Reduced z-axis coverage in multidetector-row CT pulmonary angiography decreases radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of alternative diseases

The Effect of Limiting the Scan Range of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (to Reduce Radiation Exposure) on the Detection of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the standard imaging test for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but it is associated with patients' exposure to radiation. Studies have suggested that radiation exposure can be reduced without compromising PE detection by limiting the scan range (the z-axis, going from up to down); (2) Methods: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE on 17 July 2021. Studies were included if they enrolled patients who had undergone a CTPA and described the yield of PE diagnoses, number of missed filling defects and/or other diagnoses using a reduced z-axis in comparison to a full-length scan. To assess risk of bias, we modified an existing risk of bias tools for observational studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were synthesized in a narrative review. Primary outcomes were the number of missed PE diagnoses (based on at least one filling defect) and filling defects; the secondary outcome was the number of other missed findings; (3) Results: Eleven cohort studies and one case-control study were included reporting on a total of 3955 scans including 1025 scans with a diagnosis of PE. Six different reduced scan ranges were assessed; the most studied was from the top of the aortic arch to below the heart, in which no PEs were missed (seven studies). One sub-segmental PE was missed when the scan coverage was 10 cm starting from the bottom of the aortic arch and 14.7 cm starting from the top of the arch. Five studies that reported on other findings all found that other diagnoses were missed with a reduced z-axis. Most of the included studies had a high risk of bias; (4) Conclusions: CTPA scan coverage reduction from the top of aortic arch to below the heart reduced radiation exposure without affecting PE diagnoses, but studies were generally at high risk of bias.

Clinical CT underestimation of the percentage volume occupied by cysts in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of cyst score measurements by standard high-resolution helical volume chest CT (HRCT) in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), using a short z-length ultra-high resolution re-scan (UH re-scan) as the reference. In cystic lung diseases, cyst score is derived from CT scans and defined as the percentage of the total lung parenchymal volume occupied by cysts, a biomarker which measures the severity of the disease.

METHODS

In a prospective study of 73 LAM patients, each patient received the standard HRCT chest scan and a short z-length UH re-scan. Cyst scores were acquired from both scans using a standard FDA-approved scoring software on the CT scanner.

RESULTS

The limited UH re-scan resolved small cysts that were not resolved in the HRCT. The HRCT-derived cyst scores were on average 59.6% of the reference values from the UH re-scan (p = 4.7e-25). The amount of under-estimation by HRCT varied from patient to patient, with an inter-quartile range of 29.8% and standard deviation of 20.7%. The overall trend was more pronounced underestimation for patients with lower cyst scores. For patients whose reference cyst scores were below 15 (n = 29), the HRCT cyst scores were 46.9 ± 21.6% of reference values (p = 7.4e-12), while for the rest of the patients (n = 44) the HRCT cyst scores were 68.0 ± 15.3% of reference values (p = 1.2E-19). Reconstructing the HRCT images to the resolution of the UH re-scan further widened the spread of the discrepancy between HRCT and reference values due to increased image noise, and did not provide accurate cyst scores.

CONCLUSION

Cyst scores derived from standard high-resolution helical volume chest CT significantly underestimates the percentage lung volume occupied by cysts. This inaccuracy needs to be taken into consideration when cyst score is used as part of the CT assessment of the patient's condition.

Predictors of radiation dose for CT pulmonary angiography in pregnancy across a multihospital integrated healthcare network

PURPOSE

There is a large range of published effective radiation dose for CTPA during pregnancy. The purpose of our study is to determine the mean effective radiation dose and predictors of mean effective radiation dose for CTPA in pregnant patients across a multihospital integrated healthcare network.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluates pregnant women who had a CTPA as the first primary advanced imaging test for evaluation of PE in a multihospital integrated healthcare network from January 2012-April 2017. Patient and CT-related data were obtained from the electronic health record and Radimetrics server (Radimetrics Inc, Bayer). DLP was recorded and effective radiation dose in mSv was determined using a conversation factor of 0.014 mSv·mGy^-¹·cm^-¹. Patient size was determined by water equivalent diameter. Bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed for effective radiation dose based on patient and CT factors.

RESULTS

In the 534 CTPA exams, the mean effective radiation dose was 3.96 mSv. Bivariate analysis showed significant differences in radiation dose by trimester, p = 0.042: first trimester 4.52 mSv, second trimester 3.73 mSv, and third trimester 3.95 mSv. Multivariable analysis demonstrated CTPA during first trimester, increasing mAs, kVp, scan length, patient size, and use of mAs modulation, as well as decreasing pitch, to be predictive of higher effective radiation dose.

CONCLUSION

Mean effective radiation dose was on the lower end of published studies. Trimester was a statistically significant predictor of effective radiation dose when accounting for known predictors of radiation dose.

Improved Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Pulmonary Angiograms

OBJECTIVE

The use of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) to evaluate for pulmonary embolism has been increasing, and carries a significant radiation dose. We evaluate image quality of lower-dose images, taking into account patient size as well as the effects of image postprocessing.

METHODS

A total of 250 CTPAs were retrospectively reviewed. The following parameters were obtained: kVp, mA, dose length product, Hounsfield units (HU) with standard deviation in the main pulmonary artery, transverse scout measurement, and subjective image quality.

RESULTS

Radiation dose decreased 55% by reducing kVp from 120 to 100, and 60% from 100 to 80 kVp. Radiation dose decreased 82% from 120 to 80 kVp. Noise increased 38% from 120 kVp to 100 kVp, and increased 23% from 100 kVp to 80 kVp. Adding an overlapped reconstructed image decreased noise by 16% to 21%. Despite the increase in image noise, diagnostic quality was significantly improved at 80 and 100 kVp, compared with 120 kVp, with an average subjective quality rating of 3.8, 4.0, and 3.2, respectively, and an average pulmonary artery density of 536, 423, and 278 HU. Even in larger patients, qualitative image quality was better at 100 kVp compared with 120 kVp, with an average quality rating of 3.6 versus 2.9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation dose exposure can be easily reduced on CTPA by lowering kVp, which at the same time improves image quality. Studies using a lower kVp were of significantly higher diagnostic quality. This held true even in larger patients.

Dose reduction in cardiothoracic CT: review of currently available methods

Radiation exposure from computed tomography (CT) has received much attention lately in the medical literature and the media, given the relatively high radiation dose that characterizes a CT examination. Although there are a variety of possible strategies for reducing radiation exposure from CT in an individual patient, optimal CT image acquisition requires that the radiologist understand new scanner technology and how to implement the most effective means of dose reduction while maintaining image quality. The authors describe a practical approach to dose reduction in cardiothoracic radiology, discussing CT radiation dose metrics (eg, CT dose index, dose-length product, effective diameter, and size-specific dose estimate) as well as CT scanner parameters that directly or indirectly influence radiation dose (eg, scan length, x-ray tube output, tube current modulation, pitch, image reconstruction techniques [including iterative reconstruction], and noise reduction). These variables are discussed in terms of their relative importance to image quality and the implications of parametric changes for image quality and diagnostic content, and practical recommendations are made for their immediate implementation in the clinical setting. Taken together, the principles of physics and key parameters involved in reducing radiation dose while maintaining image quality can serve as a "survival guide" for a diagnostic radiology practice.