1
|
Ozyilmaz S, Kulali F, Topal CS, Yalcinkaya C. Salient magnetic resonance imaging findings in the differential diagnosis of benign, borderline and malignant ovarian mucinous tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04545-9. [PMID: 39187694 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04545-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In mucinous ovarian tumors, preoperative prediction of histological subgroup is important for treatment approach. Therefore, we aimed to determine salient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and estimate optimal cut off values for quantitative features in differential diagnosis of benign, borderline and malignant mucinous ovarian tumors. METHODS Between January 2011 and December 2021, preoperative MRI scans of 50 patients with mucinous ovarian tumors (n = 54) were evaluated retrospectively. MRI findings [size, signal intensity, contrast pattern, features of loculation, wall, septa and mural nodule (MN), diffusion restriction] were investigated. There were benign, borderline, and malignant groups based on histopathological results. The relationship between radiological and histopathological results was analyzed by performing Kruskal Wallis test, Pearson's chi-squared test, receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS In our study, there were 54 mucinous ovarian tumors in 50 patients. Of 54, 33 were benign, 13 borderline and eight malignant tumors. In comparison of three groups, tumor size, number of loculation, number and frequency of MN were higher and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value were lower in malignant group (p < 0.05). Septa thickness was lower with optimal cut off value of 2.45 mm in benign group compared to borderline and malignant groups [sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 75%, AUC (Area under the curve): 0.861] (p < 0.05). T2-weighted (T2-w) signal intensity ratio (SIR) of MN was higher in borderline compared to malignant group, with a cut-off value of 3.9 (sensitivity: 85%, specificity: 83%, AUC: 0.943) (p < 0.05). Ascites was also significant in malignant group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION T2-w SIR of MN with a cut off value of 3.9 is beneficial for differential diagnosis. By awareness of some salient MRI findings (size, septa thickness, number of loculation, number and T2-w SIR of MN, ADC value and ascites), preoperative prediction of histological subgroup of mucinous tumors for appropriate treatment planning is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safa Ozyilmaz
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Adem Yavuz street. No:1, Umraniye, Istanbul, 34764, Turkey
| | - Fatma Kulali
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Adem Yavuz street. No:1, Umraniye, Istanbul, 34764, Turkey.
| | - Cumhur Selcuk Topal
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cem Yalcinkaya
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel-Lippmann KK, Wasnik AP, Akin EA, Andreotti RF, Ascher SM, Brook OR, Eskander RN, Feldman MK, Jones LP, Martino MA, Patel MD, Patlas MN, Revzin MA, VanBuren W, Yashar CM, Kang SK. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:S79-S99. [PMID: 38823957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Asymptomatic adnexal masses are commonly encountered in daily radiology practice. Although the vast majority of these masses are benign, a small subset have a risk of malignancy, which require gynecologic oncology referral for best treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, using a combination of both transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex Doppler technique can accurately characterize the majority of these lesions. MRI with and without contrast is a useful complementary modality that can help characterize indeterminate lesions and assess the risk of malignancy is those that are suspicious. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Esma A Akin
- The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | - Susan M Ascher
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Olga R Brook
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ramez N Eskander
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | | | - Lisa P Jones
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Martin A Martino
- Ascension St. Vincent's, Jacksonville, Florida; University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, Gynecologic oncologist
| | | | - Michael N Patlas
- Department of Medical Imaging, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margarita A Revzin
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | | | - Catheryn M Yashar
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California; Commission on Radiation Oncology
| | - Stella K Kang
- Specialty Chair, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cabedo L, Sebastià C, Munmany M, Fusté P, Gaba L, Saco A, Rodriguez A, Paño B, Nicolau C. O-RADS MRI scoring system: key points for correct application in inexperienced hands. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:107. [PMID: 38609573 PMCID: PMC11014836 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01670-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of the O-RADS MRI criteria in the stratification of risk of malignancy of solid or sonographically indeterminate ovarian masses and assess the interobserver agreement of this classification between experienced and inexperienced radiologists. METHODS This single-centre retrospective study included patients from 2019 to 2022 with sonographically indeterminate or solid ovarian masses who underwent MRI with a specific protocol for characterisation according to O-RADS MRI specifications. Each study was evaluated using O-RADS lexicon by two radiologists, one with 17 years of experience in gynaecological radiology and another with 4 years of experience in general radiology. Findings were classified as benign, borderline, or malignant according to histology or stability over time. