Spinous process fractures in osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures

Spinous Process Fractures in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to assess radiological features and clinical scores of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) accompanied by spinous process fracture (SPF).

Methods

We included painful patients with single-level OVF with intravertebral cleft. SPF was detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT). The plain radiographs of the vertebral fractures were evaluated based on the wedging angle of the fractured vertebrae and vertebral instability. We investigated the clinical parameters of age, gender, visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain (LBP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the period from the onset of acute fracture.

Results

MRI and/or CT indicated among 195 patients of OVF with LBP, 41 patients (20.5%) had SPFs. SPFs were observed one level above the fractured vertebral body in 35 patients (85.4%) and at the same level as the fractured vertebral body in 6 patients (14.6%). The prevalence of vertebral fracture of thoracic spine in the SPF-positive group was significantly greater than that in the SPF-negative group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, VAS, ODI, the time period from the onset of acute LBP, wedging angle, and vertebral instability between the presence or absence of SPFs.

Conclusions

SPFs occurred in 20.5% of patients with OVF and LBP. In addition, SPFs often occurred one level above the fractured vertebra, and SPFs with OVF tended to be located in the thoracic spine.

Risk Factors for Cement Loosening after Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture with Intravertebral Cleft: A Retrospective Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the primary outcomes and radiographic results of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with singlelevel osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) with intravertebral cleft (IVC) to identify the risk factors for cement loosening after PVP.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

PVP is a widely accepted method for managing painful OVF; however, cement loosening occasionally occurs with poor outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 195 patients treated with PVP for single-level OVF with IVC. Six months thereafter, the primary outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain and the modified Oswestry Disability Index. Computed tomography was conducted to detect cement loosening. Possible risk factors, such as age, sex, wedging angle, intravertebral instability, Parkinson's disease, spinous process fracture, ankylosing spinal hyperostosis, split vertebrae, and adjacent intervertebral vacuum, were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (25%) experienced cement loosening 6 months after PVP. The mean VAS scores were significantly higher in patients with cement loosening than in those without (50 vs. 26 mm, respectively; p <0.01). Cement loosening was closely associated with intravertebral instability (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.40; p =0.015), Parkinson's disease (OR, 54.31; 95% CI, 4.47-659.53; p =0.002), spinous process fracture (OR, 7.11; 95% CI, 1.65-30.60; p =0.009), and split vertebrae (OR, 11.59; 95% CI, 1.64-82.02; p =0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cement loosening experienced worse back pain than those without cement loosening. The important risk factors that influenced cement loosening after PVP were high intravertebral instability, Parkinson's disease, spinous process fracture, and split vertebrae.

Osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional fracture accompanied by spinous process fracture without posterior ligament injury: its clinical and radiologic significances

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and radiologic outcome of osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional fracture accompanied by spinous process fracture (SPF) without posterior ligament injury.

METHODS

A total of 391 patients with single-level osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional (T10-L2) fracture were selectively enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups by absence (group I) or presence (group II) of SPF. Clinical and radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Group I comprised of 332 patients with only vertebral body fracture, and group II comprised of 59 patients with both vertebral body and SPFs. In all cases of group II, SPFs were located just one level above the fractured vertebral body, and the injury of the posterior ligament was not found. At the time of injury, group II patients showed worse outcomes in anterior vertebral body compression percentage, kyphotic Cobb angle, cranial disk status, and the rate of the initial neurologic injury. Kyphotic alignment changes during 1-year follow-up were compared between the conservative subgroups of groups I and II. At the time of injury, there were no statistical differences in anterior vertebral body compression percentage and Cobb angle between the two conservative subgroups. However, the difference was significant after 1-year follow-up. Comparison of kyphotic alignment change at 12 months after diagnosis within group II was done according to the treatment method. Vertebroplasty subgroup in group II did not show benefit even in preventing such kyphotic alignment change, whereas instrumentation subgroup in group II showed lordotic alignment restoration despite more severe kyphotic alignment at the time of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional fracture accompanied by spinous process fracture without posterior ligament injury represented more severe injury with flexion forces on the anterior column and tensile forces on the posterior column, and was related with more severe posttraumatic kyphotic changes during the 12-month follow-up.