1
|
Yoon SM, Bazan JG. Navigating Breast Cancer Oligometastasis and Oligoprogression: Current Landscape and Future Directions. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:647-664. [PMID: 38652425 PMCID: PMC11168988 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01529-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examine the potential for curative approaches among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients by exploring the recent literature on local ablative therapies like surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer. We also cover therapies for MBC patients with oligoprogressive (OP) disease. KEY FINDINGS Surgery and SBRT have been studied for OM and OP breast cancer, mainly in retrospective or non-randomized trials. While many studies demonstrated favorable results, a cooperative study and single-institution trial found no support for surgery/SBRT in OM and OP cases, respectively. CONCLUSION While there is interest in applying local therapies to OM and OP breast cancer, the current randomized data does not back the routine use of surgery or SBRT, particularly when considering the potential for treatment-related toxicities. Future research should refine patient selection through advanced imaging and possibly explore these therapies specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive or HER2-positive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Jose G Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Pressa F, Perrone F, Benini A, Lohr F, Tiseo M, Bruni A. Management of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients: state of the art of a combined approach. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2024; 5:449-464. [PMID: 38966183 PMCID: PMC11220311 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Recently, the development of targeted therapy approaches such as those based on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) greatly improved the clinical outcomes of patients affected by oncogene addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Similarly, the improvement of radiation therapy techniques has permitted to deliver high radiation doses to a limited number of metastatic target lesions (oligopersistent or oligoprogressive), with limited high-dose normal tissue exposure that leads to low severe toxicity rates. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the currently established definition of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, to define first line and subsequent lines targeted therapies and the role of consolidative non-invasive local ablative treatments (LATs) in these settings. The potential benefit of local treatment (LT) such as radiotherapy (RT) or surgery might be represented by an overall reduction of switching to subsequent systemic treatments lowering the risk of further systemic dissemination. Further randomized clinical trials will clarify the role of LT and their correct timing in relation to systemic targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Di Pressa
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Fabiana Perrone
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Anna Benini
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Frank Lohr
- Proton Therapy Unit, APSS Trento and CISMed, University of Trento, 38100 Trento, Italy
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li GJ, Tan H, Nusrat H, Chang J, Chen H, Poon I, Shahi J, Tsao M, Ung Y, Cheung P, Louie AV. Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-central Thoracic Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00508-X. [PMID: 38621607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for ultracentral thoracic tumors at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with ultracentral lung tumors or nodes, defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus, treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All SBRT plans were generated with the goal of creating homogenous dose distributions. The primary endpoint was incidence of SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicity, defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V5.0). Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and identify predictors of severe toxicity and LF, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. RESULTS A total of 154 patients receiving 162 ultracentral courses of SBRT were included. The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%), with doses ranging from 30 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range, 48-115 Gy). The incidence of severe toxicity was 9.4% at 3 years. The most common severe toxicity was pneumonitis (n = 4). There was 1 possible treatment-related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of severe toxicity included increased PTV size, decreased PTV V95%, lung V5 Gy, and lung V20 Gy. The incidence of LF was 14% at 3 years. Predictors of LF included younger age and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. The median PFS was 8.8 months, while the median overall survival was 44.0 months. CONCLUSIONS In the largest case series of ultracentral thoracic SBRT to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT was associated with relatively low rates of severe toxicity and LF. Predictors of toxicity should be interpreted in the context of the heterogeneity in toxicities observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George J Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hendrick Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Humza Nusrat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joe Chang
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeevin Shahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - May Tsao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yee Ung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beckers C, Pruschy M, Vetrugno I. Tumor hypoxia and radiotherapy: A major driver of resistance even for novel radiotherapy modalities. Semin Cancer Biol 2024; 98:19-30. [PMID: 38040401 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Hypoxia in solid tumors is an important predictor of poor clinical outcome to radiotherapy. Both physicochemical and biological processes contribute to a reduced sensitivity of hypoxic tumor cells to ionizing radiation and hypoxia-related treatment resistances. A conventional low-dose fractionated radiotherapy regimen exploits iterative reoxygenation in between the individual fractions, nevertheless tumor hypoxia still remains a major hurdle for successful treatment outcome. The technological advances achieved in image guidance and highly conformal dose delivery make it nowadays possible to prescribe larger doses to the tumor as part of single high-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy, while keeping an acceptable level of normal tissue complication in the co-irradiated organs at risk. However, we insufficiently understand the impact of tumor hypoxia to single high-doses of RT and hypofractionated RT. So-called FLASH radiotherapy, which delivers ionizing radiation at ultrahigh dose rates (> 40 Gy/sec), has recently emerged as an important breakthrough in the radiotherapy field to reduce normal tissue toxicity compared to irradiation at conventional dose rates (few Gy/min). Not surprisingly, oxygen consumption and tumor hypoxia also seem to play an intriguing role for FLASH radiotherapy. Here we will discuss the role of tumor hypoxia for radiotherapy in general and in the context of novel radiotherapy treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Beckers
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Pruschy
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Irene Vetrugno
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang G, Kim KH, Lee CG, Hong MH, Kim HR, Cho Y, Yoon HI. Aggressive Local Ablative Radiotherapy Mitigates Progression Risk in Oligometastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 2024; 56:115-124. [PMID: 37641819 PMCID: PMC10789958 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the role of local ablative radiotherapy (LART) in oligometastatic/oligoprogressive lung adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients (n=176) with oligometastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with LART were identified, and those treated with LART at the initial diagnosis of synchronous oligometastatic disease (OMD group) or treated with LART when they presented with repeat oligoprogression (OPD group) were included. RESULTS In the OMD group (n=54), the 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 50.9% and 22.5%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 3-year overall survival in the OPD group were 75.9% and 58.1%, respectively. Forty-one patients (75.9%) received LART at all gross disease sites. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use and all-metastatic site LART were significant predictors of higher PFS (p=0.018 and p=0.046, respectively). In patients treated with TKIs at the time of LART (n=23) and those treated with all-metastatic site LART, the 1-year PFS was 86.7%, while that of patients not treated with all-metastatic site LART was 37.5% (p=0.006). In the OPD group (n=122), 67.2% of the patients (n=82) maintained a systemic therapy regimen after LART. The cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy was 39.6%, 62.9%, and 78.5% at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after LART, respectively. CONCLUSION Aggressive LART can be an option to improve survival in patients with oligometastatic disease. Patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease receiving TKI and all-metastatic site LART may have improved PFS. In patients with repeat oligoprogression, LART might potentially extend survival by delaying the need to change the systemic treatment regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gowoon Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Geol Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Hee Hong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Ryun Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeona Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong In Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
La Rosa A, Mittauer KE, Chuong MD, Hall MD, Kutuk T, Bassiri N, McCulloch J, Alvarez D, Herrera R, Gutierrez AN, Tolakanahalli R, Mehta MP, Kotecha R. Accelerated hypofractionated magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy for oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer. Med Dosim 2023; 48:238-244. [PMID: 37330328 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Given the positive results from recent randomized controlled trials in patients with oligometastatic, oligoprogressive, or oligoresidual disease, the role of radiotherapy has expanded in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While small metastatic lesions are commonly treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), treatment of the primary tumor and involved regional lymph nodes may require prolonged fractionation schedules to ensure safety especially when treating larger volumes in proximity to critical organs-at-risk (OARs). We have developed an institutional MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT) workflow for these patients. We present a 71-year-old patient with stage IV NSCLC with oligoprogression of the primary tumor and associated regional lymph nodes in which MR-guided, online adaptive radiotherapy was performed, prescribing 60 Gy in 15 fractions. We describe our workflow, dosimetric constraints, and daily dosimetric comparisons for the critical OARs (esophagus, trachea, and proximal bronchial tree [PBT] maximum doses [D0.03cc]), in comparison to the original treatment plan recalculated on the anatomy of the day (i.e., predicted doses). During MRgRT, few fractions met the original dosimetric objectives: 6.6% for esophagus, 6.6% for PBT, and 6.6% for trachea. Online adaptive radiotherapy reduced the cumulative doses to the structures by 11.34%, 4.2%, and 5.62% when comparing predicted plan summations to the final delivered summation. Therefore, this case study presets a workflow and treatment paradigm for accelerated hypofractionated MRgRT due to the significant variations in daily dose to the central thoracic OARs to reduce treatment-related toxicity associated with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Kathryn E Mittauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nema Bassiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - James McCulloch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Diane Alvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Robert Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alonso N Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ranjini Tolakanahalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Translational Medicine, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Asha W, Koro S, Mayo Z, Yang K, Halima A, Scott J, Scarborough J, Campbell SR, Budd GT, Shepard D, Stephans K, Videtic GM, Shah C. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Sarcoma Pulmonary Metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:263-270. [PMID: 36914598 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung metastases are the most common form of distant failure for patients diagnosed with sarcoma with metastasectomy considered for some patients with limited metastatic disease and good performance status. Alternatives to surgery such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be considered, though data are limited. We present outcomes after SBRT for sarcoma lung metastases. METHODS Fifty sarcoma patients with 109 lung metastases were treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2021. Outcomes evaluated included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity including lung pneumonitis/fibrosis, chest wall toxicity, dermatitis, brachial plexus, and esophageal toxicity. Systemic therapy receipt before and after SBRT was recorded. RESULTS SBRT schedules were divided into 3 cohorts: 30 to 34 Gy/1fx (n=10 [20%]), 48 to 50 Gy/4 to 5fx (n=24[48%]), and 60 Gy/5fx (n=16[32%]). With a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 1/3-year LC rates were 96%/88% and 1/3-year OS 77%/50%, respectively. There was no differences between the 3 regimens in terms of LC, OS, or toxicity. Size >4 cm was a predictor of worse LC ( P =0.031) and worse OS ( P = 0.039) on univariate analysis. The primary pattern of failure was new metastases (64%) of which the majority were in the contralateral lung (52%). One-year chemotherapy-free survival was 85%. Overall, 76% of patients did not require chemotherapy initiation or change of chemotherapy regimen after lung SBRT. Toxicity was reported in 16% of patients overall, including 25%, 20%, and 14% in the 30 to 34 Gy/1fx, 48 to 50 Gy/4 to 5fx, and 60 Gy/5fx cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SBRT outcomes for lung metastases from sarcoma demonstrate high rates of LC and are similar with different dose/fractionation regimens. Lung SBRT is associated with prolonged chemotherapy-free survival. Prospective validation of these results is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wafa Asha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - G Thomas Budd
- Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Dale Shepard
- Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ho CB, Tsai JT, Chen CY, Shiah HS, Chen HY, Ting LL, Kuo CC, Lai IC, Lai HY, Chung CL, Lee KL, Tzeng HE, Lee KH, Lee HL, Chen SW, Chiou JF. Effectiveness of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Systemic Therapy Respondents with Inoperable Pulmonary Oligometastases and Oligoprogression. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13091597. [PMID: 37174988 PMCID: PMC10177978 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) may improve survival in patients with inoperable pulmonary oligometastases. However, the impact of pulmonary oligometastatic status after systemic therapy on SABR outcomes remains unclear. Hence, we investigated the outcomes of SABR in 45 patients with 77 lung tumors and the prognostic value of pulmonary oligoprogression. Eligibility criteria were pulmonary oligometastases (defined as ≤5 metastatic lung tumors), controlled extrapulmonary disease (EPD) after front-line systemic therapy, SABR as primary local treatment for inoperable pulmonary metastases, and consecutive imaging follow-up. Oligometastatic lung tumor was classified into controlled or oligoprogressive status. Overall survival (OS), in-field progression-free survival (IFPFS), out-field progression-free survival (OFPFS), and prognostic variables were evaluated. With 21.8 months median follow-up, the median OS, IFPFS, and OFPFS were 28.3, not reached, and 6.5 months, respectively. Two-year OS, IFPFS, and OFPFS rates were 56.0%, 74.2%, and 17.3%, respectively. Oligoprogressive status (p = 0.003), disease-free interval < 24 months (p = 0.041), and biologically effective dose (BED10) < 100 Gy (p = 0.006) were independently associated with inferior OS. BED10 ≥ 100 Gy (p = 0.029) was independently correlated with longer IFPFS. Oligoprogressive status (p = 0.017) and EPD (p = 0.019) were significantly associated with inferior OFPFS. Grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in four (8.9%) patients. Conclusively, SABR with BED10 ≥ 100 Gy could provide substantial in-field tumor control and longer OS for systemic therapy respondents with inoperable pulmonary oligometastases. Oligoprogressive lung tumors exhibited a higher risk of out-field treatment failure and shorter OS. Hence, systemic therapy should be tailored for patients with oligoprogression to reduce the risk of out-field treatment failure. However, in the absence of effective systemic therapy, SABR is a reasonable alternative to reduce resistant tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Beng Ho
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Camillian Saint Mary's Hospital Luodong, Yilan 265502, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Jo-Ting Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 235041, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Chun-You Chen
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116079, Taiwan
| | - Her-Shyong Shiah
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231016, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Hsuan-Yu Chen
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115201, Taiwan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan
| | - Lai-Lei Ting
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chun Kuo
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - I-Chun Lai
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yi Lai
- Department of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Li Chung
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- School of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Division of Thoracic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Ling Lee
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Huey-En Tzeng
- Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan
| | - Kuen-Haur Lee
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Lun Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Wen Chen
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404333, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fong Chiou
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Camps-Malea A, Pointreau Y, Chapet S, Calais G, Barillot I. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for mediastinal lymph node with CyberKnife®: Efficacy and toxicity. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:225-232. [PMID: 37080855 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
PUPRPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy is more and more used for treatment of oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes. The objective of this single-centre study was to evaluate its efficacy in patients with either a locoregional recurrence of a pulmonary or oesophageal cancer or with distant metastases of extrathoracic tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes treated with CyberKnife from June 2010 to September 2020 were screened. The primary endpoint was to assess local progression free survival and induced toxicity. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression free survival. The delay before introduction of systemic treatment in the subgroup of patients who did not receive systemic therapy for previous progression was also evaluated. RESULTS Fifty patients were included: 15 with a locoregional progression of a thoracic primary tumour (87% pulmonary) and 35 with mediastinal metastasis of especially renal tumour (29%). Median follow-up was 27 months (6-110 months). Local progression free survival at 6, 12 and 18 months was respectively 94, 88 and 72%. The rate of local progression was significantly lower in patients who received 36Gy in six fractions (66% of the cohort) versus other treatment schemes. Two grade 1 acute oesophagitis and one late grade 2 pulmonary fibrosis were described. Overall survival at 12, 18 and 24 months was respectively 94, 85 and 82%. Median progression free survival was 13 months. Twenty-one patients were treated by stereotactic body irradiation alone without previous history of systemic treatment. Among this subgroup, 11 patients (52%) received a systemic treatment following stereotactic body radiotherapy with a median introduction time of 17 months (5-52 months) and 24% did not progress. CONCLUSION Stereotactic body irradiation as treatment of oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes is a well-tolerated targeted irradiation that leads to a high control rate and delay the introduction of systemic therapy in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Camps-Malea
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France.
| | - Y Pointreau
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France; Institut Inter-régional de cancérologie, centre Jean-Bernard, clinique Victor-Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - S Chapet
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - G Calais
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - I Barillot
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aquilano M, Loi M, Visani L, Livi L, Nuyttens JJ. Is stereotactic body radiotherapy an effective treatment in metastatic lung cancer with oligoprogressive disease? Acta Oncol 2023; 62:298-304. [PMID: 36905644 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2186187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligoprogression (OPD) is defined as a condition where limited progression (1-3 metastases) is observed in patients undergoing systemic cancer treatment. In this study we investigated the impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with OPD from metastatic lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from a cohort of consecutive patients with SBRT treated between June 2015 and August 2021 were collected. All extracranial metastatic sites of OPD from lung cancer were included. Dose regimens consisted of mainly 24 in 2 fractions, 30-51 Gy in 3 fractions, 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions, 52.5 Gy in 7 fractions and 44-56 Gy in 8 fractions. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS), Local Control (LC), and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) from the start date of SBRT to the event. RESULTS Sixty-three patients, 34 female and 29 males were included. Median age was 75 years (range 25-83). All patients received concurrent systemic treatment before the start of the SBRT: 19 chemotherapy (CT), 26 CT plus immunotherapy (IT) or Tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKI) and 18 IT/TKI. SBRT was delivered to the lung (n = 29), mediastinal node (n = 9), bone (n = 7), adrenal gland (n = 19), other visceral metastases (1) and other node metastases (n = 4). After a median follow-up of 17 months, median OS was 23 months. LC was 93% at 1 year and 87% at 2 years. DFS was 7 months. According to our results, there was no statistically significant correlation between prognostic factors and OS after SBRT in OPD patients. CONCLUSIONS Median DFS was 7 months, translating into the continuation of effective systemic treatment as other metastases grow slowly. In patients with oligoprogression disease, SBRT is a valid and efficient treatment that may enable postponing the switch of systemic line.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mauro Loi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Joost J Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Motas N, Davidescu MD, Tanase BC, Rus O, Burlacu AI, Alexe V, Manolache V, Mizea MC, Gheorghiu N, Trifanescu OG, Gales LN, Horvat T, Anghel RM. Oncologic Outcome after Pulmonary Metastasectomy as Part of Multidisciplinary Treatment in a Tertiary Oncological Center. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13010165. [PMID: 36611457 PMCID: PMC9818764 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Pulmonary metastases are encountered in approximately one-third of patients with malignancies, especially from colorectal, lung, breast, and renal cancers, and sarcomas. Pulmonary metastasectomy is the ablative approach of choice, when possible, as part of the multidisciplinary effort to integrate and personalize the oncological treatment. (2) Methods: The study includes 58 consecutive cases of pulmonary metastasectomies, retrospectively analyzed, performed in 12 consecutive months, in which the pathology reports confirmed lung metastases. (3) Results: Most frequent pathological types of metastases were: 14 of colorectal cancer, 10 breast, 8 lung, and 8 sarcomas. At the time of primary cancer diagnosis, 14 patients (24.14%) were in the metastatic stage. The surgical approach was minimally invasive through uniportal VATS (Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery) in 3/4 of cases (43 patients, 74%). Almost 20% of resections were typical (lobectomy, segmentectomy). Lymphadenectomy was associated in almost 1/2 of patients and lymph node metastases were found in 11.11% of cases. The mortality rate (intraoperative and 90 days postoperative) is zero. The OS after pulmonary metastasectomy is 87% at 18 months, and the estimated OS for cancer is 90% at 5 years. The worst outcome presents the patients with sarcomas and the best outcome-colorectal and lung cancer. The patients with 1 or 2 resected metastases presented 96% survival at 24 months. (4) Conclusions: After pulmonary metastasectomy, survival is favored by the small number of metastases resected (1 or 2), and by the dimension of metastases under 20.5 mm. The non-anatomic (wedge) type of lung resection may present a lower risk of death compared to lobectomy. No statistical significance on survival has the presence of lymphadenectomy, the laterality right/left lung, the upper/lower lobes. In the future, longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are needed for drawing definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Motas
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: (N.M.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Mihnea Dan Davidescu
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: (N.M.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Bogdan Cosmin Tanase
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ovidiu Rus
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alin Ionut Burlacu
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad Alexe
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Veronica Manolache
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Oncology Hospital, Șoseaua Gheorghe Ionescu Sisești 8a, 013812 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalina Cristiana Mizea
