1
|
Pal P, Mateen MA, Pooja K, Rajadurai N, Gupta R, Tandan M, Duvvuru NR. Role of intestinal ultrasound in ulcerative colitis: A systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2024; 12:97210. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i3.97210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is an emerging, non-invasive, and highly sensitive diagnostic tool in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC). Despite its potential, its adoption in clinical practice is limited due to a lack of standardization and awareness.
AIM To perform a comprehensive scoping review based on a systematic literature review on IUS in UC to inform current practice.
METHODS Ninety-nine original articles about ultrasonography in UC were identified among 7608 citations searching PubMed and EMBASE databases for systematic review.
RESULTS IUS can be useful as an initial diagnostic strategy in patients with suspected IBD/UC. In UC, IUS can predict endoscopic response, histologic healing, and steroid responsiveness in acute severe cases. IUS can predict response to biologics/small molecules (as early as 2 wk). IUS correlates well with ileo-colonoscopy, but IUS could miss rectal, jejunal, and upper GI lesions in suspected IBD and colon polyps or extra-intestinal manifestations in known IBD. IUS is useful in special situations (children, pregnancy, and postoperative Crohn's disease). Inter-observer agreement is acceptable and trained physicians have comparable diagnostic accuracy. Point-of-care ultrasound impacted management in 40%-60% of cases. Hand-held IUS has excellent agreement with conventional IUS.
CONCLUSION IUS is a non-invasive, highly sensitive tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of UC, offering excellent patient satisfaction. Point-of-care ultrasound by IBD physicians can significantly impact clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Partha Pal
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | - Mohammad Abdul Mateen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Imaging, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | - Kanapuram Pooja
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | - Nandhakumar Rajadurai
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | - Rajesh Gupta
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | - Manu Tandan
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | - Nageshwar Reddy Duvvuru
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad 500082, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noriega-Álvarez E, Martín-Comín J. Molecular Imaging in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Semin Nucl Med 2023; 53:273-286. [PMID: 36702729 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Classically, two subtypes of IBD are recognized: Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. There is not a single and reliable test for IBD diagnosis but the nuclear medicine techniques like 99mTc-HMPAO autologous labelled leukocytes scintigraphy (WBCS) and PET/CT plays a role in the management of IBD. Leukocytes can be labelled "in vitro" (using 99mTc-HMPAO in Europe or 111In-oxine in America) or "in vivo" using antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies. Nuclear medicine techniques are not the first choice to investigate IBD. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance (radiation free) are probably the first option, and the diagnosis is commonly established by endoscopic biopsies. Nevertheless, WBCS is highly sensitive and accurate and represent a real option when other methods cannot used for whatever reason. In fact, a normal scan discards the presence of active IBD. The test is also useful to measure the extension and severity of the diseases and to evaluate the response to treatment. PET/CT imaging using 18F-FDG has recently been introduced and studied in both children and adults showing an excellent sensitivity for detecting active intestinal inflammation, but poor specificity in some studies. PET alone appears to be sufficient for the evaluation of ulcerative colitis, but PET/CT provides considerably more information than PET alone in the evaluation of Crohn's disease. Current clinical applications of PET in IBD include its use in the early evaluation of IBD, especially in children who may not tolerate an invasive test such as colonoscopy. Many questions remain to be answered, but PET appears to be a promising tool in the non-invasive evaluation of IBD. On the other hand, PET/MR could become in the near future a powerful tool in the evaluation of IBD patients. In addition, immuno-PET with antibodies targeting innate immune markers is also being investigated to detect colonic inflammation. The development of these technologies in humans could offer a less invasive method than endoscopy for the diagnosis and monitoring of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edel Noriega-Álvarez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taylor SA, Mallett S, Bhatnagar G, Morris S, Quinn L, Tomini F, Miles A, Baldwin-Cleland R, Bloom S, Gupta A, Hamlin PJ, Hart AL, Higginson A, Jacobs I, McCartney S, Murray CD, Plumb AA, Pollok RC, Rodriguez-Justo M, Shabir Z, Slater A, Tolan D, Travis S, Windsor A, Wylie P, Zealley I, Halligan S. Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn's disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-162. [PMID: 31432777 DOI: 10.3310/hta23420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance enterography and enteric ultrasonography are used to image Crohn's disease patients. Their diagnostic accuracy for presence, extent and activity of enteric Crohn's disease was compared. OBJECTIVE To compare diagnostic accuracy, observer variability, acceptability, diagnostic impact and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance enterography and ultrasonography in newly diagnosed or relapsing Crohn's disease. DESIGN Prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING Eight NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive participants aged ≥ 16 years, newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease or with established Crohn's disease and suspected relapse. INTERVENTIONS Magnetic resonance enterography and ultrasonography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was per-participant sensitivity difference between magnetic resonance enterography and ultrasonography for small bowel Crohn's disease extent. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity and specificity for small bowel Crohn's disease and colonic Crohn's disease extent, and sensitivity and specificity for small bowel Crohn's disease and colonic Crohn's disease presence; identification of active disease; interobserver variation; participant acceptability; diagnostic impact; and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS Out of the 518 participants assessed, 335 entered the trial, with 51 excluded, giving a final cohort of 284 (133 and 151 in new diagnosis and suspected relapse cohorts, respectively). Across the whole cohort, for small bowel Crohn's disease extent, magnetic resonance enterography sensitivity [80%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72% to 86%] was significantly greater than ultrasonography sensitivity (70%, 95% CI 62% to 78%), with a 10% difference (95% CI 1% to 18%; p = 0.027). For small bowel Crohn's disease extent, magnetic resonance enterography specificity (95%, 95% CI 85% to 98%) was significantly greater than ultrasonography specificity (81%, 95% CI 64% to 91%), with a 14% difference (95% CI 1% to 27%). For small bowel Crohn's disease presence, magnetic resonance enterography sensitivity (97%, 95% CI 91% to 99%) was significantly greater than ultrasonography sensitivity (92%, 95% CI 84% to 96%), with a 5% difference (95% CI 1% to 9%). For small bowel Crohn's disease presence, magnetic resonance enterography specificity was 96% (95% CI 86% to 99%) and ultrasonography specificity was 84% (95% CI 65% to 94%), with a 12% difference (95% CI 0% to 25%). Test sensitivities for small bowel