Evaluation of adverse reactions to contrast media in the hospital

Misuse, Abuse and Medication Errors' Adverse Events Associated with Opioids-A Systematic Review

Opioids are the strongest analgesics available and are crucial in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. The line between these critical medications and how they are used beyond standard therapeutics in cases such as abuse, misuse, and medication errors needs to be understood, as it affects their safety, efficacy, and manner of use. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what is known about the adverse events resulting from the abuse, misuse, and medication errors associated with opioid use. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed®, Scopus® and, EBSCO® databases to retrieve studies from the inception to December 2023 reporting abuse, misuse, and medication errors associated with medicinal opioid use. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts and full text according to eligibility using Covidence® software. Full articles were examined by two independent reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The risk of bias was assessed by the JBI's critical appraisal tools. A total of 934 articles were screened by their title and abstract. Then, 151 articles were selected for full text screening. Of these, 34 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The included studies varied significantly in their population sizes, ranging from 9 individuals to 298,433 patients, and encompassed a diverse demographic, including all ages and both sexes. The studies consistently reported a range of adverse events associated with opioid use. Fentanyl, morphine, oxycodone, tramadol, and hydrocodone were frequently implicated. The data heterogeneity in this field resulted in challenges in drawing conclusions. The review highlights that some opioids, particularly fentanyl, morphine, and oxycodone, are frequently associated with preventable adverse drug reactions, abuse, and medication errors, underscoring the need for robust preventative measures and ongoing research to mitigate opioid-related harm.

Intravenous contrast medium extravasation: systematic review and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee Guidelines

NEED FOR A REVIEW

Guidelines for management and prevention of contrast media extravasation have not been updated recently. In view of emerging research and changing working practices, this review aims to inform update on the current guidelines.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, we review the literature pertaining to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, risk factors and treatments of contrast media extravasation. A suggested protocol and guidelines are recommended based upon the available literature.

KEY POINTS

• Risk of extravasation is dependent on scanning technique and patient risk factors. • Diagnosis is mostly clinical, and outcomes are mostly favourable. • Referral to surgery should be based on clinical severity rather than extravasated volume.

Assessment of the radio-contrast media-induced self-reported adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care hospital of North India: A prospective study

Background:

Objectives:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Differences in Adverse Reactions Among Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the KAERS Database

BACKGROUND

The various adverse drug reactions (ADRs) arise from different types of iodinated contrast media (ICM).

OBJECTIVE

Thus, we investigated the occurrence rate and types of ADRs according to the total usage cases of the 7 most common ICM.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 74,242 causal ADRs caused by ICM from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database between January 2014 and December 2016. The 11,712,796 total usage cases that represent all administrations of ICM reported from individual medical institutions were received from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. A proportionality test was used to examine the differences in the frequency ratio of causal ADRs to total usage cases.

RESULTS

Immediate hypersensitivity (44,467 cases, 88.56%) occurred more frequently than delayed hypersensitivity (5,725 cases, 11.4%; P < .001). The overall occurrence rate of causal ADRs and serious ADRs considering total usage cases was 0.37% and 0.02%, respectively (P < .001). The ICM most commonly resulting in ADRs were iomeprol (0.7%) and iopromide (0.59%). The serious ADRs were most common for iomeprol (0.05%). When ADRs were classified according to the system organ class, "skin and appendages disorders" (47,065 cases, 63.4%) occurred most common. Iodixanol resulted in the highest frequency of "urinary system disorders."

CONCLUSIONS

By comparison of the ADRs considering total usage cases, the incidence and classification of ADRs were different for each contrast medium. A prospective study is needed because the differences in these 7 major contrast media may assist in the selection of ICM tailored for each patient.

Adverse Drug Reactions to Radiographic Contrast Media in a Teaching Hospital in North India: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Radiocontrast media are used extensively nowadays to visualize internal organs. Currently, non-ionic iodinated contrast media are used which are generally considered to be safe but some adverse reactions have been reported. Thus, the present study was carried out to analyze the nature and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to radiographic contrast media in a teaching hospital.

