1
|
Ates O, Uh J, Pirlepesov F, Hua CH, Triplett B, Qudeimat A, Sharma A, Merchant TE, Lucas JT. Interplay Effect of Splenic Motion for Total Lymphoid Irradiation in Pediatric Proton Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5161. [PMID: 37958335 PMCID: PMC10650483 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The most significant cause of an unacceptable deviation from the planned dose during respiratory motion is the interplay effect. We examined the correlation between the magnitude of splenic motion and its impact on plan quality for total lymphoid irradiation (TLI); (2) Methods: Static and 4D CT images from ten patients were used for interplay effect simulations. Patients' original plans were optimized based on the average CT extracted from the 4D CT and planned with two posterior beams using scenario-based optimization (±3 mm of setup and ±3% of range uncertainty) and gradient matching at the level of mid-spleen. Dynamically accumulated 4D doses (interplay effect dose) were calculated based on the time-dependent delivery sequence of radiation fluence across all phases of the 4D CT. Dose volume parameters for each simulated treatment delivery were evaluated for plan quality; (3) Results: Peak-to-peak splenic motion (≤12 mm) was measured from the 4D CT of ten patients. Interplay effect simulations revealed that the ITV coverage of the spleen remained within the protocol tolerance for splenic motion, ≤8 mm. The D100% coverage for ITV spleen decreased from 95.0% (nominal plan) to 89.3% with 10 mm and 87.2% with 12 mm of splenic motion; (4) Conclusions: 4D plan evaluation and robust optimization may overcome problems associated with respiratory motion in proton TLI treatments. Patient-specific respiratory motion evaluations are essential to confirming adequate dosimetric coverage when proton therapy is utilized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozgur Ates
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (J.U.); (F.P.); (C.-h.H.); (B.T.); (A.Q.); (A.S.); (T.E.M.); (J.T.L.J.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rønde HS, Kronborg C, Høyer M, Hansen J, Bak ME, Agergaard SN, Als AB, Agerbæk M, Lauritsen J, Meidahl Petersen P, Dysager L, Kallehauge JF. Dose comparison of robustly optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) vs IMRT and VMAT photon plans for testicular seminoma. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1222-1229. [PMID: 37683054 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with stage II seminoma have traditionally been treated with photons to the retroperitoneal and iliac space, which leads to a substantial dose bath to abdominal and pelvic organs at risk (OAR). As these patients are young and with excellent prognosis, reducing dose to OAR and thereby the risk of secondary cancer is of utmost importance. We compared IMPT to opposing IMRT fields and VMAT, assessing dose to OAR and both overall and organ-specific secondary cancer risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comparative treatment planning study was conducted on planning CT-scans from ten patients with stage II seminoma, treated with photons to a 'dog-leg' field with doses ranging from 20 to 25 Gy and a 10 Gy sequential boost to the metastatic lymph node(s). Photon plans were either 3-4 field IMRT (Eclipse) or 1-2 arc VMAT (Pinnacle). Proton plans used robust (5 mm; 3.5%) IMPT (Eclipse), multi field optimization with 3 posterior fields supplemented by 2 anterior fields at the level of the iliac vessels. Thirty plans were generated. Mean doses to OARs were compared for IMRT vs IMPT and VMAT vs IMPT. The risk of secondary cancer was calculated according to the model described by Schneider, using excess absolute risk (EAR, per 10,000 persons per year) for body outline, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, bowel, bladder and spinal cord. RESULTS Mean doses to all OARs were significantly lower with IMPT except similar kidney (IMRT) and spinal cord (VMAT) doses. The relative EAR for body outline was 0.59 for IMPT/IMRT (p < .05) and 0.33 for IMPT/VMAT (p < .05). Organ specific secondary cancer risk was also lower for IMPT except for pancreas and duodenum. CONCLUSION Proton therapy reduced radiation dose to OAR compared to both IMRT and VMAT plans, and potentially reduce the risk of secondary cancer both overall and for most OAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi S Rønde
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jolanta Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Lars Dysager
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper F Kallehauge
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wakeford R, Hauptmann M. The risk of cancer following high, and very high, doses of ionising radiation. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2022; 42:020518. [PMID: 35671754 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac767b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
It is established that moderate-to-high doses of ionising radiation increase the risk of subsequent cancer in the exposed individual, but the question arises as to the risk of cancer from higher doses, such as those delivered during radiotherapy, accidents, or deliberate acts of malice. In general, the cumulative dose received during a course of radiation treatment is sufficiently high that it would kill a person if delivered as a single dose to the whole body, but therapeutic doses are carefully fractionated and high/very high doses are generally limited to a small tissue volume under controlled conditions. The very high cumulative doses delivered as fractions during radiation treatment are designed to inactivate diseased cells, but inevitably some healthy cells will also receive high/very high doses. How the doses (ranging from <1 Gy to tens of Gy) received by healthy tissues during radiotherapy affect the risk of second primary cancer is an increasingly important issue to address as more cancer patients survive the disease. Studies show that, except for a turndown for thyroid cancer, a linear dose-response for second primary solid cancers seems to exist over a cumulative gamma radiation dose range of tens of gray, but with a gradient of excess relative risk per Gy that varies with the type of second cancer, and which is notably shallower than that found in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors receiving a single moderate-to-high acute dose. The risk of second primary cancer consequent to high/very high doses of radiation is likely to be due to repopulation of heavily irradiated tissues by surviving stem cells, some of which will have been malignantly transformed by radiation exposure, although the exact mechanism is not known, and various models have been proposed. It is important to understand the mechanisms that lead to the raised risk of second primary cancers consequent to the receipt of high/very high doses, in particular so that the risks associated with novel radiation treatment regimens-for example, intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy that deliver high doses to the target volume while exposing relatively large volumes of healthy tissue to low/moderate doses, and treatments using protons or heavy ions rather than photons-may be properly assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School, Fehrbelliner Strasse 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nassi L, De Sanctis V, Loseto G, Gerardi C, Allocati E, Ciavarella S, Minoia C, Guarini A, Bari A. Second Cancers in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030519. [PMID: 35158787 PMCID: PMC8833346 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increase of lymphoma patient survival led to a modification of the incidence of long-term sequelae, including second malignancies (SM). Several groups have dealt with the incidence of SM, according to the primary treatment; however, a standardized approach for the early detection and screening of SM in the population of lymphoma survivors should be implemented. METHODS A systematic review was conducted by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL), in order to define the incidence of SM, the impact of modern radiotherapy on SM risk, and the usefulness of tailored follow-up and screening strategies for early diagnosis of SM. