1
|
Lawlor S, Leech M. Established advanced practice roles in radiation therapy: A scoping review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:342-352. [PMID: 38450863 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Advanced practitioners are healthcare professionals that are highly skilled with a particular area of expertise. These roles have been successfully implemented in many healthcare settings, improving efficiency of the service, as well as enhancing the standard of care received by patients. Although advanced practice roles have been implemented in some radiation therapy departments, their implementation have yet to be facilitated in the majority of countries. The purpose of this review is to scope the literature available regarding established advanced practice roles in radiation therapy. The PRISMA strategy for the identification of relevant literature was adhered to. Two data bases, EMBASE and PubMed, were searched using combinations of the key words 'Advanced', 'Practice', 'APRT', 'Radiation', 'Therapy' and 'Radiotherapy'. Exclusion criteria were applied, and citation lists were also screened for additional relevant sources, including grey literature sources. A total of 35 relevant sources were identified that discussed advanced practice radiation therapy roles in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada, Australia and the USA. Means of role establishment and scope of practice were defined, and a number of advantages and challenges for advanced practice radiation therapist roles were identified. There are many benefits of implementing advanced practice roles in radiation therapy departments. Though the implementation of these roles can be challenging, the existing evidence indicates that it would be beneficial for the patient, the radiation therapist and the department as a whole. A more systematic approach, including reporting of quantitative outcomes may assist in the more widespread implementation of these roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Lawlor
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michelle Leech
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Benson R, Clough A, Nelder C, Pitt E, Portner R, Vassiliou M, McDaid L, Choudhury A, Rembielak A, Eccles C. Evaluation of the palliative radiotherapy pathway in a single institute: Can an MR Linac improve efficiency? J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:S44-S50. [PMID: 34922879 PMCID: PMC9716003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is effectively used to relieve cancer related symptoms. The demand for these services is increasing worldwide. Rapid response clinics have been developed as a means to streamline the palliative RT radiotherapy process and increase efficiency and improve patient experiences. Key components to successful rapid response palliative RT are access to care, streamlined services and innovation. To successfully implement a rapid response RT programme, it is essential to identify gaps between currently provided care and ideal or enhanced care. The aims of this work are to audit the current palliative RT workflow at our institution both prior to and during the coronavirus pandemic. This work reports the impact of covid-19 on rate of palliative RT referrals and proposes a radiographer led, MR guided rapid response workflow to reduce wait times METHODS: A retrospective audit of palliative radiotherapy booking forms was completed over a two yearperiod (2019-2020) to assess the current pathway both prior to and during the covid-19 pandemic. This audit identified patients who had received urgent/emergency spinal RT in the specified timeframe. Further data on these patients was collected using departmental oncology information systems to form a detailed analysis of the pathway and wait times. Data was recorded and analysed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS A total of 813 patients met the inclusion criteria for this audit. Data was reported for 2019 and 2020 separately to determine any significant impact caused by the covid-19 pandemic. In 2020 there was an 11.5% increase in referrals for palliative radiotherapy with an equal portion (81%) of total referrals in each year being for single fractions. Timelines from referral to treatment delivery were reported, with those patients receiving same day single fraction RT palliative radiotherapy undergoing further analysis to determine the amount of time spent in the department. Mean wait time for these patients was 5 hours and 20 minutes in 2019 but increased by 20.9% in 2020. CONCLUSIONS The increasing demand for palliative RT due to rising global cancer rates and extended life expectancy due to advanced systemic treatments may lead to increased wait times. An increase in both referrals and mean wait time was seen during the covid-19 pandemic. Improving efficiency and access to care is essential for this population. The MR Linac could play a role in streamlining palliative RT workflows due to its ability to employ a scan, plan and treat model in a single session. This work forms preliminary support for the development of a trial one stop palliative program on the MR Linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Benson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Abigael Clough
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Nelder
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor Pitt
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Portner
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Vassiliou
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa McDaid
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Agata Rembielak
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Cynthia Eccles