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement were assessed. RESULTS A total of 183 patients with US indeterminate or solid adnexal masses were included. Fifty-seven (31%) did not have ovarian masses, classified as O-RADS 1. The diagnostic performance for scores 2-5 was excellent with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 97.4%, 100%, 96.2%, and 100%, respectively by the experienced radiologist and 96.1%, 92.0%, 93.9%, and 94.8% by the inexperienced radiologist. Interobserver concordance was very high (Kappa index 0.92). Almost all the misclassified cases were due to misinterpretation of the classification similar to reports in the literature. CONCLUSION The diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI determined by either experienced or inexperienced radiologists is excellent, facilitating decision-making with high diagnostic accuracy and high reproducibility. Knowledge of this classification and use of assessment tools could avoid frequent errors due to misinterpretation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Up to 31% of ovarian masses are considered indeterminate by transvaginal US and 32% of solid lesions considered malignant by transvaginal US are benign. The O-RADs MRI accurately classifies these masses, even when used by inexperienced radiologists, thereby avoiding incorrect surgical approaches. KEY POINTS • O-RADS MRI accurately classifies indeterminate and solid ovarian masses by ultrasound. • There is excellent interobserver agreement between experienced and non-experienced radiologists. • O-RADS MRI is a helpful tool to assess clinical decision-making in ovarian tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lledó Cabedo
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
| | - Carmen Sebastià
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain.
| | - Meritxell Munmany
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
| | - Pere Fusté
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
| | - Lydia Gaba
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
| | - Adela Saco
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adela Rodriguez
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Blanca Paño
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
| | - Carlos Nicolau
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/Villarroel, Barcelona, 170 08036, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dabi Y, Rockall A, Sadowski E, Touboul C, Razakamanantsoa L, Thomassin-Naggara I. O-RADS MRI to classify adnexal tumors: from clinical problem to daily use. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:29. [PMID: 38289563 PMCID: PMC10828223 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01598-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Eighteen to 35% of adnexal masses remain non-classified following ultrasonography, leading to unnecessary surgeries and inappropriate management. This finding led to the conclusion that ultrasonography was insufficient to accurately assess adnexal masses and that a standardized MRI criteria could improve these patients' management. The aim of this work is to present the different steps from the identification of the clinical issue to the daily use of a score and its inclusion in the latest international guidelines. The different steps were the following: (1) preliminary work to formalize the issue, (2) physiopathological analysis and finding dynamic parameters relevant to increase MRI performances, (3) construction and internal validation of a score to predict the nature of the lesion, (4) external multicentric validation (the EURAD study) of the score named O-RADS MRI, and (5) communication and education work to spread its use and inclusion in guidelines. Future steps will include studies at patients' levels and a cost-efficiency analysis. Critical relevance statement We present translating radiological research into a clinical application based on a step-by-step structured and systematic approach methodology to validate MR imaging for the characterization of adnexal mass with the ultimate step of incorporation in the latest worldwide guidelines of the O-RADS MRI reporting system that allows to distinguish benign from malignant ovarian masses with a sensitivity and specificity higher than 90%. Key points • The initial diagnostic test accuracy studies show the limitation of a preoperative assessment of adnexal masses using solely ultrasonography.• The technical developments (DCE/DWI) were investigated with the value of dynamic MRI to accurately predict the nature of benign or malignant lesions to improve management.• The first developing score named ADNEX MR Score was constructed using multiple easily assessed criteria on MRI to classify indeterminate adnexal lesions following ultrasonography.• The multicentric adnexal study externally validated the score creating the O-RADS MR score and leading to its inclusion for daily use in international guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohann Dabi
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Gynecologie Et Obstétrique, 75020, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Radiologie, 58 Avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Cyril Touboul
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Gynecologie Et Obstétrique, 75020, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Radiologie, 58 Avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Leo Razakamanantsoa
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Radiologie, 58 Avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Radiologie, 58 Avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Radiologie, 58 Avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France.
- APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Radiologie, 58 Avenue Gambetta, 75020, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roseland ME, Maturen KE, Shampain KL, Wasnik AP, Stein EB. Adnexal Mass Imaging: Contemporary Guidelines for Clinical Practice. Radiol Clin North Am 2023; 61:671-685. [PMID: 37169431 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Several recent guidelines have been published to improve accuracy and consistency of adnexal mass imaging interpretation and to guide management. Guidance from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria establishes preferred adnexal imaging modalities and follow-up. Moreover, the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System establishes a comprehensive, unified set of evidence-based guidelines for classification of adnexal masses by both ultrasound and MR imaging, communicating risk of malignancy to further guide management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly E Roseland
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, University Hospital B1D502D, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, University Hospital B1D502D, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kimberly L Shampain
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, University Hospital B1D502D, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Ashish P Wasnik
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, University Hospital B1D502D, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Erica B Stein
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, University Hospital B1D502D, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050885. [PMID: 36900029 PMCID: PMC10000903 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) and early clinical stage malignant adnexal masses can make sonographic diagnosis challenging, while the clinical utility of tumor markers, e.g., CA125 and HE4, or the ROMA algorithm, remains controversial in such cases. OBJECTIVE To compare the IOTA group Simple Rules Risk (SRR), the ADNEX model and the subjective assessment (SA) with serum CA125, HE4 and the ROMA algorithm in the preoperative discrimination between benign tumors, BOTs and stage I malignant ovarian lesions (MOLs). METHODS A multicenter retrospective study was conducted with lesions classified prospectively using subjective assessment and tumor markers with the ROMA. The SRR assessment and ADNEX risk estimation were applied retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) were calculated for all tests. RESULTS In total, 108 patients (the median age: 48 yrs, 44 postmenopausal) with 62 (79.6%) benign masses, 26 (24.1%) BOTs and 20 (18.5%) stage I MOLs were included. When comparing benign masses with combined BOTs and stage I MOLs, SA correctly identified 76% of benign masses, 69% of BOTs and 80% of stage I MOLs. Significant differences were found for the presence and size of the largest solid component (p = 0.0006), the number of papillary projections (p = 0.01), papillation contour (p = 0.008) and IOTA color score (p = 0.0009). The SRR and ADNEX models were characterized by the highest sensitivity (80% and 70%, respectively), whereas the highest specificity was found for SA (94%). The corresponding likelihood ratios were as follows: LR+ = 3.59 and LR- = 0.43 for the ADNEX; LR+ = 6.40 and LR- = 0.63 for SA and LR+ = 1.85 with LR- = 0.35 for the SRR. The sensitivity and specificity of the ROMA test were 50% and 85%, respectively, with LR+ = 3.44 and LR- = 0.58. Of all the tests, the ADNEX model had the highest diagnostic accuracy of 76%. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the limited value of diagnostics based on CA125 and HE4 serum tumor markers and the ROMA algorithm as independent modalities for the detection of BOTs and early stage adnexal malignant tumors in women. SA and IOTA methods based on ultrasound examination may present superior value over tumor marker assessment.
