Ethnic and age differences in right-left breast asymmetry in a large population-based screening population

Definitions of Abnormal Breast Size and Asymmetry: A Cohort Study of 400 Women

BACKGROUND

Macromastia, micromastia and breast asymmetry have an impact on health and quality of life. However, there is scarce information addressing breast size and asymmetry frequency distribution in reference populations.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to identify factors that influence breast size and symmetry and classifies abnormal breast sizes and breast asymmetries in an adult German population.

METHODS

Breast base dimensions, breast volume, symmetry, and other breast anthropometric parameters of 400 German female patients were determined in a retrospective review of the MRI archives at our institution. Professional medical MRI-segmentation software was used for volume measurement.

RESULTS

A total of 400 Patients were retrospectively enrolled. The patients had a mean age of 50 ± 12 years (min: 24; max: 82), mean BMI of 25.0 ± 5.0 (min: 14.7, max: 45.6), and a mean total breast volume of 976 ml (right: 973 ml, min: 64, max: 4777; left: 979 ml, min: 55, max: 4670). The strongest correlation of breast volume was observed with BMI (r = 0.834, p < 0.001), followed by breast base width (r = 0.799, p < 0.001). Smaller breasts have higher breast volume asymmetry ratios (r = - 0.124, p < 0.014). For a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2, micromastia is defined by breast volumes below 250 ml (5th percentile) and macromastia by volumes above 1250 ml (95th percentile). Abnormal breast volume asymmetry (< 5th and > 95th percentile) is equivalent to an absolute difference of approximately 25% relative to the smallest side (bidirectional asymmetry ratio 5th percentile - 19%; 95th percentile 26%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides normative data of German women, as well as selected size-for-BMI percentiles and asymmetry ratio percentiles. The normative data may help to establish transparent and objective coverage criteria for health insurances.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Left-right breast asymmetry and risk of screen-detected and interval cancers in a large population-based screening population

OBJECTIVES

To assess the associations between automated volumetric estimates of mammographic asymmetry and breast cancers detected at the same ("contemporaneous") screen, at subsequent screens, or in between (interval cancers).

METHODS

Automated measurements from mammographic images (N = 79,731) were used to estimate absolute asymmetry in breast volume (BV) and dense volume (DV) in a large ethnically diverse population of attendees of a UK breast screening programme. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess asymmetry associations with the odds of a breast cancer detected at contemporaneous screen (767 cases), adjusted for relevant confounders.Nested case-control investigations were designed to examine associations between asymmetry and the odds of: (a) interval cancer (numbers of cases/age-matched controls: 153/646) and (b) subsequent screen-detected cancer (345/1438), via conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

DV, but not BV, asymmetry was positively associated with the odds of contemporaneous breast cancer (P-for-linear-trend (Pt) = 0.018). This association was stronger for first (prevalent) screens (Pt = 0.012). Both DV and BV asymmetry were positively associated with the odds of an interval cancer diagnosis (Pt = 0.060 and 0.030, respectively). Neither BV nor DV asymmetry were associated with the odds of having a subsequent screen-detected cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased DV asymmetry was associated with the risk of a breast cancer diagnosis at a contemporaneous screen or as an interval cancer. BV asymmetry was positively associated with the risk of an interval cancer diagnosis.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The findings suggest that DV and BV asymmetry may provide additional signals for detecting contemporaneous cancers and assessing the likelihood of interval cancers in population-based screening programmes.