Stenosis of gastric sleeve after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: clinical, radiographic and endoscopic findings

Use of Impedance Planimetry in the Diagnosis of Gastric Sleeve Stenosis: The Establishment of New Benchmark Values

INTRODUCTION

Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) is an increasingly common adverse event following sleeve gastrectomy for which objective diagnostic criteria are lacking. Impedance planimetry measurements show promise in characterizing GSS, though normal and abnormal benchmark values have never been established.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of upper endoscopies performed with impedance planimetry for suspected GSS. A bariatric endoscopist, blind to impedance planimetry measurements, assessed gastric sleeve anatomy and graded GSS severity. Impedance planimetry of diameter and distensibility index (DI) were obtained using 3 different balloon volumes (30, 40, and 50 mL).

RESULTS

A total of 110 upper endoscopies were included. Distribution of GSS was graded as none, mild, moderate, and severe in 19 (17%), 27 (25%), 34 (31%), and 30 (27%) procedures, respectively. In normal gastric sleeve anatomy, mean (±SD) diameter and DI measurements using consecutive balloon volumes ranged from 19.1 (±5.5) to 23.2 (±1.7) and 16.8 (±4.9) to 23.1 (±10.9), respectively. In severe GSS, mean diameter and DI measurements ranged from 10.3 (±3.0) to 16.6 (±2.1) and 7.5 (±2.4) to 7.7 (±2.4), respectively. When stratified by severity, impedance planimetry measurements of diameter and DI were significantly lower with each subsequent increase in GSS grade regardless of balloon fill volumes ( P ≤ 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Impedance planimetry measurements provide objective assessment in the diagnosis of GSS and correlate with luminal narrowing. A diameter ≥20 mm and a DI ≥15 mm 2 /mm Hg, as measured by impedance planimetry, are predictive of normal gastric sleeve anatomy. This study provides new benchmark values for the diagnosis and severity of GSS.

Revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

The study aimed to evaluate the mid-term weight loss outcomes and complications of revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) following failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A total of 586 patients underwent LSG from January 2010 to February 2018. Revisional OAGB (rOAGB) was performed in 22 (3.8%) patients. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 20 patients with at least 12 months of follow-up after the revisional OAGB was carried out. The indications for revisional surgery were as follows: insufficient weight loss-4 (20%), weight regain-13 (65%), weight regain and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-2 (10%), and dysphagia with gastroesophageal reflux-1 (5%). The mean interval between the LSG and rOAGB was 35.3 ± 15.4 months (range 4-64). The mean follow-up time after rOAGB was 45.5 ± 17.1 months (range 12-54). At the end of the follow-up after rOAGB, %TWL was 26.4 ± 8.9%, and %EWL was 58.5 ± 21.6%, based on pre-LSG body weight. In all three patients with intractable GERD, the clinical symptoms of reflux retreated after revisional OAGB. The overall complication rate was 20%. In conclusion, the main indications for revision after LSG are weight regain, insufficient weight loss, and intractable GERD. Revisional OAGB emerges as a viable surgical alternative for unsuccessful LSG, presenting notable weight loss outcomes; however, it may be linked to an increased incidence of complications.

Endoscopic Management of Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Complications

Obesity is associated with several chronic conditions including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and malignancy. Bariatric surgery, most commonly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, is an effective treatment modality for obesity and can improve associated comorbidities. Over the last 20 years, there has been an increase in the rate of bariatric surgeries associated with the growing obesity epidemic. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most widely performed bariatric surgery currently, and while it serves as a durable option for some patients, it is important to note that several complications, including sleeve leak, stenosis, chronic fistula, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, may occur. Endoscopic methods to manage post-sleeve gastrectomy complications are often considered due to the risks associated with a reoperation, and endoscopy plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of post-sleeve gastrectomy complications. We perform a detailed review of the current endoscopic management of post-sleeve gastrectomy complications.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease following laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year data

