Technical note: a reference frame designed to use external numeric references during simulation for tumours located in the head

[Stereotactic localization in medical imaging. Technical and methodologic aspects]

Stereotactic neurosurgery and stereotactic radiation therapy require the three-dimensional localization of lesions for biopsy or for treatment planning. The aim of this paper is the description of methods used in the different imaging modalities: x-ray teleradiography, digital subtracted angiography, computed tomography, and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. The simple pin-target locating techniques are distinguished from those serving to the definition of volumes target necessary to treatment planning. Performances and difficulties of these techniques are emphasized. The specific methodology developed in Lille is described as an example. Organizational aspects and necessary quality controls for a good progress of the entire procedure, from imaging to treatment, are also discussed.

Simulation accuracy in radiotherapy for maxillary sinus tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and clinical importance of beam positioning during simulation of radiation treatment for tumors in the maxillary sinus.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five patients were prepared as if they were to be treated for a maxillary sinus tumor. A three-beam computed tomography (CT) scan-based computer plan was made for each patient. The location of the central beam axis of each beam was measured, relative to bony anatomical structures. A simulation was performed using the bony references to position the radiation beams during simulation. After this, the simulation procedure was repeated by the use of a noninvasive external localization frame with a known accuracy and reproducibility within 2 mm margins.

RESULTS

When defining the clinical target volume as the known tumor with a 1 cm margin, three out of five patients would suffer a partial geographical miss throughout the entire radiation treatment due to erroneous beam positioning at the simulation stage when using bony structures as a guide for beam positioning. The influence of these errors is analyzed as normal tissue complication and tumor control probabilities.

CONCLUSION

When defining a planning target volume, one should consider a margin to correct for possible simulation errors. We advise the use of objective, external (and thus nonanatomical) landmarks as a reference during simulation to reduce this extra margin to a minimum. In case of simulation, using bony structures as a reference, an additional margin should be entered, depending on the simulation accuracy that can be obtained.