Collapse
|
7
|
Koch AH, Jeelof LS, Muntinga CLP, Gootzen TA, van de Kruis NMA, Nederend J, Boers T, van der Sommen F, Piek JMJ. Analysis of computer-aided diagnostics in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:34. [PMID: 36790570 PMCID: PMC9931983 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01345-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Different noninvasive imaging methods to predict the chance of malignancy of ovarian tumors are available. However, their predictive value is limited due to subjectivity of the reviewer. Therefore, more objective prediction models are needed. Computer-aided diagnostics (CAD) could be such a model, since it lacks bias that comes with currently used models. In this study, we evaluated the available data on CAD in predicting the chance of malignancy of ovarian tumors. METHODS We searched for all published studies investigating diagnostic accuracy of CAD based on ultrasound, CT and MRI in pre-surgical patients with an ovarian tumor compared to reference standards. RESULTS In thirty-one included studies, extracted features from three different imaging techniques were used in different mathematical models. All studies assessed CAD based on machine learning on ultrasound, CT scan and MRI scan images. Per imaging method, subsequently ultrasound, CT and MRI, sensitivities ranged from 40.3 to 100%; 84.6-100% and 66.7-100% and specificities ranged from 76.3-100%; 69-100% and 77.8-100%. Results could not be pooled, due to broad heterogeneity. Although the majority of studies report high performances, they are at considerable risk of overfitting due to the absence of an independent test set. CONCLUSION Based on this literature review, different CAD for ultrasound, CT scans and MRI scans seem promising to aid physicians in assessing ovarian tumors through their objective and potentially cost-effective character. However, performance should be evaluated per imaging technique. Prospective and larger datasets with external validation are desired to make their results generalizable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H. Koch
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Lara S. Jeelof
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline L. P. Muntinga
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - T. A. Gootzen
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke M. A. van de Kruis
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Boers
- grid.6852.90000 0004 0398 8763Department of Electrical Engineering, VCA Group, University of Technology Eindhoven, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant The Netherlands
| | - Fons van der Sommen
- grid.6852.90000 0004 0398 8763Department of Electrical Engineering, VCA Group, University of Technology Eindhoven, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M. J. Piek
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melamud K, Hindman N, Sadowski E. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MR Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2023; 31:79-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
9
|
The O-RADS MRI score for the characterization of indeterminate ovarian masses: From theory to practice. RADIOLOGIA 2022; 64:542-551. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
10
|
Shero N, Kim DS. Laparoscopic removal of a dermoid cyst in one ovary and an endometrioma in the other: A case report and literature review. Case Rep Womens Health 2022; 36:e00466. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Guo Y, Phillips CH, Suarez-Weiss K, Roller LA, Frates MC, Benson CB, Shinagare AB. Interreader Agreement and Intermodality Concordance of O-RADS US and MRI for Assessing Large, Complex Ovarian-Adnexal Cysts. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2022; 4:e220064. [PMID: 36178350 PMCID: PMC9530774 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To assess interreader agreement of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and intermodality concordance between US and MRI for characterizing complex adnexal cysts measuring 5 cm or larger. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 58 "complex cysts" measuring at least 5 cm in size observed at both US and MRI in 54 women (median age, 37 years ± 12 [SD]; seven postmenopausal women) between July 2017 and June 2020, identified from an electronic US database. A separate set of two blinded radiologists independently reviewed the US or MR images to assign the O-RADS category, and an adjudicator resolved discrepancies (a total of six readers). Lesion outcome (49 benign, eight malignant, one lost to follow-up) was recorded. Interreader agreement of O-RADS US and O-RADS MRI and concordance between US and MRI were analyzed. Results Interreader agreement was fair for US (κ = 0.31), moderate for MRI (κ = 0.43), and moderate between US and MRI (κ = 0.58). A significant positive correlation was found between O-RADS US and MRI (τ = 0.72, P < .001). The O-RADS 4 threshold yielded the highest accuracy for both US and MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.92 and 0.995, respectively). Considering O-RADS US 4 or 5 as potentially malignant and 1-3 as benign, eight lesions that were assessed as potentially malignant at US were correctly downgraded to benign by using findings at MRI. Using findings at MRI, one malignant lesion that was assessed as benign at US was upgraded to potentially malignant. Conclusion O-RADS US and MRI had excellent performance and positive correlation, but significant interobserver variability remains. Keywords: Ovary, MR Imaging, Ultrasonography © RSNA, 2022 See also the commentary by Baumgarten in this issue.