Crohn's disease presence and extent were similar in the two cohorts. For colonic Crohn's disease presence in newly diagnosed participants, ultrasonography sensitivity (67%, 95% CI 49% to 81%) was significantly greater than magnetic resonance enterography sensitivity (47%, 95% CI 31% to 64%), with a 20% difference (95% CI 1% to 39%). For active small bowel Crohn's disease, magnetic resonance enterography sensitivity (96%, 95% CI 92% to 99%) was significantly greater than ultrasonography sensitivity (90%, 95% CI 82% to 95%), with a 6% difference (95% CI 2% to 11%). There was some disagreement between readers for both tests. A total of 88% of participants rated magnetic resonance enterography as very or fairly acceptable, which is significantly lower than the percentage (99%) of participants who did so for ultrasonography. Therapeutic decisions based on magnetic resonance enterography alone and ultrasonography alone agreed with the final decision in 122 out of 158 (77%) cases and 124 out of 158 (78%) cases, respectively. There were no differences in costs or quality-adjusted life-years between tests. LIMITATIONS Magnetic resonance enterography and ultrasonography scans were interpreted by practitioners blinded to clinical data (but not participant cohort), which does not reflect use in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS Magnetic resonance enterography has higher accuracy for detecting the presence, extent and activity of small bowel Crohn's disease than ultrasonography does. Both tests have variable interobserver agreement and are broadly acceptable to participants, although ultrasonography produces less participant burden. Diagnostic impact and cost-effectiveness are similar. Recommendations for future work include investigation of the comparative utility of magnetic resonance enterography and ultrasonography for treatment response assessment and investigation of non-specific abdominal symptoms to confirm or refute Crohn's disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03982913. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 42. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sue Mallett
- Institute of Applied Health Research, National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Stephen Morris
- Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Quinn
- Institute of Applied Health Research, National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Florian Tomini
- Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Miles
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Baldwin-Cleland
- Intestinal Imaging Centre, St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Stuart Bloom
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Arun Gupta
- Intestinal Imaging Centre, St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Peter John Hamlin
- Department of Gastroenterology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Antony Higginson
- Department of Radiology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ilan Jacobs
- Independent patient representative, c/o Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sara McCartney
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charles D Murray
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Ao Plumb
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard C Pollok
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Zainib Shabir
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Slater
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Damian Tolan
- Department of Radiology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Simon Travis
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Peter Wylie
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ian Zealley
- Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - Steve Halligan
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allocca M, Danese S, Laurent V, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Use of Cross-Sectional Imaging for Tight Monitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1309-1323.e4. [PMID: 31812657 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A treat-to-target strategy with close monitoring of intestinal inflammation is recommended in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Ileocolonoscopy remains the gold standard for assessing disease activity in IBD but is a relatively invasive procedure and is impossible to repeat in the context of tight monitoring strategies. In addition to biomarkers, cross-sectional imaging increasingly is used in these patients. Computed tomography is limited by the use of radiation, while the use of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is limited by its cost and access. There is growing interest in bowel ultrasound that represents a cost-effective, noninvasive, and well-tolerated modality in clinical practice, but it is operator dependent. Compared with ileocolonoscopy and MRE, bowel US has been shown to have the same level of accuracy in assessing and monitoring disease activity for both CD and UC and thus can be considered a point-of-care test. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a MR imaging technique that increasingly is used in both IBD and non-IBD conditions and has been shown to be a valuable and accurate tool for assessing and monitoring IBD activity. Compared with conventional MRE, DWI is quicker, less time consuming, may not require intravenous contrast agent, fasting, bowel cleansing, oral preparation, or rectal preparation. This review discusses the role of these cross-sectional imaging techniques for the management of patients with IBD. In the near future, the value of DWI and ultrasound in assessing IBD will require further investigation in the era of transmural healing in CD and complete mucosal healing, including histologic remission, in ulcerative colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariangela Allocca
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Valérie Laurent
- Department of Radiology, Nancy University Hospital, Lorraine University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inserm NGERE, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rao N, Kumar S, Taylor S, Plumb A. Diagnostic pathways in Crohn's disease. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:578-591. [PMID: 31005268 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The management of Crohn's disease (CD) is shifting from a stepwise, incremental approach based on symptom control to more aggressive early combined immunosuppression in an attempt to induce remission more rapidly and avoid long-term bowel damage. Accurately defining disease activity is a major challenge, as there is often a disconnect between symptomatology and underlying disease status. The role of imaging in CD has evolved such that it now plays a central role establishing the initial diagnosis, characterising disease phenotype, activity assessment, disease surveillance, and assessing response to therapy. Furthermore, the "treat-to-target" approach is being investigated in CD, with resolution of transmural inflammation on cross-sectional imaging being the treatment goal. In this review, we summarise the principal imaging techniques available to the radiologist, the key findings, and provide some guidance on the preferred imaging option in the diagnostic pathway. We consider the relative merits and drawbacks of each imaging technique before offering a brief discussion of some current developments and research avenues in CD imaging. We discuss how imaging may be useful in a "treat-to-target" approach. Finally, we highlight some practical considerations around service configuration and delivery to optimise imaging in CD in an accurate, cost-effective manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Rao
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - S Kumar
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - S Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Plumb
