Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT

Diagnostic Performance in Low- and High-Contrast Tasks of an Image-Based Denoising Algorithm Applied to Radiation Dose-Reduced Multiphase Abdominal CT Examinations

BACKGROUND. Anatomic redundancy between phases can be used to achieve denoising of multiphase CT examinations. A limitation of iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques is that they generally require use of CT projection data. A frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm applies denoising to the multiphase CT images themselves. This method does not require knowledge of the acquisition process or integration into the reconstruction system of the scanner, and it can be implemented as a supplement to commercially available IR algorithms. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the present study is to compare radiologists' performance for low-contrast and high-contrast diagnostic tasks (i.e., tasks for which differences in CT attenuation between the imaging target and its anatomic background are subtle or large, respectively) evaluated on multiphase abdominal CT between routine-dose images and radiation dose-reduced images processed by a frequency-split multiband-filtration denoising algorithm. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 47 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for known or suspected liver metastases (a low-contrast task) and 45 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for pancreatic cancer staging (a high-contrast task). Radiation dose-reduced images corresponding to dose reduction of 50% or more were created using a validated noise insertion technique and then underwent denoising using the frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm. Images were independently evaluated in multiple sessions by different groups of abdominal radiologists for each task (three readers in the low-contrast arm and four readers in the high-contrast arm). The noninferiority of denoised radiation dose-reduced images to routine-dose images was assessed using the jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) figure-of-merit (FOM; limit of noninferiority, -0.10) for liver metastases detection and using the Cohen kappa statistic and reader confidence scores (100-point scale) for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion. RESULTS. For liver metastases detection, the JAFROC FOM for denoised radiation dose-reduced images was 0.644 (95% CI, 0.510-0.778), and that for routine-dose images was 0.668 (95% CI, 0.543-0.792; estimated difference, -0.024 [95% CI, -0.084 to 0.037]). Intraobserver agreement for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion was substantial to near perfect when the two image sets were compared (κ = 0.53-1.00); the 95% CIs of all differences in confidence scores between image sets contained zero. CONCLUSION. Multiphase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images with a radiation dose reduction of 50% or greater that undergo denoising by a frequency-split multiband-filtration algorithm yield performance similar to that of routine-dose images for detection of liver metastases and vascular staging of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. The image-based denoising algorithm facilitates radiation dose reduction of multiphase examinations for both low- and high-contrast diagnostic tasks without requiring manufacturer-specific hardware or software.

A Review of Deep Learning CT Reconstruction: Concepts, Limitations, and Promise in Clinical Practice

Purpose of Review

Deep Learning reconstruction (DLR) is the current state-of-the-art method for CT image formation. Comparisons to existing filter back-projection, iterative, and model-based reconstructions are now available in the literature. This review summarizes the prior reconstruction methods, introduces DLR, and then reviews recent findings from DLR from a physics and clinical perspective.

Recent Findings

DLR has been shown to allow for noise magnitude reductions relative to filtered back-projection without suffering from “plastic” or “blotchy” noise texture that was found objectionable with most iterative and model-based solutions. Clinically, early reader studies have reported increases in subjective quality scores and studies have successfully implemented DLR-enabled dose reductions.

Summary

The future of CT image reconstruction is bright; deep learning methods have only started to tackle problems in this space via addressing noise reduction. Artifact mitigation and spectral applications likely be future candidates for DLR applications.

Low-dose abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients with lymphoma: An image quality and radiation dose reduction study

