Does the clinical information play a role in the magnetic resonance diagnostic confidence analysis of ovarian and deep endometriosis?

The Effect of Clinical History on Diagnostic Imaging Interpretation - A Systematic Review

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To provide updated information on the effect of clinical history on diagnostic image interpretation and to provide study methodology and design recommendations for future studies assessing the effect of clinical history on diagnostic image performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted from database inception to July 21, 2020. Studies comparing diagnostic imaging performance with and without clinical history, using observers reading images under both conditions that used an independent reference standard were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, with 15 showing clinical history improved diagnostic performance. One study reported a decrease in diagnostic performance with clinical history and the remaining six studies found no significant change in performance. Two studies used the free response paradigm with both reporting clinical history increased location sensitivity, decreased specificity and had no overall change in diagnostic performance. The disease spectrum of included cases was largely unreported and a balanced reading design was not used in 19 studies.

CONCLUSION

Most published studies found that clinical history improved diagnostic performance. More recent studies accounting for abnormality location and multiple abnormalities showed an increase in false positives and no significant change in overall diagnostic performance with clinical history.

Pelvic MRI for Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Challenge for the Inexperienced Radiologist. How Much Experience Is Enough?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of radiologist experience on diagnostic performance of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of endometriomas and different localisations of deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study all pelvic MRI examinations performed for pelvic endometriosis from December 2016 to August 2017 were evaluated by readers with different experience levels; junior resident (0-6 weeks of experience in female imaging), senior resident (7-24 weeks), fellow (6-24 months), and expert (10 years) in female imaging for the presence of endometriomas and DPE. Their evaluations were compared with surgery confirmed with pathology. Diagnostic performances of readers with different levels of experience were studied by the means of receiving operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve (AUC) were compared with the ones of the expert reader.

RESULTS

Of 174 patients evaluated, the standard of reference was available for 59, consisting the final population of the study. The AUC for endometriomas, DPE for the posterior and anterior pelvic compartment, for rectosigmoid DPE and for overall evaluation were 0.983, 0.921, 0.615, 0.862, and 0.914 for the expert reader, 0.966 (p = 0.178), 0.805 (p = 0.001), 0.605 (p = 0.91), 0.872 (p = 0.317), and 0.849 (p = 0.0009) for the fellow level, 0.877 (p = 0.002), 0.757 (p < 0.001), 0.585 (p = 0.761), 0.744 (p = 0.239), and 0.787 (p = < 0.001) for the senior resident level and 0.861 (p = 0.177), 0.649 (p < 0.001), 0.648 (p = 0.774), 0.862 (p = 1), and 0.721 (p < 0.001) for the junior resident level.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, interpretation of pelvic MRI for DPE should be performed by specialists as; even the performance of radiologists with up to 2 years of experience in female imaging was statistically inferior to that of experts.

Preoperative imaging of deep endometriosis: pitfalls of a diagnostic test before surgery

The usefulness of a test is determined by the clinical interpretation of its sensitivity and specificity. The pitfalls of a test with a surgical endpoint are described in this article, taking the diagnosis of deep endometriosis by imaging as an example, without discussing the management of deep endometriosis. Laparoscopy is not a 100% accurate "gold standard". Since it is not performed in women without symptoms, results are valid only for the group of women as specified in the indication for surgery. The confidence limits of accuracy estimations widen when accuracy is lower and when observations are less. Since positive and negative predictive values are inaccurate when prevalence of the disease is low, prevalence figures in the group of women investigated should be available. The accuracy of imaging should be stratified by clinically important aspects such as localisation and size of the lesion. The use of other variables as soft markers during ultrasonographic examination should be specified. It should be clear whether the accuracy of the test reflects symptoms and clinical examination and imaging combined, or whether the accuracy of the added value of imaging which requires Bayesian analysis. When imaging is used as an indication for surgery, circular reasoning should be avoided and the number of symptomatic women not undergoing surgery because of negative imaging should be reported. In conclusion, imaging reports should permit the clinician to judge the validity of the accuracy estimations of a diagnostic test, especially when used as an indication for surgery and when surgery is the gold standard to diagnose a disease.

Medical management of endometriosis: what the radiologist needs to know

The role of the radiologist in the diagnosis and management of patients with endometriosis is increasing. Improvement in MRI imaging techniques has improved detection rate of subtle manifestations of endometriosis by radiologists. Therefore, the role of imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up after treatment is also likely to increase. Knowledge of new medical management pathways used in treating patients with endometriosis-related pain is important. The knowledge of various medication regimens will allow radiologists to continue to evaluate baseline disease, and to potentially assess for imaging response/stability to these medications. This article will review the current medical therapies in use in the management of endometriosis-related pain and describe potential imaging-related findings expected with these therapies.