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baliyan V, Kordbacheh H, Serrao J, Gee MS, Yajnik V, Sahani DV, Kambadakone AR. Survey on practice patterns in imaging utilization in patients with Crohn's disease. Clin Imaging 2019; 54:91-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2018] [Revised: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
7
|
Maaser C, Sturm A, Vavricka SR, Kucharzik T, Fiorino G, Annese V, Calabrese E, Baumgart DC, Bettenworth D, Borralho Nunes P, Burisch J, Castiglione F, Eliakim R, Ellul P, González-Lama Y, Gordon H, Halligan S, Katsanos K, Kopylov U, Kotze PG, Krustinš E, Laghi A, Limdi JK, Rieder F, Rimola J, Taylor SA, Tolan D, van Rheenen P, Verstockt B, Stoker J. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detection of complications. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:144-164. [PMID: 30137275 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 909] [Impact Index Per Article: 181.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Maaser
- Outpatients Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Sturm
- Department of Gastroenterology, DRK Kliniken Berlin I Westend, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Torsten Kucharzik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Hospital Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Annese
- Department of Gastroenterology, Valiant Clinic & American Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Emma Calabrese
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy
| | - Daniel C Baumgart
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Dominik Bettenworth
- Department of Medicine B, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Paula Borralho Nunes
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital Cuf Descobertas; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Johan Burisch
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Zealand University Hospital; Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Fabiana Castiglione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Rami Eliakim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Yago González-Lama
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Puerta De Hierro, Majadahonda [Madrid], Spain
| | - Hannah Gordon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Steve Halligan
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos Katsanos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Catholic University of Paraná [PUCPR], Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Eduards Krustinš
- Department of of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Florian Rieder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jordi Rimola
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Damian Tolan
- Clinical Radiology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Patrick van Rheenen
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven and CHROMETA - Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center [AMC], University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Magnetic resonance enterography, small bowel ultrasound and colonoscopy to diagnose and stage Crohn's disease: patient acceptability and perceived burden. Eur Radiol 2018; 29:1083-1093. [PMID: 30128615 PMCID: PMC6510862 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5661-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To compare patient acceptability and burden of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and ultrasound (US) to each other, and to other enteric investigations, particularly colonoscopy. Methods 159 patients (mean age 38, 94 female) with newly diagnosed or relapsing Crohn’s disease, prospectively recruited to a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study comparing MRE and US completed an experience questionnaire on the burden and acceptability of small bowel investigations between December 2013 and September 2016. Acceptability, recovery time, scan burden and willingness to repeat the test were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar tests; and group differences in scan burden with Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results Overall, 128 (88%) patients rated MRE as very or fairly acceptable, lower than US (144, 99%; p < 0.001), but greater than colonoscopy (60, 60%; p < 0.001). MRE recovery time was longer than US (p < 0.001), but shorter than colonoscopy (p < 0.001). Patients were less willing to undergo MRE again than US (127 vs. 133, 91% vs. 99%; p = 0.012), but more willing than for colonoscopy (68, 75%; p = 0.017). MRE generated greater burden than US (p < 0.001), although burden scores were low. Younger age and emotional distress were associated with greater MRE and US burden. Higher MRE discomfort was associated with patient preference for US (p = 0.053). Patients rated test accuracy as more important than scan discomfort. Conclusions MRE and US are well tolerated. Although MRE generates greater burden, longer recovery and is less preferred than US, it is more acceptable than colonoscopy. Patients, however, place greater emphasis on diagnostic accuracy than burden. Key Points • MRE and US are rated as acceptable by most patients and superior to colonoscopy. • MRE generates significantly greater burden and longer recovery times than US, particularly in younger patients and those with high levels of emotional distress. • Most patients prefer the experience of undergoing US than MRE; however, patients rate test accuracy as more importance than scan burden. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5661-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wei SC, Chang TA, Chao TH, Chen JS, Chou JW, Chou YH, Chuang CH, Hsu WH, Huang TY, Hsu TC, Lin CC, Lin HH, Lin JK, Lin WC, Ni YH, Shieh MJ, Shih IL, Shun CT, Tsang YM, Wang CY, Wang HY, Weng MT, Wu DC, Wu WC, Yen HH, Wong JM. Management of Crohn's disease in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Intest Res 2017; 15:285-310. [PMID: 28670226 PMCID: PMC5478754 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Revised: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic relapsing and remitting inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract. CD is rare in Taiwan and other Asian countries, but its prevalence and incidence have been steadily increasing. A steering committee was established by the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease to formulate statements on the diagnosis and management of CD taking into account currently available evidence and the expert opinion of the committee. Thorough clinical, endoscopic, and histological assessments are required for accurate diagnosis of CD. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are complementary to endoscopic evaluation for disease staging and detecting complications. The goals of CD management are to induce and maintain remission, reduce the risk of complications, and improve quality of life. Corticosteroids are the mainstay for inducing re-mission. Immunomodulating and biologic therapies should be used to maintain remission. Patients should be evaluated for hepatitis B virus and tuberculosis infection prior to treatment and receive regular surveillance for cancer. These consensus statements are based on current local evidence with consideration of factors, and could be serve as concise and practical guidelines for supporting clinicians in the management of patients with CD in Taiwan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Chen Wei
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ting-An Chang
- Department of Pathology, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Te-Hsin Chao
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jinn-Shiun Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Wei Chou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yenn-Hwei Chou