To compare 5-year gastroesophageal reflux outcomes following Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) based on high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a sub-analysis of our systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of primary LVSG and LRYGB procedures in adults for 5-year post-operative complications (PROSPERO CRD42018112054). Electronic databases were searched from January 2015 to July 2021 for publications meeting inclusion criteria. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model was utilized to estimate weighted mean differences where meta-analysis was possible. Bias and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and GRADE. Four RCTs were included (LVSG n = 266, LRYGB n = 259). An increase in adverse GERD outcomes were observed at 5 years postoperatively in LVSG compared to LRYGB in all outcomes considered: Overall worsened GERD, including the development de novo GERD, occurred more commonly following LVSG compared to LRYGB (OR 5.34, 95% CI 1.67 to 17.05; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%; (Moderate level of certainty); Reoperations to treat severe GERD (OR 7.22, 95% CI 0.82 to 63.63; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%; High level of certainty) and non-surgical management for worsened GERD (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.05; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%; Low level of certainty) was more common in LVSG patients. LVSG is associated with the development and worsening of GERD symptoms compared to LRYGB at 5 years postoperatively leading to either introduction/increased pharmacological requirement or further surgical treatment. Appropriate patient/surgical selection is critical to minimize these postoperative risks.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Lacks Intrasurgeon and Intersurgeon Agreement in Technical Key Points That May Affect Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After the Procedure

PURPOSE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be related to surgical technique. The fact that there is a lack of technical standardization may explain large differences in GERD incidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate auto- and hetero-agreement for SG technical key points based on recorded videos.

METHODS

Ten experienced (minimum of 5 years performing bariatric surgery, minimum of 30 SG per year) bariatric surgeons (9 (90%) males) were selected. Participants were invited to send an unedited video with a typical laparoscopic SG (first round of the Delphi process). Videos were cropped into small clips comprising 11 key points of the technique. All anonymized clips (including their own) were returned to all surgeons. Individuals were asked to agree or not with the technique demonstrated (second round). The percentage of agreement was presented to the entire group that was asked for a second vote (third round).

RESULTS

Agreement was poor/fair for all points except hiatal repair that had a very good agreement in the second round. For the third round, there was a slight increase in agreement for distance esophagogastric junction/proximal stapling and gastric mobilization for stapling and a slight decrease in agreement for gastric tube final shape. Only 1 (10%) surgeon recognized that he evaluated his own video. Five (50%) surgeons disagreed with themselves on 1 or more points.

CONCLUSION

SG lacks intrasurgeon and intersurgeon agreement in technical key points that may justify significant differences in GERD incidence after the procedure.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Obesity: Bariatric Surgery as Both the Cause and the Cure in the Morbidly Obese Population

Gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic, highly prevalent condition in the United States. GERD can significantly impact quality of life and lead to complications including aspiration pneumonia, esophageal stricture, Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal cancer. Obesity is a risk factor for GERD, which often improves with weight loss and bariatric surgery. Though the incidence of bariatric surgery, in particular, minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy, has risen in recent years, emerging data has revealed that the severity or new onset of GERD may follow bariatric surgery. We performed a literature review to provide a detailed analysis of GERD with an emphasis on bariatric surgery as both the cure and the cause for GERD in the morbidly obese population. We also describe the pathophysiological mechanisms, management approach and treatment strategies of GERD following bariatric surgery.

Endoscopic severity of gastric sleeve stenosis can be quantified using impedance planimetry

BACKGROUND

Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) is an adverse event following sleeve gastrectomy for which objective tools are needed for diagnosis and treatment. Endoscopic treatment with serial pneumatic balloon dilation may relieve symptoms and prevent the need for conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Endoluminal functional impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) is an endoscopic tool that measures luminal diameter and distensibility indices (DI) and could be used to characterize severity of GSS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients referred for symptoms suggestive of GSS. Severity was determined at each endoscopy by a bariatric endoscopist blinded to EndoFLIP measurements. Successive pneumatic balloon dilations were performed until symptoms resolved; failure was defined as referral for conversion. EndoFLIP measurements of stenosis diameter and DI were obtained pre- and post-dilation. Primary outcomes were pre- and post-dilation luminal diameter and DI of GSS. Secondary outcomes were endoscopic severity of GSS, patient characteristics, and need for surgical revision.

RESULTS

26 patients were included; 23 (85%) were female. Mean age was 45.3 (± 9.9) years. Mean number of dilations was 2.4 (± 1.3) and 10 (38%) patients were referred for conversion. Mild, moderate, and severe GSS was found in 10 (38%), 6 (23%), and 10 (38%) patients, respectively. Moderate and severe GSS underwent more dilations (2.5 ± 1.0 and 3.2 ± 1.6) than mild GSS (1.8 ± 0.8) and were more likely to be referred for conversion. Both pre- and post-dilation diameters were significantly larger in mild versus moderate or severe GSS. Additionally, pre- and post-dilation DI at 30 ml were significantly higher for mild compared to moderate and severe GSS.

DISCUSSION

EndoFLIP measurements correlate well with endoscopic assessment of GSS. While more data are needed to determine ideal balloon size and threshold measurements, our results suggest EndoFLIP may help expedite diagnosis and treatment of GSS.