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Gheorghiu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Oana Gabriela Trifanescu
- Clinic of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laurentia Nicoleta Gales
- Clinic of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Medical Oncology II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Teodor Horvat
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Rodica Maricela Anghel
- Clinic of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Klemen ND, Court CM, Fernandes MC, Walch HS, Chatila WK, Saadat LV, Maron S, Crane C, Shia J, Cercek A, Gönen M, Schultz ND, Garcia Aguilar J, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica MI. Local Therapy for Oligoprogression or Consolidation in High Mutational Burden Stage 4 Colorectal Cancer Treated With PD-1 or PD-L1 Blockade. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8373-8382. [PMID: 35930112 PMCID: PMC9649851 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12095-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint blockade (ICI) of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) can induce durable responses in patients who have colorectal cancer (CRC) with a high tumor mutational burden (TMB). Two recurring clinical dilemmas show how to manage oligoprogressive disease and stable disease after ICI. METHODS A cohort study was conducted to analyze patients with metastatic CRC who underwent PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade. Tumors were mismatch repair (MMR) deficient or had more than 25 mutations per megabase. Patients were identified who had local therapy (surgery, ablation, or radiotherapy) for one to three sites of progressive disease (PD) or surgery to consolidate SD. The study evaluated clinical and biologic factors associated with patient selection, outcomes, and pathologic response rates. RESULTS From 2014 to 2020, treatment was administered to 111 patients with ICI. Of these 111 patients, 19 (17%) survived fewer than 6 months, whereas to date, 50 have not had progression of disease. The remaining 42 patients experienced PD, and 16 (38%) were treated with local therapy for oligoprogression. Selection for local therapy was associated with response to ICI. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) after local therapy was 62%. Finally, 6 of the 50 patients without PD had consolidation of SD, and 5 had complete or near complete pathologic responses. CONCLUSIONS Oligoprogression, a frequent pattern of failure after ICI, can be managed effectively with local therapy. In contrast, it may not be necessary to consolidate SD for selected patients. Further research is essential to define management algorithms better and to explore heterogeneity in response patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D Klemen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Colin M Court
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | - Henry S Walch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Walid K Chatila
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lily V Saadat
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Steven Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chris Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nikolaus D Schultz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hama Y, Tate E. MRI-guided stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for liver metastasis from pancreatic cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 18:S489-S492. [PMID: 36511012 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1091_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
A 69-year-old man with a history of pancreatic cancer was referred to our hospital for a newly developed solitary liver metastasis. Since the liver metastasis was in contact with the small intestine, it was necessary to perform radiation therapy while simultaneously monitoring the small intestine and liver metastasis, and then, MRI-guided stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) was performed. There were no radiation-induced adverse events during the treatment and 6 months of follow-up. MRI showed complete regression of the tumor at 6 months after SABR. It seems feasible to perform SABR safely by using MRI-guided radiation therapy system even if liver metastasis developed near the intestinal tract after surgery for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukihiro Hama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-Edogawa Cancer Centre, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Etsuko Tate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-Edogawa Cancer Centre, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nodal and osseous oligometastatic prostate cancer: a cohort including the introduction of PSMA-PET/CT-guided stereotactic and hypofractionated radiotherapy with elective nodal therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04229-1. [PMID: 36029331 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04229-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oligometastatic prostate cancer is heavily investigated, and conventionally fractionated elective nodal treatment appears to increase biochemical relapse-free (bRFS) survival. The novelty of this report is to present elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) with simultaneous integrated boost with stereotactic (SBRT) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (HoFRT) for tolerance and for bRFS which we compared with SBRT of the involved field (IF) only. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients between 2018 and 2021 with and oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with SBRT or hypofractionation were eligible. A radiobiologically calculated simultaneous integrated boost approach enabled to encompass elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) with high doses to PSMA-positive nodes. A second group had only involved field (IF) nodal SBRT. RESULTS A total of 44 patients with 80 lesions of initially intermediate- (52%) or high-risk (48%) D'Amico omPC were treated with SBRT to all visible PSMA-PET/CT lesions and 100% of the treated lesions were locally controlled after a median follow-up was 18 months (range 3-42 months). Most lesions (56/80; 70%) were nodal and the remainder osseous. Median bPFS was 16 months and ADT-free bPFS 18 months. ENRT (31 patients) versus IF (13 patients) prevented regional relapse more successfully. At univariate analysis, both initial PSA and length of the interval between primary diagnosis and biochemical failure were significant for biochemical control. Treatment was well tolerated and only two patients had toxicity ≥ grade 3 (1 GU and 1 GI, each). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION SBRT and hypofractionated radiotherapy at curative doses with ENRT was more effective to delay ADT than IF, controlled all treated lesions and was well tolerated.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ramadan S, Quan K, Schnarr K, Juergens RA, Hotte SJ, Mukherjee SD, Kapoor A, Meyers BM, Swaminath A. Impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligoprogressive metastatic disease. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:705-713. [PMID: 35435129 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2063067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing interest in using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in areas of oligoprogressive metastatic disease (OPD). Our main objective was to investigate the impact of SBRT on overall survival (OS) and the incidence of systemic therapy treatment switches in this population. METHODS A retrospective institutional review of patients treated with SBRT for OPD was performed. Patients were included if they received SBRT for 1-3 discrete progressing metastases, using a dose of at least 5 Gy per fraction. The study aimed to calculate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and incidence of treatment switch (TS). PFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology, while LC and TS were determined using cumulative incidence. RESULTS Eighty-one patients with a total of 118 lesions were treated with SBRT from July 2014 to November 2020. The Median SBRT dose was 40 (18-60) Gy in 5 (2-8) fractions. Patients had primarily kidney, lung, or breast cancer. Most patients were treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (30.9%) or chemotherapy (29.6%) before OPD. The median follow-up post-SBRT was 14 months. Median OS and PFS were 25.1 (95% CI 11.2-39.1) months and 7.8 (95% CI 4.6-10.9) months, respectively. The cumulative incidence of local progression of treated lesions was 5% at 1 year and 7.3% at 2 years. Sixty patients progressed after SBRT and 17 underwent additional SBRT. Thirty-eight patients (47%) changed systemic therapy following SBRT; the cumulative incidence of TS was 28.5% at 6 months, 37.4% at 1 year, and 43.9% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS SBRT effectively controls locally progressing lesions but distant progression still occurs frequently. A sizeable number of patients can be salvaged by further SBRT or have minimally progressing diseases that may not warrant an immediate initiation/switch in systemic therapy. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif Ramadan
- Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, LHSC, London, Canada
| | - Kimmen Quan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kara Schnarr
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rosalyn A. Juergens
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Sebastien J. Hotte
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Som D. Mukherjee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Department of Surgery (Urology), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Brandon M. Meyers
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Oligorecurrent/Oligoprogressive Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112680. [PMID: 35681659 PMCID: PMC9179886 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This paper is a review of the literature on oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastasis treated with SBRT. The use of mediastinal SBRT had historically been not feasible in view of the expected toxicity due to the proximity of critical structures such as the airways and esophagus. Despite the heterogeneity and lack of some data in the studies analyzed, this literature review is the first published and can be a valid guide for the radiotherapist in the management of oligometastatic/oligoprogressive patients, with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Abstract Introduction: Mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastases are a challenging condition in patients affected by solid tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could play a crucial role in the therapeutic management and in the so-called “no-fly zone”, delivering high doses of radiation in relatively few treatment fractions with excellent sparing of healthy surrounding tissues and low toxicity. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SBRT in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lesions with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: Two blinded investigators performed a critical review of the Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA), starting from a specific question: What is the clinical impact of SBRT for the treatment of oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar metastasis? All retrospective and prospective clinical trials published in English up to February 2022 were analyzed. Results: A total of 552 articles were identified and 12 of them were selected with a total number of 478 patients treated with SBRT for mediastinal or hilar node recurrence. All the studies are retrospective, published between 2015 and 2021 with a median follow-up ranging from 12 to 42.2 months. Studies following SBRT for lung lesions or retreatments after thorax radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer were also included. The studies showed extensive heterogeneity in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequently reported histology. Different dose schemes were used, with a higher prevalence of 4–8 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions, but dose escalation was also used up to 52 Gy in 4 fractions with dose constraints mainly derived from RTOG 0813 trial. The radiotherapy technique most frequently used was volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a median PTV volume ranging from 7 to 25.7 cc. The clinical outcome seems to be very encouraging with 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 84 to 94%, 53 to 88% and 23 to 53.9%, respectively. Half of the studies did not report toxicity greater than G3 and only five cases of fatal toxicity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: From the present review, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions because of the heterogeneity of the studies analyzed. However, SBRT appears to be a safe and effective option in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lymph node recurrence, with a good toxicity profile. Its use in clinical practice is still limited, and there is extensive heterogeneity in patient selection and fractionation schedules. Good performance status, small PTV volume, absence of previous thoracic irradiation, and administration of a high biologically effective dose (BED) seem to be factors that correlate with greater local control and better survival rates. In the presence of symptoms related to the thoracic lymph nodes, SBRT determines a rapid control that lasts over time. We look forward to the prospective studies that are underway for definitive conclusions.
