Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT vs CT-scan in patients with pulmonary metastases previously operated on for colorectal liver metastases

Prognostic value of pretreatment F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment PET/computed tomography (CT) scans in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with unresectable metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the pretreatment PET/CT images of 82 CRC patients with unresectable metastasis and their medical records. On PET/CT images, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumor, highest SUVmax of metastatic tumors and number of metastatic organs were identified. The patients were further divided into single and multiple organ metastases groups according to the extent of disease. Survival analysis was performed with the clinical variables and metabolic parameters from PET/CT.

RESULTS

In a total of 82 patients, the age of patients, highest SUVmax of metastatic tumors and number of metastatic organs were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) (all P < 0.05), whereas the SUVmax of primary tumor was not. On multivariate analysis, only the SUVmax of metastatic tumor was a significant prognostic factor in the single organ metastasis group (P = 0.047), whereas the age and highest SUVmax of metastatic tumors were independent prognostic factors in the multiple organ metastases group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The highest SUVmax of metastatic tumors was an independent prognostic factor for OS in CRC patients with unresectable metastasis.

Comparison of 18FDG-PET/CT and conventional follow-up methods in colorectal cancer: A randomised prospective study

BACKGROUND

A surveillance program was performed in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after surgery, to diagnose asymptomatic recurrence.

AIMS

To assess whether 18-FDG positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) improved the detection of recurrence during a 3-year follow-up.

METHODS

A multicentre, two-arm randomised prospective trial comparing different 36-month follow-up strategies. Complete colonoscopy was performed at baseline and after 3 years and clinical exams with imaging every 3 months. The conventional arm (A) received carcinoembryonic antigen, liver echography, and alternated between lung radiography and computed tomography (CT) scans. The experimental arm (B) received PET/CT.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients with colon (79.4%) or rectal cancer (20.6%), stages II (48.2%) or III (50.8%), were enroled in this study. At 36 months, intention-to-treat analysis revealed recurrence in 31 (17.2%) patients in arm A and 47 (25.4%) in arm B (p = 0.063). At 3 years, 7 of 31 relapses (22.5%) in arm A were surgically treated with curative intent, compared to 17 of 47 (36.2%) in arm B (p = 0.25). The rates of recurrence and new cancers were higher in arm B than arm A (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT follow-up every 6 months did not increase the rate of recurrence at 3 years or the rate of surgically treated recurrence compared with conventional follow-up.

Preoperative imaging for colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide population-based study

Background

In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) preoperative imaging may include contrast‐enhanced (ce) MRI and [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F‐FDG) PET–CT. This study assessed trends and variation between hospitals and oncological networks in the use of preoperative imaging in the Netherlands.

Methods

Data for all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2018 were retrieved from a nationwide auditing database. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess use of ceMRI, ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT and combined ceMRI and ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT, and trends in preoperative imaging and hospital and oncological network variation.

Results

A total of 4510 patients were included, of whom 1562 had ceMRI, 872 had ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT, and 1293 had combined ceMRI and ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT. Use of ceMRI increased over time (from 9·6 to 26·2 per cent; P < 0·001), use of ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT decreased (from 28·6 to 6·0 per cent; P < 0·001), and use of both ceMRI and ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT 16·9 per cent) remained stable. Unadjusted variation in the use of ceMRI, ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT, and combined ceMRI and ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT ranged from 5·6 to 100 per cent between hospitals. After case‐mix correction, hospital and oncological network variation was found for all imaging modalities.

Discussion

Significant variation exists concerning the use of preoperative imaging for CRLM between hospitals and oncological networks in the Netherlands. The use of MRI is increasing, whereas that of ¹⁸F‐FDG PET–CT is decreasing.

Lung-Seeking Metastases

Metastases from different cancer types most often affect the lung parenchyma. Moreover, the lungs are among the most frequent sites of growth of metastatic masses of uncertain/unknown lineage of origin. Thus, with regards to pulmonary neoplastic parenchymal nodules, the critical issue is to determine if they are IN the lung or OF the lung. In this review, we highlight the clinical, instrumental and molecular features which characterize lung metastases, mainly focusing on recently advancing and emerging concepts regarding the metastatic niche, inflammation, angiogenesis, immune modulation and gene expression. A novel issue is related to the analysis of biomechanical forces which cooperate in the expansion of tumor masses in the lungs. We here aim to analyze the biological, genetic and pathological features of metastatic lesions to the lungs, here referred to as site of metastatic growth. This point should be a crucial part of the algorithm for a proper diagnostic and therapeutic approach in the era of personalized medicine.

Is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography useful to discriminate metachronous lung cancer from metastasis in patients with oncological history?

BACKGROUND

Solitary pulmonary nodules detected during follow-up in patients with previous cancer history have a high probability of malignancy being either a metachronous lung cancer or a metastasis. This distinction represents a crucial issue in the perspective of "personalized medicine," implying different treatments and prognosis. Aim, to evaluate the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in distinguishing whether solitary pulmonary nodules are metachronous cancers or metastases and the relationship between the nodule's characteristics and their nature.

METHODS

From a single-institution database, we retrospectively selected all patients with a previous cancer history who performed 18F-FDG PET/CT to evaluate pulmonary nodules detected during follow-up, ranging from 5 mm to 40 mm, and histologically diagnosed as malignant.

RESULTS

Between September 2009 and August 2017, 127 patients (80 males; mean age=70.2±8.5years) with 127 malignant nodules were included: 103/127 (81%) metachronous cancers, 24/127 (19%) metastases. In both groups, PET/CT provided good and equivalent detection rate of malignancy (81% vs. 83%). No differences between metachronous cancers and metastases were found in: patient's age (70.3±8.1 years vs. 69.5±9.7years), gender (males=63.1% vs. 62.5%), interval between previous cancer diagnosis and nodules' detection (median time=4years vs. 4.5years), location (right-lung=55% vs. 54%; upper-lobes=64% vs. 67%; central-site=31% vs. 25%), size (median size=17mm vs. 19.5mm), 18F-FDG standardized uptake value (median SUVmax=5.2 vs. 5.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In oncological patients, despite its high detection rate, 18F-FDG PET/CT, as well as any other clinico-anatomical features, cannot distinguish whether a malignant solitary pulmonary nodule is a metachronous lung cancer or a metastasis, supporting the need of histological differential diagnosis.