Patients undergoing multiple 18F-FDG PET/CT exams: Assessment of frequency, dose and disease classification

Cumulative radiation exposure from multimodality recurrent imaging of CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention, and nuclear medicine

OBJECTIVES

To assess cumulative effective dose (CED) over a 4-year period in patients undergoing multimodality recurrent imaging at a major hospital in the USA.

METHODS

CED from CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention (FGI), and nuclear medicine was analyzed in consecutive exams in a tertiary care center in 2018-2021. Patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv were classified by age and body habitus (underweight, healthy weight, overweight, obese), as per body mass index percentiles < 5th, 5th to < 85th, 85th to < 95th, and ≥ 95th (age 2-19 years), and its ranges < 18.5, 18.5-24.9, 25-29.9, and ≥ 30 (≥ 20 years), respectively.

RESULTS

Among a total of 205,425 patients, 5.7% received CED ≥ 100 mSv (mean 184 mSv, maximum 1165 mSv) and their ages were mostly 50-64 years (34.1%), followed by 65-74 years (29.8%), ≥ 75 years (19.5%), 20-49 years (16.3%), and ≤ 19 years (0.29%). Body habitus in decreasing occurrence was obese (38.6%), overweight (31.9%), healthy weight (27.5%), and underweight (2.1%). Classification by dose indicated 172 patients (≥ 500 mSv) and 3 (≥ 1000 mSv). In comparison, 5.3% of 189,030 CT patients, 1.6% of 18,963 FGI patients, and 0.19% of 41,401 nuclear-medicine patients received CED ≥ 100 mSv from a single modality.

CONCLUSIONS

The study of total dose from CT, FGI, and nuclear medicine of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv indicates major (89%) contribution of CT to CED with 70% of cohort being obese and overweight, and 64% of cohort aged 50-74 years.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Multimodality recurrent exams are common and there is a lack of information on patient cumulative radiation exposure. This study attempts to address this lacuna and has the potential to motivate actions to improve the justification process for enhancing patient safety.

KEY POINTS

• In total, 5.7% of patients undergoing multimodality recurrent imaging (CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention, nuclear medicine) incurred a dose of ≥ 100 mSv. • Mean dose was 184 mSv, with 15 to 18 times contribution from CT than that from fluoroscopically guided intervention or nuclear medicine. • In total, 70% of those who received ≥ 100mSv were either overweight or obese.

Is a one percent occurrence of high-dose patients significant?

Risk-free society is utopian. We come across risks in everyday life, and we use probabilities to get a feel of how risky a situation is. Risk probability numbers of around 1% are comforting, but an intercomparison of numbers among various low risks in popular situations can be enlightening. In this article, we compare risks of complications or death in several surgeries and risks in commercial air travel with risks for patients getting cumulative effective dose (CED) of 100 mSv or more, as the latter is a hot and controversial topic currently. The analysis shows that many common surgeries are a few tens or hundreds of times less risky than the risk from a 100 mSv dose, even though the former often frightens us more. Despite there being a much higher chance of developing cancer from radiation than being involved in a commercial plane accident, there is much less emphasis on patient radiation safety than aviation safety. Further, a look at the system of control on prescription drugs indicates that there is much to learn for policy planning. This analysis may help the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in their review of recommendations.

Cumulative radiation exposure from radiological imaging in patients with Hodgkin and diffuse large b-cell lymphoma not submitted to radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cumulated exposure to radiation due to imaging in Hodgkin (HL) and diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) lymphoma patients who were not submitted to radiotherapy.

METHODS

The study population included 51 and 83 adult patients with HL and DLBCL, with a follow-up duration >1 year. The cumulated exposure was expressed using patient-specific data as cumulated effective dose (CED).