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors were investigated. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were checked for relevant reports published up to January 2020. The selection process was reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS A total of 27 full-text manuscripts resulted as eligible for the analysis. The incidence of SM in cHL patients treated with ABVD was higher compared to the general population and was even higher in patients treated with intensified regimens. The risk increased over time, as well as after 10-15 years from therapy, and was augmented by radiotherapy exposure. In DLBCL, more intensive regimens (i.e., R-CHOEP or R-MegaCHOEP) vs. R-CHOP were associated with a higher SM incidence. Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplants increased the risk of SM in both cHL and DLBCL cohorts. A lower incidence of SM, particularly of breast cancer (BC), was shown in cohorts of cHL survivors treated with reduced radiation volumes and doses (involved fields vs. extended fields), but robust trials are still lacking. Considering the advantage of a structured screening for early detection of SM, all the included studies regarded cHL survivors and screening strategy for early BC detection. Moreover, the authors discuss additional papers, to guide the early diagnosis of lung, colorectal, skin, and thyroid cancer in patients at risk due to family history, drug or RT exposure, or unhealthy lifestyles. These screening strategies all passed through patient awareness. CONCLUSION A modern approach to chemotherapy and radiotherapy led to a lower risk of SM, which should be confirmed over time. Early detection of secondary cancers could be achieved through a tailored screening program, according to the individual risk profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nassi
- Department of Hematology, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant’Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giacomo Loseto
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Chiara Gerardi
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri” IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (E.A.)
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri” IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (E.A.)
| | - Sabino Ciavarella
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Carla Minoia
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Alessia Bari
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Materno-Infantili e dell’Adulto, Universita’ di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Byskov CS, Hansen CR, Dahlrot RH, Haldbo-Classen L, Haslund CA, Kjær-Kristoffersen F, Kristensen TO, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Lukacova S, Muhic A, Nyström PW, Weber B, Kallehauge JF. Treatment plan comparison of proton vs photon radiotherapy for lower-grade gliomas. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:98-104. [PMID: 34888422 PMCID: PMC8637131 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Patients with lower-grade gliomas are long-term survivors after radiotherapy and may benefit from the reduced dose to normal tissue achievable with proton therapy. Here, we aimed to quantify differences in dose to the uninvolved brain and contralateral hippocampus and compare the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer for photon and proton plans for lower-grade glioma patients. Materials and methods Twenty-three patients were included in this in-silico planning comparative study and had photon and proton plans calculated (50.4 Gy(RBE = 1.1), 28 Fx) applying similar dose constraints to the target and organs at risk. Automatically calculated photon plans were generated with a 3 mm margin from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume. Manual proton plans were generated using robust optimisation on the CTV. Dose metrics of organs at risk were compared using population mean dose-volume histograms and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Secondary cancer risk per 10,000 persons per year (PPY) was estimated using dose-volume data and a risk model for secondary cancer induction. Results CTV coverage (V95%>98%) was similar for the two treatment modalities. Mean dose (Dmean) to the uninvolved brain was significantly reduced from 21.5 Gy (median, IQR 17.1–24.4 Gy) with photons compared to 10.3 Gy(RBE) (8.1–13.9 Gy(RBE)) with protons. Dmean to the contralateral hippocampus was significantly reduced from 6.5 Gy (5.4–11.7 Gy) with photons to 1.5 Gy(RBE) (0.4–6.8 Gy(RBE)) with protons. The estimated secondary cancer risk was reduced from 6.7 PPY (median, range 3.3–10.4 PPY) with photons to 3.0 PPY (1.3–7.5 PPY) with protons. Conclusion A significant reduction in mean dose to uninvolved brain and contralateral hippocampus was found with proton planning. The estimated secondary cancer risk was reduced with proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla S Byskov
- Dept of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian R Hansen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Dept of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rikke H Dahlrot
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Dept of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Inst of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Slávka Lukacova
- Dept of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Aida Muhic
- Dept of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Petra W Nyström
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Dept of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Britta Weber
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jesper F Kallehauge
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Dept of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Current Situation of Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: From Expectations to Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153746. [PMID: 34359647 PMCID: PMC8345146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) is of prime importance for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) management since it significantly increases progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, first-generation techniques, relying on large irradiation fields, delivered significant radiation doses to critical organs-at-risk (OARs, such as the heart, to the lung or the breasts) when treating mediastinal HL; consequently, secondary cancers, and cardiac and lung toxicity were substantially increased. Fortunately, HL RT has drastically evolved and, nowadays, state-of-the-art RT techniques efficiently spare critical organs-at-risks without altering local control or overall survival. Recently, proton therapy has been evaluated for mediastinal HL treatment, due to its possibility to significantly reduce integral dose to OARs, which is expected to limit second neoplasm risk and reduce late toxicity. Nevertheless, clinical experience for this recent technique is still limited worldwide. Based on current literature, this critical review aims to examine the current practice of proton therapy for mediastinal HL irradiation.
Collapse
|