Common, Less Common, and Unexpected Complications after Bariatric Surgery: A Pictorial Essay

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated a higher rate of success than other nonsurgical treatments in selected patients with obesity; however, like all medical procedures, postoperative complications may occur, ranging between 2 and 10% and, although rare, they can be life threatening. Complications may be unspecific (any surgery-related complications) or specific (linked to the specific surgical procedure) and can be distinguished as common, less common, and unexpected. According to the onset, they may be acute, when occurring in the first 30 days after surgery, or chronic, with a presentation after 30 days from the procedure. The aim of this pictorial essay is to review the radiological aspects of surgical techniques usually performed and the possible complications, in order to make radiologists more confident with the postsurgical anatomy and with the normal and abnormal imaging findings.

Pneumatic Balloon Dilation of Gastric Sleeve Stenosis Is Not Associated with Weight Regain

BACKGROUND

Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) occurs in up to 4% of patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Typical symptoms include reflux, abdominal pain, dysphagia, and regurgitation. Serial pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD) is a successful treatment in many cases obviating the need for revisional surgery, but the potential for weight regain is unknown. The aim of the current study was to assess weight trends following serial pneumatic dilation for GSS.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing serial PBD for GSS at one institution. Primary outcome was change in BMI before and after serial PBD. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and need for revisional surgery. Sub-group analyses were performed to determine the relationship of patient and procedural factors to BMI after PBD.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria, 34 (84.1%) women. Mean age was 46.7 (SD 11.9). Mean pre-sleeve BMI was 47.8 (SD 9.2), and mean BMI prior to first dilation was 34.2 (SD 6.8). Median follow-up was 395 days (range 48-571). Mean BMI at time of last follow up was 33.7 (SD 6.7). There was no statistical difference in BMI pre- or post-PBD (p 0.980). The lowest 10th and highest 90th BMI percentile trended toward a higher and lower BMI after PBD, respectively, though not significant.

DISCUSSION

As the prevalence of sleeve gastrectomy continues to rise, an increasing number of patients will require treatment for GSS. Stenosis is effectively treated with serial PBD in most patients without any impact on weight gain, making this an effective and appealing option for many patients.

Management of Postoperative Complications Following Bariatric and Metabolic Procedures

Bariatric and metabolic surgery is a safe and effective treatment of morbid obesity, a disease that continues to increase in prevalence in the United States and worldwide. The two most commonly performed operations are the sleeve gastrectomy and the gastric bypass. Early and late complications can occur, and although referral to a bariatric surgeon or center is ideal, emergency management of acute problems is relevant to all general surgeons. Bariatric surgery can have surgical and metabolic consequences. An understanding of the altered anatomy and physiology helps to guide management of morbidities. This article discusses surgical postoperative complications and metabolic complications.

Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Stenosis

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most popular bariatric procedures performed. A complication of this surgery is sleeve stenosis, causing significant morbidity and the need for corrective intervention. Endoscopic treatment using pneumatic dilation has evolved as an effective, and minimally invasive, technique to successfully treat this complication. Here we report our experience with endoscopic management of sleeve stenosis at a tertiary bariatric center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified all patients that underwent endoscopic management of sleeve stenosis at a tertiary bariatric center from 2010. We reviewed patient demographics, operative data, interval to endoscopic treatment, and outcomes of pneumatic dilations.

RESULTS

Sixty seven patients underwent 130 endoscopic dilations. The majority of these patients were female (71%), and at the time of sleeve gastrectomy average age was 43.3 years (range 18-68 years) and average BMI was 41.5 kg/m² (range 31-63 kg/m²). The time interval to first endoscopic procedure was 7.2 months (range 0.75-53 months), with an average of 2 procedures per patient. During the follow-up period, the success rate of endoscopic dilatation was 76.1%, while the remaining 16 patients underwent conversion to gastric bypass. Two patients underwent emergency conversion to gastric bypass for sleeve perforation during the procedure (1.5%). There was a modest weight gain of 3 kg (4.2% total body weight) after sleeve dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic management of sleeve stenosis is safe and effective, with a success rate of over 75%. During endoscopic management, there was a 1.5% risk of sleeve perforation requiring emergency surgery. Mild weight regain occurred following endoscopic sleeve dilation.