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oliveira C, Barbosa B, Couto JG, Bravo I, Khine R, McNair H. Advanced practice roles of therapeutic radiographers/radiation therapists: A systematic literature review. Radiography (Lond) 2022; 28:605-619. [PMID: 35550932 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advances in Radiotherapy (RT) technology and increase of complexity in cancer care have enabled the implementation of new treatment techniques. Subsequently, a greater level of autonomy, responsibility, and accountability in the practice of Therapeutic Radiographers/Radiation Therapists (TR/RTTs) has led to Advanced Practice (AP) roles. The published evidence of this role is scattered with confusing terminology and divergence regarding the perception of whether a specific role represents AP internationally. This study aims to establish an international baseline of evidence on AP roles in RT to identify roles and activities performed by TR/RTTs at advanced level practice and to summarise the impact. METHODS A systematic PRISMA review of the literature was undertaken. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise the roles and associated activities. Six RT external experts validated the list. The impact was scrutinised in terms of clinical, organisational, and professional outcomes. RESULTS Studies (n = 87) were included and categorised into four groups. AP roles were listed by clinical area, site-specific, and scope of practice, and advanced activities were organised into seven dimensions and 27 sub-dimensions. Three most-reported outcomes were: enhanced service capacity, higher patient satisfaction, and safety maintenance. CONCLUSION Evidence-based AP amongst TR/RTTs show how AP roles were conceptualised, implemented, and evaluated. Congruence studies have shown that TR/RTTs are at par with the gold-standard across the various AP roles. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This is the first systematic literature review synthetisising AP roles and activities of TR/RTTs. This study also identified the main areas of AP that can be used to develop professional frameworks and education guiding policy by professional bodies, educators and other stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Oliveira
- Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto (IPO Porto), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal; Escola Internacional de Doutoramento, Universidad de Vigo, Circunvalación Ao Campus Universitario, 36310, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
| | - B Barbosa
- Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto (IPO Porto), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal; Escola Internacional de Doutoramento, Universidad de Vigo, Circunvalación Ao Campus Universitario, 36310, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain; Medical Physics, Radiobiology Group and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto (IPO Porto), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
| | - J G Couto
- Radiography Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, MSD2080, Malta.
| | - I Bravo
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology Group and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Centre (CI-IPOP), Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto (IPO Porto), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
| | - R Khine
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, PO Box 30511, Utrecht, 3503, AH, Netherlands; School of Health Care and Social Work, Buckinghamshire New University, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom.
| | - H McNair
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, PO Box 30511, Utrecht, 3503, AH, Netherlands; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy and the Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evans C, Poku B, Pearce R, Eldridge J, Hendrick P, Knaggs R, Blake H, Yogeswaran G, McLuskey J, Tomczak P, Thow R, Harris P, Conway J, Collier R. Characterising the outcomes, impacts and implementation challenges of advanced clinical practice roles in the UK: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048171. [PMID: 34353799 PMCID: PMC8344309 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In response to demographic and health system pressures, the development of non-medical advanced clinical practice (ACP) roles is a key component of National Health Service workforce transformation policy in the UK. This review was undertaken to establish a baseline of evidence on ACP roles and their outcomes, impacts and implementation challenges across the UK. DESIGN A scoping review was undertaken following JBI methodological guidance. METHODS 13 online databases (Medline, CINAHL, ASSIA, Embase, HMIC, AMED, Amber, OT seeker, PsycINFO, PEDro, SportDiscus, Osteopathic Research and PenNutrition) and grey literature sources were searched from 2005 to 2020. Data extraction, charting and summary was guided by the PEPPA-Plus framework. The review was undertaken by a multi-professional team that included an expert lay representative. RESULTS 191 papers met the inclusion criteria (any type of UK evidence, any sector/setting and any profession meeting the Health Education England definition of ACP). Most papers were small-scale descriptive studies, service evaluations or audits. The papers reported mainly on clinical aspects of the ACP role. Most papers related to nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy and radiography roles and these were referred to by a plethora of different titles. ACP roles were reported to be achieving beneficial impacts across a range of clinical and health system outcomes. They were highly acceptable to patients and staff. No significant adverse events were reported. There was a lack of cost-effectiveness evidence. Implementation challenges included a lack of role clarity and an ambivalent role identity, lack of mentorship, lack of continuing professional development and an unclear career pathway. CONCLUSION This review suggests a need for educational and role standardisation and a supported career pathway for advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) in the UK. Future research should: (i) adopt more robust study designs, (ii) investigate the full scope of the ACP role and (iii) include a wider range of professions and sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catrin Evans