This study aimed to evaluate image quality, the detection rate of enlarged lymph nodes, and radiation dose exposure of ultralow-dose and low-dose abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) in patients with lymphoma. Patients with lymphoma who underwent abdominopelvic CT using dual-source scanner were retrospectively recruited from a single center. CT images were obtained at 90 kVp dual-source mode reformatted in three data sets using the advanced modelled iterative reconstruction algorithm: 100% (standard-dose CT), 66.7% (low-dose CT), and 33.3% (ultralow-dose CT). Two radiologists analyzed subjective image quality and detection of abdominal enlarged lymph nodes on ultralow-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT blindly and independently. The results were compared with reference standards. Three readers (two radiologists and one hematologist) reviewed overall image quality and spleen size. In total, 128 consecutive CT scans (77 complete response, 44 partial response, 6 progressive disease, and 1 initial evaluation) from 86 patients (64 B-cell lymphoma, 14 T/NK-cell lymphoma, and 8 Hodgkin’s lymphoma cases) were assessed. The enlarged lymph node-based detection rates for two readers were 97.0% (96/99) and 94.0% (93/99) on standard-dose CT, 97.0% (96/99) and 94.0% (93/99) on low-dose CT, and 94.0% (93/99) and 89.9% (89/99) on ultralow-dose CT. Overall image quality was 3.8 ± 0.5, 3.9 ± 0.5, and 4.1 ± 0.5 on ultralow-dose CT; 4.7 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.5, and 4.8 ± 0.3 on low-dose CT; and 4.8 ± 0.4, 4.7 ± 0.4, and 4.9 ± 0.2 on standard-dose CT, according to two radiologists and one hematologist, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients of spleen size were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87–0.93), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93) on ultralow-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT, respectively. Mean effective radiation doses of standard-dose, low-dose, and ultralow-dose CT were 5.7 ±1.8 mSv, 3.8 ± 1.2 mSv, and 1.9 ± 0.6 mSv, respectively. Our findings suggest that ultralow-dose and low-dose CT, even with radiation doses reduced by 66.7% and 33.3%, respectively, maintained adequate image quality. These imaging modalities may be employed for follow-up lymphoma evaluation in consideration of the long surveillance periods.

Effect of obesity on ability to lower exposure for detection of low-attenuation liver lesions

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of obesity and iterative reconstruction on the ability to reduce exposure by studying the accuracy for detection of low‐contrast low‐attenuation (LCLA) liver lesions on computed tomography (CT) using a phantom model.

Methods

A phantom with four unique LCLA liver lesions (5‐ to 15‐mm spheres, –24 to –6 HU relative to 90‐HU background) was scanned without (“thin” phantom) and with (“obese” phantom) a 5‐cm thick fat‐attenuation ring at 150 mAs (thin phantom) and 450 mAs (obese phantom) standard exposures and at 33% and 67% exposure reductions. Images were reconstructed using standard filtered back projection (FBP) and with iterative reconstruction (Adaptive Model‐Based Iterative Reconstruction strength 3, ADMIRE). A noninferiority analysis of lesion detection was performed.

Results

Mean area under the curve (AUC) values for lesion detection were significantly higher for the thin phantom than for the obese phantom regardless of exposure level (P < 0.05) for both FBP and ADMIRE. At 33% exposure reduction, AUC was noninferior for both FBP and ADMIRE strength 3 (P < 0.0001). At 67% exposure reduction, AUC remained noninferior for the thin phantom (P < 0.0035), but was no longer noninferior for the obese phantom (P ≥ 0.7353). There were no statistically significant differences in AUC between FBP and ADMIRE at any exposure level for either phantom.

Conclusions

Accuracy for lesion detection was not only significantly lower in the obese phantom at all relative exposures, but detection accuracy decreased sooner while reducing the exposure in the obese phantom. There was no significant difference in lesion detection between FBP and ADMIRE at equivalent exposure levels for either phantom.

Dose Reduction While Preserving Diagnostic Quality in Head CT: Advancing the Application of Iterative Reconstruction Using a Live Animal Model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Iterative reconstruction has promise in lowering the radiation dose without compromising image quality, but its full potential has not yet been realized. While phantom studies cannot fully approximate the subjective effects on image quality, live animal models afford this assessment. We characterize dose reduction in head CT by applying advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in a live ovine model while evaluating preservation of gray-white matter detectability and image texture compared with filtered back-projection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A live sheep was scanned on a Force CT scanner (Siemens) at 12 dose levels (82-982 effective mAs). Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection and ADMIRE (strengths, 1-5). A total of 72 combinations (12 doses × 6 reconstructions) were evaluated qualitatively for resemblance to the reference image (highest dose with filtered back-projection) using 2 metrics: detectability of gray-white matter differentiation and noise-versus-smoothness in image texture. Quantitative analysis for noise, SNR, and contrast-to-noise was also performed across all dose-strength combinations.