Quantification of gastric sleeve stenosis using endoscopic parameters and image analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sleeve gastrectomy has quickly become the most commonly performed bariatric surgery. In light of its increasing popularity, the prevalence of gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) continues to rise. Management with serial pneumatic dilation is highly successful but underused because of a lack of quantitative diagnostic criteria. We aimed to develop quantifiable endoscopic criteria to characterize GSS based on the (1) ratio of narrowest to widest gastric lumen diameter, (2) endoscope angulation/trajectory required for passage, and (3) presence of bilious fluid pooling in the proximal sleeve and compare it with endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) diameter and distensibility indices (DIs) and endoscopic documentation of gastric lumen morphology.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing endoscopy to assess for GSS. Endoscopic images were reviewed in a blinded fashion by 2 bariatric endoscopists. The narrowest and widest part of the gastric lumen diameters were noted on each image, in addition to a hypothetical trajectory required for endoscope passage. Using image processing software, we calculated the the ratio of diameters (ie, narrowest divided by widest) and angle of endoscope trajectory. The presence of bilious fluid pooling in the proximal gastric lumen was noted. These values were then compared with EndoFLIP parameters and endoscopic documentation of gastric lumen morphology.

RESULTS

Thirty patients met inclusion criteria, and 26 (87%) were found to have a stenosis on endoscopy. Of those, 9 (35%) were characterized as mild, 11 (42%) as moderate, and 6 (23%) as severe. There was no difference in demographic information between patients with and without stenosis. In patients with stenosis, mean EndoFLIP diameters and DIs were 12.9 ± 3.9 mm and 11.0 ± 6.8 mm²/mm Hg, respectively. In patients without stenosis, mean EndoFLIP diameters and DIs were 19.9 ± 2.9 mm and 21.5 ± 1.0 mm²/mm Hg, respectively. Patients with stenosis had significantly lower diameter ratios compared with those without stenosis (.27 ± .14 vs .48 ± .77, P = .01). Diameter ratios were also inversely related to severity of sleeve stenosis (β = -.08, P = .01). Patients with stenosis were also more likely to have fluid pooling (96.2% vs 25%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the trajectory of endoscope passage between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic criteria for diagnosis of GSS are lacking. Our data suggest the ratio between the narrowest and widest gastric lumen diameters and presence of pooled fluid is associated with diagnosis of stenosis by EndoFLIP and gastric lumen morphology. Future studies to validate these criteria are needed.

Correlation of Gastric Volume and Weight Loss 5 Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

The volume of the gastric reservoir (VGR) after sleeve gastrectomy influences weight loss in the short-term, but long-term results are scarce. The aim was to analyze the correlation between the VGR and weight loss at 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

It is a prospective observational study of 50 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from February 2009 to December 2013. An upper gastrointestinal series was performed at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years after surgery. A composite formula was used for VGR estimation. Weight loss-related data included the following: body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years. Uni- and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine other factors that might influence long-term weight loss results.

RESULTS

The %EWL at 1 year was 74.5(63.8-86) vs. 55.5(47-74.3) at 5 years (p < 0.001). The VGR 1 month after surgery was 114.9 (90.5-168.3) mL. The VGR increased from 216.7 (155.1-278.6) to 367.5 (273-560.3) mL (p < 0.001) at 1 and 5 years. Although a significant inverse correlation was observed between VGR and BMI, %EWL, and %EBMIL at 1 year, it disappeared at 5 years. In the multivariate analysis, the main factor to predict worse weight results at 5 years was a pre-surgical BMI ≥ 50 kg/m².

CONCLUSION

The VGR increased progressively during the study period. Although an inverse relationship between VGR and weight was found at 1 year, this correlation did not remain at 5 years. A preoperative BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² is the main predictive factor of poor weight outcomes.

Endoscopy in Patients With Surgically Altered Anatomy

A comprehensive understanding of gastrointestinal anatomy is essential for performance of any endoscopic procedure. Surgical approaches to therapy have become increasingly common in the past decade, which has resulted in a substantial proportion of patients with surgically altered anatomy who require endoscopy. In parallel with the obesity epidemic, bariatric surgery for obesity management has been widely adopted. In response to these trends, gastroenterologists must become familiar with patient anatomy after these surgical interventions and understand the implications of this altered anatomy on the current array of available endoscopic modalities for diagnosis and therapy. This review describes the range of surgically altered anatomy commonly encountered in the upper gastrointestinal tract. For each foregut location-esophagus, stomach, and small bowel-we describe indications for and specific details of the range of common surgical approaches affecting this regional anatomy. We then provide an endoscopic roadmap through the altered anatomy resulting from these surgical interventions. Finally, we address the impact of postsurgical anatomy on performance of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, with guidance surrounding how to successfully execute these procedures. Evolution of endoscopic approaches over time might be expected to enhance the safety and efficacy of these interventions in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Implications of Technical Factors in Development of Early Sleeve Stenosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: an Analysis Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Database

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Sleeve stenosis (SS) is a rare complication of LSG and is associated with significant morbidity and economic burden. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and impact of early SS and identify technical factors which may predict its development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was extracted from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry from 2015 to 2018. Patients undergoing primary LSG were included, while patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify technical factors associated with SS.