Collapse
|
17
|
Spałek MJ, Teterycz P, Borkowska A, Poleszczuk J, Rutkowski P. Stereotactic radiotherapy for soft tissue and bone sarcomas: real-world evidence. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359211070646. [PMID: 35186124 PMCID: PMC8848098 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211070646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Selected patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas (STBS) may benefit from intensive local treatment, such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). This study aimed to summarize the utilization and outcomes of SRT in STBS and to identify predictive factors for progression and survival. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with advanced STBS who underwent STBS in a sarcoma tertiary center were identified. We collected tumor- and treatment-related factors. Endpoints comprised time to local progression (TTLP), local progression-free survival (LPFS), time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors. Results: We identified 141 patients who underwent 233 SRTs. Median follow-up was 21 months. Local and distant progression occurred after 19 and 163 SRTs, respectively. SRT for lung metastases was predictive for better TTLP and LPFS (hazard ratio, HR = 0.12, p = 0.007 and HR = 0.42, p = 0.002, respectively). Bone sarcoma (HR for TTLP = 3.18, p = 0.043; HR for LPFS = 1.99, p = 0.028) and lower administered dose (HR for TTLP = 0.98, p = 0.007; HR for LPFS = 0.99, p = 0.012) were predictive for worse TTLP and LPFS. SRT for oligometastases (HR = 0.46, p = 0.021) and lung metastases (HR = 0.55, p = 0.046) was predictive for better OS, whereas diagnosis of bone sarcoma (HR = 2.05, p = 0.029) was predictive for worse OS. Conclusion: SRT provides excellent local control in STBS patients without significant toxicity. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung metastases, and soft tissue sarcomas benefit the most from SRT. The dose escalation moderately enhances local control; however, it does not translate into better survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Computational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jan Poleszczuk
- Department of Computational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Polish Academy of Sciences, Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Onal C, Hurmuz P, Guler OC, Yavas G, Tilki B, Oymak E, Yavas C, Ozyigit G. The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in switching systemic therapy for patients with extracranial oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1533-1541. [PMID: 35119653 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02793-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeting oligometastatic lesions with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) using stereotactic-body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve treatment outcomes and postpone the need for second-line systemic therapy (NEST). We looked at the results of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who had five or fewer lesions and were treated with SBRT. METHODS We examined the treatment outcomes of 70 extracranial metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients treated at two oncology centers between 2011 and 2020. The clinical parameters of patients with and without NEST changes were compared. The prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and NEST-free survival were evaluated. RESULTS Median age was 67 years (range 31-83 years). Lung and bone metastasis were found in 78.4% and 12.6% of patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.1 months, median OS was 49.1 months and the median PFS was 18.3 months. Histology was a prognostic factor for OS, BED, and treatment switch for PFS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, the significant predictor of poor OS was clear cell histology, and a lower BED for PFS. Following SBRT for oligometastatic lesions, 19 patients (27.2%) had a median NEST change of 15.2 months after MDT completion. There were no significant differences in median OS or PFS between patients who had NEST changes and those who did not. No patient experienced grade ≥ 3 acute and late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS The SBRT to oligometastatic sites is an effective and safe treatment option for ≤ 5 metastases in RCC patients by providing favorable survival and delaying NEST change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Onal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, 01120, Adana, Turkey. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Cem Guler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, 01120, Adana, Turkey
| | - Guler Yavas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Tilki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ezgi Oymak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
| | - Cagdas Yavas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pisano C, De Filippis M, Jacobs F, Novello S, Reale ML. Management of Oligoprogression in Patients with Metastatic NSCLC Harboring ALK Rearrangements. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030718. [PMID: 35158987 PMCID: PMC8833409 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The growing efficacy and availability of new targeted systemic therapies have markedly improved the prognosis of metastatic lung cancer patients harboring ALK rearrangements. The use of effective targeted therapies capable of maintaining a prolonged control of disease, for as long as possible, is paramount to ensure the best survival outcomes. In this regard, in cases of oligoprogression, “beyond progression” systemic treatment added to local ablative therapies is considered a feasible option in an attempt to improve the quality and quantity of patients’ lives, even if based on retrospective data. Certainly, treatment of ALK rearranged lung cancer patients with oligoprogressive disease must be individualized and based on multidisciplinary decisions. Above all, when further molecular targeted therapies are available, options must always be evaluated, especially in case of cerebral progression. In this review, we provide an updated and comprehensive overview of the main treatment strategies in cases of ALK rearranged oligoprogression. Abstract Personalized treatment based on driver molecular alterations, such as ALK rearrangement, has revolutionized the therapeutic management of advanced oncogene-addicted NSCLC patients. Multiple effective ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with the amelioration of the activity at central nervous system level, are now available, leading to substantial prognosis improvement. The exposure to TKIs triggers resistance mechanisms and the sequential administration of other TKIs and chemotherapy is, for the most part, not targeted. In this context, extending the benefit deriving from precision medicine is paramount, above all, when disease progression occurs in a limited number of sites. Retrospective data indicate that, in oligoprogressive disease, targeted therapy beyond progression combined with definitive local treatment of the progressing site(s) is an effective alternative. In these cases, a multidisciplinary approach becomes essential for an integrated treatment strategy, depending on the site of disease progression, in order to improve not only survival, but also quality of life. In this review we provide an updated and comprehensive overview of the main treatment strategies in cases of ALK rearranged oligoprogression, including systemic treatment as well as local therapy, and report a real-world clinical story, with the final aim of identifying the most promising management for this subset of patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
van Aken ES, van der Linden YM, van Thienen JV, de Langen AJ, Marijnen CA, de Jong MC. Hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: Dutch survey on current practice, knowledge and challenges. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 33:93-98. [PMID: 35243019 PMCID: PMC8885401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy referral during targeted therapy or immunotherapy occurs regularly. There is a knowledge gap regarding the implications of combined therapy. There is no consensus on expected toxicity of combined therapy. Multidisciplinary protocols regarding combined therapy are often not available. The application of radiotherapy treatment adaptations varies widely when combined with different systemic treatments.