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chiao-Hsiung Chuang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hung Hsu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiaokang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tien-Yu Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Chi Hsu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chi Lin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Hsin Lin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Kou Lin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Hsuan Ni
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jium Shieh
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Lun Shih
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Tung Shun
- Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuk-Ming Tsang
- Division of Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Yi Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Horng-Yuan Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, Taipei, Taiwan.,MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Tzu Weng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Deng-Chyang Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chieh Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Heng Yen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Jau-Min Wong
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bhatnagar G, Von Stempel C, Halligan S, Taylor SA. Utility of MR enterography and ultrasound for the investigation of small bowel Crohn's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 45:1573-1588. [PMID: 27943484 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cross sectional Imaging plays an increasingly important role the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease. Particular emphasis is placed on MRI and Ultrasound as they do not impart ionising radiation. Both modalities have reported high sensitivity for disease detection, activity assessment and evaluation of extra-luminal complications, and have positive effects on clinical decision making. International Guidelines now recommend MRI and Ultrasound in the routine management of Crohn's disease patients. This article reviews the current evidence base supporting both modalities with an emphasis on the key clinical questions. We describe current protocols, basic imaging findings and highlight areas in need of further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1573-1588.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gauraang Bhatnagar
- Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Steve Halligan
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Branchi F, Locatelli M, Tomba C, Conte D, Ferretti F, Elli L. Enteroscopy and radiology for the management of celiac disease complications: Time for a pragmatic roadmap. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48:578-86. [PMID: 27012449 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2015] [Revised: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Celiac disease is the most common autoimmune enteropathy in Western countries, and is usually associated with a good response to the gluten free diet and an excellent prognosis. However, a minority of patients develop complications of the disease, such as refractory celiac disease, ulcerative jejunoileitis and neoplastic complications such as adenocarcinoma of the small bowel and enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma. Neoplastic complications described in association with celiac disease have a high mortality rate, due to their aggressive behavior and to the usual advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. In recent years, the detection of small bowel lesions has dramatically improved thank to the availability of highly performing radiologic and endoscopic techniques. The diagnostic delay of malignant complications in patients with celiac disease may be improved by establishing a pragmatic flowchart for the identification and follow up of "at risk" patients. We performed a comprehensive review of the articles published on this issue in order to promote a roadmap to be applied when facing with celiac patients with suspected small bowel complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Branchi
- Center for the Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Locatelli
- Center for the Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Tomba
- Center for the Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Conte
- Center for the Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferretti
- Center for the Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Elli
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zakeri N, Pollok RCG. Diagnostic imaging and radiation exposure in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:2165-2178. [PMID: 26900282 PMCID: PMC4734994 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Revised: 11/02/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnostic imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However due to the relapsing nature of IBD, there is growing concern that IBD patients may be exposed to potentially harmful cumulative levels of ionising radiation in their lifetime, increasing malignant potential in a population already at risk. In this review we explore the proportion of IBD patients exposed to high cumulative radiation doses, the risk factors associated with higher radiation exposures, and we compare conventional diagnostic imaging with newer radiation-free imaging techniques used in the evaluation of patients with IBD. While computed tomography (CT) performs well as an imaging modality for IBD, the effective radiation dose is considerably higher than other abdominal imaging modalities. It is increasingly recognised that CT imaging remains responsible for the majority of diagnostic medical radiation to which IBD patients are exposed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and small intestine contrast enhanced ultrasonography (SICUS) have now emerged as suitable radiation-free alternatives to CT imaging, with comparable diagnostic accuracy. The routine use of MRI and SICUS for the clinical evaluation of patients with known or suspected small bowel Crohn’s disease is to be encouraged wherever possible. More provision is needed for out-of-hours radiation-free imaging modalities to reduce the need for CT.
Collapse
|
13
|
Prediction of patency capsule retention in known Crohn's disease patients by using magnetic resonance imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83:182-7. [PMID: 26142554 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Evaluation of small-bowel patency is recommended before swallowing video capsule endoscopy to prevent capsule retention. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) to predict patency capsule (PC) retention in patients with Crohn's disease and to identify the most predictive imaging features for retention. METHODS Fifty-seven patients prospectively underwent MRE and PC. Two radiologists predicted PC retention. Interrater reliability was determined by using Cohen's κ coefficient. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the predictions. Evaluation of the imaging features was done using the t test and receiver-operating characteristics; t-tests were also performed on the clinical parameters. RESULTS The κ value for interrater reliability was 0.58. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the predictions by the 2 radiologists were 92.3%, 59%, 40%, 96.3%, and 100%, 52.3%, 38.2%, 100%, respectively. The maximal stricture length (9.7 ± 3.66 cm vs 7.0 ± 3.08 cm, P = .04) and the number of prestenotic dilations (1.9 ± 1.07 vs 1.0 ± 1.38, P = .03) were associated with PC retention. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves was 0.69 for the maximal stricture length and 0.751 for the number of prestenotic dilations. The phenotype of the disease was the only clinical parameter significantly correlated with PC retention. CONCLUSIONS MRE has a high NPV and sensitivity for PC retention. When capsule retention is suggested by MRE, PC should be performed before the video capsule endoscopy examination. The maximal stricture length and the number of prestenotic dilations were found to be the most predictive imaging features for PC retention.
