017, 19 consecutive and non-selected patients with LR-HNS or RT-induced secondary HNS received definitive doses of CIRT delivered with pencil beam scanning technology for salvage. Six patients had locally recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma, and another 6 had chondrosarcoma. Among these 12 patients, 4 had received one prior course of RT. Seven additional patients had an RT-induced second primary soft tissue sarcoma (STS)/osteosarcoma after RT. The median time between the completion of initial treatment (either surgery only or surgery followed by adjuvant RT) and salvage CIRT was 30.6 months.

The median follow-up time was 13.1 (range 1.6-41.1) months. All patients except one (for re-irradiation) completed the planned CIRT for salvage. The median dose of salvage CIRT was 60 GyE. Three patients developed local progression, and another 3 developed distant metastasis after salvage CIRT. Deaths occurred (3 patients) only in patients with radiation-induced second primary sarcoma at the time of analysis. The actuarial 12-month LPFS, DMFS and OS rates were 74.6%, 82.6% and 86.5%, respectively.

Two patients irradiated for a second primary sarcoma had Grade 4 bleeding during CIRT, including one who experienced the rupture of an optic artery aneurysm unrelated to his disease or the salvage treatment. No patient had Grade 5 toxicity during treatment. Except for one patient who died of hemorrhage 3.5 months after the completion of CIRT, no moderate or severe late toxicities were observed.

Conclusions: With few observed acute and late toxicities, salvage CIRT can provide effective short-term tumor control. Further research, preferably in a prospective fashion, will be required to confirm the efficacy and safety of salvage CIRT in this patient population.

Preserving the legacy of reirradiation: A narrative review of historical publications

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to illustrate the historical development of reirradiation during several decades of the 20th century, in particular between 1920 and 1960.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We chose the format of a narrative review because the historical articles are heterogeneous. No systematic extraction of baseline data, treatment details, or follow-up care was possible in many cases.

RESULTS

Both hematological malignancies and solid tumors were treated with a second course of radiation therapy, and indications included local relapse, regional nodal recurrence, and second primary tumors developing in a previously treated region. The literature consists of retrospective single-institution analyses describing treatment approaches that included external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or combinations thereof. Data on toxicities and survival were often provided. Breast cancer and gynecological, head and neck, brain, and skin tumors are among the entities included in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

The leading pioneers in the field are fully aware of many of the challenges we continue to debate today. These include the process of late tissue changes and development of personalized treatment approaches and better ways to select patients who are likely to benefit from a second course of radiation therapy.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of post-irradiation and de novo sarcomas of the head and neck: a histologically matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to compare post-irradiation sarcomas (PIS) and de novo sarcomas (DN) of the head and neck in terms of tumor characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival outcomes.

METHODS

All (N=83) head and neck sarcoma patients treated at National Cancer Centre, Singapore (Feb 2002-May 2011) were included: DN (N=60; 72%); PIS (N=23; 28%). Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of all patients and histologically matched pairs were compared. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Median age, gender, smoking status, and tumor size were not significantly different. Significant differences were seen in histology (most prevalent: PIS-sarcoma-NOS; DN-angiosarcoma) and tumor subsite (most prevalent: PIS-nasal cavity and sinuses; DN-skin). Median latency of PIS development was 16.7 years. PIS patients had shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) compared with DN patients, most clearly seen on histologically matched pair analysis: 2-year OS (PIS: 54%; DN: 83%; P=0.028). Multivariate analyses showed that age>50 years (hazard ratio (HR)=3.68; P=0.007), ever-smokers (HR=2.79; P=0.017), and larger tumor-size (cm) (HR=1.12; P=0.045) were associated with worse OS, and age at >50 years (HR=2.77; P=0.04) and ever-smokers (HR=2.94; P=0.021) were associated with worse DSS. When treated with curative intent, no significant survival difference was noted between DN and PIS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, PIS constituted 28% of head and neck sarcomas. Poorer prognosis traditionally associated with PIS compared with DN was not seen amongst patients treated with curative intent.

Limb salvage in malignant tumors

Limb-sparing resection and reconstruction has become the treatment of choice in extremity malignancies, as amputation does not provide better long-term survival rates or functional advantages. R0 resection, the removal of the tumor in sano, remains the prerequisite and most important oncologic parameter to avoid local recurrence. Successful treatment requires the combination of surgical eradication and the patient's specific functional and aesthetic rehabilitation. Our clinical rationale resulting from more than 2000 cases will be demonstrated. The problematic aspects of different tumor entities and the locoregional clearance of lymphatic pathways will be discussed. Differential diagnosis and multimodality treatment in high-volume tumor centers is likely to achieve superior oncologic statistics. Long-term survivors after microsurgical reconstructions and possible secondary malignancies will be addressed.

Techniques to modulate radiotherapy toxicity and outcome in soft tissue sarcoma

Radiotherapy (RT) targeting of soft tissue sarcoma presents considerable opportunity and challenges in realizing the dual goals of tissue and function preservation and maintaining high local control. Traditional RT target volumes used for soft tissue sarcoma have largely been constrained by available technology and are not ideal in some situations. The advent of very precise treatment planning and delivery systems, including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, means it is possible to select target volumes that more closely approach the optimum. Consequently, these new approaches provide great opportunity for treatment enhancement in the future. It can be expected that newer techniques for RT planning and delivery will challenge the existing dogma concerning target delineation for optimal radiotherapy outcome. It can be foreseen that the precise knowledge of appropriate targets will continue to evolve for different clinical scenarios and likely be greatly influenced by enhanced imaging capability. Advancement of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy over the next decade must rely on the consistent reporting and sharing of results concerning outcome of normal tissue from volumetric treatment planning.

Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. Limb salvage after failure of combined conservative therapy

PURPOSE

To assess the results of salvage therapy using surgery alone or surgery and re-irradiation for patients with locally recurrent extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) following conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

25 patients with locally recurrent STS after conservative surgery and irradiation were assessed between 1990 and 1995. Two patients with concurrent systemic relapse were treated palliatively. Seven patients were not candidates for conservative re-excision and underwent amputation, 11 patients underwent conservative resection without irradiation. Seven of these patients relapsed, and five went on to receive combined conservative surgery and re-irradiation. A further five patients initially received combined retreatment, for a total of ten patients treated with combined conservative surgery and re-irradiation. Six of these ten patients were treated with brachytherapy alone, one with brachytherapy and external beam therapy, and three with external beam therapy alone. The median retreatment dose was 49.5 Gy (range 35-65 Gy), and the median cumulative soft tissue dose was 100 Gy (range 93-120 Gy).

RESULTS

The median follow-up from the most recent treatment is 24 months (range 7-42 months). At the last follow-up 14 patients are alive and disease free; two are alive with local disease and four with systemic disease, and five are dead of disease. Overall local control is 19/23 (91%). The local control for patients treated with conservative excision without irradiation is 4/11 (36%) and for conservative excision with re-irradiation 10/10 (100%). Six (60%) of these patients experienced significant post-irradiation would-healing complications, but three have recovered fully. Functional scores for the entire treated group are significantly lower after treatment, as are those for patients undergoing combined surgery and re-irradiation, but 70% of those treated with conservative surgery and re-irradiation and a good or excellent post-treatment functional score.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined conservative surgery and re-irradiation provided superior local control to local re-excision alone and a functional outcome superior to amputation. Combined treatment with re-irradiation should be considered the primary salvage therapy for patients who fail combined therapy and who are suitable for conservative re-excision. Systemic relapse is a significant problem, and optimal therapy should minimize the risk of local relapse after the initial therapy. Eighteen patients (72%) had a history of intralesional excision as their initial intervention, and suggests that inappropriate initial management is a risk factor for relapse after combined conservative therapy. Improvements in therapy must include the appropriate education of the primary care physicians.

Soft tissue sarcomas

This synthesis of the literature on radiotherapy for sarcomas originating in the body's soft, supportive tissues, ie, muscle, connective tissue, and fatty tissue is based on 71 scientific articles, including 4 randomized studies, 5 prospective studies, and 26 retrospective studies. These studies involve 3,444 patients. Over 90% of patients with soft tissue sarcomas in the arms and legs can be treated in a way that preserves the extremities. Subcutaneous and intramuscular sarcomas can be treated surgically with little functional loss or risk for local recurrence without adjuvant radiotherapy. To avoid amputation, surgery is often combined with radiotherapy for treatment of local relapse. Adequate surgical margins are usually difficult to achieve for head/neck tumors and retroperitoneal tumors, and therefore surgery is often combined with radiotherapy to reduce the risk for local relapse. Pre- and postoperative radiotherapy are similar. A disadvantage of preoperative radiotherapy is that it reduces the opportunity for exact diagnosis and determining morphobiologic sarcoma parameters. To further improve treatment results for advanced sarcomas, it is necessary to introduce other fractionation schedules, mainly hyperfractionation. This places greater demands on radiotherapy, mainly for staff resources. Combining radiotherapy and local intraarterial chemotherapy involves greater risks for complications and has not shown better treatment results than pre- or postoperative radiotherapy alone, and it is not recommended as standard treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Intraoperative treatment methods should be targeted for further study and development.

A staging system for soft-tissue sarcoma and its evaluation in relation to treatment

In order to define the significant factors for a staging system of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS), histologic and clinical findings in 190 adult patients with localized STS in the extremities and trunk were reviewed. The male-to-female ratio was 1.21. The histologic grading of tumors was defined according to the criteria recently proposed by us: tumors were low-grade in 65 cases, intermediate-grade in 57 cases and high-grade in 68 cases. The initial surgical procedure was as follows: intracapsular excision in 9 cases, marginal excision in 104 and wide local excision in 77, including 15 amputations. The mode of treatment was surgery alone (101 patients), surgery and chemotherapy (58), surgery and radiotherapy (22) and surgery and combined chemo- and radiotherapy (9). Univariate analysis revealed histologic grade, sex, tumor size and tumor depth to be significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed histologic grade to be the only independent factor for prognosis. Significant clinical factors in each histologic grade were then evaluated. In the low-grade group, local recurrence significantly affected prognosis. Most of the patients with local recurrence had had marginal resection as the initial surgical procedure. No clinical factors affecting prognosis in the intermediate-grade group could be determined. In the high-grade group, patients with wide local excision and adjuvant chemotherapy had a better prognosis than those with marginal excision with or without adjuvant chemotherapy and wide local excision without chemotherapy (p = 0.09). In conclusion, histologic grade was the only significant factor for the staging of STS. On the basis of our staging system, different modalities of treatment for each grade of STS might be indicated; adequate surgery is essential for the prevention of local recurrence, which resulted in reduced mortality in patients with low-grade STS. For high-grade STS, the prevention of distant metastasis by combined extensive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy may make long-term survival possible.