Introduction With the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and systemic antibodies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, the survival of advanced-stage cancer patients has improved for many tumor types. These patients are increasingly referred for radiotherapy, but it is unclear whether radiotherapy combined with these drugs is safe. No international guidelines exist on whether or how to combine these drugs with radiotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the current clinical practice in the Netherlands regarding hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients using targeted drugs and immunotherapy. Materials and methods We sent a survey to all 21 Dutch radiotherapy institutes. Dedicated radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and pulmonologists were asked to fill out the survey. The questions explored their familiarity with the combination of targeted drugs and immunotherapy with radiotherapy, the encountered clinical difficulties and factors influencing treatment decisions. Results The survey was filled out by 54 respondents from 19 different institutes. The median annual number of patients per radiation oncologist referred for radiotherapy when using targeted drugs or immunotherapy was 10 and 15, respectively. Despite this high number, only 11% of the radiation oncologists stated that they had sufficient information (resources) for adequate treatment decision making. Among all physicians, 44% stated that there was insufficient knowledge within their institute regarding this topic. Only 17% stated that there was a multidisciplinary protocol available. The application of radiotherapy treatment adaptations (technique, dose, fractionation, field size) varied widely. Generally, there seemed to be no consensus regarding the expected toxicity of combined drug-radiotherapy treatments and the expected risk of tumor flare upon temporary drug discontinuation. Conclusion There is no consensus amongst involved medical specialties on expected toxicity. Consequently, it is necessary to perform clinical studies examining the safety of combined drug-radiotherapy treatments, to add radiotherapy to phase I-III clinical trials for new drugs and to incorporate outcomes into multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evert S.M. van Aken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette M. van der Linden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes V. van Thienen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus J. de Langen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie A.M. Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique C. de Jong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cerda VR, Lu D, Scott M, Kim KH, Rimel BJ, Kamrava M. Evaluation of patterns of progression on poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance in ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 32:153-158. [PMID: 34911701 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite improvement in progression-free survival with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) as maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer, many patients will eventually progress on therapy. Oligoprogression is uniquely suited to considerations of local consolidation therapy in this setting, but not commonly used in ovarian cancer. In this study we evaluated the proportion of patients on PARPi maintenance who developed limited sites of disease, the location of progression, and their natural history. METHODS From January 2006 to December 2020, natural language processing software (DEEP6AI) was used to identify 58 patients with ovarian cancer treated with PARPi maintenance after complete or partial response after surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy at our institution. Patients were assessed for presence and location of recurrence based on radiologic findings. RESULTS The median patient age was 65 (IQR 57-71) years. Patients had a median of two lines of chemotherapy prior to starting PARPi. With a median follow-up of 48 (range 12-149) months, 32 (55%) patients had a recurrence on maintenance olaparib and 11 (34%) patients developed oligoprogression (≤3 sites). For the 11 patients with oligoprogression, three patients developed recurrence in one site, five in two sites, and three in three sites. The sites of oligoprogression were pelvic/periaortic nodal (27%), peritoneal (27%), liver (27%), lung/mediastinal (14%), and brain (5%). The median progression-free survival for the entire cohort was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.2 to 7.8); median overall survival was not met. There were no significant differences in overall survival (p=0.81) or progression-free survival (p=0.95) between patients with and without oligoprogression. CONCLUSIONS One-third of patients on PARPi maintenance experienced oligoprogression defined as limited to ≤3 sites. These patients may benefit from local consolidation therapy. A larger dataset is needed to validate these findings to assess if trials investigating local therapy for these patients is of value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria R Cerda
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Diana Lu
- Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marla Scott
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kenneth H Kim
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Bobbie Jo Rimel
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cheung P, Patel S, North SA, Sahgal A, Chu W, Soliman H, Ahmad B, Winquist E, Niazi T, Patenaude F, Lim G, Heng DYC, Dubey A, Czaykowski P, Wong RKS, Swaminath A, Morgan SC, Mangat R, Keshavarzi S, Bjarnason GA. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligoprogression in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2 Prospective Multicenter Study. Eur Urol 2021; 80:693-700. [PMID: 34399998 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the paucity of prospective evidence, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is increasingly being considered in the setting of oligoprogression to delay the need to change systemic therapy. OBJECTIVE To determine the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS) after SRT to oligoprogressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) lesions in patients who are on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the use of SRT in oligoprogressive mRCC patients. Patients with mRCC who had previous stability or response after ≥3 mo of TKI therapy were eligible if they developed progression of five of fewer metastases. Thirty-seven patients with 57 oligoprogressive tumors were enrolled. INTERVENTION Oligoprogressive tumors were treated with SRT, and the same TKI therapy was continued afterward. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Competing risk analyses and the Kaplan-Meir methodology were used to report the outcomes of interest. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median duration of TKI therapy prior to study entry was 18.6 mo; 1-yr LC of the irradiated tumors was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-98%). The median PFS after SRT was 9.3 mo (95% CI 7.5-15.7 mo). The cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy was 47% (95% CI 32-68%) at 1 yr, with a median time to change in systemic therapy of 12.6 mo (95% CI 9.6-17.4 mo). One-year OS was 92% (95% CI 82-100%). There were no grade 3-5 SRT-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS LC of irradiated oligoprogressive mRCC tumors was high, and the need to change systemic therapy was delayed for a median of >1 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY The use of stereotactic radiotherapy in metastatic kidney cancer patients, who develop growth of a few tumors while on oral targeted therapy, can significantly delay the need to change to the next line of drug therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Scott A North
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Belal Ahmad
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francois Patenaude
- Department of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gerald Lim
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel Yick Chin Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Arbind Dubey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Piotr Czaykowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Rebecca K S Wong
- Radiation Medicine Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Scott C Morgan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sareh Keshavarzi
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Results of Radiation Therapy as Local Ablative Therapy for Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225773. [PMID: 34830925 PMCID: PMC8616303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Oligometastatic cancer is characterized by a limited number of metastatic deposits. Compared with lung cancer patients who have more widespread disease, oligometastatic lung cancer patients have more favorable survival outcomes. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that local ablative therapy (LAT) directed at the metastatic deposits in addition to standard-of-care systemic therapy may further improve survival outcomes in oligometastatic lung cancer patients. One LAT modality that has been utilized in oligometastatic lung cancer is radiation therapy. In particular, ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy, also known as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has been shown to provide excellent local control with a favorable safety profile. Here, we reviewed the retrospective studies and prospective trials that have deployed radiation therapy as LAT in oligometastatic lung cancer, including randomized studies showing benefits for progression-free survival and overall survival with the addition of LAT. We also discuss the impact of targeted therapies and immunotherapy on radiation as LAT.
Collapse
|
24
|
The role of surgery in the treatment of oligoprogression after systemic treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2021; 161:141-151. [PMID: 34600405 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are generally considered incurable. The mainstay of treatment for these patients is systemic therapy. The addition of local treatment, including surgery, remains controversial. Oligoprogression is defined as advanced stage NSCLC with limited progression of disease after a period of prolonged disease stabilisation or after a partial or complete response on systemic therapy. In this retrospective study we evaluated outcome and survival of patients who underwent a resection for oligoprogression after systemic therapy for advanced stage NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with oligoprogression after systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC who were operated in the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital were included. Patient and treatment characteristics were collected in relation to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Between January 2015 and December 2019, 28 patients underwent surgery for an oligoprogressive lesion (primary tumor lung (n = 12), other metastatic site (n = 16)). Median age at time of resection was 60 years (39-86) and 57% were female. Postoperative complications were observed in 2 patients (7%). Progression of disease after resection of the oligoprogressive site was observed in 17 patients (61%). Median PFS was 7 months since date of resection (95% CI 6.0-25.0) and median OS was not reached. Seven patients (25%) died during follow-up. Age was predictive for OS and clinical T4 stage was predictive for PFS. M1 disease at initial presentation was predictive for better PFS compared to patients who were diagnosed with M0 disease initially. Patients who underwent resection because of oligoprogression of the primary lung tumour had a better PFS, when compared to oligoprogression of another metastastic site. CONCLUSION Surgical resection of an oligoprogressive lesion in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with systemic treatment is feasible and might be considered in order to achieve long term survival.