RESULTS

Both qualitative and quantitative results confirm that gray-white matter differentiation suffers at a lower dose but recovers when complemented by higher iterative reconstruction strength, and image texture acquires excessive smoothness with a higher iterative reconstruction strength but recovers when complemented by dose reduction. Image quality equivalent to the reference image is achieved by a 58% dose reduction with ADMIRE-5.

CONCLUSIONS

An approximately 60% dose reduction may be possible while preserving diagnostic quality with the appropriate dose-strength combination. This in vivo study can serve as a useful guide for translating the full implementation of iterative reconstruction in clinical practice.

Detection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT

Purpose To evaluate colorectal cancer hepatic metastasis detection and characterization between reduced radiation dose (RD) and standard dose (SD) contrast material-enhanced CT of the abdomen and to qualitatively compare between filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction algorithms. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (from May 2017 through November 2017), 52 adults with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and suspected hepatic metastases at baseline CT underwent two portal venous phase CT scans: SD and RD in the same breath hold. Three radiologists, blinded to examination details, performed detection and characterization of 2-15-mm lesions on the SD FBP and RD adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)-V 60% series images. Readers assessed overall image quality and lesions between SD FBP and seven different iterative reconstructions. Two nonblinded consensus reviewers established the reference standard using the picture archiving and communication system lesion marks of each reader, multiple comparison examinations, and clinical data. Results RD CT resulted in a mean dose reduction of 54% compared with SD. Of the 260 lesions (233 metastatic, 27 benign), 212 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 76%, 86%) were detected with RD CT, whereas 252 (97%; 95% CI: 94%, 99%) were detected with SD (P < .001); per-lesion sensitivity was 79% (95% CI: 74%, 84%) and 94% (95% CI: 90%, 96%) (P < .001), respectively. Mean qualitative scores ranked SD images as higher quality than RD series images, and ASIR-V ranked higher than ASIR and Veo 3.0. Conclusion CT evaluation of colorectal liver metastases is compromised with modest radiation dose reduction, and the use of iterative reconstructions could not maintain observer performance. © RSNA, 2018.

Observer Performance with Varying Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Methods for Detection of Hepatic Metastases

Purpose To estimate the ability of lower dose levels and iterative reconstruction (IR) to display hepatic metastases that can be detected by radiologists. Materials and Methods Projection data from 83 contrast agent-enhanced CT examinations were collected. Metastases were defined by histopathologic analysis or progression and regression. Lower radiation dose configurations were reconstructed at five dose levels with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR (automatic exposure control settings: 80, 100, 120, 160, and 200 quality reference mAs [QRM]). Three abdominal radiologists circumscribed metastases, indicating confidence (confidence range, 0-100) and image quality. Noninferiority was assessed by using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis (noninferiority limit, -0.10) and reader agreement rules, which required identification of metastases identified at routine dose, and no nonlesion localizations in patients negative for metastases, in 71 or more patient CT examinations (of 83), for each configuration. Results There were 123 hepatic metastases (mean size, 1.4 cm; median volume CT dose index and size-specific dose estimate, 11.0 and 13.4 mGy, respectively). By using JAFROC figure of merit, 100 QRM FBP did not meet noninferiority criteria and had estimated performance difference from routine dose of -0.08 (95% confidence interval: -0.11, -0.04). Preset reader agreement rules were not met for 100 QRM IR or 80 QRM IR, but were met for doses 120 QRM or higher (ie, size-specific dose estimate ≥ 8.0 mGy). IR improved image quality (P < .05) but not reader performance. Other than 160 QRM IR, lower dose levels were associated with reduced confidence in metastasis detection (P < .001). Conclusion For detection of hepatic metastases by using contrast-enhanced CT, dose levels that corresponded to 120 quality reference mAs (size-specific dose estimate, 8.0 mGy) and higher performed similarly to 200 quality reference mAs with filtered back projection. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Assessment of arterially hyper-enhancing liver lesions using virtual monoenergetic images from spectral detector CT: phantom and patient experience

PURPOSE

To investigate a benefit from virtual monoenergetic reconstructions (VMIs) for assessment of arterially hyper-enhancing liver lesions in phantom and patients and to compare hybrid-iterative and spectral image reconstructions of conventional images (CI-IR and CI-SR).

