Liver abscess after drug-eluting bead chemoembolization in patients with metastatic hepatic tumors

Risk factors of liver abscess and biloma formation after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) causes serious complications, including liver abscess and biloma formation. This study aimed to investigate the frequency and risk factors of liver abscess and biloma formation after dug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

152 unresectable ICC patients received 241 DEB-TACE procedures from February 2018 to November 2022 were studied retrospectively. Patients were evaluated for the presence of liver abscess and biloma formation after DEB-TACE. The medical records, including baseline demographic data, preoperative imaging data, DEB-TACE details, and postoperative management, were reviewed to search for risk factors of liver abscess and biloma formation.

RESULTS

Liver abscesses developed in 11 cases, with an incidence rate of 7.2 % (11/152) per patient and 4.6 % (11/241) per procedure. In the 11 patients with abscesses, the incidence of biloma formation was 36.4 % (n = 4). The binary logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus (OR 7.967, 95 % CI 1.491-42.571, p = 0.015), bilioenterostomy or biliary stent implantation (OR 18.716, 95 % CI 1.006-348.049, p = 0.049) and grade 1 arterial occlusion (OR 9.712, 95 % CI 1.054-89.484, p = 0.045) were independent risk factors for liver abscess and biloma formation.

CONCLUSION

Liver abscesses and biloma formation induced by DEB-TACE are associated with various factors. Diabetes mellitus, bilioenterostomy or biliary stent implantation, and grade 1 artery occlusion were all associated with liver abscess and biloma formation after DEB-TACE for unresectable ICC. In patients with these risk factors, the DEB-TACE procedure should be finely designed and manipulated with more caution.

Safety evaluation of combination treatment of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma: An increased risk of liver abscess with treatment interval less than one month

PURPOSE

To analyze the safety of combination treatment comprising drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHOD

In total, 208 HCC patients receiving DEB-TACE were enrolled for this retrospective single-institution study. Among them, 50 patients who received ICIs at an interval less than one month from DEB-TACE were categorized into the DEB-ICI group; the remaining 158 patients were categorized into the DEB group. Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score before and at three months after DEB-TACE were recorded to evaluate liver function changes. Adverse events within three months after DEB-TACE were considered TACE-related and were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The DEB-ICI group had significantly higher incidence of liver abscess than the DEB group (14.0 % versus 5.1 %, p-value = 0.0337). No significant difference in the other TACE-related adverse events and change of ALBI score between the groups. Univariate logistic regression confirmed that combination with ICIs was an independent risk factor for liver abscess after DEB-TACE (odds ratio = 3.0523, 95 % confidence interval: 1.0474-8.8947, p-value = 0.0409); other parameters including subjective angiographic chemoembolization endpoint scale and combined targeted therapy were nonsignificant risk factors in this study population. In the DEB-ICI group, patients who received ICIs before DEB-TACE exhibited a trend toward liver abscess formation compared with those who received DEB-TACE before ICIs (23.8 % versus 6.9 %, p-value = 0.0922).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment involving DEB-TACE and ICIs at an interval less than one month increased the risk of liver abscess after DEB-TACE. Greater caution is therefore warranted for HCC patients who receive ICIs and DEB-TACE with this short interval.

Complications Related to Transarterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Currently, various types of transarterial treatments are performed for hepatocellular carcinoma from the early to advanced stages. Its indications and efficacy have been widely investigated. However, procedure-related complications have not been updated in the literature, although new types of transarterial treatments, such as drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization, are common in daily practice. Herein, a comprehensive literature review was carried out, and complications were organized according to the organs affected and treatment modalities.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer

Background

The drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has already been used in hepatic malignancies. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in treating primary or secondary liver cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 59 patients with hepatic malignancies, including 41 patients with primary liver cancer and 18 patients with secondary liver cancer, between September 2016 and February 2019. All patients were treated with DEB-TACE. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by mRECIST. The pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represented no pain, and a score of ten was unbearable. Adverse reactions were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE4.0).

Results

In the subgroup of primary liver cancer, 3 patients (7.32%) got complete response, 13 patients (31.71%) got partial response, 21 patients (51.22%) experienced stable disease, and 4 patients (9.76%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 39.02% and DCR was 90.24%. In the subgroup of secondary liver cancer, 0 patients (0%) got complete response, 6 patients (33.33%) got partial response, 11 patients (61.11%) experienced stable disease, and 1 patient (5.56%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 33.33% and DCR was 94.44%. We did not find any difference when comparing the efficacy between primary and secondary liver cancer (P=0.612). The one-year survival rate was 70.73% for primary liver cancer and 61.11% for secondary liver cancer. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.52). For the patients with CR or PR, no factor could predict the efficacy of DEB-TACE. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were short-term liver function disorders. The symptoms included fever (20.34%), abdomen pain (16.95%), and vomiting (5.08%), all patients with adverse reactions got remission after treatment.

Conclusions

DEB-TACE has a promising effect in the treatment of primary or secondary liver cancer. The treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerable.

Prophylactic Use of Antibiotics for Postsurgical Infection in c-TACE and DEB-TACE High-Risk Patients: A Case-Control Study

Objectives

According to recent reports, prophylactic use of antibiotics is not always required in conventional transarterial chemoembolization (c-TACE). However, clinical evidence of prophylactic antibiotics in drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) to prevent postsurgical infection is limited. This study is aimed to evaluate the correlation between the preoperative prophylactic application of antibiotics and postoperative infection in c-TACE or DEB-TACE, especially in a population with a high risk for postsurgical infection.

Methods

In this retrospective study, TACE patients diagnosed with hepatic carcinoma (between January 2019 and May 2021) were examined. The case group was given 1.5 g cefuroxime sodium 0.5-1 hour before TACE, while there was no intervention in the control group. The outcomes analyzed were leukocyte count >9.5 × 109/L on the second day after the operation and the diagnosis of infection within one month after the operation. We applied univariate, multivariate logistic regression, trend analysis, and subgroup analysis to find potential risk factors and the necessity of prophylactic antibiotics.

Results

Among 142 eligible cases, 72 received antibiotics while 70 were kept as control, 113 cases were treated with c-TACE, and 29 were treated with DEB-TACE. Multivariate analysis showed that the increase in white blood cell count after the operation was related to diabetes (OR 5.112, 95% CI 1.229-21.264, p = 0.025). The occurrence of postoperative infection was negatively correlated with preoperative albumin value (＜25 g/L) (OR 153.118, 95% CI 1.631-14372.331, p = 0.030). Trend analysis showed that the risk of postoperative infection increased with a decrease in serum albumin level (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the incidence of increased leukocyte count and postoperative infection between the prophylactic and nonprophylactic treatment groups, in the case of diabetes, preoperative albumin levels, and operation mode (P > 0.1).

Conclusions

Prophylactic antibiotic treatment before the c-TACE or DEB-TACE had no significant correlation with postoperative leukocyte increase and postoperative infection. Diabetes history and serum albumin levels were the prominent risk factors associated with an increase in postoperative leukocyte count and postoperative infection. Future large-scale studies and randomized-controlled trials are required to confirm and validate this association.