Collapse
|
14
|
Indications and selection of MR enterography vs. MR enteroclysis with emphasis on patients who need small bowel MRI and general anaesthesia: results of a survey. Insights Imaging 2015; 6:339-46. [PMID: 25855563 PMCID: PMC4444793 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-015-0384-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2014] [Revised: 01/01/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To survey the perceived indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel (MRE) by experts, when MR enteroclysis (MREc) or MR enterography (MREg) may be chosen, and to determine how the approach to MRE is modified when general anaesthesia (GA) is required. Materials and methods Selected opinion leaders in MRE completed a questionnaire that included clinical indications (MREg or MREc), specifics regarding administration of enteral contrast, and how the technique is altered to accommodate GA. Results Fourteen responded. Only the diagnosis and follow-up of Crohn’s disease were considered by over 80 % as a valid MRE indication. The remaining indications ranged between 35.7 % for diagnosis of caeliac disease and unknown sources of gastrointestinal bleeding to 78.6 % for motility disorders. The majority chose MREg over MREc for all indications (from 100 % for follow-up of caeliac disease to 57.7 % for tumour diagnosis). Fifty per cent of responders had needed to consider MRE under GA. The most commonly recommended procedural change was MRI without enteral distention. Three had experience with intubation under GA (MREc modification). Conclusion Views were variable. Requests for MRE under GA are not uncommon. Presently most opinion leaders suggest standard abdominal MRI when GA is required. Main messages • Experts are using MRE for various indications. • Requests for MRE under general anaesthesia are not uncommon. • Some radiologists employ MREc under general anaesthesia; others do not distend the small bowel.
Collapse
|
15
|
Detection of Crohn disease lesions of the small and large bowel in pediatric patients: diagnostic value of MR enterography versus reference examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 203:W533-42. [PMID: 25341168 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to prospectively determine the accuracy of MR enterography in detecting Crohn disease lesions from the jejunum to the anorectal region in pediatric patients, in comparison with main reference investigations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Fifty consecutive children with known Crohn disease underwent MR enterography with oral contrast agent and gadolinium-chelate intravenous injection. Two radiologists detected and localized lesions by dividing the bowel into nine segments (450 analyzed segments in 50 patients). Ileocolonoscopy, barium studies, intestinal ultrasound, and capsule endoscopy were considered as first- and second-level reference examinations and were performed within 15 days of MR enterography. RESULTS MR enterography detected lesions in 164 of 450 segments, with 155 true-positive and nine false-positive findings; overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for small- and large-bowel lesions were 94.5%, 97%, 94.5%, and 97%, respectively (ĸ = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.97). Sensitivity and specificity values were 88% and 97%, respectively, for the jejunum, 100% and 97% for the proximal-to-mid ileum, 100% and 100% for the distal ileum, 93% and 100% for the cecum, 70% and 97% for the ascending colon, 80% and 100% for the transverse colon, 100% and 92% for the descending colon, 96% and 90% for the sigmoid colon, and 96% and 88% for the rectum. From jejunum to rectum, the AUC value ranged between 0.916 (jejunum) and 1.00 (distal ileum). Perianal fistulas were diagnosed in 15 patients, and other complications were found in 13 patients. CONCLUSION MR enterography showed an accuracy comparable to that of reference investigations, for both small- and large-bowel lesions. Because MR enterography is safer and more comprehensive than the reference examinations, it should be considered the primary examination for detecting Crohn disease lesions in children.