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Brenda Poku
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ruth Pearce
- School of Education, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jeanette Eldridge
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Paul Hendrick
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roger Knaggs
- School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Holly Blake
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gowsika Yogeswaran
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - John McLuskey
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Philippa Tomczak
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ruaridh Thow
- Emergency Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter Harris
- Health Education England East Midlands, Leicester, UK
| | - Joy Conway
- College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Richard Collier
- Centre for Advancing Practice, Health Education England, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caulfield L. A literature review exploring the perceived impact, challenges and barriers of advanced and consultant practice in therapeutic radiography. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 27:950-955. [PMID: 33536150 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review seeks to explore the perceived impact, challenges and barriers of advanced and consultant radiographer roles on staff, patients and healthcare. A systematic approach was used to search for and identify suitable literature for review. All appropriate literature was critically appraised and analysed qualitatively by thematic analysis. The results were integrated to give an overall evaluation of the impact of advanced and consultant practice within Therapeutic Radiography. KEY FINDINGS The literature found eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria and after critical appraisal, all were included in the analysis. Five key themes emerged from the analysis which is in keeping with the literature: education, quality of working life, patient care, benefit to healthcare and implementation obstacles. CONCLUSION Most advanced and consultant radiographers felt unprepared for these roles and the education requirements were varied and misunderstood. It was well documented that the advanced and consultant radiographer found great satisfaction from these roles and felt that it benefitted the patients as well as themselves and their career. Advanced and consultant roles benefitted patients by streamlining pathways and increasing satisfaction and there was a clear benefit to healthcare due to time and cost savings. The implementation obstacles focused around a lack of understanding and support from colleagues. There is a positive impact from advanced and consultant roles in therapeutic radiography to patients, staff and the healthcare system. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE There are challenges with respect to educational requirements, implementation obstacles and understanding of these roles which need to be addressed. There needs to be more education about the benefits of these roles so that they are encouraged and the staff are supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Caulfield
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Department, Level 0, Churchill Hospital, Oxford Cancer Centre, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Does a radiographer-led palliative radiotherapy pathway provide an efficient service for patients with symptoms of advanced cancer? The Northampton experience. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s146039692000028x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAim:To investigate whether a radiographer-led radiotherapy pathway can provide an efficient service for patients requiring treatment for symptomatic skeletal metastases.Materials and Methods:A retrospective review of 425 courses of palliative radiotherapy was conducted. Data was analysed assessing diagnosis, dose/fractionation, time from referral to treatment, gender, age, inpatient/outpatient status and referring clinic location for radiographer- and clinical oncologist-led cohorts.Results:Patients aged ≥70 years were more likely to be planned by radiographers (n = 162/57, p < 0·001). Patients were more likely to be treated with 8 Gy in single fraction than with 20 Gy in five fractions (n = 279/136, p = 0·012). The median referral to treatment time in 8-Gy single-fraction prescriptions was 3 days for radiographer-led versus 7 days for clinical oncologist-led cohorts. In all patients and in 20 Gy in five-fraction prescriptions, it was 4 versus 8 days. A comparison of all prescriptions (p < 0·001), 8 Gy in single-fraction (p < 0·001) and 20 Gy in five-fraction prescriptions (p = 0·001) showed radiographer-led procedures as enabling faster access to treatment in each category.Findings:A radiographer-led service can facilitate faster access to treatment than a clinical oncologist-led pathway for an appropriately selected patient caseload.
Collapse
|