METHODS

All imaging was performed on a SDCT (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). Images of a non-anthropomorphic phantom with a lesion-mimicking insert (containing iodine in water solution) and arterial-phase images from contrast-enhanced patient examinations were evaluated. VMIs (40-200 keV, 10 keV increment), CI-IR, and CI-SR were reconstructed using different strengths of image denoising. ROIs were placed in lesions, liver/matrix, muscle; signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, and lesion-to-liver ratios (SNR, CNR, and LLR) were calculated. Qualitatively, 40, 70, and 110 keV and CI images were assessed by two radiologists on five-point Likert scales regarding overall image quality, lesion assessment, and noise.

RESULTS

In phantoms, SNR was increased threefold by VMI_40keV compared with CI-IR/SR (5.8 ± 1.1 vs. 18.8 ± 2.2, p ≤ 0.001), while no difference was found between CI-IR and CI-SR (p = 1). Denoising was capable of noise reduction by 40%. In total, 20 patients exhibiting 51 liver lesions were assessed. Attenuation was the highest in VMI_40keV, while image noise was comparable to CI-IR resulting in a threefold increase of CNR/LLR (CI-IR 1.3 ± 0.8/4.4 ± 2.0, VMI_40keV: 3.8 ± 2.7/14.2 ± 7.5, p ≤ 0.001). Subjective lesion delineation was the best in VMI_40keV image (p ≤ 0.01), which also provided the lowest perceptible noise and the best overall image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

VMIs improve assessment of arterially hyper-enhancing liver lesions since they increase lesion contrast while maintaining low image noise throughout the entire keV spectrum. These data suggest that to consider VMI screening after arterially hyper-enhancing liver lesions.

Task-based quantification of image quality using a model observer in abdominal CT: a multicentre study

Objective

We investigated the variability in diagnostic information inherent in computed tomography (CT) images acquired at 68 different CT units, with the selected acquisition protocols aiming to answer the same clinical question.

Methods

An anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with two optional rings was scanned on 68 CT systems from 62 centres using the local clinical acquisition parameters of the portal venous phase for the detection of focal liver lesions. Low-contrast detectability (LCD) was assessed objectively with channelised Hotelling observer (CHO) using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) paradigm. For each lesion size, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated and considered as a figure of merit. The volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI_vol) was used to indicate radiation dose exposure.

Results

The median CTDI_vol used was 5.8 mGy, 10.5 mGy and 16.3 mGy for the small, medium and large phantoms, respectively. The median AUC obtained from clinical CT protocols was 0.96, 0.90 and 0.83 for the small, medium and large phantoms, respectively.

Conclusions

Our study used a model observer to highlight the difference in image quality levels when dealing with the same clinical question. This difference was important and increased with growing phantom size, which generated large variations in patient exposure. In the end, a standardisation initiative may be launched to ensure comparable diagnostic information for well-defined clinical questions. The image quality requirements, related to the clinical question to be answered, should be the starting point of patient dose optimisation.

Key Points

• Model observers enable to assess image quality objectively based on clinical tasks.

• Objective image quality assessment should always include several patient sizes.

• Clinical diagnostic image quality should be the starting point for patient dose optimisation.

• Dose optimisation by applying DRLs only is insufficient for ensuring clinical requirements.

Quantitative Measurements Versus Receiver Operating Characteristics and Visual Grading Regression in CT Images Reconstructed with Iterative Reconstruction: A Phantom Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of quantitative measurements with visual grading regression (VGR) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis in computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans on a liver phantom were performed on CT scanners from GE, Philips, and Toshiba at three dose levels. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative techniques (ASiR, iDose, and AIDR 3D of different strengths). Images were visually assessed by five readers using a four- and five-grade ordinal scale for liver low contrast lesions and for 10 image quality criteria. The results were analyzed with ROC and VGR. Standard deviation, signal-to-noise ratios, and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured in the images.

