Comparison between coronal reformatted images and direct coronal CT images of the swine lung specimen: assessment of image quality with 64-detector row CT

"Transcanal view" computed tomography reformat: Applications for transcanal endoscopic ear surgery

PURPOSE

Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) is an increasingly used surgical approach for otologic surgeries, but no en face preoperative imaging format currently exists. We aim to assess the utility of a transcanal high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) reformat suitable for TEES preoperative planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative HRCTs of patients with middle ear pathologies (cholesteatoma, otosclerosis, and glomus tympanicum) who underwent TEES were obtained. Axial image series were rotated and reformatted -90 or +90 degrees for left and right ear surgeries, respectively, where additional rotation along the left-right axis was performed to align the transcanal series with the plane of the external auditory canal. Quantitative measurements of middle ear structures were recorded. Consecutive transcanal reformatted sections were then reviewed to identify critical middle ear anatomy and pathology with corresponding TEES cases.

RESULTS

The aforementioned methodology was used to create three transcanal view HRCTs. The mean left-right axis degree of rotation was 4.0 ± 2.2 degrees. In the cholesteatoma transcanal HRCT, areas of cholesteatoma involvement in middle ear compartments (e.g. epitympanum) and eroded ossicles were successfully identified in the corresponding case. In the otosclerosis transcanal HRCT, areas for potential otosclerotic involvement were visualized such as the round window as well as a low-hanging facial nerve. In the glomus tympanicum transcanal HRCT, the span of the glomus tympanicum was successfully visualized in addition to a high riding jugular bulb.

CONCLUSION

A transcanal HRCT reformat may aid preoperative planning for middle ear pathologies. This novel reformat may help highlight patient-specific anatomy.

Transcanal Computed Tomography Views for Transcanal Endoscopic Lateral Skull Base Surgery: Pilot Cadaveric Study

Objective  Transcanal endoscopic operative approaches provide for a minimally invasive surgical portal to the lateral skull base. Traditional preoperative imaging evaluation involves computed tomography (CT) acquisition in the axial and coronal planes that are not optimized for the transcanal surgical corridor. Herein, we describe a novel CT-based "transcanal view" for preoperative surgical planning and intraoperative navigation. Study Design  Present study is a cadaveric imaging study. Methods  Cadaveric temporal bones ( n  = 6) from three specimens underwent high-resolution CT (0.625 mm slice thickness). Using three-dimensional (3D) Slicer 4.8, reformatted "transcanal" views in the plane of the external auditory canal (EAC) were created. Axial and coronal reformats were used to compare and measure distances between anatomic structures in the plane of the EAC. Results  The degree of oblique tilt for transcanal CT reformats was 6.67 ± 1.78 degrees to align the EAC in axial and coronal planes. Anticipated critical landmarks were identified easily using the transcanal view. Mean values were 8.68 ± 0.38 mm for annulus diameter, 9.5 ± 0.93 mm for isthmus diameter, 10.27 ± 0.73 mm for distance between annulus and isthmus, 2.95 ± 0.13 mm for distance between annulus and stapes capitulum, 5.12 ± 0.35 mm for distance between annulus and mastoid facial nerve, and 19.54 ± 1.22 mm for EAC length. Conclusion  This study is the first to illustrate a novel "transcanal" CT sequence intended for endoscopic lateral skull base surgery. Future studies may address how incorporation of a transcanal CT reformat may influence surgical decision making.

CT triage for lung malignancy: coronal multiplanar reformation versus images in three orthogonal planes

BACKGROUND

Generation of multiplanar reformation (MPR) images has become automatic on most modern computed tomography (CT) scanners, potentially increasing the workload of the reporting radiologists. It is not always clear if this increases diagnostic performance in all clinical tasks.

PURPOSE

To assess detection performance using only coronal multiplanar reformations (MPR) when triaging patients for lung malignancies with CT compared to images in three orthogonal planes, and to evaluate performance comparison of novice and experienced readers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 63 patients with suspicion of lung cancer, scanned on 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with images reconstructed in three planes. Coronal images were presented to four readers, two novice and two experienced. Readers decided whether the patients were suspicious for malignant disease, and indicated their confidence on a five-point scale. Sensitivity and specificity on per-patient basis was calculated with regards to a reference standard of histological diagnosis, and compared with the original report using McNemar's test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to compare the performance of the four readers, using the area under the curve (AUC) as figure of merit.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference of sensitivity and specificity was found for any of the readers when compared to the original reports. ROC analysis yielded AUCs in the range of 0.92-0.93 for all readers with no significant difference. Inter-rater agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Sensitivity and specificity were comparable to diagnosis using images in three planes. No significant difference was found between experienced and novice readers.

A comparison of axial versus coronal image viewing in computer-aided detection of lung nodules on CT

PURPOSE

To compare primarily viewing axial images (Axial mode) versus coronal reconstruction images (Coronal mode) in computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules on multidetector computed tomography (CT) in terms of detection performance and reading time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty CT data sets from two institutions were collected prospectively. Ten observers (6 radiologists, 4 pulmonologists) with varying degrees of experience interpreted the data sets using CAD as a second reader (performing nodule detection first without then with aid). The data sets were interpreted twice, once each for Axial and Coronal modes, in two sessions held 4 weeks apart. Jackknife free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to compare detection performances in the two modes.

RESULTS

Mean figure-of-merit values with and without aid were 0.717 and 0.684 in Axial mode and 0.702 and 0.671 in Coronal mode; use of CAD significantly increased the performance of observers in both modes (P < 0.01). Mean reading times for radiologists did not significantly differ between Axial (156 ± 74 s) and Coronal mode (164 ± 69 s; P = 0.08). Mean reading times for pulmonologists were significantly lower in Coronal (112 ± 53 s) than in Axial mode (130 ± 80 s; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference between Axial and Coronal modes for lung nodule detection with CAD.

Image quality of multiplanar reconstruction of pulmonary CT scans using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the image quality of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).

METHODS

Inflated and fixed lungs were scanned with a garnet detector CT in high-resolution mode (HR mode) or non-high-resolution (HR) mode, and MPR images were then reconstructed. Observers compared 15 MPR images of ASIR (40%) and ASIR (80%) with those of ASIR (0%), and assessed image quality using a visual five-point scale (1, definitely inferior; 5, definitely superior), with particular emphasis on normal pulmonary structures, artefacts, noise and overall image quality.

RESULTS

The mean overall image quality scores in HR mode were 3.67 with ASIR (40%) and 4.97 with ASIR (80%). Those in non-HR mode were 3.27 with ASIR (40%) and 3.90 with ASIR (80%). The mean artefact scores in HR mode were 3.13 with ASIR (40%) and 3.63 with ASIR (80%), but those in non-HR mode were 2.87 with ASIR (40%) and 2.53 with ASIR (80%). The mean scores of the other parameters were greater than 3, whereas those in HR mode were higher than those in non-HR mode. There were significant differences between ASIR (40%) and ASIR (80%) in overall image quality (p<0.01). Contrast medium in the injection syringe was scanned to analyse image quality; ASIR did not suppress the severe artefacts of contrast medium.

CONCLUSION

In general, MPR image quality with ASIR (80%) was superior to that with ASIR (40%). However, there was an increased incidence of artefacts by ASIR when CT images were obtained in non-HR mode.