Elastography and diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with rectal cancer

Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision in distal rectal cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

At present, abdominoperineal excision with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is one of the treatment modalities of distal rectal cancer. Our study analyzed the effects of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE) compared with laparoscopic conventional abdominoperineal resection(cAPR) in the treatment of distal rectal cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinicopathological data of 177 distal rectal cancer patients treated with a laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection between 2011 and 2018. The patients were divided into four groups as follows: ELAPE without nCRT (group A), cAPR without nCRT (group B), ELAPE with long-course nCRT (group C) and cAPR with long-course nCRT (group D).

RESULTS

Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), local recurrence rate, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) did not differ between group A and group B. The rate of positive CRM in group C was lower than group D (4.4% vs. 11.9%, respectively), although the difference was not significant (P = 0.377). The 3-year local recurrence rate in group C was lower compared with group D (6.6% vs. 16.7%, respectively), although the difference was not significant (P = 0.135). Three-year DFS and 3-year OS were not different between groups C and D.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the effect of laparoscopic ELAPE in patients with low-risk rectal cancer is similar to laparoscopic cAPR, revealing that laparoscopic cAPR can be routinely selected for patients with low-risk rectal cancer. Furthermore, laparoscopic ELAPE has a tendency to reduce the rate of positive CRM and local recurrence in patients with high-risk rectal cancer. Laparoscopic ELAPE can be routinely considered for patients with high-risk rectal cancer.

Endorectal Ultrasound Shear-Wave Elastography of Complex Rectal Adenoma and Early Rectal Cancer

Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic performance of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), shear-wave elastography (SWE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a complex rectal adenoma or an early rectal cancer, i.e., T1 or T2 adenocarcinoma in a clinical setting, and to evaluate the association between SWE and stromal fraction (SF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and SF. Method: This prospective study included patients undergoing ERUS and SWE for a rectal tumor subsequently confirmed by histopathology to be an adenoma or a T1 or T2 adenocarcinoma. The accuracy of the imaging methods was assessed by comparing the T category as determined by ERUS and MRI with histopathology, which served as the gold standard. SF was assessed on surgical specimens. Results: A total of 86 patients were included. Of these, 62 patients had adenomas and 24 patients had carcinomas, of which 11 were T1 tumors and 13 were T2 tumors. ERUS and MRI yielded sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.79 and 0.73, 0.95 and 0.90, and 0.86 and 0.78, respectively, for discrimination between benign and malignant lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for SWE was 0.88, and with a cut-off value of 40 kPa the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.79, 0.89, and 0.86, respectively. There was a positive correlation between SF and SWE with a p-value of <0.001 and a negative correlation between SF and ADC with a p-value of 0.011. Conclusion: Both ERUS and MRI classified T categories with a high accuracy; however, ERUS classified more adenomas correctly than MRI. In this small population, SWE could differentiate an adenoma from early carcinoma. SF was correlated with both SWE and ADC, as increasing SF tended to yield higher SWE and lower ADC values.

Microstructural breast tissue characterization: A head-to-head comparison of Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse elastography with clinical implications

PURPOSE

Head-to-head comparison of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) elastography regarding the characterization of breast lesions in an assessment setting.

METHOD

Patients undergoing an ultrasound examination including ARFI and an MRI protocol including DWI for the characterization of a BI-RADS 3-5 breast lesion between 06/2013 and 10/2016 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective, IRB-approved study. 60 patients (30-84 years, median 50) with a median lesion size of 16 mm (range 5-55 mm) were included. The maximum shear wave velocity (SWV_max) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_mean) for each lesion were retrospectively evaluated by a radiologist experienced in the technique. Histology was the reference standard. Diagnostic performances of ARFI and DWI were assessed using ROC curve analysis. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate the independence of both tests regarding their diagnostic information to distinguish benign from malignant lesions.

RESULTS

Corresponding areas under the ROC curve for differentiation of benign (n = 16) and malignant (n = 49) lesions were 0.822 (ARFI) and 0.871 (DWI, p-value = 0.48). SWVmax and ADCmean values showed a significant negative correlation (ρ = -0.501, p-value < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, combination of ARFI and DWI did not improve the results of each single modality, thus no significant independent diagnostic information was present.