RESULTS

All data were compared to FBP. The results of the quantitative measurements were improved for all algorithms. ROC analysis showed improved lesion detection with ASiR and AIDR and decreased lesion detection with iDose. VGR found improved noise properties for all algorithms, increased sharpness with iDose and AIDR, and decreased artifacts from the spine with AIDR, whereas iDose increased the artifacts from the spine. The contrast in the spine decreased with ASiR and iDose.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved quantitative measurements in images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction compared to FBP are not equivalent to improved diagnostic image accuracy.

Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction in thoracoabdominal CT, using Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) technique in a longitudinal study

Objective

To step-wise evaluate image quality of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) in reduced-dose (RD) thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) compared to full-dose (FD) and RD filtered back projection (FBP) in a longitudinal study.

Materials and methods

122 patients were included in this prospective study. 49 patients (14 men: mean age ± SD, 56±0.4 years; 35 women: 58±1.3 years) completed FD, RD1 (80%-dose) and RD2 (60%-dose) thoracoabdominal CT. Each CT dataset was reconstructed with FBP and SAFIRE. For quantitative image analysis image noise was measured in defined tissue regions. Qualitative image evaluation was performed according to the European Guidelines on Quality criteria for CT. Additionally artifacts, lesion conspicuity, and edge sharpness were assessed.

Results

Compared to FD-FBP noise in soft tissue increased by 12% in RD1-FBP and 27% in RD2-FBP reconstructions, whereas SAFIRE lead to a decrease of 28% (RD1) and 17% (RD2), respectively (all p <0.001). Visually sharp reproduction, lesion conspicuity, edge sharpness of pathologic findings, and overall image quality did not differ statistically significant between FD-FBP and RD-SAFIRE datasets. Image quality decreased in RD1- and RD2-FBP compared to FD-FBP, reaching statistically significance in RD2 datasets (p <0.001). In RD1- and RD2-FBP (p <0.001) streak artifacts were noted.

Conclusion

Using SAFIRE the reference mAs in thoracoabdominal CT can be reduced by at least 30% in clinical routine without loss of image quality or diagnostic information.

Impact of hybrid iterative reconstruction on unenhanced liver CT

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the impact of hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and filtered back projection (FBP) on unenhanced liver CT.

METHODS

30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underwent unenhanced CT. The images were reconstructed with FBP and weak (Level 1), mild (Level 4) and strong (Level 7) levels of HIR (iDose⁴; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH). Quantitatively, attenuations of the HCC (with the largest lesion in each case), hepatic parenchyma (the average of four segments) and image noise (standard deviation of the attenuations in hepatic parenchyma) were compared between the four kinds of reconstruction using the two-tailed paired t-test. Qualitatively, liver lesion conspicuity and characterization were also compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Attenuation of the liver lesion with the strong level of HIR was significantly higher than that with FBP (p = 0.0005). Attenuations of hepatic parenchyma with all three HIR levels were significantly lower than that with FBP (p ≤ 0.0002 in all comparisons). Image noise with each of the three HIR levels was significantly smaller than that with FBP (p < 0.0001 in any comparison). There was no significant difference in lesion conspicuity and characterization between FBP and each HIR level (p ≥ 0.0819 in all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Although attenuations of the liver lesion and hepatic parenchyma were significantly different between HIR and FBP, HIR had no significant effect on lesion conspicuity and characterization. Advances in knowledge: Attenuations of liver lesions and hepatic parenchyma differ significantly between HIR and FBP images.

Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of reduced-dose (RD) contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) with standard-dose (SD) CECT for detection of low-contrast liver lesions.

METHODS

Seventy adults with non-liver primary malignancies underwent abdominal SD-CECT immediately followed by RD-CECT, aggressively targeted at 60-70 % dose reduction. SD series were reconstructed using FBP. RD series were reconstructed with FBP, ASIR, and MBIR (Veo). Three readers-blinded to clinical history and comparison studies-reviewed all series, identifying liver lesions ≥4 mm. Non-blinded review by two experienced abdominal radiologists-assessing SD against available clinical and radiologic information-established the reference standard.