Collapse
|
25
|
Gutiérrez E, Sánchez I, Díaz O, Valles A, Balderrama R, Fuentes J, Lara B, Olimón C, Ruiz V, Rodríguez J, Bayardo LH, Chan M, Villafuerte CJ, Padayachee J, Sun A. Current Evidence for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Lung Metastases. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:2560-2578. [PMID: 34287274 PMCID: PMC8293144 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28040233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Lung metastases are the second most common malignant neoplasms of the lung. It is estimated that 20–54% of cancer patients have lung metastases at some point during their disease course, and at least 50% of cancer-related deaths occur at this stage. Lung metastases are widely accepted to be oligometastatic when five lesions or less occur separately in up to three organs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive, safe, and effective treatment for metastatic lung disease in carefully selected patients. There is no current consensus on the ideal dose and fractionation for SBRT in lung metastases, and it is the subject of study in ongoing clinical trials, which examines different locations in the lung (central and peripheral). This review discusses current indications, fractionations, challenges, and technical requirements for lung SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Gutiérrez
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Irving Sánchez
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Omar Díaz
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Adrián Valles
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Ricardo Balderrama
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Jesús Fuentes
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Brenda Lara
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Cipatli Olimón
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Víctor Ruiz
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - José Rodríguez
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Luis H. Bayardo
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Matthew Chan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Conrad J. Villafuerte
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Jerusha Padayachee
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Alexander Sun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-41-6946-2853
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
De B, Venkatesan AM, Msaouel P, Ghia AJ, Li J, Yeboa DN, Nguyen QN, Bishop AJ, Jonasch E, Shah AY, Campbell MT, Wang J, Zurita-Saavedra AJ, Karam JA, Wood CG, Matin SF, Tannir NM, Tang C. Definitive radiotherapy for extracranial oligoprogressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma as a strategy to defer systemic therapy escalation. BJU Int 2021; 129:610-620. [PMID: 34228889 PMCID: PMC10097479 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study whether delivering definitive radiotherapy (RT) to sites of oligoprogression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) enabled deferral of systemic therapy (ST) changes without compromising disease control or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified patients with mRCC who received RT to three or fewer sites of extracranial progressive disease between 2014 and 2019 at a large tertiary cancer centre. Inclusion criteria were: (1) controlled disease for ≥3 months before oligoprogression, (2) all oligoprogression sites treated with a biologically effective dose of ≥100 Gy, and (3) availability of follow-up imaging. Time-to-event end-points were calculated from the start of RT. RESULTS A total of 72 patients were identified (median follow-up 22 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19-32 months), with oligoprogressive lesions in lung/mediastinum (n = 35), spine (n = 30), and non-spine bone (n = 5). The most common systemic therapies before oligoprogression were none (n = 33), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 23), and immunotherapy (n = 13). At 1 year, the local control rate was 96% (95% CI 87-99%); progression-free survival (PFS), 52% (95% CI 40-63%); and overall survival, 91% (95% CI 82-96%). At oligoprogression, ST was escalated (n = 16), maintained (n = 49), or discontinued (n = 7), with corresponding median (95% CI) PFS intervals of 19.7 (8.2-27.2) months, 10.1 (6.9-13.2) months, and 9.8 (2.4-28.9) months, respectively. Of the 49 patients maintained on the same ST at oligoprogression, 21 did not subsequently have ST escalation. CONCLUSION Patients with oligoprogressive mRCC treated with RT had comparable PFS regardless of ST strategy, suggesting that RT may be a viable approach for delaying ST escalation. Randomised controlled trials comparing treatment of oligoprogression with RT vs ST alone are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amado J Zurita-Saavedra
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tan H, Cheung P, Louie AV, Myrehaug S, Niglas M, Atenafu EG, Chu W, Chung HT, Poon I, Sahgal A, Soliman H. Outcomes of extra-cranial stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Treatment indication matters. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:159-165. [PMID: 34119585 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To summarize the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) from a large institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with mBC who received extra-cranial SBRT to metastatic lesions from 2011 to 2017 were identified. Treatment indications were: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumor (CDT). Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and cumulative incidence of starting/changing chemo or hormonal therapy (SCT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive factors. RESULTS We analyzed 120 patients (193 treated metastatic lesions) with a median follow up of 15.25 months. 1-and 2-year LC rates were 89% and 86.6%, respectively. 1-and 2-year OS rates were 83.5% and 70%, respectively, with treatment indication and molecular subtype being the predictive factors on MVA. 1-year OS was 91.0%, 78.5% and 63.9% for oligometastases, oligoprogression and CDT, respectively (p = 0.003). The worst OS was seen in basal subtype with 1-and 2-year OS rates of 59.2% and 39.5% (p = 0.01). Treatment indication was found to be predictive for PFS and lower rates of SCT on MVA. 1-and 2-year PFS rates were 45% and 32%, respectively. The 1-year PFS for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and CDT was 66%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of SCT at 1-year was 12% for oligometastases, 39.7% for oligoprogression and 53.3% for CDT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients treated for oligometastases have better OS and PFS than those treated for oligoprogression or CDT. SBRT may delay SCT in mBC patients, particularly those with oligometastases. SBRT provided an excellent LC in mBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrick Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark Niglas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RS Mclaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen LC, Lin HY, Hung SK, Chiou WY, Lee MS. Role of modern radiotherapy in managing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:2434-2457. [PMID: 34092968 PMCID: PMC8160620 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i20.2434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer. Several treatment options are available for managing HCC patients, classified roughly as local, local-regional, and systemic therapies. The high post-monotherapy recurrence rate of HCC urges the need for the use of combined modalities to increase tumor control and patient survival. Different international guidelines offer treatment recommendations based on different points of view and classification systems. Radiotherapy (RT) is a well-known local-regional treatment modality for managing many types of cancers, including HCC. However, only some of these treatment guidelines include RT, and the role of combined modalities is rarely mentioned. Hence, the present study reviewed clinical evidence for the use of different combined modalities in managing HCC, focusing on modern RT's role. Modern RT has an increased utility in managing HCC patients, mainly due to two driving forces. First, technological advancement (e.g., stereotactic body radiotherapy and advanced proton-beam therapy) enables precise delivery of radiation to increase tumor control and reduce side effects in the surrounding normal tissue. Second, the boom in developing target therapies and checkpoint-blockade immunotherapy prolongs overall survival in HCC patients, re-emphasizing the importance of local tumor control. Remarkably, RT combines with systemic therapies to generate the systemic therapy augmented by radiotherapy effect, a benefit now being actively investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang-Cheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
| | - Hon-Yi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
- Institute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Cheng University, Min-Hsiung, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Kai Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yen Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - Moon-Sing Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Local Ablative Therapies for Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:129-136. [PMID: 32205537 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
More than half of all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. A subset of these patients has oligometastatic disease, which exists in an intermediary state between locoregional and disseminated metastatic disease. In addition, some metastatic patients on systemic therapy may have limited disease progression, or oligoprogression. Historically, treatment of metastatic NSCLC was palliative in nature, with little expectation of long-term survival. However, an accumulation of evidence over the past 3 decades now demonstrates that local ablative therapy to sites of limited metastases or progression can improve patient outcomes for this complex disease. This review examines the evidence behind local ablative therapy in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC, with a focus on surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
|
30
|
Alomran R, White M, Bruce M, Bressel M, Roache S, Karroum L, Hanna GG, Siva S, Goel S, David S. Stereotactic radiotherapy for oligoprogressive ER-positive breast cancer (AVATAR). BMC Cancer 2021; 21:303. [PMID: 33757458 PMCID: PMC7989018 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08042-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The enhanced knowledge of cancer biology has led to considerable advancement in systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer. Recently, studies showed that cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, when added to endocrine therapy, had improved the outcomes of patients with advanced ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. However, the disease often progresses following a period of treatment response. In a subset of patients, disease progression may occur at limited sites, i.e., oligoprogressive disease (OPD). In the past few years, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for advanced cancer when delivered to limited metastatic sites. Hence, it is worth investigating the role of SRT in the setting of oligoprogressive breast cancer. METHOD AVATAR is a multicentre phase II registry trial of SRT with endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor for the management of advanced ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. The study aims to enrol 32 patients with OPD limited to 5 lesions. The primary endpoint of the study is time to change systemic therapy measured from the commencement of SRT to change in systemic therapy. Secondary objectives include overall survival, progression free survival and treatment related toxicity. The exploratory objective is to describe the time to change in systemic therapy by the site (bone only vs. non-bone lesions) and number (1 vs. > 1) of OPD. DISCUSSION This study aims to explore the effect of SRT in maximising the benefit of systemic therapy in patients with oligoprogressive ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. This approach might help reduce the burden of disease and improve the life quality in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN, ACTRN12620001212943 . Date of registration 16 November 2020- Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Alomran
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Melissa Bruce
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Mathias Bressel
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Susan Roache
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Lama Karroum
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Shom Goel
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Steven David
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.
- Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bible KC, Kebebew E, Brierley J, Brito JP, Cabanillas ME, Clark TJ, Di Cristofano A, Foote R, Giordano T, Kasperbauer J, Newbold K, Nikiforov YE, Randolph G, Rosenthal MS, Sawka AM, Shah M, Shaha A, Smallridge R, Wong-Clark CK. 2021 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Management of Patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2021; 31:337-386. [PMID: 33728999 PMCID: PMC8349723 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2020.0944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare but highly lethal form of thyroid cancer. Since the guidelines for the management of ATC by the American Thyroid Association were first published in 2012, significant clinical and scientific advances have occurred in the field. The aim of these guidelines is to inform clinicians, patients, and researchers on published evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of ATC. Methods: The specific clinical questions and topics addressed in these guidelines were based on prior versions of the guidelines, stakeholder input, and input of the Task Force members (authors of the guideline). Relevant literature was reviewed, including serial PubMed searches supplemented with additional articles. The American College of Physicians Guideline Grading System was used for critical appraisal of evidence and grading strength of recommendations. Results: The guidelines include the diagnosis, initial evaluation, establishment of treatment goals, approaches to locoregional disease (surgery, radiotherapy, targeted/systemic therapy, supportive care during active therapy), approaches to advanced/metastatic disease, palliative care options, surveillance and long-term monitoring, and ethical issues, including end of life. The guidelines include 31 recommendations and 16 good practice statements. Conclusions: We have developed evidence-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the management of ATC. While all care must be individualized, such recommendations provide, in our opinion, optimal care paradigms for patients with ATC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith C. Bible
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Electron Kebebew
- Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - James Brierley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Juan P. Brito
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria E. Cabanillas
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Antonio Di Cristofano
- Department of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Robert Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Thomas Giordano
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jan Kasperbauer
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kate Newbold
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yuri E. Nikiforov
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gregory Randolph
- Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Endocrine Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - M. Sara Rosenthal
- Program for Bioethics and Markey Cancer Center Oncology Ethics Program, Departments Internal Medicine, Pediatrics and Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Anna M. Sawka
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Manisha Shah
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ashok Shaha
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ji X, Zhao Y, Zhu X, Shen Z, Li A, Chen C, Chu X. Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Oligometastases, Oligoprogression, or Local Control of Dominant Tumors. Front Oncol 2021; 10:595781. [PMID: 33585211 PMCID: PMC7878536 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.595781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with oligometastases, oligoprogression, or local control of dominant tumors after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and establish a nomogram model to predict the prognosis for these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS A cohort of 94 patients with 162 mCRC metastases was treated with SBRT at a single institution. Treatment indications were oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors. End points of this study were the outcome in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and cumulative incidence of starting or changing systemic therapy (SCST). In addition, univariate and multivariable analyses to assess variable associations were performed. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. RESULTS Median PFS were 12.6 months, 6.8 months, and 3.7 months for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors, respectively. 0-1 performance status, < 10 ug/L pre-SBRT CEA, and ≤ 2 metastases were significant predictors of higher PFS on multivariate analysis. Median OS were 40.0 months, 26.1 months, and 6.5 months for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of the cohort, the independent factors for survival were indication, performance status, pre-SBRT CEA, and PTV, all of which were selected into the nomogram. The calibration curve for probability of survival showed the good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.848. CONCLUSIONS SBRT for metastases derived from colorectal cancer offered favorable survival and symptom palliation without significant complications. The proposed nomogram could provide individual prediction of OS for patients with mCRC after SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqin Ji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yulu Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xixu Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zetian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Aomei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Chu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Node Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:764-774. [PMID: 33115687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to metastatic mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (MHL) is challenging owing to the proximity of centrally located organs-at-risk. As limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of SBRT for MHL, a retrospective review of clinical outcomes was conducted from a large academic center. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients received SBRT to MHL between 2014 to 2019 for the following indications: oligometastases, oligoprogression, or local control of a dominant area of progression. The primary endpoint was grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0). The cumulative incidence function evaluated local failure (LF) and starting or changing systemic therapy (SCST). Kaplan-Meier methodology estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Fifty-two patients (84 metastases) were included. Median follow-up was 20 months. Primary cancer sites included kidney (53.8%), lung (13.4%), breast (7.7%), and other (25.1%). Indications for SBRT were oligoprogression (n = 35; 67.3%), oligometastases (n = 10; 19.2%), or local failure of a dominant area of progression (n = 7; 13.5%). The majority (n = 31; 59.6%) received SBRT to a single lymph node metastasis. Median SBRT dose was 35 Gy (range, 30-50 Gy) with a median biologically effective dose of 59.5 Gy (range, 48-100 Gy). All treatments were in 5 fractions. Seven grade ≥3 toxicities were experienced by 6 patients (11.5%) and were mostly transient (5/7; 71%). There was a single (1.9%) grade 5 toxicity (radiation pneumonitis). The cumulative incidence of LF was 9.0% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of SCST was 33.2% and 57.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval, 2.8-7.3) and median OS was 31.7 months (95% confidence interval, 23.8-87.5). CONCLUSIONS In one of the largest single institutional series of SBRT for MHL, moderate rates of grade ≥3 toxicity were observed, although the majority were transient. This treatment resulted in low LF rates and potentially delayed SCST for many patients.
Collapse
|
34
|
Franceschini D, Rossi S, Loi M, Chiola I, Piccoli F, Lutman FR, Finocchiaro G, Toschi L, Santoro A, Scorsetti M. Lung cancer management: monitoring and treating resistance development in third-generation EGFR TKIs. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:743-753. [PMID: 32755244 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1806716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients treated with third-generation EGFR TKIs will develop resistance to treatment at a certain point. Early detection of resistance occurrence could allow more options for treatment. AREAS COVERED We discuss the development of third-generation EGFR TKIs, focusing on osimertinib and discuss the most common resistance mechanisms under evaluation. We also debate how this resistance can be detected; particularly we review the possible application of liquid biopsy in this scenario. Lastly we discuss available treatment options when resistance occurs, with an eye on ongoing trials and possible future developments. EXPERT OPINION As resistance will ultimately develop, a strict instrumental follow-up as per international guidelines is required with the aim of detecting this resistance in an early phase. Detecting an oligoprogression could allow the integration of local ablative therapies while further delaying the need for a systemic therapy change. By exploiting the increasing potentiality of liquid biopsy, in the near future, physicians could be able to understand why a patient develops resistance and therefore can choose the best possible individualized treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy
| | - S Rossi
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy
| | - M Loi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy
| | - I Chiola
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy
| | - F Piccoli
- Radiology Department, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - F R Lutman
- Radiology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy
| | - G Finocchiaro
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy
| | - L Toschi
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy
| | - A Santoro
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS , Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rahimi A, Timmerman R. Curing Metastatic Disease with Radiation Therapy: Myth or Reality?—Arguing for Reality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:429-432. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
36
|
Abbas AE. Commentary: When cancer is oligometastatic, even mesothelioma is curable. JTCVS Tech 2020; 3:361-362. [PMID: 34317931 PMCID: PMC8302998 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas E Abbas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Temple University Hospital and Fox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Berghen C, Joniau S, Vulsteke C, Albersen M, Devos G, Rans K, Haustermans K, De Meerleer G. Metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic urological tumours: still no second-hand news. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:1036. [PMID: 32565889 PMCID: PMC7289610 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients presenting with limited metastatic disease burden, known as the oligometastatic state of disease, a more aggressive treatment approach targeting the new or progressive metastatic lesions might improve patient outcome, with no or only limited toxicity to be expected from the treatment. This review provides an overview of the existing evidence and on-going trials on oligometastatic disease and metastasis-directed therapy in the field of renal, bladder and prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christof Vulsteke
- Department of Oncology, Ghent Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIPRO), Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gaëtan Devos
- Department of Urology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kato Rans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schaub SK, Tseng YD, Chang EL, Sahgal A, Saigal R, Hofstetter CP, Foote M, Ko AL, Yuh WTC, Mossa-Basha M, Mayr NA, Lo SS. Strategies to Mitigate Toxicities From Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Metastases. Neurosurgery 2020; 85:729-740. [PMID: 31264703 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Improvements in systemic therapy are translating into more patients living longer with metastatic disease. Bone is the most common site of metastasis, where spinal lesions can result in significant pain impacting quality of life and possible neurological dysfunction resulting in a decline in performance status. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of the spine has emerged as a promising technique to provide durable local control, palliation of symptoms, control of oligoprogressive sites of disease, and possibly augment the immune response. SBRT achieves this by delivering highly conformal radiation therapy to allow for dose escalation due to a steep dose gradient from the planning target volume to nearby critical organs at risk. In our review, we provide an in-depth review and expert commentary regarding seminal literature that defined clinically meaningful toxicity endpoints with actionable dosimetric limits and/or clinical management strategies to mitigate toxicity potentially attributable to SBRT of the spine. We placed a spotlight on radiation myelopathy (de novo, reirradiation after conventional external beam radiation therapy or salvage after an initial course of spinal SBRT), plexopathy, vertebral compression fracture, pain flare, esophageal toxicity, myositis, and safety regarding combination with concurrent targeted or immune therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie K Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rajiv Saigal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christoph P Hofstetter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Andrew L Ko
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - William T C Yuh
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mahmud Mossa-Basha
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nina A Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wallington DG, Rashid AS, Buchwald ZS, Sudmeier LJ, Khan MK. Complete and Durable Response After Radiation Therapy to Primary Tumor Site of a Patient With Metastatic Anorectal Mucosal Melanoma With Oligoprogression on Nivolumab. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:503-510. [PMID: 32529147 PMCID: PMC7276687 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David G. Wallington
- Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan
| | - Arif S. Rashid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zachary S. Buchwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa J. Sudmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mohammad K. Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Corresponding author: Mohammad K. Khan, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Iravani A, Violet J, Azad A, Hofman MS. Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) theranostics: practical nuances and intricacies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23:38-52. [PMID: 31595044 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0174-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Theranostic principles utilize a molecular biomarker specific for a tumor target, initially for imaging to assess target expression and, if deemed suitable, for targeted therapy. This presents an exciting opportunity for a highly personalized treatment strategy in the era of precision medicine. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) theranostics has attracted increasing attention as a promising targeted treatment in metastatic prostate cancer (PC). 177Lu-DOTA-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) is a PSMA-targeted small molecule with favorable properties and is the most extensively investigated PSMA radioligand for radionuclide therapy (RNT) in PC. Since 2014 multiple retrospective studies and more recently a phase II prospective study demonstrated safety and impressive efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA RNT. The evidence generated by these trials led to two currently underway randomized trials in metastatic castrate-resistant PC: TheraP (NCT03392428) and VISION (NCT03511664). While we wait for these pivotal trials to read out, nuclear medicine physicians, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and urologists are facing a steep learning curve to master the intricacies and nuances of this novel therapeutic strategy. This review article aims to share and discuss the evolving experience in practical aspects of PSMA theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Iravani
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Violet
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Arun Azad
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy in 8 fractions when prioritizing organs at risk for central and ultracentral lung tumors. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:61. [PMID: 32106868 PMCID: PMC7047404 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01491-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to central (C) and ultracentral (UC) lung tumors, our provincial practice has been to prioritize organs at risk (OARs) constraints by compromising target volume coverage if needed. The objectives are to report the treatment's efficacy and safety. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of all provincial patients who underwent SBRT at 60Gy in 8 fractions to C and UC lung tumors, from 2013 to 2017. RESULTS Ninety-eight lesions were treated, 57 (58.2%) C and 41 (41.8%) UC. The median follow-up was 22.9 months (range 2.5-64.8 months). The 1- and 3-year local control (LC) was 97.8 and 84.5% respectively, with no differences between C and UC groups (p = 0.662). Fifty-three (54.1%) cases had optimal dose coverage (V60Gy ITV&PTV > 95%), 29 (29.6%) had compromised PTV coverage (V60Gy ITV > 95%/PTV < 95%), and 16 (16.3%) had both compromised ITV and PTV coverage (V60Gy ITV&PTV < 95%). No significant difference in LC was detected at 2 years between the 3 groups (95.6, 91.8 and 90.9%, p = 0.717). There were 3 episodes of grade 3 toxicity in the C group (2 dyspnea, 1 pneumonitis) and 2 in the UC group (1 dyspnea, 1 hemoptysis). There were no gr4/5 toxicities. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, ITV size was found to be a predictor for LC (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SBRT at 60Gy in 8 fractions achieves high rates of LC with low risks of significant toxicities, even if target volume coverage is reduced to meet OARs constraints.