Collapse
|
16
|
Jennings VCE, Williams L, Henson S. Orofacial granulomatosis as a presenting feature of Crohn's disease. BMJ Case Rep 2015; 2015:bcr-2013-203005. [PMID: 25576503 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2013-203005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
An 11-year-old girl was referred to oral medicine with persistent facial swelling. She was diagnosed with orofacial granulomatosis (OFG) and was treated conservatively for 7 years, with no evidence of systemic illness. Aged 17 she re-presented with a flare up of her OFG, watery diarrhoea and fluctuating febrile episodes. Inflammatory markers were raised and an MR enterogram revealed terminal ileal Crohn's disease. This case highlights that OFG may precede the onset of intestinal Crohn's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Sophie Henson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Despite advances in medical management, many patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require intestinal surgery throughout their lives. Surgery is not a cure, and postoperative recurrence is common in patients with CD. Ileocolonoscopy has been considered to be the gold standard in the diagnosis and monitoring of postoperative recurrence. However, the optimal monitoring strategy for postoperative recurrence has yet to be established. Capsule endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging techniques, including ultrasonography, computed tomography and MRI, have been used in the postoperative setting, and their usefulness in the monitoring of disease activity has been evaluated in recent clinical trials. The value of fecal markers, such as calprotectin and lactoferrin, has been also assessed in several studies. This review was to identify optimized methods for the diagnosis and monitoring of postoperative recurrence in CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Yamamoto
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and Department of Surgery, Yokkaichi Hazu Medical Center, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, present an ever increasing burden to the healthcare systems in the Western world. Scotland in particular has seen a significant increase in both diseases, particularly Crohn's disease. It is thus of paramount importance that secondary care services within Scotland are equipped to cope with this increased demand at a time when the treatment options are broadening, patients expectations are increasing and healthcare budgets face major restriction. This article outlines some aspects of optimal delivery of an IBD service in secondary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gaya
- Consultant Physician & Gastroenterologist, Gastroenterology Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radiologic investigations continue to play a pivotal role in the diagnosis of pathologic conditions of the small intestine despite enhancement of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy. Imaging techniques continue to evolve and new techniques in MRI in particular, are being developed. RECENT FINDINGS Continued advances in computed tomography (CT) and MRI techniques have reinforced the importance of these imaging modalities in small bowel assessment. The more invasive enteroclysis technique yields better small bowel distension for both CT and MRI when compared with peroral enterography, but no clinically significant difference is seen in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Recent concern regarding radiation exposure means that MRI is gaining in popularity. Fluoroscopic studies such as barium follow through and small bowel enteroclysis are being replaced by the cross-sectional alternatives. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is showing results comparable with CT and MRI, but concern remains regarding reproducibility, especially outside centres that specialize in advanced sonographic techniques. SUMMARY CT and MRI enterography are comparable first-line modalities for patients with suspected small bowel disease, but magnetic resonance enterography is favoured given the absence of ionizing radiation. Capsule endoscopy is a reasonable alternative investigation in exploration of chronic gastrointestinal blood loss, but is best kept as a second-line test in patients with other symptoms.
Collapse
|
20
|
Yacoub JH, Oto A. New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modalities for Crohn Disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2014; 22:35-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
21
|
Yacoub JH, Obara P, Oto A. Evolving role of MRI in Crohn's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 37:1277-89. [PMID: 23712842 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2012] [Accepted: 01/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
MR enterography is playing an evolving role in the evaluation of small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). Standard MR enterography includes a combination of rapidly acquired T2 sequence, balanced steady-state acquisition, and contrast enhanced T1-weighted gradient echo sequence. The diagnostic performance of these sequences has been shown to be comparable, and in some respects superior, to other small bowel imaging modalities. The findings of CD on MR enterography have been well described in the literature. New and emerging techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), cinematography, and magnetization transfer, may lead to improved accuracy in characterizing the disease. These advanced techniques can provide quantitative parameters that may prove to be useful in assessing disease activity, severity, and response to treatment. In the future, MR enterography may play an increasing role in management decisions for patients with small bowel CD; however, larger studies are needed to validate these emerging MRI parameters as imaging biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Yacoub
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chatu S, Poullis A, Holmes R, Greenhalgh R, Pollok RCG. Temporal trends in imaging and associated radiation exposure in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Clin Pract 2013; 67:1057-65. [PMID: 24073979 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2012] [Accepted: 04/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Increasing use of diagnostic imaging in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has led to concerns about the malignant potential of ionising radiation in a cohort that have an increased lifetime risk of gastrointestinal malignancy. The aim was to quantify radiation exposure in IBD patients referred from primary care, determine predictors of high exposure and evaluate temporal trends in diagnostic imaging over a 20-year period. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study whereby IBD patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic and evaluated retrospectively. The total cumulative effective dose (CED) received from tests was calculated for each subject. Cox regression was performed to assess factors associated with potentially harmful levels of ionising radiation defined as total CED > 50 milli-sieverts (mSv; equivalent to five CT abdomen scans). RESULTS The cohort included 415 patients. Median total CED was 7.2 mSv (IQR: 3.0-22.7) in Crohn's disease and 2.8 mSv (IQR: 0.8-8.9) in ulcerative colitis patients, respectively. A total of 32 patients (8%) received a CED > 50 mSv. A history of IBD-related surgery was associated with high exposure (HR 7.7). During the study period, usage of abdominal CT increased by 310%. CONCLUSION Approximately 1 in 13 patients in the study cohort were exposed to potentially harmful levels of ionising radiation. Strategies to minimise exposure to diagnostic medical radiation in IBD patients are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Chatu
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Baumgart DC, Danese S, Halligan S, Marincek B, Matos C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Rimola J, Rogler G, van Assche G, Ardizzone S, Ba-Ssalamah A, Bali MA, Bellini D, Biancone L, Castiglione F, Ehehalt R, Grassi R, Kucharzik T, Maccioni F, Maconi G, Magro F, Martín-Comín J, Morana G, Pendsé D, Sebastian S, Signore A, Tolan D, Tielbeek JA, Weishaupt D, Wiarda B, Laghi A. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7:556-85. [PMID: 23583097 DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 446] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The management of patients with IBD requires evaluation with objective tools, both at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease, to determine the location, extension, activity and severity of inflammatory lesions, as well as, the potential existence of complications. Whereas endoscopy is a well-established and uniformly performed diagnostic examination, the implementation of radiologic techniques for assessment of IBD is still heterogeneous; variations in technical aspects and the degrees of experience and preferences exist across countries in Europe. ECCO and ESGAR scientific societies jointly elaborated a consensus to establish standards for imaging in IBD using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, ultrasonography, and including also other radiologic procedures such as conventional radiology or nuclear medicine examinations for different clinical situations that include general principles, upper GI tract, colon and rectum, perineum, liver and biliary tract, emergency situation, and the postoperative setting. The statements and general recommendations of this consensus are based on the highest level of evidence available, but significant gaps remain in certain areas such as the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between different techniques, the value for therapeutic monitoring, and the prognostic implications of particular findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Panes