RESULTS

RD-CECT mean effective dose was 2.01 ± 1.36 mSv (median, 1.71), a 64.1 ± 8.8 % reduction. Pooled per-patient performance data were (sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV/accuracy) 0.91/0.78/0.60/0.96/0.81 for SD-FBP compared with RD-FBP 0.79/0.75/0.54/0.91/0.76; RD-ASIR 0.84/0.75/0.56/0.93/0.78; and RD-MBIR 0.84/0.68/0.49/0.92/0.72. ROC AUC values were 0.896/0.834/0.858/0.854 for SD-FBP/RD-FBP/RD-ASIR/RD-MBIR, respectively. RD-FBP (P = 0.002) and RD-MBIR (P = 0.032) AUCs were significantly lower than those of SD-FBP; RD-ASIR was not (P = 0.052). Reader confidence was lower for all RD series (P < 0.001) compared with SD-FBP, especially when calling patients entirely negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive CT dose reduction resulted in inferior diagnostic performance and reader confidence for detection of low-contrast liver lesions compared to SD. Relative to RD-ASIR, RD-FBP showed decreased sensitivity and RD-MBIR showed decreased specificity.

KEY POINTS

• Reduced-dose CECT demonstrates inferior diagnostic performance for detecting low-contrast liver lesions. • Reader confidence is lower with reduced-dose CECT compared to standard-dose CECT. • Overly aggressive dose reduction may result in misdiagnosis, regardless of reconstruction algorithm. • Careful consideration of perceived risks versus benefits of dose reduction is crucial.

Impact of iterative reconstructions on image noise and low-contrast object detection in low kVp simulated abdominal CT: a phantom study

BACKGROUND

Low kilovoltage (kVp) computed tomography (CT) may be used to reduce contrast medium dose in patients at risk of contrast nephropathy, at the cost of increased image noise.

PURPOSE

To evaluate: (i) the impact of iterative reconstructions (Siemens SAFIRE) on low-contrast object detection to compensate for increased noise instead of increased tube loading when decreasing tube potential; and (ii) the change in iodine attenuation in simulated abdominal CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A phantom was scanned at 70, 80, 100, and 120 kVp at fixed effective tube loading (170 mAsEFF) and fixed radiation dose (CTDIVOL 10 mGy). Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP) and SAFIRE strengths S1-S5. Iodine attenuation, objective image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), noise power spectrum (NPS), spatial resolution, and subjective detectability of low-contrast objects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with 120 kVp iodine attenuation increased by a factor 1.6 and 2.0, and image noise increased by a factor 1.9 and 2.5 at 80 and 70 kVp, respectively. Compared with FBP, SAFIRE showed objective reduction in image noise and increased CNR without loss of spatial resolution or any significant NPS alteration, with general tendency to improve subjective detectability of low-contrast objects. At 170 mAsEFF the number of discernible 1.0% contrast objects at 70 kVp/S5 and 80 kVp/S5 was similar to that at 120 kVp/FBP.

CONCLUSION

With the SAFIRE algorithm image noise, CNR and detectability of low-contrast objects may be kept unchanged without increased tube loading when using low kVp settings to reduce contrast medium dose in azotemic patients.

Assessment of Low-Contrast Resolution for the American College of Radiology Computed Tomographic Accreditation Program: What Is the Impact of Iterative Reconstruction?

OBJECTIVE

To compare contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) thresholds with visual assessment of low-contrast resolution (LCR) in filtered back projection (FBP) and iteratively reconstructed (IR) computed tomographic (CT) images.

METHODS

American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom LCR images were acquired at CTDIvol levels of 8, 12, and 16 mGy using 2 scanner models and reconstructed using one FBP and 2 IR kernels. Acquisitions were repeated 100 times. Three board-certified medical physicists blindly reviewed the LCR section images. Pass-percentage rates (PPRs) using previous and current ACR CT accreditation criteria were compared.

RESULTS

Observer PPRs for FBP images were less than 32%. For IR images, 5 of 18 settings/dose/model configurations had PPRs greater than 32% (maximum 76.3%). For CNR evaluation of FBP images, PPRs for 15 configurations were greater than 70%. For IR images, all PPRs were at least 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

The CNR threshold used by the ACR CT accreditation program yields higher PPRs than visual assessment of LCR, potentially resulting in lower-quality images passing the ACR CNR criteria.