Collapse
|
12
|
La clasificación O-RADS RM para caracterización de las masas ováricas indeterminadas. De la teoría a la práctica. RADIOLOGIA 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
13
|
Magnetic resonance imaging findings of cystic ovarian tumors: major differential diagnoses in five types frequently encountered in daily clinical practice. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:1213-1234. [PMID: 35916971 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01321-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
There are many types of ovarian tumors, and these different types often form cystic masses with a similar appearance, which can make their differentiation difficult. However, with the exclusion of rare ovarian tumors, the number of ovarian tumors encountered in daily practice is somewhat fixed. It goes without saying that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for differentiating ovarian tumors. In this review, we summarize the differential diagnoses for each of the five types of MRI findings commonly encountered in daily practice. First, unilocular cystic masses without mural nodules/solid components include benign lesions such as serous cystadenoma, functional cysts, surface epithelial inclusion cysts, paratubal cysts, and endometriosis. Second, multilocular cystic ovarian lesions include mucinous tumors and ovarian metastases. It should be noted that mucinous tumors may be diagnosed as borderline or carcinoma, even if no solid component is observed. Third, cystic lesions with mural nodules that are unrelated to endometriosis include serous borderline tumor and serous carcinoma. Cystic lesions with solid components are more likely to be malignant, but some may be diagnosed as benign. Fourth, ovarian tumors deriving from endometriosis include seromucinous borderline tumors, endometrioid carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma. These tumors sometimes need to be differentiated from serous tumors. Finally, cystic lesions with lipid contents include teratoma-related tumors. In mature cystic teratoma, mural nodules (called "Rokitansky protuberance" or "dermoid nipple") are sometimes seen, but they do not suggest malignancy. Some of these lesions can be diagnosed accurately by considering their characteristic imaging findings, their changes over time, MRI findings other than those of the primary lesion, and information from other modalities such as tumor markers. To ensure the optimal treatment for ovarian tumors, it is important to estimate the histological type as well as to diagnose whether a lesion is benign or malignant.
Collapse
|
14
|
MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:60. [PMID: 35347481 PMCID: PMC8960522 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01152-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for the imaging of female pelvis, there is an ongoing debate about the most appropriate indications and optimal imaging protocols. The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) launched a survey to evaluate the current utilization of female pelvic MRI in clinical practice.
Methods
The ESUR female imaging subgroup developed an online survey that was then approved by the ESR board and circulated among the ESR members. The questions in the survey encompassed training and experience, indications for imaging and MR imaging protocols, reporting styles and preferences. The results of the survey were tabulated, and subgroups were compared using χ2 test.
Results
A total of 5900 ESR members with an interest in both MRI and female pelvic imaging were invited to participate; 840 (14.23%) members completed the survey. Approximately 50% of respondents were academic radiologists (50.6%) and nearly 60% women (59.69%). One third of the respondents were subspecialized in Gynecological imaging. Nearly half of the survey participants were aware of the presence of ESUR guidelines for imaging of the female pelvis (47.1%). The adoption of the ESUR recommendations was higher among subspecialized and/or academic and/or senior and/or European radiologists compared to all others. The current ESUR recommendations about female pelvic MRI protocols were generally followed. However wide variations in practice were identified with respect to the use of contrast media.
Conclusion
Female pelvic MRI protocol was generally following the ESUR recommendations, especially among subspecialized and academic radiologists. However, the fact that they are followed by only half of the participants highlights the need for wider awareness of these recommendations.
Collapse
|
15
|
Nougaret S, Vargas HA, Sala E. BJR female genitourinary oncology special feature: introductory editorial. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20219003. [PMID: 34415200 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20219003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,INSERM, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Radiology and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Eom SY, Rha SE. [Adnexal Masses: Clinical Application of Multiparametric MR Imaging & O-RADS MRI]. TAEHAN YONGSANG UIHAKHOE CHI 2021; 82:1066-1082. [PMID: 36238388 PMCID: PMC9432352 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Incidental adnexal masses considered indeterminate for malignancy are commonly observed on ultrasonography. Multiparametric MRI is the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Conventional MRI enables a confident pathologic diagnosis of various benign lesions due to accurate tissue characterization of fat, blood, fibrous tissue, and solid components. Additionally, functional imaging sequences, including perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging, improve the diagnostic efficacy of conventional MRI in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) MRI was recently designed to provide consistent interpretations in assigning risk of malignancy to ovarian and other adnexal masses, and to provide a management recommendation for each risk category. In this review, we describe the clinical application of multiparametric MRI for the evaluation of adnexal masses and introduce the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system.
Collapse
|