Schmidt MA, Panek R, Colgan R, Hughes J, Sohaib A, Saran F, Murray J, Bernard J, Revell P, Nittka M, Leach MO, Hansen VN. Slice Encoding for Metal Artefact Correction in magnetic resonance imaging examinations for radiotherapy planning.
Radiother Oncol 2016;
120:356-62. [PMID:
27222296 PMCID:
PMC5013753 DOI:
10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images are degraded in the presence of metallic implants. We investigate whether SEMAC (Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction) MR is advantageous for radiotherapy (RT) planning.
METHODS
Conventional and SEMAC MR protocols were compared (1.5T). A spine fixation device suspended in gelatine, two patients with spine fixation devices and six patients with bilateral hip replacements were scanned with both conventional and SEMAC protocols. In spine patients the visibility of the spinal canal and spinal cord was assessed; in prostate patients, the visibility of the prostate, pelvic structures and the pelvic girdle.
RESULTS
The signal loss volume surrounding the spine fixation device was reduced by approximately 20% when the SEMAC protocol was employed, and registration errors were reduced. For spine patients, the spinal canal was completely visible only using the SEMAC protocol. In hip replacement patients, metal artifacts were local; the signal loss extended to the internal surface of the acetabulum in eight implants with conventional protocols, but only in four using SEMAC.
CONCLUSIONS
SEMAC MR contributes towards correct co-registration of MR and CT images for RT planning, and is particularly relevant when the TV or OARs are close to implants.
Collapse