Collapse
|
42
|
Aykan NF, Özatlı T. Objective response rate assessment in oncology: Current situation and future expectations. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:53-73. [PMID: 32133275 PMCID: PMC7046919 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The tumor objective response rate (ORR) is an important parameter to demonstrate the efficacy of a treatment in oncology. The ORR is valuable for clinical decision making in routine practice and a significant end-point for reporting the results of clinical trials. World Health Organization and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are anatomic response criteria developed mainly for cytotoxic chemotherapy. These criteria are based on the visual assessment of tumor size in morphological images provided by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. Anatomic response criteria may not be optimal for biologic agents, some disease sites, and some regional therapies. Consequently, modifications of RECIST, Choi criteria and Morphologic response criteria were developed based on the concept of the evaluation of viable tumors. Despite its limitations, RECIST v1.1 is validated in prospective studies, is widely accepted by regulatory agencies and has recently shown good performance for targeted cancer agents. Finally, some alternatives of RECIST were developed as immune-specific response criteria for checkpoint inhibitors. Immune RECIST criteria are based essentially on defining true progressive disease after a confirmatory imaging. Some graphical methods may be useful to show longitudinal change in the tumor burden over time. Tumor tissue is a tridimensional heterogenous mass, and tumor shrinkage is not always symmetrical; thus, metabolic response assessments using positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/CT may reflect the viability of cancer cells or functional changes evolving after anticancer treatments. The metabolic response can show the benefit of a treatment earlier than anatomic shrinkage, possibly preventing delays in drug approval. Computer-assisted automated volumetric assessments, quantitative multimodality imaging in radiology, new tracers in nuclear medicine and finally artificial intelligence have great potential in future evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuri Faruk Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istinye University Medical School, Bahcesehir Liv Hospital, Istanbul 34510, Turkey
| | - Tahsin Özatlı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istinye University Medical School, Bahcesehir Liv Hospital, Istanbul 34510, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for adrenal metastases of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive tumor patients. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:30. [PMID: 32019553 PMCID: PMC7001286 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-1480-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Local ablative treatment strategies are frequently offered to patients diagnosed with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), as ablative treatment option, is well established for lung and liver metastases, whereas for isolated adrenal gland metastases the level of evidence is scarce. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single-institution analysis of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease was limited to patients who received SBRT to adrenal metastasis between 2012 and 2019. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics, and dosimetric parameters were analyzed for evaluation of their effect on survival outcomes. RESULTS During the period of review 28 patients received ablative SBRT to their adrenal gland metastases. Most common primary tumors were non-small cell lung cancers (46%) with most patients diagnosed with a single adrenal gland metastasis (61%), which occurred after a median time of 14 months. SBRT was delivered to a median biological effective dose at α/β of 10 (BED10) of 75 Gy (range: 58-151 Gy). Median gross tumor volume (GTV) and median planning target volume (PTV) were 42 and 111 mL, respectively. The homogeneity and conformity indices were 1.17 (range: 1.04-1.64) and 0.5 (range: 0.4.0.99), respectively, with the conformity index being affected by dose restrictions to organs at risk (OARs) in 50% of the patients. Overall response rate based on RECIST criteria was 86% (CR = 29%, PR = 57%) with 2-year local control (LC) of 84.8%, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 26.3%, and 1-and 2-year overall survival (OS) of 46.6 and 32.0%, respectively. During follow up, only two local recurrences occurred. A trend for superior LC was seen if BED10 was ≥75Gy (p = 0.101) or if the PTV was < 100 ml (p = 0.072). SBRT was tolerated well with only mild toxicity. CONCLUSION SBRT for adrenal metastases resulted in promising LC with low toxicity. Treatment response appeared to be superior, if SBRT was applied with higher BED. As the close proximity of OARs often limits the application of sufficiently high doses, further dose escalations strategies and techniques should be investigated in future.
Collapse
|
44
|
Onderdonk BE, Gutiontov SI, Chmura SJ. The Evolution (and Future) of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2020; 34:307-320. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
45
|
Thompson R, Cheung P, Chu W, Myrehaug S, Poon I, Sahgal A, Soliman H, Tseng CL, Wong S, Ung Y, Beatriz Kinupe Abrahão A, Erler D, Zhang L, Ko YJ, Chung HT. Outcomes of extra-cranial stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: Dose and site of metastases matter. Radiother Oncol 2020; 142:236-245. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
46
|
Hotte SJ, Kapoor A, Basappa NS, Bjarnason G, Canil C, Conter HJ, Czaykowski P, Graham J, Gray S, Heng DYC, Karakiewicz PI, Kollmannsberger C, Lalani AKA, North SA, Patenaude F, Soulières D, Violette P, Winquist E, Wood LA, Dudani S, Maloni R, Reaume MN. Management of Advanced Kidney Cancer: Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada (KCRNC) consensus update 2019. Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 13:343-354. [PMID: 31603413 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Urologic Research Center for Research & Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,The Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Naveen S Basappa
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Georg Bjarnason
- Division of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christina Canil
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Samantha Gray
- Department of Oncology, Dalhousie University, Saint John Regional Hospital, St. John, NB, Canada
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary and Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Department of Surgery, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Christian Kollmannsberger
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Cancer Center, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Scott A North
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - François Patenaude
- Department of Medicine, Hematology Service and Department of Oncology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Denis Soulières
- Division of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Phillippe Violette
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Lori A Wood
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary and Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Ranjena Maloni
- The Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Neil Reaume
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Traitement des oligometastases et oligoprogression. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:482-485. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
48
|
Jumeau R, Vilotte F, Durham AD, Ozsahin EM. Current landscape of palliative radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019; 8:S192-S201. [PMID: 31673524 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.08.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone in the management of advanced stage III and stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Despite international guidelines, clinical practice remains heterogeneous. Additionally, the advent of stereotactic ablative RT (SABR) and new systemic treatments such as immunotherapy have shaken up dogmas in the approach of these patients. This review will focus on palliative thoracic RT for NSCLC but will also discuss the role of stereotactic radiotherapy, endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB), the interest of concomitant treatments (chemotherapy and immunotherapy), and the role of RT in lung cancer emergencies with palliative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Jumeau
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Florent Vilotte
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - André-Dante Durham
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat-Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Patel PH, Palma D, McDonald F, Tree AC. The Dandelion Dilemma Revisited for Oligoprogression: Treat the Whole Lawn or Weed Selectively? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:824-833. [PMID: 31182289 PMCID: PMC6880295 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Oligoprogressive disease is a relatively new clinical concept describing progression at only a few sites of metastasis in patients with otherwise controlled widespread disease. In the era of well-tolerated targeted treatments, resistance inevitably occurs and overcoming this is a challenge. Local ablative therapy for oligoprogressive disease may allow the continuation of systemic treatments by overcoming the few sub-clones that have developed resistance. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is now frequently used in treating oligometastatic disease using ablative doses with minimally invasive techniques and acceptable toxicity. We discuss the current retrospective clinical evidence base supporting the use of local ablative therapy for oligoprogression in metastatic patients on targeted treatments within multiple tumour sites. As there is currently a lack of published prospective data available, the best management for these patients remains unclear. We discuss current trials in recruitment and the potential advancements in treating this group of patients with stereotactic radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Patel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
| | - D Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - F McDonald
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - A C Tree
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Matsuo Y. Stereotactic body radiotherapy as an alternative to metastasectomy for pulmonary oligometastasis. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:S1420-S1422. [PMID: 31245149 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.94] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|