RESULTS

Fifty-one HL patients (median age 47 years) were followed for a median of 3.5 years. The median total CED per subject was 104 mSv. CT and PET/CT examinations accounted for 75 and 25% of the total CED, respectively. 26 patients (49%) had a total CED ≥ 100 mSv and the maximum CED was 302 mSv. Eighty-three DLBCL patients (median age 66 years) were followed for a median of 3.7 years. The median total CED per subject over the study period was 134 mSv. CT and PET/CT for 86% and 13% of the total CED, respectively. 56 patients (67%) had a total CED ≥100 mSv. The maximum CED was 557 mSv.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated the large number of imaging procedures performed for patients with lymphoma. Overall, 61% of the patients accrued a CED ≥ 100 mSv. Imaging policies were only in a partial agreement with current international guidelines.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The cumulated exposure radiation exposure may be of concern in HL patients and the contribution of CT procedures to the total CED is significant. The standardisation of clinical guidelines for managing patients with lymphoma is warranted.

Organ dose calculator for diagnostic nuclear medicine patients based on the ICRP reference voxel phantoms and biokinetic models

The exponential growth in the use of nuclear medicine procedures represents a general radiation safety concern and stresses the need to monitor exposure levels and radiation-related long term health effects in NM patients. In the current study, following our previous work on NCINM version 1 based on the UF/NCI hybrid phantom series, we calculated a comprehensive library of S values using the ICRP reference pediatric and adult voxel phantoms and established a library of biokinetic data from multiple ICRP Publications, which were then implemented into NCINM version 2. We calculated S values in two steps: calculation of specific absorbed fraction (SAF) using a Monte Carlo radiation transport code combined with the twelve ICRP pediatric and adult voxel phantoms for a number of combinations of source and target region pairs; derivation of S values from the SAFs using the ICRP nuclear decay data. We also adjusted the biokinetic data of 105 radiopharmaceuticals from multiple ICRP publications to match the anatomical description of the ICRP voxel phantoms. Finally, we integrated the ICRP phantom-based S values and adjusted biokinetic data into NCINM version 2. The ratios of cross-fire SAFs from NCINM 2 to NCINM 1 for the adult phantoms varied widely from 0.26 to 5.94 (mean = 1.24, IQR = 0.77-1.55) whereas the ratios for the pediatric phantoms ranged from 0.64 to 1.47 (mean = 1.01, IQR = 0.98-1.03). The ratios of absorbed dose coefficients from NCINM 2 over those from ICRP publications widely varied from 0.43 (colon for99mTc-ECD) to 2.57 (active marrow for99mTc-MAG3). NCINM 2.0 should be useful for dosimetrists and medical physicists to more accurately estimate organ doses for various nuclear medicine procedures.

Accounting for radiation exposure from previous CT exams while deciding on the next exam: What do referring clinicians think?

PURPOSE

To obtain clinicians' views of the need to account for radiation exposure from previous CT scans and the advisability of a regulatory mechanism to control the number of CT scans for an individual patient.

METHODS

A convenience survey was conducted by emailing a link to a three-question electronic survey to clinicians in many countries, mostly through radiology and radiation protection contacts.

RESULTS

505 responses were received from 24 countries. 293 respondents (58%) understand that current regulations do not limit the number of CT scans that can be prescribed for a single patient in a year. When asked whether there should be a regulation to limit the number of CT scans that can be prescribed for a single patient in one year, only a small fraction (143, 28%) answered 'No', 182 (36%) answered 'Maybe' and 166 (33%) answered 'Yes'. Most respondents (337; 67%) think that radiation risk should form part of the consideration when deciding whether to request a CT exam. A minority (138; 27%) think the decision should be based only on the medical indication for the CT exam. Comparison among the 4 countries (South Korea, Hungary, USA and Canada) with the largest number of respondents indicated wide variations in responses.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of the surveyed clinicians consider radiation risk, in addition to clinical factors, when prescribing CT exams. Most respondents are in favor of, or would consider, regulation to control the number of CT scans that could be performed on a patient annually.