Dose reduction in pediatric abdominal CT: use of iterative reconstruction techniques across different CT platforms

Dose reduction in children undergoing CT scanning is an important priority for the radiology community and public at large. Drawbacks of radiation reduction are increased image noise and artifacts, which can affect image interpretation. Iterative reconstruction techniques have been developed to reduce noise and artifacts from reduced-dose CT examinations, although reconstruction algorithm, magnitude of dose reduction and effects on image quality vary. We review the reconstruction principles, radiation dose potential and effects on image quality of several iterative reconstruction techniques commonly used in clinical settings, including 3-D adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR-3D), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), iDose, sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). We also discuss clinical applications of iterative reconstruction techniques in pediatric abdominal CT.

Comparison of iterative model-based reconstruction versus conventional filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques: lesion conspicuity and influence of body size in anthropomorphic liver phantoms

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether an iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) can improve lesion conspicuity and depiction on computed tomography (CT) compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) using anthropomorphic phantoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One small and one large anthropomorphic body phantoms, each containing 8 simulated focal liver lesions (FLLs), were scanned using a 256-channel CT scanner at 120 kVp with variable tube current-time products (10-200 mAs). Scans were divided into 3 groups based on radiation dose (RD) as follows: (a) full dose (FD), (b) low dose (FD50), and (c) ultralow dose (FD25 for the large phantom, FD15 for the small phantom). All images were reconstructed using FBP, iDose, and IMR. Image noise and lesion-to-liver contrast were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. Thereafter, 6 radiologists independently evaluated conspicuity of FLLs, and then, compared the number of invisible FLLs on 3 image sets of each RD group.

RESULTS

Image noise was significantly lower with IMR than with FBP and iDose at the same RD. Iterative model-based reconstruction improved conspicuity of low-contrast FLLs in all RD groups compared to the others (P < 0.001). Furthermore, compared to FBP and iDose, the number of visible FLLs significantly increased on IMR images in the FD15 group of the small phantom 52.8% [38/72], 68.1% [49/72], and 84.8% [61/72], respectively; P < 0.001) and in the FD 25, FD50 groups of the large phantom (FD50: 56.9% [41/72], 76.4% [55/72], and 84.7% [61/72], respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Iterative model-based reconstruction reduced image noise and improved low-contrast FLL conspicuity, compared to FBP and iDose. Therefore, depiction of low-contrast FLLs on FBP could be improved using IMR.

Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study

PURPOSE

To measure the effect of reduced radiation exposure on low-contrast low-attenuation liver lesion detection in an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom by using filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen radiologists blinded to phantom and study design interpreted randomized image data sets that contained 36 spherical simulated liver lesions of three sizes and three attenuation differences (5-mm diameter: 12, 18, and 24 HU less than the 90-HU background attenuation of the simulated liver insert; 10- and 15-mm diameter: 6, 12, and 18 HU less than the 90-HU background attenuation) scanned with four discrete exposure settings and reconstructed by using FBP and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. Response assessment included region-level lesion presence or absence on a five-point diagnostic confidence scale. Statistical evaluation included multireader multicase receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with nonparametric methods and noninferiority analysis at a margin of -0.10.

RESULTS

Pooled accuracy at 75% exposure for both FBP and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction was noninferior to 100% exposure (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). Subsequent exposure reductions resulted in a significant decrease in accuracy. When the smallest (5-mm-diameter) lesions were excluded from analysis, sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction was superior to FBP at 100% exposure (P = .011), and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction at 25% and 50% exposure reduction was noninferior to FBP at 100% exposure (P ≤ .013). Reader confidence was greater with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction than with FBP for 10- and 15-mm lesions (2.94 vs 2.76 and 3.62 vs 3.52, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this low-contrast low-attenuation liver lesion model, a 25% exposure reduction maintained noninferior diagnostic accuracy. However, detection was inferior with each subsequent exposure reduction, regardless of reconstruction method. Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction and FBP performed equally well at modest exposure reduction (25%-50%). Readers had higher confidence levels with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction for the 10- and 15-mm lesions.