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, CIBERehd, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Helbren EL, Plumb AA, Taylor SA. The future developments in gastrointestinal radiology. Frontline Gastroenterol 2012; 3:i36-i41. [PMID: 28839691 PMCID: PMC5551948 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2012] [Accepted: 03/13/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The last decade has witnessed great advances in abdominal imaging with technological developments and diagnostic improvements in CT, MRI and positron emission tomography-CT. Over the next decade, gastrointestinal imaging is set to rapidly evolve. Fluoroscopic techniques will be left behind and we will develop beyond simply anatomical imaging, embracing increasingly functional and quantitative techniques. Dose reduction and radiation-free modalities will take centre stage as imaging goes mobile, allowing clinicians at the bedside and remote subspecialty radiologists to review radiology from electronic devices. The authors discuss some of the key trends set to define the next decade in gastrointestinal radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Helbren
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew A Plumb
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wallihan DB, Towbin AJ, Denson LA, Salisbury S, Podberesky DJ. Inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents: assessing the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of magnetic resonance enterography compared to histopathology. Acad Radiol 2012; 19:819-26. [PMID: 22520509 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2012] [Revised: 02/13/2012] [Accepted: 02/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) compared to histopathology in the evaluation of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and to assess interreader reliability for image interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS All magnetic resonance enterography studies performed for known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease between July 2009 and July 2010 were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric radiologists. Exams were evaluated for signs of enteric inflammation and extraenteric disease. A five-point, Likert-type scale was used to assess the overall likelihood of active inflammation, with scores ≥ 3 considered positive. Cohen's κ coefficient was calculated to assess interreader agreement. A subset of patients who had undergone ileocolonoscopy or surgery with confirmed histopathology within 45 days of MRE were used to assess the accuracy of MRE for detecting active inflammation in the terminal ileum and large bowel. RESULTS A total of 91 magnetic resonance enterography studies were reviewed. Of these, 45 had comparison histopathology within 45 days. The overall sensitivity of MRE for detecting active inflammation compared to ileocolonoscopy was 92% for both readers, while specificity was 100% for reader 1 and 75% for reader 2. Of the individual parameters evaluated, mucosal hyperenhancement and bowel wall thickening were the most sensitive indicators of active inflammation, each having sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 88%. Cohen's κ coefficient was 0.59, indicating moderate agreement between the readers. CONCLUSIONS MRE has high overall diagnostic accuracy for detecting active bowel inflammation in pediatric patients compared to ileocolonoscopy and demonstrates moderate interreader reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Wallihan
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnett Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ilangovan R, Burling D, George A, Gupta A, Marshall M, Taylor SA. CT enterography: review of technique and practical tips. Br J Radiol 2012; 85:876-86. [PMID: 22553291 PMCID: PMC3474054 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/27973476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2011] [Revised: 12/01/2011] [Accepted: 12/06/2011] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
CT enterography is a new non-invasive imaging technique that offers superior small bowel visualisation compared with standard abdomino-pelvic CT, and provides complementary diagnostic information to capsule endoscopy and MRI enterography. CT enterography is well tolerated by patients and enables accurate, efficient assessment of pathology arising from the small bowel wall or surrounding organs. This article reviews the clinical role of CT enterography, and offers practical tips for optimising technique and accurate interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ilangovan
- Intestinal Imaging Centre, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Radhamma A, Halligan S, Bloom S, McCartney S, Taylor SA. MRI enterography: what is the clinical impact of unsuspected extra-enteric findings? Br J Radiol 2012; 85:e766-9. [PMID: 22553300 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/33344438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
To define the incidence and nature of incidental extra-enteric findings on magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) following the introduction of a new clinical service, to assess the volume of additional tests generated and to gauge the potential of MRE to reduce the need for subsequent abdominal imaging. The imaging and patient records of 500 consecutive patients undergoing MRE at a single institution were reviewed. Note was made of patient demographics, any extra-enteric findings reported on the MRE, whether additional tests were recommended by the reporting radiologists to clarify or follow up extra-enteric findings and whether the patients underwent additional abdominal or pelvic imaging in the 4 months after the MRE. 64% of the cohort was male. The mean age was 45 years (range 11-80 years). Overall 190 (38%) underwent MRE for assessment of known Crohn's disease and 310 (62%) for other indications, such as abdominal pain and anaemia. 26 non-bowel-related extra-enteric abnormalities were noted on the MRE report in just 15 patients (3%), and a total of 6 additional tests were recommended by the reporting radiologist. 13 patients (2.6%) underwent some form of abdominal imaging within 4 months of the MRE. None of these additional investigations revealed any abnormality missed on the MRE. Extra-enteric findings are unlikely to have a significant impact on healthcare resources after the introduction of an MRE service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Radhamma
- Department of Imaging, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chatu S, Subramanian V, Pollok RCG. Meta-analysis: diagnostic medical radiation exposure in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35:529-39. [PMID: 22239831 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04975.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2011] [Revised: 11/28/2011] [Accepted: 12/13/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, increasing use has led to concerns about the malignant potential of ionising radiation. Several studies have demonstrated that diagnostic imaging can result in exposure to potentially harmful levels of ionising radiation in IBD patients. AIM To determine the pooled prevalence of increased exposure and pooled odds ratio of risk factors associated with exposure to potentially harmful levels of diagnostic medical radiation. METHODS We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINHAL and reference lists of identified articles, without language restrictions in October 2011. RESULTS Six studies with 1704 participants provided data on the proportion of patients receiving potentially harmful levels of radiation defined as ≥50 milli-sieverts (mSv)-equivalent to 5 CT abdomen scans. The pooled prevalence was 8.8% (95% CI 4.4-16.8) for IBD patients and 11.1% (95% CI 5.7-20.5%) and 2% (95% CI 0.8-4.9%) for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients respectively. Five studies involving 2627 participants provided data for risk factors. IBD-related surgery and corticosteroid use were significant with pooled adjusted odds ratio of 5.4 (95% CI 2.6-11.2) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.7-3.4) respectively. CONCLUSIONS About 1 in 10 patients may be exposed to potentially harmful levels of diagnostic medical radiation. Corticosteroid use and IBD related surgery increased this risk. Strategies to reduce radiation exposure while assessing disease activity need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Chatu
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Imaging of Crohn's disease of the small bowel is gradually moving away from barium fluoroscopy and towards cross-sectional modalities. This review explores the strengths and limitations of various techniques, and focuses on several current questions in small bowel imaging, such as the comparison between oral ingestion or nasojejunal intubation and enteroclysis for introduction of contrast, the use of computerised tomography (CT) versus magnetic resonance (MR) and the likely changes over the next decade.