RESULTS

A total of 389,839 patients (79.4% female) were included with a mean age of 44.2 ± 12.0 years and mean body mass index of 45.1 ± 7.8 kg/m². SS was rare, occurring in only 0.09% (n=345) of patients within 30 days of the operation. Following multivariable analysis, technical factors associated with early SS included prolonged operative time > 60 min (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17-1.48, p < 0.001) and a shorter PD (OR 0.864, 95% CI 0.784-0.951, p=0.003). For every 1-cm increase in PD, the odds of SS decreased by 13.6%.

CONCLUSION

Overall, early SS is a rare complication, affecting only 0.09% of patients undergoing primary LSG. Technical factors associated with 30-day SS included PD and operative time. Though current guidelines suggest a PD as short as 2 cm, our findings suggest this may be associated with an increased risk of early postoperative SS.

The impact of the surgical technique on stenosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained worldwide popularity in the last 10 years as self alone bariatric procedure. Symptomatic stenosis (SS) is a potential severe postoperative complication and it can be divided in organic stenosis (OS) and functional stenosis (FS). The aim of this paper is to propose a modified surgical technique to prevent FS.

METHODS

A retrospective review on 5235 LSG performed in Ponderas Academic Hospital between January 2011 and December 2019, searched FS in two consecutive patients groups, divided based on the modified surgical technique introduced in 2015, with fixation of the gastric tube to the prepancreatic fascia and stapler line's over-sewn running suture.

RESULTS

Group A (2011-2014) included 1332 LSG, 16 SS were registered (1.2%), 7 OS and 9 FS; 3903 LSG included in group B (2015-2019), counting for 37 SS (0.95%), 27 OS and 10 FS. A statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was observed for the FS incidence (P=0.03), while it was non-significant for the OS (P=0.52) and the total number of SS (P=0.43). The endoscopic approach was used in forty-eight SS (90.5%) with a successful rate of 83%, while specifically for the FS it was 100%; only one complication was registered during endoscopic treatment, that required further surgical solution.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation of the gastric tube to the prepancreatic fascia and stapler line's over-sewn running suture during LSG, introduced lately, are beneficial in preventing the postoperative functional stenosis of the LSG, contributing to the improvement of the patient's quality of life.

Do we understand the pathophysiology of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a prevalent problem among obese individuals, is strongly associated with obesity and weight loss. Hence, bariatric surgery effectively improves GERD for many patients. Depending on the type of bariatric procedure, however, surgery can also worsen or even cause a new onset of GERD. As a consequence, GERD remains a relevant problem for many bariatric patients, and especially those who have undergone sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Affected patients report not only a decrease in physical functioning but also suffer from mental and emotional problems, resulting in poorer social functioning. The pathomechanism of GERD after SG is most likely multifactorial and triggered by the interaction of anatomical, physiological, and physical factors. Contributing factors include the shape of the sleeve, the extent of injury to the lower esophageal sphincter, and the presence of hiatal hernia. In order to successfully treat post-sleeve gastrectomy GERD, the cause of the problem must first be identified. Therapeutic approaches include lifestyle changes, medication, interventional treatment, and/or revisional surgery.

The middle-term result of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Chinese obesity patients in a single hospital, with the review of literatures and strategy for gastric stenosis

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term metabolic results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in Chinese patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of our LSG results between February 2011 and February 2015, and conducted a literature review of stenosis after LSG during a recent 10-year period.

Results

Of 142 patients in our study, the mean initial body mass index (BMI) was 38.34 kg/m², the mean age of the patients (44 males and 98 females) was 29.36 years. All patients were followed up for at least 36 months. There was a significant reduction in BMI and blood lipid levels. For one case with gastric stenosis (0.7%), resolution was achieved by conversion to gastric bypass, with a satisfied result in weight loss and diabetes remission. The incidence of stenosis after LSG in previous studies was 0.1-3.5%. Among the cases of stenosis, 83.0% resolved with dilation, and the remainder resolved with a surgical procedure.

Conclusions

LSG is a relatively safe surgical option for weight loss as a primary procedure in our study. Stenosis after LSG requires diagnosis and treatment promptly. Surgery can be a feasible treatment option, but care must be taken to avoid complications.