METHODS

An observational study carried out for a period of six months in a teaching hospital. Contrast media induced adverse reactions were analyzed in terms of affected organs, rate, causality assessment, severity and preventability. The treatment and outcomes of adverse events were also recorded. Naranjo Probability Scale was used to evaluate the relationship between the contrast agent used and the suspected ADR. The severity of the suspected ADRs was determined using Hartwig Scale and preventability was assessed using modified Schumock and Thornton criterion.

RESULTS

A total of 15 suspected ADRs occurred in 11 patients with an incidence of 1.4%. It included 5 (45.4%) males and 6 (54.5%) females (p < 05). The highest percentage (72.7 %) of ADRs was seen in adult patients, the mean age being 40.8 years. Vomiting (33.3%) was the most common ADR noted followed by severe nausea and rashes. 64.7 % of ADRs were categorized as probable and 35.3 % were possible. Adverse reactions required treatment in 46.6% patients. There was no fatality reported.

CONCLUSION

The reactions observed were mild to moderate in severity and occurred within 30 minutes of the administration of the contrast.

Evaluation of nephroprotection of silymarin on contrast-induced nephropathy in liver cirrhosis patients: A population-based cohort study

Recent findings from an animal experiment suggest a modest association between silymarin and decreased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. However, the relationship between silymarin and contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with liver cirrhosis remains unclear.From 1997 to 2007, we identified 3019 patients with liver cirrhosis who were administered silymarin and matched them with 3019 patients with liver cirrhosis who were not administered silymarin. Each patient was followed up for a minimum of 4 years. After adjusting for age, gender, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, alcoholic hepatitis, and Charlson comorbidity index, we considered death occurrence and used the Fine and Gray regression models to calculate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) for contrast-induced nephropathy. Sensitivity analyses were also performed using the same model on the subgroups classified by comorbidity.Using the Fine and Gray regression models and with death as the competing risk, we observed that sHR for contrast-induced nephropathy was 0.94-fold higher in the silymarin cohort than in the nonsilymarin cohort (95% confidence interval = 0.61-1.47, P = .791). On the basis of sensitivity analyses results classified by comorbidity, a nonsignificant decrease in risk of contrast-induced nephropathy was found.Silymarin shows no nephron-protective positive effects on contrast-induced nephropathy. Silymarin did not play a nephron-protective role according to Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan. Clinical trials are necessary to further assess the nephron-protective effects of silymarin of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Differences between Drug-Induced and Contrast Media-Induced Adverse Reactions Based on Spontaneously Reported Adverse Drug Reactions

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed differences between spontaneously reported drug-induced (not including contrast media) and contrast media-induced adverse reactions.

METHODS

Adverse drug reactions reported by an in-hospital pharmacovigilance center (St. Mary's teaching hospital, Daejeon, Korea) from 2010-2012 were classified as drug-induced or contrast media-induced. Clinical patterns, frequency, causality, severity, Schumock and Thornton's preventability, and type A/B reactions were recorded. The trends among causality tools measuring drug and contrast-induced adverse reactions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 1,335 reports, 636 drug-induced and contrast media-induced adverse reactions were identified. The prevalence of spontaneously reported adverse drug reaction-related admissions revealed a suspected adverse drug reaction-reporting rate of 20.9/100,000 (inpatient, 0.021%) and 3.9/100,000 (outpatients, 0.004%). The most common adverse drug reaction-associated drug classes included nervous system agents and anti-infectives. Dermatological and gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions were most frequently and similarly reported between drug and contrast media-induced adverse reactions. Compared to contrast media-induced adverse reactions, drug-induced adverse reactions were milder, more likely to be preventable (9.8% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001), and more likely to be type A reactions (73.5% vs. 18.8%, p < 0.001). Females were over-represented among drug-induced adverse reactions (68.1%, p < 0.001) but not among contrast media-induced adverse reactions (56.6%, p = 0.066). Causality patterns differed between the two adverse reaction classes. The World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality evaluation and Naranjo algorithm results significantly differed from those of the Korean algorithm version II (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found differences in sex, preventability, severity, and type A/B reactions between spontaneously reported drug and contrast media-induced adverse reactions. The World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre and Naranjo algorithm causality evaluation afforded similar results.