Low-dose CT screening using hybrid iterative reconstruction: confidence ratings of diagnoses of simulated lesions other than lung cancer

Balancing act between quantitative and qualitative image quality between nonionic iodinated dimer and monomer at various vessel sizes during computed tomography: a phantom study

PURPOSE

Investigate the impact of nonionic dimer and monomer on iodine quantification in different vessel sizes when employing a vascular specific phantom and varying iodinated contrast media (ICM) concentrations during computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We created a vascular specific phantom (30 cm) to simulate human blood vessel diameters (25 cylinders of different diameters: 10 × 9mm, 10 × 12mm and 5 × 21mm). The phantom was filled with two ICM separately: Group: Iohexol(monomer)350 mg ml^-1 and B: Iodixanol(Dimer)320 mg ml^-1. Cylinders of same size were filled with increasing ICM concentration(10%-100%) while large cylinders were filled in quartiles(25%-100%). Phantom was scanned with different tube potential (80-140kVp), current (50-400mAs), reconstruction method [filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid-based iterative reconstruction (HBIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR)] for each ICM. Chi-square was employed to compare mean opacification, contrast/noise ratio (CNR) and noise. Qualitative analysis was assessed by Visual grading characteristic (VGC) and Cohens-kappa analyses.

RESULTS

At 80 and140kVp significant difference in opacification between Group A (2054 ± 1040HU and 1696 ± 1027HU) and B (2169 ± 1105HU and 1568 ± 1034HU) was demonstrated (p < 0.001). However, at 100 and 120kVp no difference was noted (p > 0.05). When comparing image noise, it was higher in Group A compared to B (p < 0.05). CNR was higher in Group B (119.99 ± 126.10HU) than A (107.09 ± 102.56HU) (p < 0.0001). VGC: Group A outperformed B in image opacification in all vessel sizes and ICM concentrations except at medium vessels with concentration group 2(0.4-0.6 mg ml^-1). Cohens'-kappa: agreement in opacification between each ICM group and iodine concentration 1(0-0.3 mg ml^-1): κ = 0.253 and 0.014 respectively, concentration 2(0.4-0.6 mg ml^-1):κ = -0.017 and -0.005 respectively and concentration 3(0.7-1 mg ml^-1):κ = 0.031 and 0.115 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nonionic dimer (Iodixanol) surpasses monomer (Iohexol) in quantitative image quality assessment by having lower image noise and higher CNR during CT.

Attenuation and Morphologic Characteristics Distinguishing a Ground-Glass Nodule Measuring 5-10 mm in Diameter as Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma on Thin-Slice CT

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to comprehensively investigate the role of multiple features seen on thin-section CT (TSCT) in the differential diagnosis of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) measuring 5-10 mm in diameter as invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. The TSCT features of 313 surgically diagnosed GGNs from 288 patients were retrospectively reviewed. A logistic regression model was applied, and the AUC values for the model and the size and attenuation of the lesions were compared using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS. A total of 247 lung adenocarcinomas in situ (AISs) and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs) (hereafter referred to as the AIS-MIA group) and 66 invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs) were identified. Compared with the AIS-MIA group, the IAC groups were significantly larger in size and had higher attenuation values, a higher frequency of mixed GGNs (all p < 0.001), bubblelike appearance, spiculation, pleural indentation, different locations, and a lower frequency of clear tumor-lung interface (all p < 0.05). The logistic model included size and attenuation (both p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 1.872 and 1.009, respectively) as well as tumor-lung interface (p = 0.001; OR, 0.242), bubblelike appearance (p < 0.05; OR, 2.205), and type of nodule. The AUC value for the logistic model was 0.847 (sensitivity, 80.3%; specificity, 81.0%) and was significantly higher than that for size or attenuation (both p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. Radiologic features could help in the differential diagnosis of a GGN that was 5-10 mm in diameter as IAC versus AIS or MIA. GGNs larger than 8.12 mm and with attenuation greater than -449.52 HU were more likely to be IAC.