Collapse
|
30
|
Taylor SA. Commentary on small bowel imaging in Crohn's disease. Frontline Gastroenterol 2012; 3:3-4. [PMID: 28839622 PMCID: PMC5517245 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2011-100012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
|
31
|
Diagnostic accuracy of small intestine ultrasonography using an oral contrast agent in Crohn's disease: comparative study from the UK. Clin Radiol 2011; 67:553-9. [PMID: 22212635 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2011] [Revised: 11/09/2011] [Accepted: 11/17/2011] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the usefulness of small intestine contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (SICUS) using an oral contrast agent in routine clinical practice by assessing the level of agreement with the established techniques, small bowel follow-through (SBFT) and computed tomography (CT), and diagnostic accuracy compared with the final diagnosis in the detection of small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) and luminal complications in a regional centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS All symptomatic known or suspected cases of CD who underwent SICUS were retrospectively reviewed. The level of agreement between SICUS and SBFT, CT, histological findings, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level was assessed using kappa (κ) coefficient. Sensitivity was demonstrated using the final diagnosis as the reference standard defined by the outcome of clinical assessment, follow-up, and results of investigations other than SICUS. RESULTS One hundred and forty-three patients underwent SICUS of these 79 (55%) were female. Eighty-six (60%) were known to have CD and 57 (40%) had symptoms suggestive of intestinal disease with no previous diagnosis. Forty-six (55%) of the known CD patients had had at least one previous surgical resection. The sensitivity of SICUS in detecting active small bowel CD in known CD and undiagnosed cases was 93%. The kappa coefficient was 0.88 and 0.91 with SBFT and CT, respectively. SICUS detected nine patients who had one or more small bowel strictures and six patients with a fistula all detected by SBFT or CT. CONCLUSION SICUS is not only comparable to SBFT and CT but avoids radiation exposure and should be more widely adopted in the UK as a primary diagnostic procedure and to monitor disease complications in patients with CD.
Collapse
|
32
|
Hafeez R, Punwani S, Boulos P, Bloom S, McCartney S, Halligan S, Taylor SA. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of MR enterography in Crohn's disease. Clin Radiol 2011; 66:1148-58. [PMID: 21943719 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2010] [Revised: 12/13/2010] [Accepted: 12/14/2010] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the impact of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) on clinician diagnostic confidence and therapeutic strategy in patients under investigation for small bowel Crohn's disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS Gastroenterologists completed a proforma before and following MRE in 51 patients (mean age 35 years, 26 female) under investigation for small bowel Crohn's disease, indicating percentage confidence for presence/absence of small bowel involvement. In suspected disease, diagnostic confidence (using a scoring system from 1=no to 6=yes) was scored for subcategories: extent >30 cm (DE), terminal ileum (lTI), jejunal (JD), colonic disease (CoD), strictures (ST), activity (AD), extraluminal complications (EL), and surgical need (NS). Therapeutic strategy was recorded. Patients were divided into three groups: 1=suspected disease, MRE normal (n=15); 2=suspected disease, MRE abnormal (n=30); 3=no suspected disease, MRE normal (n=6). Binomial exact and paired t-tests were use to compare confidence pre and post-MRE. RESULTS Mean percentage confidence for the presence/absence of small bowel disease increased from 62 to 84% (p=0.003), 87 to 98% (p=0.0001), and 83 to 98% (p=0.005) after MRE for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In suspected disease, confidence changed significantly for all of the subcategories (p<0.001) except EL in group 1. The percentage of patients with a confidence change ranged from 40% (CoD) to 87% (lTI; group 1) and from 7% (EL) to 93% (DE; group 2). Therapeutic strategy changed in 31/51 (61%, 95% CI 47-74%), 14 with a reduction in planned therapy and 17 with an increase. CONCLUSION MRE had a positive diagnostic impact in patients under investigation for small bowel Crohn's disease and this influenced therapeutic strategy in 61% of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hafeez
- Department of Surgery, University College London Hospitals, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|