CONCLUSION

Significant correlation between quantitative findings of ARFI and DWI in breast lesions exists. Thus, ARFI provides similar diagnostic information as a DWI-including protocol of an additional "problem-solving" MRI for the characterization of a sonographically evident breast lesion, improving the immediate patient management in the assessment setting.

Elastography and diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with testicular microlithiasis, normal testicular tissue, and testicular cancer: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound elastography is increasingly available in clinical practice. Recent studies showed higher velocity stiffness in testicular tumors compared to normal testicles.

PURPOSE

To evaluate ultrasound elastography in combination with the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in testicles. DW can be a useful tool in evaluating testicular malignancies. However, the relationship between velocity stiffness and MRI diffusion is not well established.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We prospectively included 132 patients with testicular microlithiasis (n = 53), or normal testicular tissue (n = 53), or suspected for testicular cancer (n = 26). All 132 patients underwent ultrasonography including shear wave elastography and MRI diffusion coefficient examination of the scrotum.

RESULTS

No clinically relevant difference in velocity stiffness was found between normal and testicles with microlithiasis. There was a significant difference in stiffness between patients with testicular microlithiasis (0.78 m/s), normal testicular tissue (0.77 m/s), and patients with testicular cancer (1.95 m/s) ( P ≤ 0.001). Similarly, there was a statistically significant difference in MRI diffusion values between patients with testicular microlithiasis (0.978 × 10^-3mm²s^-1), normal testicular tissue (0.929 × 10^-3mm²s^-1), and testicular cancers (0.743 × 10^-3mm²s^-1) ( P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with testicular microlithiasis had no malignant characteristics measured with shear wave elastography or MRI diffusion. MRI diffusion and elastography may be useful to preoperatively differentiate benign from malignant testicular lesions.

EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound

This article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.

Non-invasive evaluation of intestinal disorders: The role of elastographic techniques

Over the recent years the non-invasive techniques for the evaluation of the small bowel have been playing a major role in the management of chronic intestinal diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The diagnostic performances of magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and ultrasound in the field of small bowel disorders, have been assessed and established for more than two decades. Newer sonographic techniques, such as strain elastography and shear wave elastography, have been put forward for the assessment of disease activity and characterization of IBD-related damage in the setting of Crohn's disease and other gastrointestinal disorders. The data from the preliminary research and clinical studies have shown promising results as regards the ability of elastographic techniques to differentiate inflammatory from fibrotic tissue. The distinction between IBD activity (inflammation) and IBD-related damage (fibrosis) is currently considered crucial for the assessment and management of patients. Moreover, all the elastographic techniques are currently being considered in the setting of other intestinal disorders (e.g., rectal tumors, appendicitis). The aim of this paper is to offer both a comprehensive narrative review of the non-invasive techniques available for the assessment of small-bowel disorders, with particular emphasis on inflammatory bowel diseases, and a summary of the current evidence on the use of elastographic techniques in this setting.

Diagnostic value of strain elastography for differentiation between renal cell carcinoma and transitional cell carcinoma of kidney

PURPOSE

The objective of our study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography for differentiation between renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) of kidney.

METHODS

A total of 99 consecutive patients who were referred to our hospital because of a newly diagnosed solid renal mass suspicious for malignancy on radiological screenings were evaluated with sonography, including strain elastography. Strain elastography was used to compare the stiffness of the renal masses and renal cortex. The ratio of strain in a renal mass and nearby renal cortex was defined as the strain index value. Mean strain index values for RCCs and TCCs were compared, and mean strain index values between histological subtypes of RCC were also compared.

RESULTS

Although TCCs were smaller than RCCs (p < 0.001), there were no significant differences in gender distribution and mean age of the patients, and mean probe-tumor distance between RCC and TCC. The mean strain index value ±SD for TCC (5.18 ± 1.12) was significantly higher than the value for RCC (4.04 ± 0.72; p < 0.001). Mean strain index value for papillary cell carcinomas (4.09 ± 0.45) was slightly higher than that for clear cell carcinomas (3.85 ± 0.78): however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Strain elastography can be used as a valuable imaging technique for preoperative differentiation between RCC and TCC of kidney.